Blind vs Blind with History

[George2Loose]

With history, I think you have to snap here.

Ok you could be up against an A2 which would be gay, and we're not thrilled to see him with 89s or something, but there's a very reasonable chance you have him dominated...

[MANTIS01]

I don't understand this at all.

Are you saying you knew from some kind of wacky newmanseye ESP skillz (hereafter to be referred to as wnesps) that he didn't have a hand which fell in the bottom 30% of cards.

You knew that his two holecards were in the top 70% (via wnesps) and so while his jamming range may not have been quite 100%, you were 100% sure he was going to raise.


Or do you mean that your read was that he was jamming range was 100%, but want to know what we think his jamming range might be given the info you have provided.

If the latter... why didn't you just say that.

I am confusing myself now. I felt I was on the verge of unearthing the secret of ESP skillz and was seeking answers to combat future questions you are certain will be asked. However, upon reflection, my actual question was, is K-Q any good?

[George2Loose]

If you're gonna raise fold here I'd rather you save yourself the money and just open fold pre if you're sure he's shoving a wide range and you're going to fold.

I think in this spot because he's shoved on you in the last two orbits he is more likely to have a hand here but if he does it's a bit of a caller imo considering it's sb to bb and given past history.

[Royal Flush]

Mantis mate you have lost it, you say he is 100% going to jam on you so how is his range not ATC? I really don't get it, please re-state the whole question how you now mean it and we can try and answer it for you.

I am curious though how a 100% shove rate is not any 2 cards, i guess this is the same thought process that brought you round to the idea that its sometimes best not to make +EV decisions.

[Hairydude]

Tell us what he had and we'll tell you whether it was correct to call

[Longy]

Mantis mate you have lost it, you say he is 100% going to jam on you so how is his range not ATC? I really don't get it, please re-state the whole question how you now mean it and we can try and answer it for you.

I am curious though how a 100% shove rate is not any 2 cards, i guess this is the same thought process that brought you round to the idea that its sometimes best not to make +EV decisions.

Cos the bb is a luckbox and never gets dealt a rag hand?

Tbh i haven't got a clue what Mantis is talking about but that isn't really any different to normal.

[totalise]

I don't understand this at all.

Are you saying you knew from some kind of wacky newmanseye ESP skillz (hereafter to be referred to as wnesps) that he didn't have a hand which fell in the bottom 30% of cards.

You knew that his two holecards were in the top 70% (via wnesps) and so while his jamming range may not have been quite 100%, you were 100% sure he was going to raise.


Or do you mean that your read was that he was jamming range was 100%, but want to know what we think his jamming range might be given the info you have provided.

If the latter... why didn't you just say that.

I am confusing myself now. I felt I was on the verge of unearthing the secret of ESP skillz and was seeking answers to combat future questions you are certain will be asked. However, upon reflection, my actual question was, is K-Q any good?

KQ is pretty good against people that shove 100% of their hands from the BB, but its not that good against people that shove 100% of hands that beat KQ from the bb.

I was 100% sure he would jam if I raise. Maybe this is because of the trend that's developed, maybe it's because I have special soul reading skillz, maybe I'm wrong, who knows. While this is what I expect does this actually make his range atc?

<3

[ACE2M]

not read any replies but for me its a snap with a catherine wheel arm spin with face up plant to fist pump and an oh yeah baby. this is the bit of poker i really love, maths is boring.

[Jamier-Host]

Mantis mate you have lost it, you say he is 100% going to jam on you so how is his range not ATC? I really don't get it, please re-state the whole question how you now mean it and we can try and answer it for you.

Pretty sure i know what Karl means:

Villain knows that Karl thinks he's shoving 100%.  Therefore maybe he'll adapt his shoving range accordingly....