blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 27, 2025, 10:24:25 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261840 Posts in 66597 Topics by 16985 Members
Latest Member: Going south
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Simon's reply on ESPN
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Simon's reply on ESPN  (Read 4766 times)
DTD-ACES
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1662



View Profile
« on: July 07, 2005, 08:00:59 AM »

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/poker/columns/story?columnist=rosenbloom_steve&id=2100457

Now it's Simon "Aces' Trumper's turn to tell his side of the story.
In a hand I detailed in a blog a couple days ago, Trumper busted Barry Greenstein in the $10,000 buy-in Pot Limit Omaha tournament, prompting Greenstein to claim Trumper took as much as 10 minutes to raise with the nuts and then slow-rolled the best hand, and ultimately said people who act like that should not be allowed in tournaments.
My using only Greenstein's side of the story was unfair. I should've had Trumper respond in the same piece, especially after it stirred up a ruckus on poker forums, websites and generated talk among players. So now, pretty much unplugged, here's what Simon says.
"People were writing to me on my site, 'How dare you do that to Greenstein?' 'If you I see you at the table, I'm going to kick your teeth in.'
"Let me tell you what happened. But forget the hand for a minute. This is what happened since the hand. Bruno Fituossi, a tournament director who watched the hand, said to me (Tuesday), 'How come he never said anything when he got up?' He never said a word. I turned the hand over - and I'll explain what happened there - he got up from the table, he looked down at the hand, never showed his hand - so don't get too confident that he had what he said he had; no one ever saw his hand - and off he walked.
"The next thing I know is the next day, and (tournament director) Johnny Grooms comes up to me. He said, 'Are you Mr. Trumper?' I said yeah. He said, 'I have a complaint that you took 10 minutes to reraise with the nuts yesterday.' I said, 'I'll tell you what, Johnny, I don't even need to answer it. Sitting around this table are the players who were here yesterday evening; there's Huck Seed, there's Barny Boatman, there's Tommy Grimes and there's Peter Costa. Ask them. I won't say a word.'
"Now think about it. If I was an American who wants to try to protect myself, I'd say (to those players at the table), 'It couldn't have been more than three minutes; you agree, don't you?' Not me. I said, 'I'm not saying anything.' Huck Seed said, 'Two, three minutes at the most.' Barny Boatman: 'Couldn't have been that long.' Tommy Grimes, 'Well, I didn't think it was longer than two minutes.' Peter Costa: 'Yeah, I would say 2-21/2 tops.' There's four people who could verify it at the table. That was that.
"Twenty minutes later, in comes Barry. He comes straight over to the table, points at me in front of everyone and says, 'Players like you who take 10 minutes to re-raise with the nuts should be banned from poker.' Those were his exact words. And he walked off. Huck Seed and I were like, 'What the hell was that?' The players at the table were gobsmacked. So, off he goes. As far as I was concerned, that was finished. I went up and saw Johnny. I said, 'Listen, you've already verified from the table that that wasn't what happened. He's now come and said this, you need to say something to this guy.' He said, 'OK, I will.' He came up to me 15-20 minutes later and said, 'I saw him at the break and look, you can't do that, Barry. Blah, blah, blah.' As far as I was concerned, that was it. Sour grapes. No problem.
"Then I get home last night about 11:30, 12 o'clock, and I read on the Hendon Mob site somebody said, 'Has anyone see this (ESPN Poker Club) article?' So, I read your article, and I said, 'What the hell is that?' People are on the site saying, 'He's this, he's that.' Whatever. Then someone said, 'Have a look at this forum,' and if you go to the 2+2 forum, there's a whole massive thread on it. And Barry has replied, and in one of the replies, he admitted that he came in to try to upset me. He said 'I tried to rile him.'
"None of this bothered me until I read the whole article. Someone on the Hendon Mob (site) said, 'If you read the whole thing, it sounds to me like Simon did nothing wrong. If you forget the 10-minutes thing that could be wrong, I can't believe he slow-rolled him and it sounds like Barry played like an idiot and is very unhappy with himself, so he's taking it out on Simon.'
"So I read your whole article. Let me put you right on a few things. This is exactly what happened.
