poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
June 28, 2025, 04:48:46 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2261942
Posts in
66597
Topics by
16986
Members
Latest Member:
GazzaT
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
This ok?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
Author
Topic: This ok? (Read 3384 times)
Eso Kral
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6910
Lucky in Life!!
This ok?
«
on:
November 10, 2013, 03:11:37 PM »
Not sure this needs a thread but Milli asked me to to see responses from the good folk of Blonde
DTD Tourney
15000
9000
5500
3500
We are button 900k villain is CambridgeAlex SB 5M, JGill BB 2.25M UTG Villain who folds has 2m
Blinds 30/60/10k and go 40/80 in 3mins
folds to us we shove Q9o into Alex and Jon cool?
Logged
Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
Rexas
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1963
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #1 on:
November 10, 2013, 03:12:47 PM »
So we have 15bbs? Seems totally fine mate
Logged
Quote from: verndog158 on June 29, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
Quote from: cambridgealex on November 04, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
I disrepectfully agree with Matt
millidonk
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9059
I'm supposed to wear a shell.. I don't - SLUG LIFE
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #2 on:
November 10, 2013, 03:42:39 PM »
Lolz, always blame me.. As I said its abs fine and the majority of online kidz don't give it a seconds thought. Some older generation will open fold which is probs too nitty 4 handed. But I would be interested to see if there are any live pros that ever r/f here. Raising looks so strong and obv they won't think we have a r/f in us with our stack so its pretty unexploitable.
Logged
WC2014 WOTN:
http://1drv.ms/1s7Bcqh
Get rich like a N!T:
http://sdrv.ms/RDOMxQ
http://twitter.com/BigDaveMilligan
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #3 on:
November 10, 2013, 03:47:15 PM »
Assuming you've played reasonably normally up to now (so this doesn't look completely alarming), shoving seems the most reasonable option to this live rec.
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
theprawnidentity
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3599
8 high happens!
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #4 on:
November 10, 2013, 04:16:56 PM »
As I said via PM. Close between shoving and folding (doing more shoving than folding depending on the other stack sizes / dynamics). Really dislike raise folding or raise calling.
Logged
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14799
#lovethegame
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #5 on:
November 10, 2013, 04:25:29 PM »
Quote from: tomsom87 on November 10, 2013, 04:16:56 PM
As I said via PM. Close between shoving and folding (doing more shoving than folding depending on the other stack sizes / dynamics). Really dislike raise folding or raise calling.
If he had a similar stack to anyone else I think there's a good argument for folding. But he had less than half of the next biggest stack, so think he really has to take this spot and jam.
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
theprawnidentity
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3599
8 high happens!
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #6 on:
November 10, 2013, 04:46:39 PM »
Indeed. I'm pretty sure I said that in the PM I sent Eso, but nice to know that you know what you're talking about and aren't just a haircut.
Logged
millidonk
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9059
I'm supposed to wear a shell.. I don't - SLUG LIFE
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #7 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:03:04 PM »
meh, r/c upper and r/f bottom end of your range is fine. I think I am just ahead of the trend as per.
In a few years time everyone will be doing it..
Alex, fwiw what would be your general impression had Eso opted to 2 to 3x it in this spot? Surely it would set alarm bells off as opposed to thinking "lol, this fish. i'm jamming"
Logged
WC2014 WOTN:
http://1drv.ms/1s7Bcqh
Get rich like a N!T:
http://sdrv.ms/RDOMxQ
http://twitter.com/BigDaveMilligan
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14799
#lovethegame
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #8 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:06:01 PM »
I also sent Eso a pm about this hand. And apparently lots of people also did but didn't want to post itt.
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14799
#lovethegame
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #9 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:11:20 PM »
Quote from: millidonk on November 10, 2013, 05:03:04 PM
Alex, fwiw what would be your general impression had Eso opted to 2 to 3x it in this spot? Surely it would set alarm bells off as opposed to thinking "lol, this fish. i'm jamming"
I'd think Eso still had a r/f range but I wouldn't jam T3s or anything...
