Tips for Tikay

[Chompy]

Boils are a waste of time but it's worth opening one with Seaniemac imo. They use Boil prices and usually last a bit longer.

[tikay]

Brisbane Hear are underdogs (6/4) hosting top of the table Sydney Thunder (4/7) this morning. Game starts in 20 mins. Heat have won the toss and will bowl first, so hopefully Thunder rack up 180+, should be another high-scoring game.

Good shout, 186/5.

Slow start, I was a tad worried after 6, good rebuild and the wheels came off a bit for the Heat bowling (again). Heat's batting is their strength but they've left themselves a lot to do, Thunder 2/5 shots. Despite Simmons being in bad Nick I'd like him early, he's dangerous. Lynn the main man again. Can't complain so far though

Kallis injured so can't bowl, this might be a struggle :-(

We were looking dead & buried 2 overs ago, but a glimmer of hope has emerged, 2 quick wickets & a marked slowing of the run rate.

90/2 after 12, needing 12 an over. We could use seeing the back of Lynn.

The rain seems to be getting heavier, will DL be used if they come off? Think Thunder are ahead on DL.

[Mark_Porter]

For those who still have a account (very few I know), they've priced up Chris Lynn wrong for tomorrow's big bash game. Top batsman market in a T20 game is pretty high variance, but he's in good form (scores of 35, 1, 75* and 101 so far) and his main danger Lendl Simmons is in terrible form (29, 16, 0, 0). The rest aren't near the calibre of these two, and if Lynn carries on like he has in the lat 2 games they'd all need career bests to beat him. 9/4 is the correct price so 3's is good value.

http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-big-bash/brisbane-heat-v-sydney-thunder/top-brisbane-heat-batsman

Very nice, thank you again.

If Fred likes it and I am about then always happy to help get on with Stan.

[tikay]

For those who still have a account (very few I know), they've priced up Chris Lynn wrong for tomorrow's big bash game. Top batsman market in a T20 game is pretty high variance, but he's in good form (scores of 35, 1, 75* and 101 so far) and his main danger Lendl Simmons is in terrible form (29, 16, 0, 0). The rest aren't near the calibre of these two, and if Lynn carries on like he has in the lat 2 games they'd all need career bests to beat him. 9/4 is the correct price so 3's is good value.

http://www.oddschecker.com/cricket/t20-big-bash/brisbane-heat-v-sydney-thunder/top-brisbane-heat-batsman

Very nice, thank you again.

If Fred likes it and I am about then always happy to help get on with Stan.

Thanks Mark, appreciated.

Tighty & I were both AWOL yesterday, so we missed it.

What a clever spot it was by Nelly, too. Win or lose, that's proper value.

[TheDazzler]

Daily report


+£90 Van Barneveld e/w in the PDC Darts at 40-1. This is pending conformation from the Dazzler that the e/w terms on the spreadsheet are correctly recorded

I'd imagine it's 1/2 odds 1, 2 but the bet hasn't settled yet so there is so some hope

[tikay]

Shut'em down Vic went 5-2 Armstrong for the L1 Boot last night but quickly cut it to 6-4.

Guess someone asked for a fiver, got the spinning clock and were told the line had changed before leaving it. That tends to be the way of things with that farce of a firm these days.

If someone goes 2-1+ think we'll have to max it each-way. Twenty is normally good for a top-three spot in L1 and he's almost there. Be surprised if he doesn't get to 30 tbh. Conor the only one capable of going close to that number if he stays put.

BetEveryDay go 15/8  quarter top 3, (no good to Fred) & BMU 7/4 but one fifth top 3. 


http://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/league-1/top-goalscorer

[tikay]

Brisbane Hear are underdogs (6/4) hosting top of the table Sydney Thunder (4/7) this morning. Game starts in 20 mins. Heat have won the toss and will bowl first, so hopefully Thunder rack up 180+, should be another high-scoring game.

Good shout, 186/5.

Slow start, I was a tad worried after 6, good rebuild and the wheels came off a bit for the Heat bowling (again). Heat's batting is their strength but they've left themselves a lot to do, Thunder 2/5 shots. Despite Simmons being in bad Nick I'd like him early, he's dangerous. Lynn the main man again. Can't complain so far though

Kallis injured so can't bowl, this might be a struggle :-(

We were looking dead & buried 2 overs ago, but a glimmer of hope has emerged, 2 quick wickets & a marked slowing of the run rate.