"Now, let's put things in perspective. I'm chip leader in the tournament. I've been moved to the worst possible table; they're all good players. I'm not going to be able to dominate with my stack. I've got the second-chip leader on my left, Peter Costa. I've got third- or fourth-chip leader, Barry Greenstein. I'd say he had about $48,000 when the average was probably about $25,000. I had a lot more, probably $70,000. We're in the last level.
"Now, I do know what I'm doing in tournament poker. I am No. 1 in Europe in Omaha. So, I know what I'm doing. So, in the last level, I've got absolutely no need to get involved. I'm just passing, passing, passing. Barry is pretty much in control of the table. He's not interested in just cashing. Barry's making lots of small raises preflop and picking up pots. He's positionally raising and stealing a lot of pots.
"So, this pot comes up. I've limped in for the first time in about half an hour with A-A-8-8-10, double suited -- 8-10 of diamonds, A-8 of spades. Barry raises on the button. I think Tommy Grimes called and I called. The flop comes rag-J-Q, two spades. So, as far as I'm concerned, I'm drawing to a 9 for a straight - obviously the wrong end of the straight, but a straight - a king for the straight or the nut flush. That's my hand.
"Tommy checks. I check. Barry leads out. I think he bet about $4,000. Tommy passes. I'm calling, and the reason I'm calling - two reasons: One is the outs I've got, but the second reason is I'm playing a guy with a lot of chips, therefore if I hit my hand, I might get paid and further increase my chip lead.
"So I call. The turn comes ace of clubs. I check. Now he bets $12,000. Although I'm No. 1 in Omaha, I'm actually better known for No Limit. I've got 29 major No Limit finals. The reason I'm good at No Limit is I have a gut feeling for putting people on hands. Now he says, according to your article, he has K-K-J-10, which means that on the turn he had the nut straight. Maybe he's telling the truth, but that's not what I put him on. I put him on something like A-K-K-something or K-K-spade.
"I'll tell you why: If he had the nuts on the turn with the king flush draw, why is he betting the pot? He wants to keep me in. He's sitting there with the nuts with the backup of the second-nut flush draw. If I had flopped two pair or whatever, why would he want to bet me out of the pot? So, when he bet the $12,000, I thought about it, and in the end, I put him on kings with a king flush draw, and I would've made exactly the same play if I had the blockers with his king flush draw. I could represent the straight and I've got the king flush for backup. That's the hand I put him on.
"If I'm right, then I'm winning with aces. If I'm also right, the 9 is going to be good for me; the king, if I'm wrong, would give me the same straight; and if a spade comes, I'm certain he has the king of spades and I could win a big pot. So, on implied odds, I call.
"The river is a deuce of spades. I check. I did not hesitate. I just checked. He sits there for 30 seconds to a minute. He starts counting his chips down. I'm not looking at him. I'm looking at the pot. He finally bets $17,500. The pot was about $36,000. He had about $11,000-$12,000 left. I'm sitting there thinking to myself, 'I can't believe he bet this.' I'm certain he's got the king flush and I'm certain what's happened here is he did have the straight on the turn and he did make the king flush, he thinks that I also had the straight on the turn and I called because I'm scared of the flush, and on the end I've checked into him and now he can bet into me and I might be stupid enough to call with the straight, hoping he's on a bluff with the bare king. This is why I think he bet. Why would you bet if you think I've called on the turn with the nut flush draw and the worst card comes? Why would you bet when at that stage of the tournament, you've got average chips for the following day? Why would you risk another $17,500 of your chips?
"So, how do I get a world-class player to give me the other $11,000? First, I've checked into him. Secondly, I have to make him think that I think that he's got it and I have only got the straight. So, I separated $17,500 from my stack. I've still got like $60,000. I'm making him think I'm going to call. At this point, he's thinking, 'Great, he's going to call; I'm going to get paid off here with the king flush.' I then count the rest of my chips as if to say, 'If I'm wrong, if he has the flush, at least I've still got $50,000.' This was my process. And then I did what you don't know about in your article: I raised double.
