Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #15 on: December 08, 2008, 08:44:04 PM » |
|
Marvellous trouble in the stable!!
LOL. But what do you do in this situation?
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #16 on: December 08, 2008, 08:48:39 PM » |
|
I call
However PP is one of the few players I consider passing to, just because he doesn't put his tourney on the line in Level one without the absolutes. Just not his style. He's smallball and accumulation rather than huge early moves.
I can't see anything unusual in your play on the flop/turn either as you ask
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #17 on: December 08, 2008, 08:51:16 PM » |
|
Marvellous trouble in the stable!!
LOL. But what do you do in this situation? If this is ME vs Paul its a snap as he is going to 3 bet jam for value pretty light vs me as we always play ridic hard against eachother.
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #18 on: December 08, 2008, 09:01:39 PM » |
|
Marvellous trouble in the stable!!
LOL. But what do you do in this situation? If this is ME vs Paul its a snap as he is going to 3 bet jam for value pretty light vs me as we always play ridic hard against eachother. But its not, its me vs Paul... Sooooooooo...
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
celtic
|
|
« Reply #19 on: December 08, 2008, 09:23:35 PM » |
|
what a horrible hand. Only ever played with Paul once so don't really know his game. would he do this with 88 or 66? Your check on the river may have made him think 88 or 66 is good. I have to call.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back But for how long?
|
|
|
TheChipPrince
|
|
« Reply #20 on: December 08, 2008, 09:27:15 PM » |
|
I couldnt fold this, 66 he has if i was to guess considering how its played out...
|
|
|
Logged
|
The harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph.
RIP- TheChipPrince - $17,165
|
|
|
vegaslover
|
|
« Reply #21 on: December 08, 2008, 09:27:46 PM » |
|
Like you say he's not pissing his chips away in this situation. However I think he could easily have 88 here, since he kept it small till the river. He should also know that you are also highly likely to be playing the hand light.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #22 on: December 08, 2008, 09:30:03 PM » |
|
would he call flop and turn with 88?
got to be K6 or 66 surely.
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
celtic
|
|
« Reply #23 on: December 08, 2008, 09:31:50 PM » |
|
Ax clubs?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back But for how long?
|
|
|
vegaslover
|
|
« Reply #24 on: December 08, 2008, 09:38:10 PM » |
|
would he call flop and turn with 88?
got to be K6 or 66 surely.
Against someone like Rookie I don't discount it
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #25 on: December 08, 2008, 09:39:18 PM » |
|
Sigh, I wanted Flushy to reply. Nevermind. Thanks for your comments guys.
This situation did not actually happen. It happened the same until the river when it went check check. I was a bit disappointed at this as I couldn't see there was any way Paul could not bet the river. If he has clubs he must value bet and if he has a big K he must value bet. But this did not happen, I showed my house and scooped and he flashed KJ as he mucked. I can't believe he has checked behind here tbh. By checking behind surely he is missing value from his hand? He is putting me on either full house (which I cant have once I check, can I?!), or KQ/AK, in which case I surely raise preflop?
Either way he has got out of this cheaply I guess. The reason I posted this is Jim Reid and another guy at the table couldn't believe how much value I missed on the river, whilst another guy on the table was on my side and liked the check. When I told him I was check raising for value he couldn't understand why I would do that and then asked me the question... What do I do if he shoved? I said i'd probably snap and hi five the dealer, and again he couldn't believe it. It's a tough situation and I think both hands have been played differently to how most people would play them.
Any further thoughts anyone/additional comments to above?
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #26 on: December 08, 2008, 09:45:10 PM » |
|
were you seriously playing level 1 of a main event 6 handed?
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #27 on: December 08, 2008, 09:47:53 PM » |
|
were you seriously playing level 1 of a main event 6 handed?
Yep twas ridiculous, 24 runners so instead of three and room for 6 reserves at a push, we started with four 6's. Because there were really gonna be so many alternates turn up for the ME, especially considering we kicked off half hour late anyway!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #28 on: December 08, 2008, 09:49:06 PM » |
|
of course there are going to be 16 street walk ins at £750 a pop in the first two levels!
lolol you couldn't make it up
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
AndrewT
|
|
« Reply #29 on: December 08, 2008, 09:52:34 PM » |
|
of course there are going to be 16 street walk ins at £750 a pop in the first two levels!
Lalit was there at the start and sat there reading a magazine for two hours before buying in. And Jeff Buffenbarger only turned up after Dave Courtney phoned him to tell him it was now a one day event (Jeff couldn't make the Sunday).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|