|
muckthenuts
|
 |
« on: May 04, 2014, 02:35:49 PM » |
|
A rec in the CO open limps.
BB is either a rec or a nit.
Thoughts on:
1) What our raising range should look like from the SB
2) Completing range
Cheers
Say 100bb eff
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 04, 2014, 02:53:06 PM by muckthenuts »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rfgqqabc
|
|
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2014, 04:49:11 PM » |
|
1) big broadways/ hands that flop top pair enough
2) 83s or better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
|
|
|
|
Flash92
|
|
« Reply #2 on: May 04, 2014, 07:42:18 PM » |
|
1) big broadways/ hands that flop top pair enough
2) 83s or better.
Are we really completing 83s? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rexas
|
|
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2014, 03:23:17 AM » |
|
1) big broadways/ hands that flop top pair enough
2) 83s or better.
Are we really completing 83s? That's pretty tight according to Tom Dwan. Fwiw, I do similar stuff to picken here. Any two cards above a 9 are good for a raise, any thing suited and connected below that are good for completing. It seems im a little tighter than adam in my completing range though! Also probably raising 88+, flatting 77-. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
I disrepectfully agree with Matt  |
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
|
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2014, 10:22:29 AM » |
|
I'd raise every pair.
I'd complete just about everything with the exception of utter junk 72o 82o etc and I'd raise all suited connectors. K8, Q8, JT etc and anything broadway/broadway, prolly every Ax too although I miiigggghhhht consider just completing the worse ones for the old "never has an ace he didn't raise" trickery if you are lucky enough to flop one :-p
This is FR live poker yeh?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
cambridgealex
|
|
« Reply #5 on: May 05, 2014, 10:38:12 AM » |
|
I'd raise every pair.
I'd complete just about everything with the exception of utter junk 72o 82o etc and I'd raise all suited connectors. K8, Q8, JT etc and anything broadway/broadway, prolly every Ax too although I miiigggghhhht consider just completing the worse ones for the old "never has an ace he didn't raise" trickery if you are lucky enough to flop one :-p
This is FR live poker yeh?
This for me too. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
|
|
|
|
pleno1
|
|
« Reply #6 on: May 05, 2014, 03:33:55 PM » |
|
Adams range looks good.
I'd never raise bad ax here or small pairs, I can see how small pairs could potentially be good though. Build a pot I guess.
Would be far more inclined to raise 95s than a4o though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
|
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2014, 01:30:22 PM » |
|
is this FR live poker?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
theprawnidentity
|
|
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2014, 01:38:04 PM » |
|
1) big broadways/ hands that flop top pair enough
2) 83s or better.
Are we really completing 83s? Only were going for a triple range merge down the streets. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muckthenuts
|
|
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2014, 11:09:09 PM » |
|
is this FR live poker?
Didn't have a particular format in mind but would you change your ranges based on one or the other? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rfgqqabc
|
|
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2014, 11:12:06 PM » |
|
a lot depends on rake structure for live ranges too.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
|
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
|
« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2014, 12:53:57 AM » |
|
is this FR live poker?
Didn't have a particular format in mind but would you change your ranges based on one or the other? Yes massively, when I made posts ITT I was working on the assumption it was 8/9handed live NLHE. Changes massively if its online 6max, for me anyways. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muckthenuts
|
|
« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2014, 02:27:21 AM » |
|
a lot depends on rake structure for live ranges too.
is this FR live poker?
Didn't have a particular format in mind but would you change your ranges based on one or the other? Yes massively, when I made posts ITT I was working on the assumption it was 8/9handed live NLHE. Changes massively if its online 6max, for me anyways. Could you elaborate on this? It seemed like I could face this exact same spot across all formats so figured ranges would be the same, but i could be missing something. Be interested to know why there is a difference and how you'd adjust. |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 08, 2014, 02:28:52 AM by muckthenuts »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rfgqqabc
|
|
« Reply #13 on: May 08, 2014, 02:58:33 AM » |
|
Live people are deeper and have weaker ranges whereas online people tend to be a bit more clued up. Lower the stakes the more significant rake is so tighten up there, also some live games have a larger than usual cap meaning you should also tighten up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
|
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
|
« Reply #14 on: May 08, 2014, 10:25:09 AM » |
|
Well I defo wouldn't raise 33 in an online game, but defo would in a live game, generally speaking, like Adam said, in love games stacks tend to be deeper and often slightly weaker stnd of play so can expect postflop to be easier - speshly when you have the advantage of being able to see everyone. You might see the BB playing with his chips, or look like he's n waiting to go t the bathroom etc and change you're mind that way.
Online I think you should be a fair bit tighter with what you're opening - would still complete a fair old chunk though
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author