david3103
|
|
« on: February 23, 2012, 10:15:43 AM » |
|
Simple question...
In a tournament with 1 re-entry allowed where 30 started and there were 17 re-entries how many would you expect to be paid?
and a follow up
in a rebuy tournament where 30 start and there are 100 rebuys, how may would you expect to be paid?
|
|
« Last Edit: February 23, 2012, 10:41:35 AM by david3103 »
|
Logged
|
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
|
|
|
Skippy
|
|
« Reply #1 on: February 23, 2012, 10:20:39 AM » |
|
Simple question...
In a tournament with 1 re-entry allowed where 30 started and there were 17 re-entries how many would you expect to be paid?
7 and a follow up
in a rebuy tournament where 30 start and there are 100 rebuys, how may would you expect to be paid?
5
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ironside
|
|
« Reply #2 on: February 23, 2012, 10:31:48 AM » |
|
Rule of thumb I use is top 10%
|
|
|
Logged
|
lend me a beer and I'll lend you my ear
|
|
|
Simon Galloway
|
|
« Reply #3 on: February 23, 2012, 10:48:33 AM » |
|
4 for both
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ironside
|
|
« Reply #4 on: February 23, 2012, 10:52:27 AM » |
|
4 for both
i think its 4-5 for first one and 3 for 2nd but can see a reason for paing 4 for 2nd
|
|
|
Logged
|
lend me a beer and I'll lend you my ear
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
|
« Reply #5 on: February 23, 2012, 12:49:47 PM » |
|
5
3
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
pleno1
|
|
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2012, 01:00:13 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
Poker_Monkey
|
|
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2012, 01:20:46 PM » |
|
Rule of thumb I use is top 10%
Yet I would say the same if not 1 for every 10 people
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ironside
|
|
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2012, 02:46:04 PM » |
|
i prefer 10 man sng to be winner takes all not saying dtd is right or i am right just the way i think
|
|
|
Logged
|
lend me a beer and I'll lend you my ear
|
|
|
david3103
|
|
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2012, 10:38:43 AM » |
|
10% or 10% +1 seems right for most situations
Really should be applied at all stakes too - I asked because I stumbled into a £10 1 re-entry game this week that got 30 runners plus 17 re-entries and paid 10 players. Apparently the 'regulars' like it that way...
They even made noises about a saver for the bubble...
|
|
|
Logged
|
It's more about the winning than the winnings
5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
|
|
|
luckyblind
|
|
« Reply #11 on: February 24, 2012, 01:43:05 PM » |
|
In a re-entry event each re-entry is effectively a new player so payouts should be based on the total of the initial entries plus the re-entries.
In a re-buy the payouts are based on only the number of actual players who enter, re-buys are not taken into consideration.
A clearer example would be:
Re-Entry tournament - 100 unique players plus 50 re-entries would pay 15 spots
Re-Buy tournament - 100 unique players plus 50 re-buys would pay 10 spots
If you re-enter in a re-entry tournament it would be very common for a min-cash to pay less than how much you have paid into the tournament as not many tournaments pay more than double the entry fee for a min cash.
In a re-buy tournament sometimes the min-cash can be 2 or 3 times the initial entry cost so a min-cash would represent a profit for most people who re-buy.
This came up at our Deepstack in Dublin which was a re-entry and anyone who min-cashed got less than 2 buy ins so if they re-entered they made a loss on the event. The thing to remember with a re-entry tournament is that a re-entry should be considered as a sperate tournament if you take advantage of the option.
|
|
|
Logged
|
D 4 Events - Deepstack & Short-Handed Poker Festivals across Europe. €500 main events with €300 & €200 Side Events.
Great Structures, Fantastic Venues, Affordable entry fees.
PM for more info.
|
|
|
MC
|
|
« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2012, 01:50:57 PM » |
|
I mean, 45-man SNGs pay 7 and 18-man SNGs pay 4.
So 7 and 5 would not be unreasonable.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rupert
|
|
« Reply #13 on: February 24, 2012, 02:31:09 PM » |
|
how may would you expect to be paid? cash
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|