poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
April 28, 2024, 10:06:05 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2272618
Posts in
66755
Topics by
16946
Members
Latest Member:
KobeTaylor
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
NFL 2010
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
15
16
17
18
[
19
]
20
21
22
23
...
51
Author
Topic: NFL 2010 (Read 84055 times)
stonecoldkiller
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 382
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #270 on:
September 28, 2010, 12:27:02 AM »
Fancy Clay Matthews to be all over cutler tonight, the guy is a total beast.
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #271 on:
September 28, 2010, 05:18:12 AM »
If you backed the Packers tonight you should feel robbed.
The better team on both offense and defense.
Special Teams and Pens were the only way the Bears stayed around until the amazing play by Briggs and Urlacher.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16222
Let's go round again
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #272 on:
September 28, 2010, 12:36:58 PM »
lol, wtf? I went to bed at 1/2 time pretty sure I knew the result already and there's only so many times you can watch cutler get beat up. can't believe the packers didn't win
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4013
5 2 off
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #273 on:
September 28, 2010, 03:15:00 PM »
Quote from: The Camel on September 28, 2010, 05:18:12 AM
If you backed the Packers tonight you should feel robbed.
The better team on both offense and defense.
Special Teams and Pens were the only way the Bears stayed around until the amazing play by Briggs and Urlacher.
5 teams won this weekend even though they gave up over 100+ yrds net on offence
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4013
5 2 off
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #274 on:
September 28, 2010, 03:19:25 PM »
I think robbed is a very harsh term.
The Packers indisicpine was a big part of it so have to blame themselves a lot
Penalties 18-152 5-38
Turnovers 2 1
GB gave up their most penalties in a match in 40 years, giving up 150 yrds of pens in a game you cant expect to win
Same as against the Cowboys, Chicago won the penalties and turnover war and thats why they won.
2nd half Defence is the reason Chicago are 3-0. They gave up 2 FGs against the Lions. No points against the Cowboys and 1 TD v GB.
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #275 on:
September 28, 2010, 06:59:48 PM »
Quote from: 77dave on September 28, 2010, 03:19:25 PM
I think robbed is a very harsh term.
The Packers indisicpine was a big part of it so have to blame themselves a lot
Penalties 18-152 5-38
Turnovers 2 1
GB gave up their most penalties in a match in 40 years, giving up 150 yrds of pens in a game you cant expect to win
Same as against the Cowboys, Chicago won the penalties and turnover war and thats why they won.
2nd half Defence is the reason Chicago are 3-0. They gave up 2 FGs against the Lions. No points against the Cowboys and 1 TD v GB.
Some of the penalties were very very marginal.
They would not have been called againt the Pack at Lambeau.
Finley is an absolute beast and Rodgers seems to have matured into one of the top 5 QBs in the league.
The good thing about the result is I can get a bigger price on Green Bay for the division.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4013
5 2 off
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #276 on:
September 28, 2010, 07:16:22 PM »
Dont get me wrong i think GB are a great team and my tip for the NFC.
I dont think i can remember a better performance by a losing QB by Rodgers for a long time.
By the end of the season i think he will be the no2 QB in the NFL behind P Manning and ahead of Brady and Brees
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
thetank
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19284
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #277 on:
September 29, 2010, 12:56:50 AM »
Quote from: 77dave on September 28, 2010, 07:16:22 PM
I dont think i can remember a better performance by a losing QB by Rodgers for a long time.
Kyle Orton the day before.
Logged
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #278 on:
September 29, 2010, 01:48:17 AM »
Quote from: thetank on September 29, 2010, 12:56:50 AM
Quote from: 77dave on September 28, 2010, 07:16:22 PM
I dont think i can remember a better performance by a losing QB by Rodgers for a long time.
Kyle Orton the day before.
It must be the rule changes which have stopped defenses blasting QBs which means they are more confident in the pocket, because there are more "quality" QBs in the league today than in my memory of the game.
