outragous76
|
 |
« Reply #150 on: December 29, 2011, 08:31:16 PM » |
|
epic game there - so fast too!
gonna be a good night on the oche!
|
|
|
Logged
|
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
|
|
|
Sighmuns
|
 |
« Reply #151 on: December 29, 2011, 08:32:04 PM » |
|
Top match, great entertainment. Well done Simon for keeping it together.
Anyone got thoughts on Chisnall? Without trying to brag I knew he had potential so i backed him vs Taylor for a small amount, but I don't know about his consistancy? Is he now a sure thing vs Hamilton?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dubai
|
 |
« Reply #152 on: December 29, 2011, 08:36:20 PM » |
|
Over 12.5 180s 5/6 lads- think will be close game and go minimum of 6 close sets which should be enough to land
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
 |
« Reply #153 on: December 29, 2011, 08:38:14 PM » |
|
Have backed Hamilton at 15/8.....2.70 now which is about right I think.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Solaris
|
 |
« Reply #154 on: December 29, 2011, 08:38:38 PM » |
|
Van Gerwen backers with Laddies will be cursing their luck and at the same time thanking Laddies for the money back offer!
Whitlock so nearly blew it there.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sighmuns
|
 |
« Reply #155 on: December 29, 2011, 08:51:27 PM » |
|
Over 12.5 180s 5/6 lads- think will be close game and go minimum of 6 close sets which should be enough to land
Followed you...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sighmuns
|
 |
« Reply #156 on: December 29, 2011, 08:58:54 PM » |
|
Over 12.5 180s 5/6 lads- think will be close game and go minimum of 6 close sets which should be enough to land
Followed you... Am I clutching at straws to think that it might not be so bad from a 180s point of view that Ham won first set? Ought to be a longer game now? (Cue Chizzy collapse)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dubai
|
 |
« Reply #157 on: December 29, 2011, 09:00:05 PM » |
|
From 180 perspective u just want everyone to hold throw every leg. I think the games gonna go 6sets+ anyway, just dont want Hamilton switching too often for 177s- which makes u wanna kick the nearest object
spread is 11.6-12.2 so not much damage done by 1 quiet set
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
outragous76
|
 |
« Reply #158 on: December 29, 2011, 09:06:54 PM » |
|
From 180 perspective u just want everyone to hold throw every leg. I think the games gonna go 6sets+ anyway, just dont want Hamilton switching too often for 177s- which makes u wanna kick the nearest object
spread is 11.6-12.2 so not much damage done by 1 quiet set
3 treble 18's just to ensure the cat gets it! ouch!
|
|
|
Logged
|
".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
|
|
|
Solaris
|
 |
« Reply #159 on: December 29, 2011, 09:15:12 PM » |
|
5 already. Will come in imo.
Before you ask, yes I am intentionally posting this as a bok.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dubai
|
 |
« Reply #160 on: December 29, 2011, 09:15:37 PM » |
|
That was obv disastrous. Hard to envisage losing if it goes 1-1
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Sighmuns
|
 |
« Reply #161 on: December 29, 2011, 09:18:02 PM » |
|
Does intentional bokking count?
C'mon Chizzy Rascal
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Solaris
|
 |
« Reply #162 on: December 29, 2011, 09:19:02 PM » |
|
That was obv disastrous. Hard to envisage losing if it goes 1-1
Really long way to go imo. Keep the faith. Classic Chisnall atm though. 19% on the doubles is appalling.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dubai
|
 |
« Reply #163 on: December 29, 2011, 09:20:03 PM » |
|
I still really fancy it, just cant see how can lose if it was 1-1 in sets
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dubai
|
 |
« Reply #164 on: December 29, 2011, 09:41:00 PM » |
|
11 180s in 17 legs and lose. Just lol
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|