"Now, any professional player should know that when someone re-raises you double, you are in big trouble, especially if you've only got $11,000 or $12,000 left. He now starts thinking and thinking and thinking. His first comment to me was, 'Were you thinking that long with the nuts?' It was about two or three minutes I was thinking. It might've seemed like 10 minutes to him because he was the one sitting there with the second nuts.
"If it was possible to trap a world-class player, would you not check into the guy and if he's dumb enough to bet into you, would you immediately say, 'I raise''? He falls straight into the trap and the guy's got an enormous ego. He feels like an idiot. Don't forget, he hasn't just given me all his chips when he could've checked the hand and come out the next day with an average chip count. How many people would've been thrilled not to have put their last $30,000 in in the last level and done it in front of his peers?
"Now, he thinks and thinks and thinks, and he finally says, 'Nuts is good.' Those were his words. 'Nuts is good.' I said yeah, and turned over my cards. So, obviously he's saying, "I have the king flush.' He pushed his last $12,000 in. Before I've actually re-raised, because we can all make mistakes, I've double-checked my hand. At the bottom I have the 10-8 of diamonds, at the top I have the A-8 of spades, but I couldn't remember which order they were in. I knew they were the top two cards - at which time, by the way, we've got people five-deep around the table - I'm not showboating or anything. I turn the top two cards over. It just so happens, the 8 was the first card. It goes 8-A. I didn't go 'nah-nah-nah-nah' or slow-rolled it or any of that rubbish. I went 8-A. And he just got up and shrugged and didn't say a word.
"So, this morning. Bruno Fituossi says to me, 'If he had a problem, surely he would've said, "I can't believe you did that. How dare you do that?''' He never said a word. Bruno said, 'You didn't slow-roll him.'
"Now, in your article, he says, 'I have the nuts on the turn. I wanted the deuce of hearts to come, but the deuce of spades comes. When he checked to me, I was worried that he might have the nut flush, and really I should've checked it down because I had the king flush and it was a big pot anyway. But I decided to bet $17,500 of my remaining chips, and if he raises me, I know he's got the nuts.'
"Yeah, that's intelligent. Like somebody said, I trapped him beautifully, and obviously, he doesn't like it. Then he said in your article, 'I didn't know who this guy was' and someone said, 'Didn't you know he was some naughty word?' Subsequently, he said, 'People like him shouldn't be allowed to play' and 'Did you know he's got a website?'
"What the hell is he talking about my website for? He's done me a huge favor. The hits have gone through the roof. I normally get 100 a day; I'm getting 500 a day. Unfortunately, I'm also getting people threatening to kick my head in. So, now it's been blown out of all proportion. Two things have been picked up: the slow-roll and the 10 minutes. Neither happened. As a result, I'm getting all these threats. It's disgusting.''
"One other thing: He said in your article, 'When I left the table, all the other players looked at Trumper as if he was a jerk.' You know what actually happened? Tommy Grimes and Barny Boatman said, 'Fantastic play.' They tapped the table and said, 'Great play.' They didn't call me a jerk at all. They thought he was an idiot. Barney couldn't believe the guy called me.
"He said in your article that the reason he called was to prove to the rest of the table that I would think so long with the nut flush. Wow. That's an intelligent reason for calling.
Trumper's version of the events was backed up by Seed and Grooms. As for the time that Trumper took to raise at the end, Seed said it was 2-5 minutes, as did all the other players whom Trumper asked the tournament director to survey.
"It was verified by players that it wasn't 10 minutes,'' Grooms said.
Overall, Seed said, "I didn't think he did anything wrong. It might've been kind of a slow-roll, but I've done it by accident before going through my cards.''
And here's proof enough: On the 2+2 forum, Greenstein himself posted this Tuesday afternoon: "I talked to Huck Seed (who was at the table) and he said it was between two and five minutes.''
And this: "I didn't think Simon should have been barred, but I didn't like what he did and I decided to rile him up.''
Later Tuesday, Trumper approached Greenstein at the table, and Greenstein said they had to talk, Trumper said. Trumper said Greenstein reconsidered how long he believed Trumper waited to re-raise -- five minutes now -- and they eventually agreed to end any kind of festering ill will and carry on playing poker.