Without even thinking: Both Mannings, Brady, Rodgers, Favre, Cutler, Ryan, Brees, McNabb, Schaub, Romo, Rothlesberger, Palmer and Rivers are all genuine elite QBs.
Used to be 3 or 4 per generation. Now its nearly half the starters.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
77dave
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4013
5 2 off
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #279 on:
September 29, 2010, 03:49:12 PM »
What do you think of the next generation coming through.
Can you see the likes of Flacco, Henne, Sanchez, Stafford, McCoy and Braford making it to the elite section
Logged
Mantis - I would like to thank 77dave for his more realistic take on things.
stonecoldkiller
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 382
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #280 on:
September 29, 2010, 04:55:11 PM »
Quote from: 77dave on September 29, 2010, 03:49:12 PM
What do you think of the next generation coming through.
Can you see the likes of Flacco, Henne, Sanchez, Stafford, McCoy and Braford making it to the elite section
Flacco, Sanchez and Bradford from that list imo.
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17523
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #281 on:
September 29, 2010, 06:42:32 PM »
Quote from: 77dave on September 29, 2010, 03:49:12 PM
What do you think of the next generation coming through.
Can you see the likes of Flacco, Henne, Sanchez, Stafford, McCoy and Braford making it to the elite section
I think Stafford has the tools to be a top QB but like David Carr and JP Losman in other places he has no chance because his O line cannot protect him.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #282 on:
September 29, 2010, 07:04:36 PM »
Flacco could be, less natural talent than some others but the sheer efficiency of his team year after year will make him look good
Stafford and Sanchez yes. Sanchez on the way. Stafford and Bradford will depend on how well they are protected. Both No 1 picks so it would suggest they have a shot. Much like Peyton Manning when he was drafted by a no hope franchise the Colts, will depend what they surround their QB with
Henne no, McCoy or Tebow too early to say
A lot of franchise qbs at the moment for two reasons I feel
a) has been mentioned, they are protected like never before and therefore are generally more durable and more confident
b) the changes in the rules to accentuate the passing game, making it tougher for defensive backs to defend by contact etc. Back in the old days cornerbacks could literally mug WRs at the line and all the way down the field making big numbers much trickier to achieve
b) in particular is responsible for stellar numbers which over time is meaning the stats from the modern qbs are eclipsiing those from past eras
It's only Marino and Elway (and Favre, of corse) whose stats are yet to be overtaken by the best 10 in the modern era, and now Manning is up there and about to go top on most categories
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
smileriraq
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 144
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #283 on:
September 29, 2010, 09:41:41 PM »
As a Bears fan its tough to say but I think the Pack beat themselves at no point did I think we stopped their offense rather they made mistakes that stopped themselves.
That said the packers indiscipline was astounding , I can think of only two that was a marginal one being false start, the second being rodgers intentional grounding however that can be offset by the fact I spotted two blatant holding calls by the packers that were not picked up, also factor in completely bonehead plays such as the upending of forte clearly after the whistle had blown.
That said the Bears did enough to win.
Im think the packers will still take the division and that having to chase Chicago will help them focus on eliminating stupid plays and make them a better team.
as for the future stud Qbs Bradford and Stafford should be in the mix as these two teams wont be cellar dwellers for much longer.
Logged
Click to see full-size image.
Indestructable
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6485
Re: NFL 2010
«
Reply #284 on:
September 29, 2010, 10:32:35 PM »
Anyone else going to Wembley on the 31st October?
There is a change to the tailgate party arrangements:
"The 2010 Tailgate Party will be different from previous years, with access open to all game ticket holders, meaning that you do not need to apply in advance to be able to attend. A new location gives the event much more space, and means that you can party pre-game in the shadow of the Wembley arch."
Must admit that I thought we were getting two top teams this year but based on the season so far it is more like West Ham v Wolves.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
15
16
17
18
[
19
]
20
21
22
23
...
51
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...