Tips for Tikay

[Doobs]

Btw if we used a free bet on Lambert to score 1st, it looks like Hills have refunded as another free bet due to him scoring 2nd.

I don't think you do.

A free bet offer is not to be used in conjunction with another (possible) free bet offer. Or something similar.

Had similar issue before.

There's a free bet in your account!
 
He might not have managed the first, but he did grab the second. That’s good enough to earn you a free bet thanks to our Goalscorer 2nd Chance offer.

Your Goalscorer stake has been refunded and is ready to use as a free bet!

That doesn't answer the query.

You have 2 people have said we should have a free bet, and I even copy and pasted the message I got from Hills, yet you still want to argue?  Good luck with that.

[aaron1867]

Btw if we used a free bet on Lambert to score 1st, it looks like Hills have refunded as another free bet due to him scoring 2nd.

I don't think you do.

A free bet offer is not to be used in conjunction with another (possible) free bet offer. Or something similar.

Had similar issue before.

There's a free bet in your account!
 
He might not have managed the first, but he did grab the second. That’s good enough to earn you a free bet thanks to our Goalscorer 2nd Chance offer.

Your Goalscorer stake has been refunded and is ready to use as a free bet!

That doesn't answer the query.

You have 2 people have said we should have a free bet, and I even copy and pasted the message I got from Hills, yet you still want to argue?  Good luck with that.

I am not arguing, I am just saying that sometimes you don't another free bet if you bet with a free bet.

Seems it might have got through this time, however not sure it works out like that as often.

[Omm]

Btw if we used a free bet on Lambert to score 1st, it looks like Hills have refunded as another free bet due to him scoring 2nd.

I don't think you do.

A free bet offer is not to be used in conjunction with another (possible) free bet offer. Or something similar.

Had similar issue before.

There's a free bet in your account!
 
He might not have managed the first, but he did grab the second. That’s good enough to earn you a free bet thanks to our Goalscorer 2nd Chance offer.

Your Goalscorer stake has been refunded and is ready to use as a free bet!

That doesn't answer the query.

You have 2 people have said we should have a free bet, and I even copy and pasted the message I got from Hills, yet you still want to argue?  Good luck with that.

I am not arguing, I am just saying that sometimes you don't another free bet if you bet with a free bet.

Seems it might have got through this time, however not sure it works out like that as often.

I used my free bet with hills on lambert 1st goal scorer, and have been given a free bet back. Seems to me Hills might just be a respectable bookie.

[Doobs]

Btw if we used a free bet on Lambert to score 1st, it looks like Hills have refunded as another free bet due to him scoring 2nd.

I don't think you do.

A free bet offer is not to be used in conjunction with another (possible) free bet offer. Or something similar.

Had similar issue before.

There's a free bet in your account!
 
He might not have managed the first, but he did grab the second. That’s good enough to earn you a free bet thanks to our Goalscorer 2nd Chance offer.

Your Goalscorer stake has been refunded and is ready to use as a free bet!

That doesn't answer the query.

You have 2 people have said we should have a free bet, and I even copy and pasted the message I got from Hills, yet you still want to argue?  Good luck with that.

I am not arguing, I am just saying that sometimes you don't another free bet if you bet with a free bet.

Seems it might have got through this time, however not sure it works out like that as often.

I definitely have this one this time, and it was a free bet, but can't remember having got an unexpected racing one before.  It may well be a cock up by Hills this time, but it has happened.

[Doobs]

Two quickies

2.40 Haydock  £25 evens Montridge
3.45 Haydock £25 3/1 Lethal Force.  I think we should do this, the ground isn't as soft as hoped, it provides a bit of hedging for our good bets, and the maths is correct.

Both Hills mobile.

I would have put up Royal Empire in the 14.20 at Kempton but Betfred were 7/2 beat Betfair have best odds guarantee, so just did it there.

From Chompy's Report above Tikay bet on GLB on hills, I think the money back if second offer only counts on the first bet in each race. I don't know if he did it on his mobile or desktop though, and if he did it on his desktop then he could place it on his mobile and it would count as the first bet in this race?  Alternatively he could do it on betfred if the price is the same? Just a thought.

