|
celtic
|
 |
« Reply #120 on: March 31, 2009, 04:45:26 PM » |
|
will try and make this one if i am home in time. gl all.
dont forget to wear your lippy! Seriously, I don't see a problem with blokes playing the feeders to make the numbers up if they then want to give seat to wife/girlfriend or do a deal with someone if they qualify for the super sats. With the amount of feeders, I can't see many of them running otherwise tbh. What do you think Kev? this was my thinking. As it's on the tinterweb, it can't really be controlled who plays etc, who is to say that it's not Kirsty playing on my account? Shocking really that Blonde Poker allow cheating....... Kirsty would stand a better chance. imo. you are defo turning into chompy imo  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back  But for how long? |
|
|
|
Pelham Boy
|
|
« Reply #121 on: March 31, 2009, 04:46:13 PM » |
|
will try and make this one if i am home in time. gl all.
dont forget to wear your lippy! Seriously, I don't see a problem with blokes playing the feeders to make the numbers up if they then want to give seat to wife/girlfriend or do a deal with someone if they qualify for the super sats. With the amount of feeders, I can't see many of them running otherwise tbh. What do you think Kev? this was my thinking. As it's on the tinterweb, it can't really be controlled who plays etc, who is to say that it's not Kirsty playing on my account? Shocking really that Blonde Poker allow cheating....... Kirsty would stand a better chance. imo. you are defo turning into chompy imo Oh shit. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"The boy Gedge has written some of the best love songs of the Rock 'n' Roll Era. You may dispute this, but I'm right and you're wrong!" John Peel.
|
|
|
|
Dingdell
|
|
« Reply #122 on: March 31, 2009, 04:46:25 PM » |
|
I agree with guys playing as long as they agree that whoever wins lets me have the seat.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #123 on: March 31, 2009, 04:47:19 PM » |
|
If it was decided that men could play the feeders, I think there would need to be some sort of caveat that they would have to declare first who they are intending to transfer their seat to the super to should they win. Would obviously be unfair if someone was getting more than one shot at the seat from the same feeder.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
Rookie (Rodney)
|
|
« Reply #124 on: March 31, 2009, 04:48:38 PM » |
|
If it was decided that men could play the feeders, I think there would need to be some sort of caveat that they would have to declare first who they are intending to transfer their seat to the super to should they win. Would obviously be unfair if someone was getting more than one shot at the seat from the same feeder.
Why would it? They are paying twice as much.. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
HI HELEN!
|
|
|
|
celtic
|
|
« Reply #125 on: March 31, 2009, 04:49:25 PM » |
|
If it was decided that men could play the feeders, I think there would need to be some sort of caveat that they would have to declare first who they are intending to transfer their seat to the super to should they win. Would obviously be unfair if someone was getting more than one shot at the seat from the same feeder.
if you win the super sat is the cash paid into your blonde acct or does blonde buy you in? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Keefy is back But for how long? |
|
|
|
turny
|
|
« Reply #126 on: March 31, 2009, 04:51:06 PM » |
|
lmao of course men shouldnt play it. i know its unpoliceable but letting men enter into a tournament they cant take the prize themselves for is wrong and unfair to the actual women entering the tournament legally.
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
makes an absolute mockery of the event imo and if women cant get enough for the first feeder that they have been chirping for for weeks then it wont run.
if the feeders are filling how the hell is the sat itself gona run?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #127 on: March 31, 2009, 04:51:08 PM » |
|
If it was decided that men could play the feeders, I think there would need to be some sort of caveat that they would have to declare first who they are intending to transfer their seat to the super to should they win. Would obviously be unfair if someone was getting more than one shot at the seat from the same feeder.
