poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
August 11, 2025, 09:47:17 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262839
Posts in
66615
Topics by
16992
Members
Latest Member:
Rmf22
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
should this of worked?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
Author
Topic: should this of worked? (Read 9572 times)
$muszlesz$
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1315
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #15 on:
April 28, 2009, 07:13:25 AM »
willie tann had 30k-40k......player in cut off had 20k and not sure of the player on the buttons stack...does this help
Logged
http://muszleszpokerblog.blogspot.com/
jakally
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2003
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #16 on:
April 28, 2009, 08:36:29 AM »
Quote from: $muszlesz$ on April 28, 2009, 06:13:08 AM
ok thanks for ur opinion...so saying some sort of hand wot range would u be puttin him on plz?
Better question is, what is the percentage chance of getting it through.
Given the odds you are giving them, unless they put you on a premium only, then they are correct to call 100% of the time.
You have just about enough to get one player to fold, but not to get it through 3 of them.
Logged
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6738
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #17 on:
April 28, 2009, 09:41:52 AM »
Quote from: $muszlesz$ on April 28, 2009, 03:09:44 AM
palyin a live £100 fo at the g luton on sunday .....
blinds are 400/800 and i have just moved to a new table 27 players left with average stack of around 17k.....2nd hand and im in the big blind i have about 13k...
Willie
Tann
raises my big blind and im thinkin he is raising light i havent looked at my cards yet but ive made my mind up that he is raisin light and expects me to fold because he will think i know he is a good player...so im shovin any 2 here for defo.......right he is in the hi jack and the cut off and button flat call the 2300 the small blind passes...so there is 7750 in the middle now and with my 1500 it now makes it 9250...........so i look down at
and shove for a extra 10k...........as i thought
Willie
Tann
passes and i expect the other 2 to pass as i dont think they have a good enough hand to call 10k as i think they would have re raised willies raise.....anyway the player in the cutoff calls after about 45seconds of thinkin and the button passes......now wot range of hands do ppl put him on and wot range of hands do u think he could call with....................i will tell u wot he called with after some replies......i was definatly expectin them to all pass and how often should thid of worked ?
Buddy. You have just moved to a new table. After 2 hands a player raises and you insta-decide he is raising your bb light. You believe you know what the raiser's range is and what he thinks you are thinking having sat down like 2 secs ago. From this insta-information you decide to shove before the other 2 actually call. When they do call you say you definitely expect them to pass as well when you shove. Why do you expect that? They could both be calling stations. You don't know. In reality you are making a lot of assumptions when you're actually completely in the dark with regard to the potential success of this move. Next time i'd take a bit of time to assess your oppos before you steam in with an atc squeeze thinking you know what gwon at this new table.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
LeedsRhodesy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3952
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #18 on:
April 28, 2009, 10:03:20 AM »
Quote from: $muszlesz$ on April 28, 2009, 03:09:44 AM
palyin a live £100 fo at the g luton on sunday .....
blinds are 400/800 and i have just moved to a new table 27 players left with average stack of around 17k.....2nd hand and im in the big blind i have about 13k...
Willie
Tann
raises my big blind and im thinkin he is raising light i havent looked at my cards yet but ive made my mind up that he is raisin light and expects me to fold because he will think i know he is a good player...so im shovin any 2 here for defo.......right he is in the hi jack and the cut off and button flat call the 2300 the small blind passes...so there is 7750 in the middle now and with my 1500 it now makes it 9250...........so i look down at
and shove for a extra 10k...........as i thought
Willie
Tann
passes and i expect the other 2 to pass as i dont think they have a good enough hand to call 10k as i think they would have re raised willies raise.....anyway the player in the cutoff calls after about 45seconds of thinkin and the button passes......now wot range of hands do ppl put him on and wot range of hands do u think he could call with....................i will tell u wot he called with after some replies......i was definatly expectin them to all pass and how often should thid of worked ?
he calls with A10/99/88/AJ all hands i would flat call with to see a flop
Logged
MANTIS01
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6738
What kind of fuckery is this?
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #19 on:
April 28, 2009, 10:06:27 AM »
now wot range of hands do ppl put him on and wot range of hands do u think he could call with
So that said how can we (and you) come up with a calling range for a complete unknown? What you're asking really is what is the correct range of hands he can call with. But that's you assuming this guy is going to play correctly. And why would you think he is going to play correctly? So until we know better we must assume his calling range is 100% of hands he called the initial raise with. And actually, considering you don't have any kind of tight image to speak of his correct calling range is prob 100% of those hands anyway.
Logged
Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"
Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"
Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"
taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
Simon Galloway
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4167
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #20 on:
April 28, 2009, 10:07:16 AM »
As usual Mantis beats me to it. I will add a few things, seeing as I have played thousands of tournys at Luton, that might be relevant.
First up, amplifying Mantis' point about your pre-conceived squeeze. You made your mind up that you were happy to put your chips in light with Willie, but you didn't stop to think if having 2 extra callers in changed the hand dynamics at all. It now looks far more like a squeeze than it did heads up where you could have received more credit for playing your hand strength than the situation.
Now let's take a look at what villain mioght have been thinking. Again, having had the misfortune to listen to many hand disections at the tables, these thoughts can and do take place. So trying to assign hand ranges and FPS is wasted when players (on here) make the mistake that villain will follow a similar thought process. They have already been labeled as bad, so DAI, and don't make plays based on what a HUD is suggesting - to me that is re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic. Villain could be thinking:
a) I didn't come out tonight to pass.
b) I have work in the morning, let's gamble, early bed or final table ftw.
c) here's a spite call. You raised my blind last week.
d) I was gonna pass, but now everyone else has passed, I can't let him have it.
e) It is 100% a squeeze. He can never ever have a genuine hand here.
f) I know I'm behind but...#
g) I have put "some" chips in the pot, therefore I am committed.
h) I have him covered so I am still "in" if I lose this.
