|
ChipRich
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: July 23, 2008, 05:52:35 PM » |
|
Defo, i think if were including loans from Man U and Chelsea, we should allow other ppl to come in league and take over them teams too so we have opportunity to loan other players too.
lets gogogogo. Get a vote going.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nakor
|
|
« Reply #166 on: July 23, 2008, 06:02:20 PM » |
|
Spoke to Scotty this afternoon about this. I was anti at first but it does no real harm. I say let them except Loan applications from Midday Sunday, everyone should then see this thread, nobody gets an advantage.
Obv happy to go with a vote.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Shit post Nakor, such a clown.
What do you get when you cross a joke with a rhetorical question? |
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #167 on: July 23, 2008, 06:04:27 PM » |
|
yeah, let's give it a couple of days to let everyone see the thread and discuss it before a vote as it's a really big change to the league if we go with it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
booder
|
|
« Reply #168 on: July 23, 2008, 06:31:01 PM » |
|
How does everyone feel about opening the game up to allow outsiders to manage the Div 1 sides? It is beneficial in that it allows loan deals for us lower clubs.
Views please.
my first instinct is that I don't really like it, the whole point of this 2nd setup was to create a more level playing field and challenging environment for the managed teams. I'd prefer the top teams to remain comp controlled. also don't really want to make it easy for kev to get loan players +1 Just keep Manure + Chelski and thats it Blondes only (+Tighty's 2) imo |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Quote from: action man
im not speculating, either, but id have been pretty peeved if i missed the thread and i ended up getting clipped, kindly accepting a lift home.
In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends.
Martin Luther King Jr
|
|
|
|
rossfourfive
|
|
« Reply #169 on: July 23, 2008, 06:45:20 PM » |
|
saw the bit about loans so made some bids then read the rest of the thread so have withdrawn them aswell.
If we're voting i say yes. In real life there would be loans and its not as if we're going to be loaning ridic good players. i also vote yes to open the big teams up to randoms once everyone has their team.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pelham Boy
|
|
« Reply #170 on: July 23, 2008, 07:15:58 PM » |
|
My first reaction is to stay as we are. It doesn't do me any favours,with my low buget and small ground,but that was the idea behind taking teams from the bottom division.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The boy Gedge has written some of the best love songs of the Rock 'n' Roll Era. You may dispute this, but I'm right and you're wrong!" John Peel.
|
|
|
|
pokerram
|
|
« Reply #171 on: July 23, 2008, 09:44:11 PM » |
|
Blonde plus tightys 2. We all trust each other in this. Heard alot of cheats in other leagues. But ill happily go along with majority.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
|
« Reply #172 on: July 23, 2008, 09:59:46 PM » |
|
Sigh ... I wanted to take a big team in this and loan loads of players to my Darlington ... i spose i cant do that now  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #173 on: July 23, 2008, 10:10:02 PM » |
|
Sigh ... I wanted to take a big team in this and loan loads of players to my Darlington ... i spose i cant do that now lol, slight chance that could be classed as cheating! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
|
« Reply #174 on: July 23, 2008, 10:10:31 PM » |
|
I believe loans can be an intregal part of a lower lge side so i say do it as it will make it more realistic.We are still all going to struggle with poor teams so that isn't going to change.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
|
« Reply #175 on: July 23, 2008, 10:12:13 PM » |
|
it's only 3 loans though, so perhaps it doesn't have as much of a vital part to play.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jizzemm
|
|
« Reply #176 on: July 24, 2008, 11:47:07 AM » |
|
How does everyone feel about opening the game up to allow outsiders to manage the Div 1 sides? It is beneficial in that it allows loan deals for us lower clubs.
Views please.
my first instinct is that I don't really like it, the whole point of this 2nd setup was to create a more level playing field and challenging environment for the managed teams. I'd prefer the top teams to remain comp controlled. also don't really want to make it easy for kev to get loan players +1 Just keep Manure + Chelski and thats it Blondes only (+Tighty's 2) imo |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"I want to talk about my hand, what do you mean I cant talk about my hand, right im going to talk about the fact that I cant talk about my hand"...
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
|
« Reply #177 on: July 24, 2008, 02:30:07 PM » |
|
Good signing for Darlo
£1.8M - Rory FALLON from Plymouth Argyle
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
|
« Reply #178 on: July 24, 2008, 02:33:37 PM » |
|
Clear out at Darlington ... players available to buy or loan.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #179 on: July 24, 2008, 04:47:08 PM » |
|
Stockport bastards, shouldn't have given you a head start. Saivet was one I wanted!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
|
Author