blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 29, 2024, 04:47:26 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272622 Posts in 66756 Topics by 16721 Members
Latest Member: Zula
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Another AA problem....
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Another AA problem....  (Read 1781 times)
RioRodent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1009



View Profile
« on: April 25, 2006, 08:37:36 PM »

25c/50c NL 6 handed on Prima... I guess a better player could lay this AA down on the flop??

** Game ID 770248728 starting - 2006-04-25 19:52:03
** Edinburgh [Hold 'em] (0.25|0.50 No Limit - Cash Game) Real Money

- gun4660 sitting in seat 1 with $18.95
- nygges sitting in seat 2 with $95.56 [Dealer]
- Durga78 sitting in seat 3 with $33.88
- Franny8 sitting in seat 4 with $53.60
- RioRodent sitting in seat 5 with $49.25
- Gliset sitting in seat 6 with $46.25

Durga78 posted the small blind - $0.25
Franny8 posted the big blind - $0.50
** Dealing card to RioRodent: 
RioRodent called utg - $0.50
Gliset folded
gun4660 folded
nygges called - $0.50
Durga78 called - $0.50
Franny8 bet - $3.00
RioRodent called - $3.00
nygges called - $3.00
Durga78 folded

** Dealing the flop: 
Franny8 bet - $3.00
RioRodent raised - $9.00
nygges raised - $15.00
Franny8 went all-in - $48.10


The pot is now $84.60... I've $37.25 left... and still a player to act behind me.

Logged

£10 to £10k Challenge

If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19284



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2006, 08:39:54 PM »

I'd lump it in every time man.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2006, 08:48:22 PM »

me too, there is always the runner runner nut flush.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19284



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2006, 08:50:54 PM »

Would have to be runner runner runner?Huh?Huh?
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9500



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2006, 09:04:52 PM »

Call and you should have raise PF.
Logged
RioRodent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1009



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2006, 09:05:14 PM »

"lump it in" was exactly what I did... even though I 'knew' I was against trips!!!!

RioRodent went all-in - $37.25
nygges called - $51.10
nygges shows:  
Franny8 shows:  

** Dealing the turn:  

** Dealing the river:  
nygges wins $145.25 from the main pot
nygges wins $9.75 from side pot 1

End of game 770248728
Logged

£10 to £10k Challenge

If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 20207


Enchantment? Enchantment!


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2006, 09:08:41 PM »

No re-raise preflop?
Logged

RioRodent
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1009



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2006, 09:11:36 PM »

Call and you should have raise PF.

Yes... I've been thinking about that.

I limped UTG hoping for someone to raise behind me... when they did, a big re-raise might have got the 77 out of it and maybe got it all in against the QQ.
Logged

£10 to £10k Challenge

If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space!
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9500



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2006, 09:19:58 PM »

when they did, a big re-raise might have got the 77 out of it and maybe got it all in against the QQ.

Exactly. 90% of the time QQ pushes pf, especially at 25/50c.

At least you know next time thumbs up
Logged
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2006, 09:44:41 PM »

why do you want 77 pushed out preflop when you hold AA?
Logged
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2006, 09:46:38 PM »

Would have to be runner runner runner?Huh?Huh?

Indeed. My poker brain has not engaged at all today. Luckily I havent played so it hasnt cost me anything!
Logged
Bongo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8827



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2006, 09:52:17 PM »

why do you want 77 pushed out preflop when you hold AA?

I'd much rather play a big pot preflop against QQ than a 3 way pot on the flop v QQ and 77 (unless I knew exactly what they were holding so I could get out if I'm behind).
Logged

Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1505



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2006, 10:10:54 PM »

I agree in a way Bongo poker would be a sinch if we knew our opponents holdings. I think I would be prepared to take 3 way action with AA in a cash game tho . I know your chance of winning goes down but the potential reward goes up.
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9500



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2006, 10:23:40 PM »

why do you want 77 pushed out preflop when you hold AA?

Who wants 77 out? I want more money in the pot and hopefully the initial raiser to raise my re-raise.
« Last Edit: April 25, 2006, 10:25:35 PM by Nemesis » Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22972


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2006, 10:24:23 PM »

Well i don't want an unamed pair in there for $3 if i am going to stackoff, i dont mind 77 calling aslong as its for $10+
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.157 seconds with 20 queries.