Horsey
I asked earlier in the thread, page 1.
Why do you do high priced horses to win sometimes, when there is room and enough runners to do them each way.
I am not querying your strategy, just intrigued by your motive.
hi typhoon
i will answer this tonight in detail it is rather raw at present after backing the second and third win only in the melbourne cup this morning at 50-1 and 100-1 respectably
sorry for delay typhoon
just as i read this morning i had been awake all night having stayed up watching the melbourne cup meeting in aus from 11pm until 3.45am the race was at 4am and i fell asleep
ended up watching it at about 5.30? recorded freezing cold knackered and seeing two horses i had backed at 50-1 and 100-1 second and third and horses i had backed in small exactas and tricasts fill 2nd 3rd 4th and 5th
If that doesnt get you annoyed nothing will, its moments like that wehn i sometimes think what the hell am i doing? How many people are watching this race at this time feeling as bad or worse? On reflection more than i originally though at 6am this morning.
It is very rare i let things stay with me but until about 2pm today i couldnt shake of the potential massive win and it was making me wary of backing irish jugger again in truth i had less on myself than i would have last night the dangers of punting with a tired, mixed up head are massive.
Anyway your question why win only? Simple answer is it makes me more money than each way betting has ever done (based on last 5 years) Yes losing runs can be longer, but when i find a 20-1 winner i need it to count to the maximum it can.
Sorry this is a bit muddled i am shattered and heading for a sleep very soon
