blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 13, 2025, 09:29:55 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262870 Posts in 66616 Topics by 16993 Members
Latest Member: jobinkhosla
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  British Road Tax
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: British Road Tax  (Read 6637 times)
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7141


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2006, 05:55:23 PM »


we could take every car of the road in britain and it wouldnt make a blind bit of difference..the reason why is the chinese explosion in car owners...its exponential in its increase and is seen as the must have...



A bit of an exaggeration - however how can we put set an example for the rest of the world if we do nothing.



also is car tax not meant to be for the upkeep of the roads so i presume this will be dispensed with...again doubt it

also it seems that the main way to ease congestion is to tax the car and petrol...that would seem to lead to ensuring that wealth determines who drives as opposed to need ...so i dont fancy the methodology


Unfortunately high price/low demand is the way the world works.  Also the effect of global warming on the poorest regions of the world should not be forgotten


my solution would be to have state owned or non  profit public transport...and not run by quangos either...if that could be made safe , efficient and economically viable i`d go for it...
instead we have 8 different bus companies running the same routes in competition which is neither economic, enviromentally firendly or safe.
we have train track fragmented throughout regions,owned by one company and travelled on by another company who pay royally for it and therefore whos main interest is in charging for it.
no one is interested in the enviroment just a business model of competition and market forces for transport..whch doesnt work


Absolutely couldn't agree more, there is no point whatsover in attempting to reduce car use without providing safe affordable and reliable alternatives.

The world is taking too much each month from its bankroll - it's has to reduce this to a sustainable amount.  Whether this particular initiative is going to be effective or not has yet to be seen, but rejecting it out of hand isn't the way forward.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2006, 07:20:53 PM »

Signed.

People who drive cars with larger engines that have poorer fuel consumption are already paying more tax to use the roads!  Tax on petrol.  It's higher here than almost anywhere else in the world.  Is it reducing congestion - no.

We need better roads, wider motorways, proper investment.  Yes, do the same thing for public transport - but it's not a feasible alternative - and won't be for many years.

There are other things that can be done, this isn't one of the better ideas.  Congestion charging and tolls on certain roads at certain times might be a solution - if people could find an alternative way to travel.

Anyway, I'm off out - in my thirtsy beast that only does 25mpg (on a good day).

Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2006, 08:33:40 PM »

To all of you who voted labour:


Thankyou....
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2006, 08:36:51 PM »

A young male 18-30 now pays out 50p of every pound he earns in taxes.


Mugs, tell them poker is not taxed.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: December 21, 2006, 08:44:58 PM »

To all of you who voted labour:


Thankyou....

you're welcome

don't particularly agree with this policy but if the Tories got in I'd be up shit creek and so would most familys with 1.5 incomes and a couple of kids.

Some of us believe in a moderate socialist ideal. higher taxes and more state involvement. better standard of life for those nearer the bottom of the ladder. state funded schools, hospitals, pension etc.

something has to be done to break our reliance on the car. I would still drive to work despite there being a decent train line to the town I work in. however, I would be more likely to walk into town on a saturday rather than drive. I'd be more likely to car pool for thinks like my martial arts sessions where a dozen cars turn up when only three need do so. most people make some unnecessary car journeys that a harsh measure like this would stop. I do think this is a mis-step because it hits the people at the bottom of the ladder pretty hard. that said, if there is a sliding scale for payment depending on the car you drive I might be more in favour. big saloons and 4x4s paying more
« Last Edit: December 21, 2006, 08:54:00 PM by AdamM » Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: December 21, 2006, 08:57:39 PM »

To all of you who voted labour:


Thankyou....

you're welcome

don't particularly agree with this policy but if the Tories got in I'd be up shit creek and so would most familys with 1.5 incomes and a couple of kids.

Some of us believe in a moderate socialist ideal. higher taxes and more state involvement. better standard of life for those nearer the bottom of the ladder. state funded schools, hospitals, pension etc.

something has to be done to break our reliance on the car. I would still drive to work despite there being a decent train line to the town I work in. however, I would be more likely to walk into town on a saturday rather than drive. I'd be more likely to car pool for thinks like my martial arts sessions where a dozen cars turn up when only three need do so. most people make some unnecessary car journeys that a harsh measure like this would stop. I do think this is a mis-step because it hits the people at the bottom of the ladder pretty hard. that said, if there is a sliding scale for payment depending on the car you drive I might be more in favour. big saloons and 4x4s paying more

There is a sliding scale - petrol duty.

