poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 05, 2025, 10:30:02 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262046
Posts in
66598
Topics by
16762
Members
Latest Member:
michael85
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
JJ, is this OK..?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: JJ, is this OK..? (Read 2676 times)
Moskvich
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1002
JJ, is this OK..?
«
on:
November 11, 2008, 12:46:01 PM »
1/2 FR, though I don't think the fact that it's FR is very relevant here.
HJ raises to 8, I flat on the button with JJ. Both blinds call.
Flop 862 no suits. SB leads out for 18, BB calls, HJ folds.
SB has about 220 back, as do I. BB has about 100 back.
I make it 62.
SB seems pretty solid and I think is likely to have a set a lot here if he continues... so I'm not really planning to put any more in the pot here vs him. If he passes here then against the shorter BB I'm obviously happy to get it in now or on turn.
Is this a legitimate line..? I guess I'm kind of 'raising for information' but I don't really know what else to do - don't feel I can just pass, don't feel I can flat as I've no idea what I want the turn to be and am likely to be facing a chunky bet with the pot at 80-odd.
The actual pot as played has a pretty absurd ending, but it's the flop play I'd like views on, cheers.
Logged
jakally
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2003
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #1 on:
November 11, 2008, 01:55:42 PM »
I know you want views on flop play but I reraise pre (although I never play FR - not sure if that makes a difference).
If you flat jacks to a LP raise then your RR range is too narow.
As played on flop I think your line is fine to this point.
Logged
Moskvich
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1002
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #2 on:
November 11, 2008, 02:11:37 PM »
Quote from: jakally on November 11, 2008, 01:55:42 PM
I know you want views on flop play but I reraise pre (although I never play FR - not sure if that makes a difference).
If you flat jacks to a LP raise then your RR range is too narow.
As played on flop I think your line is fine to this point.
Re the reraise - yeah I think it probably does make a difference that it's FR - I would reraise JJ sometimes here, but the problem with it can be that, since a typical perception of a reraising range is that it's QQ+/AK, I'd almost be turning it into a bluff against some opponents. My reraising range in this spot is obviously wider than QQ+/AK, but I'm not sure that hands like JJ/TT are necessarily the next best hands to include.
When you say 'up to this point', do you mean it's fine to effectively be raise/folding here versus the SB?
Logged
byronkincaid
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5024
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #3 on:
November 11, 2008, 02:51:19 PM »
no stats?
i call
Logged
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM »
i like the line, but i think your flop raise freezes out all worse hands. make it smaller. if sb calls i 100% check behind turn nearly all the time. on most rivers i would call but depending on bet-zigin i would fold prolly fold a 10/9.
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #5 on:
November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM »
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #6 on:
November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
Logged
Moskvich
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1002
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #7 on:
November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #8 on:
November 11, 2008, 06:25:52 PM »
Quote from: Moskvich on November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
I understand how you're approaching it but you lose a lot of the power of the buton by flatting pre and make it tricky for yourself to know exactly where you are when the flop brings overs
Logged
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #9 on:
November 12, 2008, 12:29:33 AM »
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 06:25:52 PM
Quote from: Moskvich on November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
I understand how you're approaching it
but you lose a lot of the power of the buton by flatting pre
and make it tricky for yourself to know exactly where you are when the flop brings overs
huh?
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #10 on:
November 12, 2008, 01:06:16 PM »
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 12, 2008, 12:29:33 AM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 06:25:52 PM
Quote from: Moskvich on November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
I understand how you're approaching it
but you lose a lot of the power of the buton by flatting pre
and make it tricky for yourself to know exactly where you are when the flop brings overs
huh?
unless you hit a set here being 4 handed what good is position when you're pretty much folding to any overs and any connected flop? the button doesnt make the decission easier the way its played if you dont hit a set you're folding most flops(especially against the action faced) kinda pointless being in position if thats the case.