Why would it? They are paying twice as much.. fair point, well made. Danger of collusion though. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2009, 04:53:04 PM by Claw75 »
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
LeKnave
|
|
« Reply #128 on: March 31, 2009, 04:52:47 PM » |
|
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
lol A+ subtle way of saying men>women. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
turny
|
|
« Reply #129 on: March 31, 2009, 04:55:14 PM » |
|
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
lol A+ subtle way of saying men>women. not subtle i dont do subtle lol. men do though dont they?   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LeKnave
|
|
« Reply #130 on: March 31, 2009, 04:56:20 PM » |
|
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
lol A+ subtle way of saying men>women. not subtle i dont do subtle lol. men do though dont they? all i know is Ling>>>>>>>>>>>>us lot. thats for sure. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #131 on: March 31, 2009, 04:56:27 PM » |
|
lmao of course men shouldnt play it. i know its unpoliceable but letting men enter into a tournament they cant take the prize themselves for is wrong and unfair to the actual women entering the tournament legally.
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
makes an absolute mockery of the event imo and if women cant get enough for the first feeder that they have been chirping for for weeks then it wont run.
if the feeders are filling how the hell is the sat itself gona run?
sigh. I've no doubt the super sat will run. AFAIK it is the only online sat being offered for this event, and there are several women who are willing to pay $300 to play that. The difficulty is that we have 6 $45 feeders set up, as requested by some players. Filling them is going to be difficult as a lot of people who are planning to play the $300 simply won't bother (I'm going to play one or two myself in an attempt to make numbers up, but still plan on buying into the $300 direct), and because those that do want to play a feeder or two have a fair bit of choice with 6 on offer. This is not a case of 'let's get someone good (man) to play so the crappy (woman) player has a chance of playing. It's a suggestion more along the lines of 'let's be pragmatic to get these feeders to run'. Also, how exactly is it 'unfair to the women entering the tournament'? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: March 31, 2009, 04:59:48 PM by Claw75 »
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
turny
|
|
« Reply #132 on: March 31, 2009, 04:58:32 PM » |
|
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
lol A+ subtle way of saying men>women. not subtle i dont do subtle lol. men do though dont they? all i know is Ling>>>>>>>>>>>>us lot. thats for sure. yeah but shes a bloke like that chilli guy lol |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jon MW
|
|
« Reply #133 on: March 31, 2009, 05:00:08 PM » |
|
If it was decided that men could play the feeders, I think there would need to be some sort of caveat that they would have to declare first who they are intending to transfer their seat to the super to should they win. Would obviously be unfair if someone was getting more than one shot at the seat from the same feeder.
Why would it? They are paying twice as much.. fair point, well made. Danger of collusion though. Danger of collusion when any 2 people who know each other are playing. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
|
|
|
|
turny
|
|
« Reply #134 on: March 31, 2009, 05:02:11 PM » |
|
lmao of course men shouldnt play it. i know its unpoliceable but letting men enter into a tournament they cant take the prize themselves for is wrong and unfair to the actual women entering the tournament legally.
its like gettin man utd to play the early rounds of the fa cup for bury and then when the lucrative tie comes along bury play themselves.
makes an absolute mockery of the event imo and if women cant get enough for the first feeder that they have been chirping for for weeks then it wont run.
if the feeders are filling how the hell is the sat itself gona run?
sigh. I've no doubt the super sat will run. AFAIK it is the only online sat being offered for this event, and there are several women who are willing to pay $300 to play that. The difficulty is that we have 6 $45 feeders set up, as requested by some players. Filling them is going to be difficult as a lot of people who are planning to play the $300 simply won't bother (I'm going to play one or two myself in an attempt to make numbers up, but still plan on buying into the $300 direct), and because those that do want to play a feeder or two have a fair bit of choice with 6 on offer. This is not a case of 'let's get someone good (man) to play so the crappy (woman) player has a chance of playing. It's a suggestion more along the lines of 'let's be pragmatic to get these feeders to run'. its wrong in my opinion thats all. i hope you get the full up but think its morally wrong to fill a womens satallite with men. numbers should have been sort before feeders were set up otherwise dont bother with the feeder and just set up the sat itself, job done! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author