poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 21, 2025, 04:43:49 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262353
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Could Simon Trumper clarify?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Author
Topic: Could Simon Trumper clarify? (Read 5955 times)
stewart
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 376
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #15 on:
July 05, 2005, 06:05:57 PM »
Quote from: chrisbruce on July 05, 2005, 05:32:56 PM
I played 10 10 in the Gala 100 on sunday. I raised full pot to 300 (25/50 stage) and got 2 callers. Flop came 10 10 4... I check..aggresive player bets full pot 1k other player passes i think for 2 mins give stare and flat call.... turn card is a 7 ....I check...same player bets full pot 2k...I think for 2 mins and flat call big stare again ....river is a 2... I check AP is all in and I call for remaining 2k and show my hand.
1 or 2 players on the table were critical of my play but I know this player has missed the flop and I must appear very weak to get paid....to me thats poker. I did not over dwell but I did want to trap the player to gain as much of his chips as possible. For the record he held A 7 off suit.
after your flat call, he plays poorly, his own fault he lost,
you were very lucky to get paid there,
but you were not slow rolling,you were produceing a stratagey to get all the chips off your opp,
Logged
bluesq : archclub vc : ericuk DTD : pokerstu pokerstars : pokerstu1
RFC
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 835
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #16 on:
July 05, 2005, 07:12:28 PM »
Quote from: chrisbruce on July 05, 2005, 05:32:56 PM
I played 10 10 in the Gala 100 on sunday. I raised full pot to 300 (25/50 stage) and got 2 callers. Flop came 10 10 4... I check..aggresive player bets full pot 1k other player passes i think for 2 mins give stare and flat call.... turn card is a 7 ....I check...same player bets full pot 2k...I think for 2 mins and flat call big stare again ....river is a 2... I check AP is all in and I call for remaining 2k and show my hand.
1 or 2 players on the table were critical of my play but I know this player has missed the flop and I must appear very weak to get paid....to me thats poker. I did not over dwell but I did want to trap the player to gain as much of his chips as possible. For the record he held A 7 off suit.
spot on play i dont think you done anything wrong at all
if it was me i would of played the exact same
nice one for getting all his chips thats the hole point of the game to get everyones chips
and leave youself smileing
Logged
Blonde means a lot to me
When you cry, I cry
When you laugh, I laugh
When you jump out of a window , I laugh again
doubleup
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7128
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #17 on:
July 06, 2005, 12:39:25 AM »
Slow rolling is taking time to turn the cards over isn't it?
Yes, you are correct, it is
Logged
portfolio
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1119
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #18 on:
June 03, 2007, 02:08:34 AM »
Quote from: redsimon on July 05, 2005, 10:52:40 AM
I doubt if Simon took
10 minutes
to act. Now Carlo, that would be an instant decision
Logged
blonde17
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 195
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #19 on:
June 03, 2007, 10:23:09 AM »
Slow rolling definitely is...THE TIME TAKEN TO TURN OVER AND DECLARE YOUR HAND.
secondly...When two Ego`s collide in this case one large and one absolutely huge then...accidents are bound to happen!
Once again minor people wasting time majoring on minor subjects...how I love this clique sorry click...am I banned yet?
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #20 on:
June 03, 2007, 11:54:53 AM »
What a load of bollox. Simon obviously knew Greenstein would lay down his second nuts if he insta raised all in so he thought about it for a few minutes to induce the call...that's good poker in anyones book.
The slowrolling clearly isn't true as all witnesses say he didn't do it.
Greenstein is a poor loser and that's tghe end of that in my book.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #21 on:
June 03, 2007, 12:28:45 PM »
Quote from: boldie on June 03, 2007, 11:54:53 AM
What a load of bollox. Simon obviously knew Greenstein would lay down his second nuts if he insta raised all in so he thought about it for a few minutes to induce the call...that's good poker in anyones book.
The slowrolling clearly isn't true as all witnesses say he didn't do it.
Greenstein is a poor loser and that's tghe end of that in my book.
i cant remember the specifics so i should probably just shut up but from what i remember wasn't Barry pot committed
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #22 on:
June 03, 2007, 12:34:19 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on June 03, 2007, 12:28:45 PM
Quote from: boldie on June 03, 2007, 11:54:53 AM
What a load of bollox. Simon obviously knew Greenstein would lay down his second nuts if he insta raised all in so he thought about it for a few minutes to induce the call...that's good poker in anyones book.
The slowrolling clearly isn't true as all witnesses say he didn't do it.
