cash,mtt,stt question

[cambo]

ok this has more holes in it than jerry's cheese triangle, but humour me please.

ok you have 3 poker players, each is of an equal standard, though each plays cash, mtts and stts respectivly

so they all play there games for exactly 6 hours per day on average for a full year, each playing up to a maximum of 4 tables, assume they are playing to a maximum all the time

they all start with $10k , and start with $10k (or less if they are losing) each day

they play the same stakes all year in their chosen field

they all adhere to perfect bankroll management

who has the best $/h?

[Eck]

The better player

[cambo]

The better player

i know its ropey, but assume their equal

[Eck]

The better player

i know its ropey, but assume their equal

In that case not a fucking clue. Longy will be along shortly to help i'm sure.

[gatso]

how do you measure equal across the 3 disciplines? if your criteria for equalness is is $/h, which would be a very fair criteria to use, then it will be a draw

[cambo]

how do you measure equal across the 3 disciplines? if your criteria for equalness is is $/h, which would be a very fair criteria to use, then it will be a draw

pass

[Eck]

how do you measure equal across the 3 disciplines? if your criteria for equalness is is $/h, which would be a very fair criteria to use, then it will be a draw

pass

lol  i did notice you replied twice and deleted both answers....its the better player isn't it? If i win the T-Shirt give it to bolt imo...

[cambo]

no i replied saying 114th best playing for previous year in an accepted league table for total profit,

but for example say 99 of the worlds top 100 are cash players, so this isnt really equal players

3 scientificallly created poker clones might be better

[MANTIS01]

imo no doubt the cash player wins. In tournaments you can win 20 straight hands and the 21st could knock you out winning you nothing. So 6 hours unrewarded play. Also the clock in tournaments forces you to take risks you wouldn't ideally take.

[totalise]

If they are all "equal" players within their respective disciplines, I'd probably start off with the bankroll and go from there.. so 1.25/2.50 nl cash game players vs $100 MTT players vs $200 SNG players (assuming 40 buyin cash/100 buyin mtt/50 buyin sng, which is pretty close to recommended levels from what I read)

[cambo]

yea totalise, well worded

[cambo]

i reckon it would be
1st cash
2nd stt
3rd mtt

but thats just a guess

[totalise]

I think this is just a round about way of asking, which discipline is the most profitable? and I'd assume that the games that the closest to being solved would be the least profitable, and vice versa.. so I'd go with cash then MTT then Stt

[bolt pp]

I'd take my $10k roll to every crayford dog meeting per week and pwn the shit out of the poker players for end of year ROI%

I'll even include travel expenses and drinks, i'm that good!

[DaveShoelace]

ok this has more holes in it than jerry's cheese triangle, but humour me please.

ok you have 3 poker players, each is of an equal standard, though each plays cash, mtts and stts respectivly

so they all play there games for exactly 6 hours per day on average for a full year, each playing up to a maximum of 4 tables, assume they are playing to a maximum all the time

they all start with $10k , and start with $10k (or less if they are losing) each day

they play the same stakes all year in their chosen field

they all adhere to perfect bankroll management

who has the best $/h?

The cash game player, because having to stop playing after exactly 6 hours can be quite detrimental if you are halfway through a tournament or sng at the time.