I could carry on. This isn't me bashing the Luton players ~ there are good and bad players in every domain. I am just saying that to find the best play you have to look at the hand from their POV. Sometimes a situation is crying out for a play. But if you know that 100% the donk can't pass then it makes it a bad play to execute.
Logged
https://www.rocketmiles.com/refer/SIMONGALLOWAY22
daviebhoy
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 297
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #21 on:
April 28, 2009, 11:46:33 AM »
Quote from: nirvana on April 28, 2009, 06:52:27 AM
Any small pair, any ace, TJ and above is the right answer
+1
Logged
LeedsRhodesy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3952
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #22 on:
April 28, 2009, 12:08:58 PM »
Quote from: Simon Galloway on April 28, 2009, 10:07:16 AM
As usual Mantis beats me to it. I will add a few things, seeing as I have played thousands of tournys at Luton, that might be relevant.
First up, amplifying Mantis' point about your pre-conceived squeeze. You made your mind up that you were happy to put your chips in light with Willie, but you didn't stop to think if having 2 extra callers in changed the hand dynamics at all. It now looks far more like a squeeze than it did heads up where you could have received more credit for playing your hand strength than the situation.
Now let's take a look at what villain mioght have been thinking. Again, having had the misfortune to listen to many hand disections at the tables, these thoughts can and do take place. So trying to assign hand ranges and FPS is wasted when players (on here) make the mistake that villain will follow a similar thought process. They have already been labeled as bad, so DAI, and don't make plays based on what a HUD is suggesting - to me that is re-arranging deckchairs on the Titanic. Villain could be thinking:
a) I didn't come out tonight to pass.
b) I have work in the morning, let's gamble, early bed or final table ftw.
c) here's a spite call. You raised my blind last week.
d) I was gonna pass, but now everyone else has passed, I can't let him have it.
e) It is 100% a squeeze. He can never ever have a genuine hand here.
f) I know I'm behind but...#
g) I have put "some" chips in the pot, therefore I am committed.
h) I have him covered so I am still "in" if I lose this.
I could carry on. This isn't me bashing the Luton players ~ there are good and bad players in every domain. I am just saying that to find the best play you have to look at the hand from their POV. Sometimes a situation is crying out for a play. But if you know that 100% the donk can't pass then it makes it a bad play to execute.
hahahaha love it!!!!
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #23 on:
April 28, 2009, 12:50:58 PM »
Given what SG has said, and typical type of play i would have him on............
66-TT
AJ-AK + ATs
all suited connectors 78-kq
Basically you can determine from the above that he prob has a very wide range for you to merrily shove any flop (which I presume is you intention)
I would only shove
1. A board which connects nicely with your hand (any 2 spades, top pair open ended, 2 pair etc)
2. a rainbow single broadway card board (like 2 6 Q) and
hope
he didnt have the Q
3. Any A on board is bad as it falls too much into his range so this has you folding even if he checks to you
Your options here are limited - pray for the miracle flop
If you want me to
guess
his hand - i would plump for the middle of his range - so 99 or KQ suited
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
LeedsRhodesy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3952
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #24 on:
April 28, 2009, 01:23:03 PM »
when is he going to tell us this hand???
Logged
noble1
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 141
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #25 on:
April 28, 2009, 04:20:50 PM »
i think by now after all the replies , you know you made a questionable play .. most opponents know if they offered 2to1 pot odds that there calling range can be quite wide..You ask what his hand could be and as replied so far it could be anything
What is correct to call even if villain puts you on a range like 99+,AJs+,KQs,AKo then he'd be ok calling with 66+,A4s+,K8s+,Q9s+,J9s+,T9s,A9o+,KTo+,QTo+,JTo to be ''mathematically correct'' if as simon says in points A to H then i would not be surprised to see an even wider range...
If i was going to steal like in your situation then my broad ish rule is that my stack size is at least 7x the size of the raise so against 1 opponent [willie] then even i'd be wary of trying to steal with 13k and with the 2 extra callers i would not attempt it...
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #26 on:
April 28, 2009, 04:53:53 PM »
Quote from: action man on April 28, 2009, 06:08:09 AM
if u had 20k i like the play.
Basically this^^
It all comes down to stack size but at the moment someone is likely to look you up. Your play looks like a squeeze too so you really need to be giving them a worse price so they can't call.
Your thinking is good though. Willie is bound to be opening a ton of pots and we don't think cutoff or button are flatting with anything good enough to snap us off in but it's harder to 3-bet now that there's a lot more money in the pot and you will get looked up wider.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
$muszlesz$
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1315
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #27 on:
April 28, 2009, 05:20:51 PM »
thanks for all the replys guys..................he actually called with kt suited which i was pretty amazed with tbh.........i didnt mind the call as the pot was now for 30k.......after the hand i really felt that if i had 20-25k the player still would have called....anyways the flop came 7 8 t....cant remember the turn and another 8 on the river...he obviously felt that i knew willie was raisin light....
Logged
http://muszleszpokerblog.blogspot.com/
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #28 on:
April 28, 2009, 06:01:34 PM »
I think I answered most accurately and most succinctly. That is all :-)
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
$muszlesz$
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1315
Re: should this of worked?
«
Reply #29 on:
April 28, 2009, 06:18:20 PM »
i still think kt is light here tho.....dont u ?
Logged
http://muszleszpokerblog.blogspot.com/
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
4
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...