RSQ39 I'm captain of the blonde RSQ Falcon, Claw's fobbed it off on me!

[Graham C]

If I take a coffee break, do things blow over for a bit

[Cf]

2. Name a Star Wars character - Hmm, ambiguous at this point. Do you mean the film or the overall universe?

(not a race, a "person" in the film) - Ah, he's on about the film.

The answers I quoted are not in the above film. Hence they are wrong. There isn't even a discussion to be had here.

[Claw75]

Farce

[TightEnd]

If I take a coffee break, do things blow over for a bit

Just crack on. Cf, like Gatso, is like a lexicographic crack addict. He needs a successful objection to feel wanted. Don't give in

[Graham C]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters!  

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

[Graham C]

Just crack on. Cf, like Gatso, is like a lexicographic crack addict. He needs a successful objection to feel wanted. Don't give in

Advice taken!

Question 4 - Name a country that has a team in the Davis Cup tennis competition

Sheep for 2 points

Sweden - Snoopy, technolog

Aces for 1 point

France - moonandback
Thailand - jjandellis
Australia - Girgy
Belgium - Nakor
Spain - mondatoo
Germany - The Baron
Russia - cambridgealex
Croatia - redsimon
Canada - bhoywonder
Serbia - Tightend
Ukraine - Gatso
USA - Cf

Pass - Claw, TheWhisper

Incorrect Sheep+5= 7 points
Cf's blog - Boshi

Running total


Cf 4
Girgy 5
Mondatoo 5
Thebaron 5
cambridgealex 5
redsimon 4
technolog 5
gatso 6
bhoywonder 7
TheWhisper 6
Tightend 7
Claw 6
Snoopy 9
jjandellis 9
Nakor 8
moonandback 9
Kinboshi 31

[Claw75]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters! 

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

would have been fine if you hadn't said 'in the film'.  innit. 

[Graham C]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters! 

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

would have been fine if you hadn't said 'in the film'.  innit. 

I meant films, so meant it.  Clearly regretting things now

[Claw75]

feeling slightly guilty about making you be QM and giving you grief.  Almost enough to stop.

[Cf]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters! 

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

would have been fine if you hadn't said 'in the film'.  innit. 

I meant films, so meant it.  Clearly regretting things now

But that's the thing. What you MEANT is irrelevant. All that matters is what you actually asked.

This whole thing is pointless if we can just answer whatever we want.

[Claw75]

if you had meant it as you asked, presume you'd be happy to fail 'em?

[celtic]

You're doing a great job Silo.

Ignore the haters.

[Graham C]

feeling slightly guilty about making you be QM and giving you grief.  Almost enough to stop.

Lol, forgot I didn't even win, or come second!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters!  

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

would have been fine if you hadn't said 'in the film'.  innit.  

I meant films, so meant it.  Clearly regretting things now

But that's the thing. What you MEANT is irrelevant. All that matters is what you actually asked.

This whole thing is pointless if we can just answer whatever we want.

I know, I'm not even arguing that part.  My main defence is that Wiki agrees with me.   I'm taking Wiki as reference over you I'm afraid.

[Robert HM]

sigh. yet another reveal when we may as well not be here if QM is just going to do what he likes and ignore correct objections.

I'm prepared to listen to objections but these are clearly just nit picking.  if the answer was Peter Pan and I'd given it as correct, I'd listen and change things accordingly, but I know what you bunch are like!   The answers are all good so far.

That's the whole idea surely, it always has been.

[Cf]

feeling slightly guilty about making you be QM and giving you grief.  Almost enough to stop.

Lol, forgot I didn't even win, or come second!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_characters

Not sure how else to argue it, even Wikigeeks agree with me.   They're Star Wars Characters! 

Should have left the brackets part out then marked everyone that said Ewok wrong.

would have been fine if you hadn't said 'in the film'.  innit. 

I meant films, so meant it.  Clearly regretting things now

But that's the thing. What you MEANT is irrelevant. All that matters is what you actually asked.

This whole thing is pointless if we can just answer whatever we want.

I know, I'm not even arguing that part.  My main defence is that Wiki agrees with me.   I'm taking Wiki as reference over you I'm afraid.

No it doesn't. Give me a min.