Tips for Tikay

[Tal]

Cate Blanchett enters Sydney Airport with a smile as she and her husband Andrew Upton prep for their departing flight on Thursday (February 27) in Sydney, Australia.

The 44-year-old Oscar nominee had with her a large garment bag from Gucci – could it be her Oscars dress!?

Rec £2.18 (aka Max) @ 13/2 with "We'll bet on anything, even murder cases."

Can't go wrong with a bet on Gucci but surely she's savvy enough not to reveal who she will be wearing?

[Marky147]

Incred tekkers, Tal

[horseplayer]

pm sent Rubbish

[Doobs]

Cate Blanchett enters Sydney Airport with a smile as she and her husband Andrew Upton prep for their departing flight on Thursday (February 27) in Sydney, Australia.

The 44-year-old Oscar nominee had with her a large garment bag from Gucci – could it be her Oscars dress!?

Rec £2.18 (aka Max) @ 13/2 with "We'll bet on anything, even murder cases."

Can't go wrong with a bet on Gucci but surely she's savvy enough not to reveal who she will be wearing?

You snooze you lose, 4/1 now. 

[Ant040689]

Well Palace reminded me of the Holloway era in the prem, but with less possession. Truly dire. Scott Dann will send us down at this rate. Danny Gabbs is so much better. Did not anticipate woefulness like that and haven't seen a half as bad as that under Pulis. Worrying. Even more annoying I doubt Dann will be dropped until the end of the season and while he plays in his current form do not back Palace, unless something drastic changes to form. Lesson learned.

[Tal]

Cate Blanchett enters Sydney Airport with a smile as she and her husband Andrew Upton prep for their departing flight on Thursday (February 27) in Sydney, Australia.

The 44-year-old Oscar nominee had with her a large garment bag from Gucci – could it be her Oscars dress!?

Rec £2.18 (aka Max) @ 13/2 with "We'll bet on anything, even murder cases."

Can't go wrong with a bet on Gucci but surely she's savvy enough not to reveal who she will be wearing?

You snooze you lose, 4/1 now. 

That's taken a tenner to move that distance I reckon.

Not one bet, obviously; four lots of £2.50

[Chompy]

Happy days for the lurking 'guests' imo.

Anyone get on?

[Tal]

All the prices have moved. Are we being watched?

Chompy, would you do your thing, please?

[horseplayer]

Any further news on the persistent lurking guests being removed? or something kinder

[Marky147]

Happy days for the lurking 'guests' imo.

Anyone get on?

 

More than £2.50, but less than £10...

Oscar punting sponsored by Segal

[Doobs]

Happy days for the lurking 'guests' imo.

Anyone get on?

Lurkers got held up by Tal's diversion tactics.  Meanwhile Tal gets his £2.46 on and moves the market.  Least he deserves after the earlier opus.

[Doobs]

Well Palace reminded me of the Holloway era in the prem, but with less possession. Truly dire. Scott Dann will send us down at this rate. Danny Gabbs is so much better. Did not anticipate woefulness like that and haven't seen a half as bad as that under Pulis. Worrying. Even more annoying I doubt Dann will be dropped until the end of the season and while he plays in his current form do not back Palace, unless something drastic changes to form. Lesson learned.

So we lay them, right?

[Tal]

I was going to laugh at them spelling Roksanda Ilincic wrongly (Ilinic) until I realised I had missed the D out in my post. They've pushed McQueen out from 5/1 to 7/1 and Lanvin now 14/1. Funny I'd mentioned those in my post as unlikelies. I've gone for Givenchy as my main one. I don't think there will be anything dramatic because she is so likely to be standing up on the stage and on every TV screen and magazine cover (even What Car? and Good Housekeeping) from tomorrow morning. Simple Parisian elegance will do just nicely, thank you, and as we don't fancy Lanvin, that leaves us with Givenchy.

(And yes, a little saver on Gucci, which I make NB)

[Doobs]

I was going to laugh at them spelling Roksanda Ilincic wrongly (Ilinic) until I realised I had missed the D out in my post. They've pushed McQueen out from 5/1 to 7/1 and Lanvin now 14/1. Funny I'd mentioned those in my post as unlikelies. I've gone for Givenchy as my main one. I don't think there will be anything dramatic because she is so likely to be standing up on the stage and on every TV screen and magazine cover (even What Car? and Good Housekeeping) from tomorrow morning. Simple Parisian elegance will do just nicely, thank you, and as we don't fancy Lanvin, that leaves us with Givenchy.

(And yes, a little saver on Gucci, which I make NB)

Even whilst wearing my Maine New England jumper I can tell that 2/1 doesn't look like much value.   Good job we are limited to pennies in my view. 

[BigAdz]

Jesus Christ.........