I understand what moskovich is saying and why he flatted pre but i dont know what network this is on i would expect to get called by a lot worse than jj, especially 3 betting from the button(i do anyway, but my reg oppos se me do some strange stuff, especially in pos) so jj on the button is huge here for me, i want the origional raiser to put more money in and go 2 to the flop, seeing it 4 way and flatting pre causes all sorts of unnessarcery complications imo
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #11 on:
November 12, 2008, 01:09:12 PM »
I know you're a busy man so i'll post your riposte for you
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
It's not 2005 bolt, we have to mix up our play a bit more, games are a lot tougher
Logged
byronkincaid
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5024
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #12 on:
November 12, 2008, 02:44:08 PM »
i'm quite surprised you guys think turning an overpair into a bluff is good on the flop. i'm not convinced at all yet. although it's possible the game has moved on again and left me behind a bit, raptor has spoken in his vids about doing this cos it makes it easier to play.
hmmm
«
Last Edit: November 12, 2008, 04:03:18 PM by byronkincaid
»
Logged
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #13 on:
November 12, 2008, 04:30:59 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on November 12, 2008, 01:06:16 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 12, 2008, 12:29:33 AM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 06:25:52 PM
Quote from: Moskvich on November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
I understand how you're approaching it
but you lose a lot of the power of the buton by flatting pre
and make it tricky for yourself to know exactly where you are when the flop brings overs
huh?
unless you hit a set here being 4 handed what good is position when you're pretty much folding to any overs and any connected flop? the button doesnt make the decission easier the way its played if you dont hit a set you're folding most flops(especially against the action faced) kinda pointless being in position if thats the case.
I understand what moskovich is saying and why he flatted pre but i dont know what network this is on i would expect to get called by a lot worse than jj, especially 3 betting from the button(i do anyway, but my reg oppos se me do some strange stuff, especially in pos) so jj on the button is huge here for me, i want the origional raiser to put more money in and go 2 to the flop, seeing it 4 way and flatting pre causes all sorts of unnessarcery complications imo
level?
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: JJ, is this OK..?
«
Reply #14 on:
November 12, 2008, 04:44:31 PM »
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 12, 2008, 04:30:59 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 12, 2008, 01:06:16 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 12, 2008, 12:29:33 AM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 06:25:52 PM
Quote from: Moskvich on November 11, 2008, 06:05:52 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on November 11, 2008, 04:24:47 PM
Quote from: GreekStein on November 11, 2008, 03:12:29 PM
Quote from: AlexMartin on November 11, 2008, 02:51:55 PM
Make it 46 here. 62 is too much.
I dont mind the bet size, you know for sure if you're beat if he re-shoves though fck it i think i'm having it on the flop the way it was played if he does cos i'm probably 5 buy-ins down already, i always re-raise pre here.
It's like turning jj into 22 playing it multi way against 3 opp, position doesnt help that much multiway with such a vunerable holding you're almost set mining with the 4th best starting hand?
I kind of take your point, though I don't really agree... Rather than a flat call turning JJ into 22, I think the reraise potentially does just that - it leaves me playing the bottom of my perceived reraising range, rather than the top of my flat calling range. So if I reraise and then get action, then it doesn't much matter whether I've got JJ or 22, cos I'm likely to need a set to continue in either case.
Obviously yes, it would have helped if both blinds hadn't come along for the ride...
I wasn't any buy-ins down at this point lol.
I understand how you're approaching it
but you lose a lot of the power of the buton by flatting pre
and make it tricky for yourself to know exactly where you are when the flop brings overs
huh?
unless you hit a set here being 4 handed what good is position when you're pretty much folding to any overs and any connected flop? the button doesnt make the decission easier the way its played if you dont hit a set you're folding most flops(especially against the action faced) kinda pointless being in position if thats the case.
I understand what moskovich is saying and why he flatted pre but i dont know what network this is on i would expect to get called by a lot worse than jj, especially 3 betting from the button(i do anyway, but my reg oppos se me do some strange stuff, especially in pos) so jj on the button is huge here for me, i want the origional raiser to put more money in and go 2 to the flop, seeing it 4 way and flatting pre causes all sorts of unnessarcery complications imo
level?
imagine you go out for the night and pull a bird and her sister, you go home with them and have a few drinks, then you all go into the bedroom where you instantly pass out, flatting pre here is the poker equivelent.
you get points for use of the term "level" flushy went from saying that everyother post to not at all, bout time it had a ressurection
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...