|
thetank
|
 |
« Reply #1755 on: January 18, 2010, 12:54:47 AM » |
|
I kick this deep, who likes onside?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #1756 on: January 18, 2010, 12:55:48 AM » |
|
onside nap
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #1757 on: January 18, 2010, 01:02:21 AM » |
|
Wish they'd show more San Diego fans having a wee cry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #1758 on: January 18, 2010, 01:05:01 AM » |
|
 JETZ!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #1759 on: January 18, 2010, 01:05:31 AM » |
|
2 knees left in your season San Dan, enjoy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #1760 on: January 18, 2010, 01:08:32 AM » |
|
Mev can trade for a £3300 freeroll, such an epic green screen
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #1761 on: January 18, 2010, 01:09:46 AM » |
|
Mev can trade for a £3300 freeroll, such an epic green screen
gambooooool |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Ismene
|
|
« Reply #1762 on: January 18, 2010, 01:20:33 AM » |
|
gambooooooool nap
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #1763 on: January 18, 2010, 01:20:55 AM » |
|
Mev can trade for a £3300 freeroll, such an epic green screen
gambooooool obv i not done anything yet |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
smileriraq
|
|
« Reply #1764 on: January 18, 2010, 11:54:39 AM » |
|
had a tenner on the Jets to win at 13/5
not bad for a free bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
| Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #1765 on: January 18, 2010, 03:06:36 PM » |
|
had a tenner on the Jets to win at 13/5
not bad for a free bet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lol what sort of price is that they were 4-1 nearly everywhere! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #1766 on: January 22, 2010, 10:54:41 PM » |
|
Under 52.5 in saints/vikings please.
Ridic line both looked v impressive on D last week, can't really see either team trying to win it in the first quarter either.
Thinking of trading my position on SB winner to Indy/Saints +£1 Jets/Vikings +£1k
Nice life etc.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #1767 on: January 23, 2010, 09:48:40 AM » |
|
yet again gutted I can't back jets. bookies giving us a 2 score lead on sunday seems ridic
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
ChipRich
|
|
« Reply #1768 on: January 24, 2010, 06:53:33 PM » |
|
Bored tonight, so will prob be watching the Niffle.
Any Coo's?? will defo be watching early game and maybe the late one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
thetank
|
|
« Reply #1769 on: January 24, 2010, 07:12:23 PM » |
|
Flushy's recommendation is the under 52.5 line in the Vikings Saints game.
Nick Scott recommends the under 40.5 line in the Jets Colts game.
Both look decent to me. I've lumped on Flushy's line.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
|
Author