Darts Betting and discussion

[Tal]

I'm not sure I can stand this much excitement

- Stephen Fry on Twitter

[The Camel]

Wade is insanely good at double 10.

[The Camel]

Ladbrokes tweet they would have offered 50,000-1 for consecutive 9darters.

Probably worth a quid

Complete bollocks. They would never give that price.

They are only 500/1 William and Kate call their sprog Elvis.

Wonder which is more likely.

[AndrewT]

Ladbrokes tweet they would have offered 50,000-1 for consecutive 9darters.

Probably worth a quid

Complete bollocks. They would never give that price.

They are only 500/1 William and Kate call their sprog Elvis.

Wonder which is more likely.

It takes a real bookie to offer odds on something that might have happened in the past.

[TightEnd]

aarrgghh

missed single 12 for two darts at tops

aarrggh

[Tal]

Ladbrokes tweet they would have offered 50,000-1 for consecutive 9darters.

Probably worth a quid

Complete bollocks. They would never give that price.

They are only 500/1 William and Kate call their sprog Elvis.

Wonder which is more likely.

...which is exactly why I posted that here. Made me laugh out loud when I read it. Could just imagine walking up to the counter in the local shop and saying "how much for consecutive nine darters?" Lady rings up head office and comes back with "50,000-1 sir"

Cos that would definitely happen..!

[Tal]

Wade is the Neptune Collonges of darts

[Karabiner]

Stumptastic

[millidonk]

180s and plenty of em please RVB.

Hope this is an absolute cracker of a game.

[horseplayer]

Ladbrokes tweet they would have offered 50,000-1 for consecutive 9darters.

Probably worth a quid

Complete bollocks. They would never give that price.

They are only 500/1 William and Kate call their sprog Elvis.

Wonder which is more likely.

classic laddies

utter pr bullshite

[Tal]

I'm funking for the big man with all my heart.

Come on, Mr T!

[Nico29]

I don't think I have enjoyed a game of Darts as much as last nights match.
Hopefully more of the same tonight.

Me 2 mate.

I've gone for under 7.5 180's for wade tonight at evens, can see mvg winning this in a cakewalk if wade doesn't improve his average-thus might not be enough sets for mr switcher to hit the spread. Am also thinking of backing the under 19.5 total 180's for the same reasoning. Obv mvg could prove a problem here as he'll hit them for fun when he gets going, but 20 will be a large number if it only goes 7/8 sets.

Thoughts?

Would you not be better going under 36.5 legs?

Well i've had a tiny interest on under 9 sets at 11/10 and think skybet's 11/8 under 35.5 legs is ok too.

Can't say the 5/6 under 36.5 legs excites me hugely though.

I think the main edge on the market is that some of those making the spreads don't realise how much Wade moves away from the red bit.

Even if the match goes 9/10 sets I think I prefer the under 180 market to the leg one.

Yes MVG could hit 14-15, but Wade could easily be as low as 4-5.

At an average of 4 legs per set if it goes 9/10 sets i'm probs just flipping-so would always want odds against.

Think there were 39 legs and there were 15 (14-1) 180's.

Phew that's won me back what I lost laying Liverpool earlier.

Can't really find a bet I like on the Barney match so may just enjoy it.

Wouldn't be adverse to punting on a decent tip tho if anyone has one?

Was tempted by 10 sets or more at 6/5 but bad feeling Taylor may go beserk and send out a statement to mvg.

So want barney to win!

[Rod]

Come on Barney

[TL900]

Come on Barney

[claypole]

Sorry.  Not impressed outside the two legs.  Tilted he didnt cover handicap as big bet - however will wade into Barney / Power in final