Logged

Maroon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 311


Utrinque Paratus


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 07, 2005, 09:05:55 AM »

It's great to get the other side of the story officially in the media.  The danger of celebrity status that some sports people are given when they reach the top is they are often taken on their word by the media against less well known people.  I know Barry does great things for charity and seems like a great bloke but the media have to understand that like us mere mortals even the best sports people can get emotional in the heat of battle and have a 'personal' view of the events that in the cold light of day may not be an accurate reflection.  No one likes to be out played and sometimes it hurts.  We are all only human and prone to mistakes and, unfortunately, bad reactions.

I hope now the people that bad mouthed/threatened Simon have the good grace to apologize and learn not to jump into an unconfirmed dispute.

Well done Simon.  Sounds like a world class play too!  Great result.

Logged

If it ain't broke keep fixing it 'til it is.
The Truth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1205


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 07, 2005, 09:56:33 AM »

After reading much of what has been written about this affair and the characters involved I feel the need to add just one point.

In much of what has been written Mr Greenstein's supporters highlight his very generous donations to charity. Mr Greenstein's charitable donations are of course very commendable and will make a world of difference to those recipients of his aid. What does disturb me somewhat is the picture that has been painted that we have on one hand Mr Greenstein, a generous supporter of charities and on the other hand Simon Trumper who isn't a generous supporter of charity. I feel the need to put the record straight as far as Simon is concerned. Although not well documented and widely publicised Simon has been a fantastic supporter of Poker4Charity since its inception and is a great ambassador for Game for Life. Indeed Simon was the very first Gold Member of Poker4Charity (his cheque arrived before I had paid my own!). In addition to the money he has given Simon regularly gives up his time to P4C / Game for Life absolutely free of charge. On every occassion he has spoken to a whole host of people about our work and aims in an enthusiastic and courteous manner. We are proud to have Simon associated with us.

This post is not an attack on Mr Greenstein, far from it, I applaud his work. It is just to point out to those who wish to turn this into a battle between 'a good guy' and 'a bad guy' that things are usually not as black and white as people would like them.

I hope this matter can be sorted out to the satisfaction of all those involved and I hope both the central players in this affair continue their committments to charitable organisations and improving the profile of poker both in the US and here in the UK.
Logged
danmonkey
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 131



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 07, 2005, 01:14:44 PM »

I saw Simon at the P4C North East Charity Shield last year when he could have been playing a juicy event in Brighton (Joe Beevers was there too amongst others).  He spent the entire day there and donated prizes to the auction.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of the hand in question (and I don't believe Simon has done anything that justifies Barry's reaction) Davey's point is an excellent one, Simon Trumper is a good ambassador for the game and his sponsors and appears to me to be a genuinely nice guy. 
Logged
Robert HM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15926



View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: July 07, 2005, 01:48:37 PM »

It's annoying that ACES has to explain himself like this due to the misreporting of a hack. We have the nearest we can expect to an apology (i.e "My using only Greenstein's side of the story was unfair.") from one of his breed. I am sure those who used intemperate words on various blogs and forums won't be fast to retract their comments and will, maybe, go and find another target to lambast, often anonymously.

Got to say though, that hand analysis abiove makes Rob Yong almost reticent  Smiley. I am learning so much during this WSOP.