Greenstein is a poor loser and that's tghe end of that in my book.
i cant remember the specifics so i should probably just shut up but from what i remember wasn't Barry pot committed
yeah he was BUT from his posts it seems he would have folded if Simon had moved all in instantly
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
bhoywonder
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3238
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #23 on:
June 03, 2007, 04:15:13 PM »
slowrolling is only deemed apt at the end of the hand when all betting is done,and hands have to be turned over....
and obviously if u have the nuts and delay to say for e.g. the 2nd nuts, then obviously this would be painful to the loser and not be in the spirit of the game
BUT during a hand you can take as much time as the rules allow..isnt that poker?
Logged
may your god go with you
Scottish Open Apat online gold medal winner 2008
bhoywonder
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3238
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #24 on:
June 03, 2007, 04:19:22 PM »
another ancient post
lol
wot the heck is going on
behave
and now to our live update section where ' chris moneymaker- an unknown amateur has made the FT of this years maint event'
«
Last Edit: June 03, 2007, 04:21:43 PM by bhoywonder
»
Logged
may your god go with you
Scottish Open Apat online gold medal winner 2008
portfolio
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1119
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #25 on:
June 03, 2007, 04:47:35 PM »
Quote from: bhoywonder on June 03, 2007, 04:15:13 PM
slowrolling is only deemed apt at the end of the hand when all betting is done,and hands have to be turned over....
and obviously if u have the nuts and delay to say for e.g. the 2nd nuts, then obviously this would be painful to the loser and not be in the spirit of the game
BUT during a hand you can take as much time as the rules allow..isnt that poker?
well said bhoy.
no doubt about whos integrity was questioned yet again.
live and learn tho !!!
Logged
redsimon
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8631
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #26 on:
June 03, 2007, 04:51:56 PM »
Quote from: portfolio on June 03, 2007, 04:47:35 PM
Quote from: bhoywonder on June 03, 2007, 04:15:13 PM
slowrolling is only deemed apt at the end of the hand when all betting is done,and hands have to be turned over....
and obviously if u have the nuts and delay to say for e.g. the 2nd nuts, then obviously this would be painful to the loser and not be in the spirit of the game
BUT during a hand you can take as much time as the rules allow..isnt that poker?
well said bhoy.
no doubt about whos integrity was questioned yet again.
live and learn tho !!!
Any reason why you bumped a two year old thread apart from malicous?
Logged
Success has many parents but failure is an orphan
http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
fearisthekey
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 844
PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #27 on:
June 03, 2007, 05:54:45 PM »
It's a subscription site on the initial link, any chance of a cut and paste? The other details are sketchy elsewhere.
That aside, the issue of getting really annoyed/vocal about people taking their time to decide in order to deceive would reaaaaaaaally get my goat if it wasn't so comical. Actually, I know people who behave the same way about a lot of speech play ('You call, it's all over', 'You should call', 'You are a donkey', I can't believe how you played that'), throwing chips about and the rattle out of the pram, screaming about ethics, professional player blah blah blah. What a total load of b)II()x. They sit down at a ********* table with the specific intention of taking your chips/money, and will happily deceive you to do so (what the hell is a bluff check raise/any kind of bet without the strongest hand, slow play etc etc) but the moment someone stretches it just slightly and they lose out to it they throw a tantrum. What the hell?
Poker is a GAME (in the technical sense of the word) and as such you can (should?) exploit all the angles you can within the rules. Otherwise, go get a desk job.
Too many prima donas in poker.
Logged
W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5
4ON0TW1K589MUP
CHEYNE STOKING
fearisthekey
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 844
PL: 51S1NT 4R51MS
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #28 on:
June 03, 2007, 06:00:08 PM »
ps I found myself in a similar situation when someone I hardly knew totally lost it with me in a tournament because (I was slightly steaming inside from a bad beat) I called his raise with not very good cards and flopped the nuts and took all his chips. I of course should be banned from tournament poker for ever, for calling a raise with a weak hand.
Logged
W85N 494 T85 4R51M 253OM5 1 N978TM1R5
4ON0TW1K589MUP
CHEYNE STOKING
portfolio
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1119
Re: Could Simon Trumper clarify?
«
Reply #29 on:
June 03, 2007, 06:57:53 PM »
Quote from: redsimon on June 03, 2007, 04:51:56 PM
Quote from: portfolio on June 03, 2007, 04:47:35 PM
Quote from: bhoywonder on June 03, 2007, 04:15:13 PM
slowrolling is only deemed apt at the end of the hand when all betting is done,and hands have to be turned over....
and obviously if u have the nuts and delay to say for e.g. the 2nd nuts, then obviously this would be painful to the loser and not be in the spirit of the game
BUT during a hand you can take as much time as the rules allow..isnt that poker?
well said bhoy.
no doubt about whos integrity was questioned yet again.
live and learn tho !!!
Any reason why you bumped a two year old thread apart from malicous?
yip
mainly boredom from 3000 runner mtts
not sure how u construe it as malicious , i certainly didnt put it in the public domain.
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...