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
theprawnidentity
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3599
8 high happens!
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #10 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:25:25 PM »
Alright I promised Eso I would do some sums ITT.
Nash suggests, based on the payouts that:
We should shove: 22+,A2s+,A8o+,K7s+,KTo+,Q8s+,QTo+,J8s+,JTo,T8s+,98s
Alex should iso: 55+,A8s+,A9o+
Gill should call: 55+,A8s+,ATo+,KJs+,KQo
As Alex suggested, the reason I like shoving here is for reasons that Nash fails to take into account; our position in the tournament with 4 left is about as bad as it can be. We have fewer than half as many chips as 3rd and the blinds are about to go up. In the next couple of hands the blinds will have gone up and through us thus potentially leaving us with 8 or 9bb's.
The reason I don't like raise calling is that Q9o isn't really a hand that we want to induce action with. If we go just based on the Nash calling ranges, you can see that we get so much that we want to fold just by shoving. The last thing I want is for either of them to eyeball me with with something like Kxs or some weak Ax hands when I would have otherwise got a fold.
I don't like raise folding for a couple of reasons. Firstly for it to be profitable we would have to be getting a good portion of folds from the blinds and given the reputation of all 3 bro's involved I don't see this getting through all that often. Secondly if were in a bad position in the tournament before this, then raise folding here will only make things worse. Assuming we're going to min raise and make it 160k, then fold, we will be left with 700k by the time the blinds go up and then through us. So in 4 hands time, were going to have paid another 80k + 40k + 40k in antes and be sitting on around 550k (6.8bb). And now were going to have to shove the button / co with very little fold equity into 3 players who can all comfortably call it off.
Logged
celtic
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19135
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #11 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:40:23 PM »
Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.
Logged
Keefy is back
But for how long?
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14799
#lovethegame
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #12 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:45:23 PM »
Quote from: celtic on November 10, 2013, 05:40:23 PM
Think in this situation, raise folding would be tragic v Alex.
Like his moustache
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
celtic
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 19135
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #13 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:49:12 PM »
Poor old wooden spoon. He does look a bit strange though, to be fair.
Logged
Keefy is back
But for how long?
millidonk
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9059
I'm supposed to wear a shell.. I don't - SLUG LIFE
Re: This ok?
«
Reply #14 on:
November 10, 2013, 05:50:34 PM »
Bit of a disjointed reply as saw Tomsom's reply half way through..
Nash also fails to take into account the pure value of us remaining in the tournament.
I think we would have been unfortunate that it was Alex in the BB. A lot of people either wont give him much of a r/f range at all and loads will be folding hands they shouldn't. IMO the vast majority of people are only really jamming when we are in pretty bad shape and would have called our jam anyway.
Jamming = 1. Fold out marginal hands 2. Fold out weak hands
R/F = 1. Fold out marginal hands 2. Fold out weak hands 3. Fold out some strong hands (I've seen people fold A10/66 and below) 4. Fold to a 3b and remain in the comp (which is impossible to put a price on)
Obv they could call a jam and we get a sexy double, but they could call our open and we get a sexy flop anyway.
Tom, you say you don't want to r/c as Q9 isn't a hand you want to induce with but my whole theory is based on the fact that if we raise they think we are inducing thus play badly against us.. Obv not everyone is a Goulder with a new haircut so they won't know we have a fold in us.
Obv I realise I am the only person who has spoken out that is on this side of the fence but If we all played exactly the same then not many people would make much money and I know firsthand that this play can be profitable all be it over a small sample. Just trying to provide options.
Anyway, Eso; Nash says it's a fold you fish. Get your ranges down!
Logged
WC2014 WOTN:
http://1drv.ms/1s7Bcqh
Get rich like a N!T:
http://sdrv.ms/RDOMxQ
http://twitter.com/BigDaveMilligan
Pages:
[
1
]
2
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...