Logged

http://www.rooms-direct.co.uk - If you need some furniture, give Shogun a shout, he can do you some discount for Blonde Poker forum members..
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 07, 2005, 02:01:01 PM »

I would, as the person who brought up the subject here, to thank Simon for posting his account here.

Whatever the rights and wrongs of it all, certainly things have got well out of hand to the extent that Simon has health issues as a result (see his blog)
Whilst I very much doubt it is so, I hope all those who posted anonymously elsewhere in the most derogatory and offensive terms have this on thier conscience today. Completely unforgiveable.
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20204


Enchantment? Enchantment!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 07, 2005, 04:49:10 PM »

What Barry G was unforgivable, much worse than any (wrongly) held grievances he had against Simon, if he had a problem with what Simon did (which he didn't at the time) then he should have spoken to him at a later time instead of running off like a spoilt brat and squealing to the teacher.

I can't believe so many people on Barry's side are getting worked up by this. If I had to take TWO MINUTES out of 8 to 10 hours of solid playing to squeeze every last chip from another player, then I'd do it damn straight. In poker, you use every advantage you can get including time, and if someone calls for the clock, well that's them using their advantage.

Oh, and Paul Phillips can go and f**k himself for all I care, with his "you don't wait for two minutes with the nuts before raising."

Yes, you can Paul, I don't see it written in the rules or in Super System.
« Last Edit: July 07, 2005, 04:51:58 PM by NoflopsHomer » Logged

Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41885



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 07, 2005, 07:21:56 PM »

last year i saw Prince  Charles take 2 minutes to rereraise James Vogts preflop with AA James didnt like it but accepted it as it coxed him into thinking his QQ might be good
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 08, 2005, 01:49:24 AM »

i said from the start that this needed verification and folks shouldn't make judgements blah blah blah
One thing that has constantly come up here though by various fellow pro's is simons liking for showboating when he has the nuts, most of the folks mentioned in the differing reports have said they did NOT agree with the way he played this hand regardless of whether it was within the rules or not.
This should at least make simon think about the way he does things in future.
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
DTD-ACES
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1662



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 08, 2005, 02:07:09 AM »

The only Pro who mentioned showboating was Barny , i would have played the hand exactly the same whether there were 20 people watching or not , this was a $10,000 tournament not a 20 at Brighton , when you are trying to outplay a world class player you have to adapt to their level of thought .

Barny and i had a seperate grievance ( since resolved ) and he just wanted to highlight that i can be a character when i play , that is partly the reason i have a sponsorship deal i assume .

Thanks to all those that have been supportive , now let's focus on the big one !

ACES
Logged

Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: July 08, 2005, 02:09:48 AM »

good luck Simon!

Always remeber that some of us will be rooting for you no matter what people say!
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Robert HM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15926



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: July 08, 2005, 02:11:14 AM »

Well said James
How you getting on in "The Biggie"?
Logged

http://www.rooms-direct.co.uk - If you need some furniture, give Shogun a shout, he can do you some discount for Blonde Poker forum members..
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: July 08, 2005, 03:07:09 AM »

It was not meant as a criticism Simon ( if you check my posts i was never against you ), i was merely saying that a few pro's saw something untoward(Paul Phillips was another) in the way you played it.
I am certainly not qualified to criticise in any way, nor am i inclined to.
The very best of luck in the biggie, i will be rooting for you.
Ian
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
Bongo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8824



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: July 08, 2005, 11:16:32 AM »

From what I read on Paul Phillips commented that if someone took 10 minutes to raise with the nuts then it would be bad. He made no mention of the actual hand at all.
Logged

Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
snoopy1239
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33034



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: July 08, 2005, 11:42:55 AM »

last year i saw Prince Charles take 2 minutes to rereraise James Vogts preflop with AA James didnt like it but accepted it as it coxed him into thinking his QQ might be good

I see absolutely nothing wrong in this. Surely the fella is allowed to think about whether he wants to call for a trap or simply go over the top.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.324 seconds with 19 queries.