|
DungBeetle
|
 |
« Reply #540 on: October 06, 2015, 07:21:20 PM » |
|
Wasn't there talk of deleted social media posts from the victim? Is it possible they have managed to recover these?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #541 on: October 06, 2015, 07:31:57 PM » |
|
Wasn't there talk of deleted social media posts from the victim? Is it possible they have managed to recover these?
there was talk of facebook activity that couldn't be retrieved according to his website. So it could be yes |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 06, 2015, 07:44:00 PM by TightEnd »
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #542 on: October 06, 2015, 07:33:22 PM » |
|
witness statements not used will be it
at least two that are rock solid but were not used for whatever reason
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doobs
|
|
« Reply #543 on: October 06, 2015, 07:41:25 PM » |
|
Tighty
I assume there are legal reasons why the chedevans website and his lawyers haven't revealed the new evidence.
Probably best not to encourage speculation here in the circumstances?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #544 on: October 06, 2015, 07:43:42 PM » |
|
Tighty
I assume there are legal reasons why the chedevans website and his lawyers haven't revealed the new evidence.
Probably best not to encourage speculation here in the circumstances?
i wasn't attempting to, i read it on that site ages ago. but i will edit my post anyway |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
mulhuzz
|
|
« Reply #545 on: October 06, 2015, 07:58:18 PM » |
|
Being inadmissble and new are two different things.
It's unlikely to be those alleged statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #546 on: October 06, 2015, 08:11:23 PM » |
|
Will be amusing to watch that tool Jean Hatchet spin this if the conviction is quashed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #547 on: October 07, 2015, 02:59:59 AM » |
|
Will be amusing to watch that tool Jean Hatchet spin this if the conviction is quashed.
Not really. I don't think the argument has ever been about Evans personally. It is about whether a convicted rapist should be allowed to play professional football. If he's innocent I hope the court quash the conviction. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #548 on: October 07, 2015, 09:52:00 AM » |
|
Will be amusing to watch that tool Jean Hatchet spin this if the conviction is quashed.
Not really. I don't think the argument has ever been about Evans personally. It is about whether a convicted rapist should be allowed to play professional football. If he's innocent I hope the court quash the conviction. Don't think Ratchet shares your view. From yesterday's post doesn't sound like he/she will be considering new evidence any time soon: "#ChedEvansIsARapist. The judicial system knows it. You know it. I know it. My cats know it. Plants know it #rapist" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #549 on: April 21, 2016, 10:28:02 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 10:30:27 AM by horseplayer »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #550 on: April 21, 2016, 10:32:54 AM » |
|
I wonder if we'll be hearing any apologies from his hate mob on social media.
Edit: Although I see it is a retrial as opposed to quashed conviction. What's the rationale for that? Thought retrials could only happen if there was new evidence or changed circumstances come to light?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 21, 2016, 10:36:54 AM by DungBeetle »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #551 on: April 21, 2016, 10:33:57 AM » |
|
I wonder if we'll be hearing any apologies from his hate mob on social media.
Don't hold your breath dung |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
superwomble
|
|
« Reply #552 on: April 21, 2016, 10:45:07 AM » |
|
I wonder if we'll be hearing any apologies from his hate mob on social media.
Edit: Although I see it is a retrial as opposed to quashed conviction. What's the rationale for that? Thought retrials could only happen if there was new evidence or changed circumstances come to light?
But three appeal judges on Thursday quashed the conviction after fresh evidence emerged. Details of the grounds of appeal can not be reported for legal reasons |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
DungBeetle
|
|
« Reply #553 on: April 21, 2016, 10:46:03 AM » |
|
I wonder if we'll be hearing any apologies from his hate mob on social media.
Edit: Although I see it is a retrial as opposed to quashed conviction. What's the rationale for that? Thought retrials could only happen if there was new evidence or changed circumstances come to light?
But three appeal judges on Thursday quashed the conviction after fresh evidence emerged. Details of the grounds of appeal can not be reported for legal reasons Makes sense. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #554 on: April 21, 2016, 10:54:29 AM » |
|
Allegedly (only hearsay) they came up with the "lost" facebook messages that night from the "victim"
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Author