I have just read the T and Cs and it says the offer applies to the first bet on mobile and it has to be after 17.30 the day before, so I think the Lethal Force bet would have counted.  It is too late for me anyway, as I bet before you posted.  Guess if it is 2nd, we'll get to know if we get a free bet in circumstances like this. 

I am turning into Tikay with the misclicks, I thought I had put a free bet and an extra bet on both Gordon Lord Byron and Garswood, what I actually did was put both the extra bets on Garswood.   So come on Garswood.

[a.sparrow]

Two quickies

2.40 Haydock  £25 evens Montridge
3.45 Haydock £25 3/1 Lethal Force.  I think we should do this, the ground isn't as soft as hoped, it provides a bit of hedging for our good bets, and the maths is correct.

Both Hills mobile.

I would have put up Royal Empire in the 14.20 at Kempton but Betfred were 7/2 beat Betfair have best odds guarantee, so just did it there.

From Chompy's Report above Tikay bet on GLB on hills, I think the money back if second offer only counts on the first bet in each race. I don't know if he did it on his mobile or desktop though, and if he did it on his desktop then he could place it on his mobile and it would count as the first bet in this race?  Alternatively he could do it on betfred if the price is the same? Just a thought.

I have just read the T and Cs and it says the offer applies to the first bet on mobile and it has to be after 17.30 the day before, so I think the Lethal Force bet would have counted.  It is too late for me anyway, as I bet before you posted.  Guess if it is 2nd, we'll get to know if we get a free bet in circumstances like this. 

I am turning into Tikay with the misclicks, I thought I had put a free bet and an extra bet on both Gordon Lord Byron and Garswood, what I actually did was put both the extra bets on Garswood.   So come on Garswood.

Yeah you have a good point, if the GLB bet was before the promotion then I guess the first bet after the start of the promotion counts.  Thought it was worth a mention though just to make sure the bet was eligable as you are very much a numbers man and it could have changed how +ev the bet was. If you run as good as Tikay with missclicks then garswood is a cert

[McGlashan]

Boxing

Ian "Lay 'Em Out"Lewison v Tom "The Bomb"Dallas - This is low grade domestic stuff, Lewison has been hyped as being a level or two above this grade but I'm not convinced.  He is 7-2-1 with a points defeat to journeyman Colin Kenna on his record, admittedly he was really fat that night whereas tonight he will be just fat.  Dallas was 15-0 before stepping in at short notice against David Price and getting KO'd in the 2nd round, he followed that up with a stoppage defeat against Matt Skelton followed by a stoppage in Prizefighter.  He is pretty fragile and could get blown away early but shouldn't be a 3/1 shot here imo as Lewison has shown very little so far,  has never gone beyond 4 rounds and his physique would suggest that the longer the fight goes the better it is for Dallas.  Recommend £20 on Dallas at 3/1 with Betfred.

Classy guy this Lewison fella, he reportedly arrived at the weigh in yesterday with condoms and lubrication, threatening to 'f**k' Dallas up.

The price looks good as an over hyped fat domestic level slugger shouldn't be a 3-1 favourite over a similarly ranked domestic level slugger.

[a.sparrow]

oi oi, you horse gurus are the nuts!

[Ironside]

was GLB a good result for thread after lay off some of the bet?

[judge]

glb hoses up , wp all

[Doobs]

oi oi, you horse gurus are the nuts!

Yeah, great result.

Official. I don't run as well as Tikay on misclicks

[Chompy]

[a.sparrow]

FWIW PP didnt have a rule 4 on their bet, just been settled.  Waiting for ladbrokes.

[a.sparrow]

oi oi, you horse gurus are the nuts!

Yeah, great result.

Official. I don't run as well as Tikay on misclicks

Lol sorry mate, i backed both recommends, and either foolishly or not i didn't lay any off as i didn't go too big and with all the rule 4 uncertainity and locking in some value i thought i'd let them ride.

[BigAdz]

Good result.

More worried about what Chompy had in his search engine when stumbling across this tho!