Nem
|
 |
« Reply #135 on: September 16, 2006, 05:22:50 PM » |
|
What I want to know is why would the US government want to knock down the WTC?
i already told you as a '' pearl harbour'' scale event to use as a catalyst or pretext for their warmongering Why would America want to go to war?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nem
|
 |
« Reply #136 on: September 16, 2006, 05:25:08 PM » |
|
Click to see full-size image. |
 That's what brought down the WTC. If the government really wanted to knock it down then there were easier ways. They could have just detondated a bomb inside. As Al Qaeda did years ago. no steel building has ever collapsed from fire flushy , its a scientific impossibility for fire to melt steel.You are giving loads of explanations with loads of intelligent words, but come on FFS! Its a scientific impossibility to melt steel with fire? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
WellChief
|
 |
« Reply #137 on: September 16, 2006, 05:40:28 PM » |
|
BT - Why don't you listen to the explanation of constructional engineers who describe how the towers collapsed, I watched a programme on it before, the impact of the plane hitting the tower and where they hit had a big effect on it. The second plane hit lower down and the tower collapsed first I remember this being explained as well. I get the feeling you haven't been looking at both sides of the arguement, only the conspiracy theory sides.
And whether or not a plane hit the pentagon is not a matter of opinion, its a matter of fact.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SupaMonkey
|
 |
« Reply #138 on: September 16, 2006, 05:52:27 PM » |
|
BT, for the thrid time.
The fire didn't melt the steel because there was not a pool of molten steel at the bottom of either of the towers. However, by heating steel you transform it into a malleable material (think blacksmiths putting steel into coal fires). Once it is softer it will no longer be able to support the building because the redundant members will be highly stressed to cope with the fact that some members will now be missing (i.e the plane knocked them out).
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
totalise
|
 |
« Reply #139 on: September 16, 2006, 06:36:40 PM » |
|
BT, for the thrid time.
The fire didn't melt the steel because there was not a pool of molten steel at the bottom of either of the towers. However, by heating steel you transform it into a malleable material (think blacksmiths putting steel into coal fires). Once it is softer it will no longer be able to support the building because the redundant members will be highly stressed to cope with the fact that some members will now be missing (i.e the plane knocked them out).
thats what they want you to believe.......
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
SupaMonkey
|
 |
« Reply #140 on: September 16, 2006, 06:44:36 PM » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
 |
« Reply #141 on: September 16, 2006, 07:16:08 PM » |
|
So why would they go through this elaborate Aircraft ploy etc, when they could just plant bombs?!?! It makes no sense.
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
totalise
|
 |
« Reply #142 on: September 16, 2006, 07:24:16 PM » |
|
So why would they go through this elaborate Aircraft ploy etc, when they could just plant bombs?!?! It makes no sense.
its like playing a set hard, you do it because its not what people expect. Same with usin the aircrafts.. non believers like you say stuff like "why would they use planes".. its a perfect ruse.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Royal Flush
|
 |
« Reply #143 on: September 16, 2006, 07:26:04 PM » |
|
So why would they go through this elaborate Aircraft ploy etc, when they could just plant bombs?!?! It makes no sense.
its like playing a set hard, you do it because its not what people expect. Same with usin the aircrafts.. non believers like you say stuff like "why would they use planes".. its a perfect ruse. Love it. You realise Big T is going to post that as fact on some 9-11 forum!
|
|
|
Logged
|
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
|
|
|
Wardonkey
|
 |
« Reply #144 on: September 16, 2006, 07:26:31 PM » |
|
More of an all-in bluff I would have said....
|
|
|
Logged
|
EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
|
|
|
BigTomatoes
|
 |
« Reply #145 on: September 18, 2006, 05:30:56 PM » |
|
for anyone who seen my last post on here . . . thats what 8 pints of Stella do to me  couldnt be bothered replying , still cant , so 
|
|
|
Logged
|
is it cold in his shadow ?
|
|
|
cambo
|
 |
« Reply #146 on: November 10, 2006, 12:59:45 AM » |
|
after watching this i thought i would dig up this old thread as i remembered reading abit of it before, after 9/11 i like most people just took it at face value and excepted what what i was told. im not sure i by into this really but it certainly made me think. www.ufos-aliens.co.uk . dont ask me how i came across this site  ive no idea ,( im not into conspiricys and ufos in general) i can see everyone going  already with that site name but if you can be bothered watch the 3 episodes and let me know what u think the first one is the first vidoe on the main page...
|
|
|
Logged
|
bring back Fergus! and the bandit! free the glasgow 2!
|
|
|
BigTomatoes
|
 |
« Reply #147 on: November 10, 2006, 01:14:55 AM » |
|
yeah Loose Change is a well known film in the 911 truth movement
you should also check out Terrorstorm by Alex Jones and America: from freedom to fascism by Aaron Russo , a hollywood director btw not a conspiracy theorist.
both on google video im sure
scary stuff
|
|
« Last Edit: November 10, 2006, 01:16:40 AM by BigTomatoes »
|
Logged
|
is it cold in his shadow ?
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
 |
« Reply #148 on: November 10, 2006, 01:40:57 AM » |
|
Perhaps once eastenders has finished, we should ask poppets fortune teller for her thoughts on the 9/11 stuff ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Newmanseye
|
 |
« Reply #149 on: November 10, 2006, 01:44:40 AM » |
|
I bet she knew it was gonna happen!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer."
Hans Gruber - Die Hard
|
|
|
|