77
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: November 12, 2023, 02:24:43 PM
|
Burrage collapse after 4-0 up in first set good win for Boulter Draper beat 2 good players this week but just missing out on the win and a place in the top 50
Davis cup next thinking it will be Cam and Draper in singles Murray and Skupski in the doubles
that is if Cam plays
Think it is obviously Draper. You'd take Cam over Murray, but both out of form. Murray seems to be throwing away a few games from winning positions, so can't have him in the singles right now. Do you ever consider Broady? Good for team spirit and in his best form ever? Think you have to play Burrage today. Got to be better playing a weak opponent today than someone much better when she next plays a BJK tie. She has put the odd bad game in, but played well again next time in the past. They announced Burrage earlier, but it is now going to be Dart. Think Lumsden is there, so might be Lumsden Watson in the doubles? Not entirely sure, but Dart should be good enough here. Don't know what this means for Burrage though, future games are going to be harder.
|
|
|
78
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: November 12, 2023, 09:57:18 AM
|
Burrage collapse after 4-0 up in first set good win for Boulter Draper beat 2 good players this week but just missing out on the win and a place in the top 50
Davis cup next thinking it will be Cam and Draper in singles Murray and Skupski in the doubles
that is if Cam plays
Think it is obviously Draper. You'd take Cam over Murray, but both out of form. Murray seems to be throwing away a few games from winning positions, so can't have him in the singles right now. Do you ever consider Broady? Good for team spirit and in his best form ever? Think you have to play Burrage today. Got to be better playing a weak opponent today than someone much better when she next plays a BJK tie. She has put the odd bad game in, but played well again next time in the past.
|
|
|
85
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: COVID19
|
on: November 01, 2023, 01:30:19 PM
|
Was just listening to a podcast with John Campbell, he's mentioned in this thread quite a lot and was always interesting to listen to during the pandemic.
I find the whole Covid enquiry approach is pretty much guaranteed to ensure we learn almost nothing from the experience that will ensure we would handle something like this better in the future.
It seems way too focused on the Government's clown like behaviours, uselessness and corruption than the more serious issue of whether the nature of the generally supported response (lockdowns, speedy introduction of new tech vaccines, closing schools etc) were actually better than doing nothing and serve as any kind of model for a future response.
Think it is a bit of performance bollocks too. I wouldn't waste 30 seconds watching a John Campbell video these days. He makes fortunes telling the gullible what they want to hear, even when he knows the opposite is true (there are plenty of receipts). I have a lot of sympathy for those that end up sceptical of vaccines, but don't extend my sympathy to those who deliberately made them that way. It is long beyond doubt that the vaccines were very successful and saved millions of lives; and that lockdowns, whether forced or voluntary, did the same. You can argue about if and for how long schools needed to close, what we could do better for care homes etc, booster targeting etc. I am not sure what we can usefully learn though, the next pandemic could be entirely different. It could be less, or more severe, than the last one; or it may be more lethal for children. So you can't say that we never need lockdowns again, or that we should never shut schools again etc. I am not sure if a bazillion pound enquiry is needed for that, especially when most of the participants seem mostly interested in protecting their own reputations. Am all for profanity aimed at ministers though... More of that pls.
|
|
|
86
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: October 30, 2023, 10:53:48 AM
|
That's a final for Edmunds, now think it a futures 25, so 16 points atleast, 25 if he can get the win
it's a start
Klugman took a player just outside the top 100 to 3 sets should be an interesting watch over the next 6 seasons or so
think i seen her in the girls doubles event at Wimbledon or US open not sure which but name rings a bell
Mimi Xu beat Klugman last week, so that is another young UK prospect. I don't think Klugman has ever beat her, but Xu is 18 months older. Both now in the top 1,000. Presumably both playing over half term and not missing too much school. FWIW we officially have 5 in the top 100 for men today as Broady has crept into the last spot.
|
|
|
87
|
Community Forums / The Lounge / Re: Post a pic of where you are now
|
on: October 21, 2023, 10:16:05 AM
|
Bangkok. I wouldn't recommend it to anyone.
It's Marmite City. You will love it, or you will hate it.
Why do people use the Marmite term then explain it?
Some people love to have it explained to them, others will hate it.
|
|
|
88
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: October 19, 2023, 08:26:50 PM
|
Not getting any easier for Norrie, 17th in live rankings means unseeded and playing Fritz (1 seed) in the first round in Tokoyo. Draper playing Alec De-M 3am tomorrow morning.
Both gone FWIW Edmund has won 3 matches at Edgbaston. Of more interest for the future, Hannah Klugman has won 2 in an ITF W100 at Shrewsbury. Just beaten Miyazaki. She was the youngest to ever qualify for one and is still only 14. She will be the only 14 year old in the top 1000 on the WTA rankings; if she wins the next match, she'll be ranked higher than any 15 year olds.
|
|
|
89
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: October 14, 2023, 09:32:07 AM
|
Didn't realise they had fallen so far, do they get the number 1 ranking back if they win today.
Just had a thought, Tara Moore has disappeared from the news. Couldn't see any recent news stories, she has deleted her twitter and is now showing as a former tennis player on Wikipedia. Wikipedia has no recent news and there is no reference for the "former".
I couldn't even find the length of her ban. Did she just retire after getting suspended? Or do we just assume it is what happened until hearing otherwise. Quite a difference to Simona Halep who seems to still crop up frequently.
|
|
|
90
|
Community Forums / Betting Tips and Sport Discussion / Re: The long overdue (no staking) tennis betting and discussion thread
|
on: October 13, 2023, 01:07:15 PM
|
Saw Draper made the final. Had a brief hope that we had 5 in the top 100, but Broady has been booted already.
Broady is up 7 places and back into top 100 without playing this week. According to https://live-tennis.eu/en/atp-live-rankingthats the 5 men in top 100 I don't think they were ever officially in at the same time. The temporary rankings delete the rankings from the same week in the previous year, but people can still overtake by the end of the week.. Broady is still listed outside the top 100, and don't think he has been officially inside this month. We giving up on Edmund yet? Sad he can't even win in the first round of small ITF tournaments currently though one time was defeated by the heat.
|
|
|
|
|
| |