poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 23, 2025, 09:29:06 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262399
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Good spot/bad spot
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
Author
Topic: Good spot/bad spot (Read 4973 times)
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #30 on:
March 22, 2010, 10:11:16 AM »
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 10:00:50 AM
Quote from: outragous76 on March 22, 2010, 09:02:02 AM
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 07:37:48 AM
a really easy pass
and that is why the raiser loves having people like you on his table.
When someone calls with AK he will have stolen enough blinds to take a "free" shot and will bink with his J3 anyway
lol - why should the raiser love having someone like me at his table. I call light in spots like these but i think you overrate the strength of A3o. Bit of a sweeping statement
so like I asked gatso - whats your calling range?
calling "light" but passing A3 is a contradiction in terms
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
BulldozerD
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1888
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #31 on:
March 22, 2010, 10:31:46 AM »
we are acting as if the guy has been open shoving every hand for 2 rounds. he has done it twice per the OP.
Logged
BulldozerD
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1888
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #32 on:
March 22, 2010, 10:33:58 AM »
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 10:31:46 AM
we are acting as if the guy has been open shoving every hand for 2 rounds. he has done it twice per the OP.
calling range is 66+, A9+ KQ maybe slightly lighter depending on how i feel at the time btw
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #33 on:
March 22, 2010, 10:56:50 AM »
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 10:33:58 AM
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 10:31:46 AM
we are acting as if the guy has been open shoving every hand for 2 rounds. he has done it twice per the OP.
calling range is 66+, A9+ KQ maybe slightly lighter depending on how i feel at the time btw
villain holds say J6
A3 = 59%
A9 = 63%
KQ = 68%
77 = 70%
Now it strikes me that if you woke up with AK and he showed you QQ - you would call
so what are you waiting for?
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
BulldozerD
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1888
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #34 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:04:13 AM »
your explanation has just lost me completely but hasn't levelled me into thinking calling is good here.
i don't care whether he has j6o or shows me QQ or whatever, i just don't think calling with A3 against his
range
of hands is good here.
Logged
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #35 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:21:34 AM »
Quote from: BulldozerD on March 22, 2010, 11:04:13 AM
your explanation has just lost me completely but hasn't levelled me into thinking calling is good here.
i don't care whether he has j6o or shows me QQ or whatever, i just don't think calling with A3 against his
range
of hands is good here.
his range of hands is any 2 cards - hence i used a randomiser to come up with J6
You are levelling yourself if you think that the %'s are wrong
even if you start to give him hands with strength (v's A3o)
K9 = 58%
KQ = 57%
JQs = 53%
98s = 51%
So basically what we are saying is that providing he doesnt have a pair or a bigger A - we are pretty much never worse than 50/50 - but yet you snap off a 50/50 if you know that is what you are getting (in the Ak v's QQ scenario)
and worst case he has the pair or a bigger A you have 30%
All I am trying to do is put some maths behind your mind set of what you "deem" to be a strong or weak hand. If you chose to ignore it then so be it
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #36 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:41:44 AM »
Click to see full-size image.
Q8o is right near the bottom of 50% pushing range, his range is probably wider.
This is deffo a cEV call.
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6260
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #37 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:44:39 AM »
^^Yeah, this is def a call without ICM considerations.
But with ICM considerations I would think it's a fold?
Personally I was gonna say fold until I saw Longy said call, so now I might call
«
Last Edit: March 22, 2010, 11:52:43 AM by MC
»
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #38 on:
March 22, 2010, 12:03:43 PM »
Quote from: MC on March 22, 2010, 11:44:39 AM
^^Yeah, this is def a call without ICM considerations.
But with ICM considerations I would think it's a fold?
Personally I was gonna say fold until I saw Longy said call, so now I might call
ICM at this stage of a mtt, meh. The places before the final table are probably all min cashes and therefore ICM doesn't have a particularly strong effect.
It is bit like the 180 mans on stars that I just play a totally cEV game, when we are on the 18person bubble and I think most of the good regs do the same.
Logged
craigbetts
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1234
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #39 on:
March 22, 2010, 06:39:22 PM »
It looks like Guy has been flying the flag for the call and yes i still edge to this.
Many thanks for all the views/replies, it just highlights how marginal the call is.
Logged
"We're not here to take part, we're here to take over"
treefella
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 555
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #40 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:18:51 PM »
Quote from: Longy on March 22, 2010, 11:41:44 AM
Click to see full-size image.
Q8o is right near the bottom of 50% pushing range, his range is probably wider.
This is deffo a cEV call.
what is this software and were can i get it ? looks handy . thanks.
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #41 on:
March 22, 2010, 11:28:05 PM »
www.sngwiz.com
30 month free trial available.
Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6260
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #42 on:
March 23, 2010, 12:13:34 AM »
Quote from: Longy on March 22, 2010, 12:03:43 PM
Quote from: MC on March 22, 2010, 11:44:39 AM
^^Yeah, this is def a call without ICM considerations.
But with ICM considerations I would think it's a fold?
Personally I was gonna say fold until I saw Longy said call, so now I might call
ICM at this stage of a mtt, meh. The places before the final table are probably all min cashes and therefore ICM doesn't have a particularly strong effect.
It is bit like the 180 mans on stars that I just play a totally cEV game, when we are on the 18person bubble and I think most of the good regs do the same.
Yeah good point.
However, can it be dismissed entirely as 7th place in a 45 man is only a min-cash, and 9 handed we'd be taking ICM into account...
Logged
"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
outragous76
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 13315
Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #43 on:
March 23, 2010, 12:36:07 AM »
Quote from: MC on March 23, 2010, 12:13:34 AM
Quote from: Longy on March 22, 2010, 12:03:43 PM
Quote from: MC on March 22, 2010, 11:44:39 AM
^^Yeah, this is def a call without ICM considerations.
But with ICM considerations I would think it's a fold?
Personally I was gonna say fold until I saw Longy said call, so now I might call
ICM at this stage of a mtt, meh. The places before the final table are probably all min cashes and therefore ICM doesn't have a particularly strong effect.
It is bit like the 180 mans on stars that I just play a totally cEV game, when we are on the 18person bubble and I think most of the good regs do the same.
Yeah good point.
However, can it be dismissed entirely as 7th place in a 45 man is only a min-cash, and 9 handed we'd be taking ICM into account...
i think ICM could be taking it too far (as most people wont be thinking that sophisticated in this tourney), but on the same theme - people can be very bothered about "cashing" (i know its the same thing but on many levels it isnt) . This is what makes the villains play stand up here against many of his opponents in this particular tourney.
Logged
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Good spot/bad spot
«
Reply #44 on:
March 23, 2010, 09:43:39 AM »
Quote from: Longy on March 22, 2010, 11:28:05 PM
www.sngwiz.com
30 month free trial available.
that's very generous of them
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...