poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 22, 2025, 09:33:05 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262378
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Full house, oh dear.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Full house, oh dear. (Read 3588 times)
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Full house, oh dear.
«
on:
August 31, 2011, 07:31:36 PM »
PokerStars Game #66816607072: Tournament #433296476, $20+$2 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level VIII (60/120) - 2011/08/31 19:15:50 WET [2011/08/31 14:15:50 ET]
Table '433296476 8' 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: shahar waite (6098 in chips)
Seat 2: theczar19 (10095 in chips)
Seat 3: Bear4rms (15183 in chips)
Seat 4: -ANALNATSHA- (9671 in chips)
Seat 5: Palau777 (14074 in chips)
Seat 6: TranquilMind (16790 in chips)
shahar waite: posts the ante 25
theczar19: posts the ante 25
Bear4rms: posts the ante 25
-ANALNATSHA-: posts the ante 25
Palau777: posts the ante 25
TranquilMind: posts the ante 25
-ANALNATSHA-: posts small blind 60
Palau777: posts big blind 120
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Bear4rms [
As]
TranquilMind: raises 180 to 300
shahar waite: folds
theczar19: folds
Bear4rms: calls 300
-ANALNATSHA-: folds
Palau777: folds
*** FLOP *** [
]
TranquilMind: bets 465
Bear4rms: calls 465
*** TURN *** [
] [
]
TranquilMind: bets 960
Bear4rms: calls 960
*** RIVER *** [
] [
]
TranquilMind: checks
Bear4rms: bets 1285
TranquilMind: raises 13755 to 15040 and is all-in
Bear4rms: ?
How many people call and how many people fold and for what reasons (we are readless on villain btw)
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14799
#lovethegame
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #1 on:
August 31, 2011, 07:37:46 PM »
I call, the reason being we have a full house.
A jolly good full house, in fact. The best possible one.
It's probably a chop but meh. Let's get our chips back.
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
zerofive
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1884
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #2 on:
August 31, 2011, 07:57:04 PM »
Quote from: Nit Tendencies on August 31, 2011, 07:31:36 PM
How many people call and how many people fold and for what reasons (we are readless on villain btw)
We would have to have a pretty good read to fold here. Call and chop it up.
Logged
DMorgan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4440
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #3 on:
August 31, 2011, 08:54:26 PM »
TranquilMind is a reg, ridic aggro Polish guy - met him at a UKIPT event
Definitely a call, I'd expect to see a fair number of bluffs here.
Logged
Quote from: Karabiner on May 24, 2014, 12:47:13 PM
Is Dan awake yet?
Rod
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 998
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #4 on:
August 31, 2011, 09:58:50 PM »
This looks like a really easy call to me, he is almost never bluffing I would say (assuming no reads) but he is still bluffing more often than he has 88 isn't he? I would also say it's unlikely CRAI with 88 OTR as I would say it's pretty easy to put you on an ace if that is his hand. It is nearlly impossible for you to be beaten.
Logged
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #5 on:
August 31, 2011, 10:14:16 PM »
I'd snap. If we're thinking about folding this hand we're only losing to 88 (44 would make me puke sooooooo hard) then it's a good spot for him to shove an ace too. Basically we're beat less than 2% of the time imo so I can't fold.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #6 on:
August 31, 2011, 10:20:05 PM »
Quote from: GreekStein on August 31, 2011, 10:14:16 PM
I'd snap. If we're thinking about folding this hand we're only losing to 88
(44 would make me puke sooooooo hard)
then it's a good spot for him to shove an ace too. Basically we're beat less than 2% of the time imo so I can't fold.
why?
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #7 on:
August 31, 2011, 10:21:59 PM »
Misread hh. Forgot unlimited hold em doesn't have 2 rivers.
Ignore my bs about 44 but rest is true.
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #8 on:
August 31, 2011, 10:23:18 PM »
ah, ok, was somewhat confused there
snap call obv
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10437
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #9 on:
August 31, 2011, 11:28:32 PM »
This has to be way closer than everyone is saying,
he would DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO play 88 exactly this way, there is one combo of 88 and one remaining ace, so his actual value range is split pretty evenly between hands that we call 12,173 to win 15,348 (+3175) and where we lose 12,173.
I think he would play both A* and 88 like this - so if he never bluffing I think this should be a pretty mandatory fold.
However for every combo of bluffs you can give him folding becomes worse and worse, but how many AIR combo's can we realistically give him? what does he dbl barrell on a board like this, not too much complete badugi OTT surely because it doesn't look like you'll be folding much - unless you think he bets turn with total air a lot after you've called the flop? (I don;t know a ton about MTT tendancies so dont really know??)
Also do you think he ever turns 8* into a bluff? If you say he has no history with you then its tough to expect him to give you credit for folding an ACE and even really good regs have a habit of being pretty stationy.
I mean I don't think i'd fold in game but I'm pretty sure this is a spot where folding would be reasonable
Logged
http://lildaveslife.blogspot.com/
www.thefirmpoker.com
hatthehole
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 347
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #10 on:
September 01, 2011, 03:17:07 PM »
Quote from: SuuPRlim on August 31, 2011, 11:28:32 PM
This has to be way closer than everyone is saying,
he would DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO play 88 exactly this way, there is one combo of 88 and one remaining ace, so his actual value range is split pretty evenly between hands that we call 12,173 to win 15,348 (+3175) and where we lose 12,173.