90/2 after 12, needing 12 an over. We could use seeing the back of Lynn.

The rain seems to be getting heavier, will DL be used if they come off? Think Thunder are ahead on DL.

Terrible fielding by Thunder looks to have done us here.

[horseplayer]

Shut'em down Vic went 5-2 Armstrong for the L1 Boot last night but quickly cut it to 6-4.

Guess someone asked for a fiver, got the spinning clock and were told the line had changed before leaving it. That tends to be the way of things with that farce of a firm these days.

If someone goes 2-1+ think we'll have to max it each-way. Twenty is normally good for a top-three spot in L1 and he's almost there. Be surprised if he doesn't get to 30 tbh. Conor the only one capable of going close to that number if he stays put.

Newcastle not recalling him seems one of the stranger decisions in football. Whether he is good enough yet or ever will be who knows but surely he is an option even if from the bench?

[Ironside]

Aberdeen game today postponed after celtic winning in dying seconds with a Griffiths goal yesterday leaves us 3 points behind having played a game more and Rooney 1 goal behind

[DropTheHammer]

Daily report


+£90 Van Barneveld e/w in the PDC Darts at 40-1. This is pending conformation from the Dazzler that the e/w terms on the spreadsheet are correctly recorded

I'd imagine it's 1/2 odds 1, 2 but the bet hasn't settled yet so there is so some hope

In cases like this, where there is some confusion of terms, would it be prudent for the agent to post a screen shot of the settled bet? Would hate to see Fred get grimmed at some point in the future, seeing as how many lurkers there are...

[tikay]

Daily report


+£90 Van Barneveld e/w in the PDC Darts at 40-1. This is pending conformation from the Dazzler that the e/w terms on the spreadsheet are correctly recorded

I'd imagine it's 1/2 odds 1, 2 but the bet hasn't settled yet so there is so some hope

In cases like this, where there is some confusion of terms, would it be prudent for the agent to post a screen shot of the settled bet? Would hate to see Fred get grimmed at some point in the future, seeing as how many lurkers there are...

Not really, much of what we do here is based on trust, which is good, & if people are kind enough to put bets on for us, it would not be in the spirit of things to question them.

We have 100% trust in Dazzler.

This case apart, if someone does the dirty on us, so be it, it'll only happen the once, & it's not the end of the world. 

[TightEnd]

no need, i always double check the terms when doing the spreadsheet when the bets are placed and they are recorded at the time. which makes it surprising if i have made a mistake, but they happen.

unfortunately in this instance i can't access the original conversation on this thread about nine months and a couple of thousand posts ago without a lot of searching because the spreadsheet references to the bets on the thread seem to have been copied across incorrectly at the end of the year

[TightEnd]

a lose lose situation for week 17

Loser of today’s Eagles-Giants game will travel to London next season to play St. Louis Rams (none of the teams actually want to come to London, disruptions to schedules, timezones etc). Winner gets Seahawks in Seattle next season.

No one wants to play in Seattle, if they can help it, if they hope to win.

[KarmaDope]

no need, i always double check the terms when doing the spreadsheet when the bets are placed and they are recorded at the time. which makes it surprising if i have made a mistake, but they happen.

unfortunately in this instance i can't access the original conversation on this thread about nine months and a couple of thousand posts ago without a lot of searching because the spreadsheet references to the bets on the thread seem to have been copied across incorrectly at the end of the year

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=56581.msg2048286#msg2048286

Sadly no mention of the e/w terms officially, although arbboy's post above it indicates 1/2 1,2

[TightEnd]

no need, i always double check the terms when doing the spreadsheet when the bets are placed and they are recorded at the time. which makes it surprising if i have made a mistake, but they happen.

unfortunately in this instance i can't access the original conversation on this thread about nine months and a couple of thousand posts ago without a lot of searching because the spreadsheet references to the bets on the thread seem to have been copied across incorrectly at the end of the year

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=56581.msg2048286#msg2048286

Sadly no mention of the e/w terms officially, although arbboy's post above it indicates 1/2 1,2

thanks