I think he would play both A* and 88 like this - so if he never bluffing I think this should be a pretty mandatory fold.
However for every combo of bluffs you can give him folding becomes worse and worse, but how many AIR combo's can we realistically give him? what does he dbl barrell on a board like this, not too much complete badugi OTT surely because it doesn't look like you'll be folding much - unless you think he bets turn with total air a lot after you've called the flop? (I don;t know a ton about MTT tendancies so dont really know??)
Also do you think he ever turns 8* into a bluff? If you say he has no history with you then its tough to expect him to give you credit for folding an ACE and even really good regs have a habit of being pretty stationy.
I mean I don't think i'd fold in game but I'm pretty sure this is a spot where folding would be reasonable
there's several combos of Ax in his range and only 1 combo of 88 so it isnt an equal spilt. I'd be pretty amazed to see a reg (any1) bluff here.
Logged
Spraggs
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 219
Don't hate, appreciate!
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #11 on:
September 01, 2011, 03:42:56 PM »
Quote from: Nit Tendencies on August 31, 2011, 07:31:36 PM
How many people call and how many people fold and for what reasons (we are readless on villain btw)
If we have no read on the villain it has to be a call in a $22. As some have mentioned, this particular opponent is a decent agro (i think) reg.
In real time MT'ing in a $22 i probably just call, however if it was say a HSMTT/WCOOP i probably tank, figure out he knows we have to have an ace and fold.
He's never really bluffing here, maybe he thinks your capable of folding an ace, i highly doubt it though.
Logged
Spraggspoker.blogspot.com
https://twitter.com/#!/BenSpraggs
pleno1
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 18912
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #12 on:
September 01, 2011, 03:55:16 PM »
wtf, he is close to 0.000000001% bluffing here. not a very nice spot at all, in game i call, but that doesnt mean its right, its probably super close, but meh wtf hes polish i call.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
AlexMartin
spewtards r us
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8039
rat+rabbiting society of herts- future champ
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #13 on:
September 01, 2011, 03:57:19 PM »
Quote from: hatthehole on September 01, 2011, 03:17:07 PM
Quote from: SuuPRlim on August 31, 2011, 11:28:32 PM
This has to be way closer than everyone is saying,
he would DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO play 88 exactly this way, there is one combo of 88 and one remaining ace, so his actual value range is split pretty evenly between hands that we call 12,173 to win 15,348 (+3175) and where we lose 12,173.
I think he would play both A* and 88 like this - so if he never bluffing I think this should be a pretty mandatory fold.
However for every combo of bluffs you can give him folding becomes worse and worse, but how many AIR combo's can we realistically give him? what does he dbl barrell on a board like this, not too much complete badugi OTT surely because it doesn't look like you'll be folding much - unless you think he bets turn with total air a lot after you've called the flop? (I don;t know a ton about MTT tendancies so dont really know??)
Also do you think he ever turns 8* into a bluff? If you say he has no history with you then its tough to expect him to give you credit for folding an ACE and even really good regs have a habit of being pretty stationy.
I mean I don't think i'd fold in game but I'm pretty sure this is a spot where folding would be reasonable
there's several combos of Ax in his range and only 1 combo of 88 so it isnt an equal spilt. I'd be pretty amazed to see a reg (any1) bluff here.
dading.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10437
Re: Full house, oh dear.
«
Reply #14 on:
September 01, 2011, 04:16:26 PM »
Quote from: hatthehole on September 01, 2011, 03:17:07 PM
Quote from: SuuPRlim on August 31, 2011, 11:28:32 PM
This has to be way closer than everyone is saying,
he would DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO DEFO play 88 exactly this way, there is one combo of 88 and one remaining ace, so his actual value range is split pretty evenly between hands that we call 12,173 to win 15,348 (+3175) and where we lose 12,173.
I think he would play both A* and 88 like this - so if he never bluffing I think this should be a pretty mandatory fold.
However for every combo of bluffs you can give him folding becomes worse and worse, but how many AIR combo's can we realistically give him? what does he dbl barrell on a board like this, not too much complete badugi OTT surely because it doesn't look like you'll be folding much - unless you think he bets turn with total air a lot after you've called the flop? (I don;t know a ton about MTT tendancies so dont really know??)
Also do you think he ever turns 8* into a bluff? If you say he has no history with you then its tough to expect him to give you credit for folding an ACE and even really good regs have a habit of being pretty stationy.
I mean I don't think i'd fold in game but I'm pretty sure this is a spot where folding would be reasonable
there's several combos of Ax in his range and only 1 combo of 88 so it isnt an equal spilt. I'd be pretty amazed to see a reg (any1) bluff here.
yh true lol - middy in your esteemed opinion what combo's of Ah X would you expect an aggressive reg to open UTG?
either way when one out come is +3,175 and one is -12,173 then he needs 4 Ah X combo's which he easy has to break even on the call so yh it's prolly a call asumming he plays A* here this way 100% of the time, if we think 50% of the time he'll value bet A* then we now need 8 combo's of A*'s in his opening range to break even which is pretty thin.
It looks for sure like you have an ACE, but because if he has an ace also it makes it slightly LESS likely you do so that's why I think he'll c/j A* with a lower frequency than 88 (speshly as you can't have an
Logged
http://lildaveslife.blogspot.com/
www.thefirmpoker.com
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...