Any increase on the cost of driving wil not penalise the more wealthy with large cars.  It will penalise the poorer.  The nurse who has to drive to work every day in their 1.0 Corsa.  Only fair I guess that they contribute more - so that the cost for them to own and drive a car is closer to those in the big gas guzzlers 
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: December 21, 2006, 09:02:10 PM »

but if that's not enough and this measure is brought in, will that also be on a sliding scale?
Logged
Gryff
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 459


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: December 21, 2006, 09:28:35 PM »

To all of you who voted labour:


Thankyou....

you're welcome

don't particularly agree with this policy but if the Tories got in I'd be up shit creek and so would most familys with 1.5 incomes and a couple of kids.

Some of us believe in a moderate socialist ideal. higher taxes and more state involvement. better standard of life for those nearer the bottom of the ladder. state funded schools, hospitals, pension etc.


I hate pretty much all our main current political parties but bladdy hall meight.

Its labour who are privatising our industires, they've sold off the NHS, they've sold off everything they can think of onto lucrative PFI contracts that are awarded for 20-30 years, make fat profit great, dont make profit well the goverment has to fork out its a no-risk high reward option and leads to crap service.

As for the people lower down being better off are you taking the piss?

Under gordon brown your pension contributions are taxed, and your pensions are being cut in real terms as they dont rise in line with inflation.
Anyone relying on a state pension is in for a rude awakening.

state funded schools? lol, "city academies" that offer worse results than what was there before but get labour donours nice titles.

Education for all? Great, part of the labour manifesto was no university fees, and what happens?

Billions wasted on expensive computer systems that fail to deliver, the firm cant pay so the government has to.
Child support lol, payments months late - payments lost, proposed writing off all child support debts etc.

NHS IT system? utter shambles.

Defence - defence procurement is ridiculous, the uk army still uses uncoded radio while we wait for a replacement system.
The standard army rifle is the SA80, a shambles of a rifle.
We went into Iraq without body armour because the goverment didnt want it to look like we were going into Iraq.
Our transport planes are without insulating foam to protect from RPG fire - but its been standard on US transport planes since vietnam.

NHS? Huge cutbacks because government funding is inadequate for rising healthcare costs resulting in cuts for nurses, creating a huge surplus in nurses allowing health trusts to pay as little as possible for nursing.

The reason this country is so shit is because people wont educate themselves on the political realities.

The health service isnt "free" its rationed because there isnt the supply to cope with demand.
The defence service is overstretched and underfunded
Our transport network is a joke - the train system cant cope so with one hand they raise fares and on the other they say cars are bad so use the rail network.



The UK and the US are not democracies, they are political systems run by and for the elite - remember we invented "democracy" - it was great, it was a way for fat landowners and barons to control the country while promising the people the earth, how little have things changed.

And then you go and blame the tories.

Fair enough they may have been cocks in the past but Margeret Thatcher solved a lot of the UKs economic problems, and like any big economic fix it had huge repercussions and families suffered. But how much would we be suffering now if we were subsidising tens of thousands of miners, and had militant unions ?
We'd be in a huge national debt in a situation where an individual would be declared bankrupt if they were in the same situation ( ie the position france is in now - fucked ).


Feel free to disagree with anything I've said but blindly voting for labour or the conservatives or the lib dems is insanity.

The political system is so awful in this country and in most countries, yet we are comfortable in our cesspit of mediocrity.

We banned the slave trade yet we endorse goverments that create economic slavery in third world countries - NIMBYism at its best.

Bah.

You read papers and watch news created by corporations with vested interests, our politicians are lobbied by those with the money to do so.
We have an unelected upper house and judicial overview.

We have no written constitution so we cant change the system very easily.

Oh PS: Sorry for derailing this thread but there you go.







Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: December 21, 2006, 09:39:44 PM »

remember we invented "democracy"

I thought the Greek's did, i may be wrong though.


I do think this is a mis-step because it hits the people at the bottom of the ladder pretty hard.

Where do you think most car users are?
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 34178



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: December 21, 2006, 09:42:37 PM »

Flushy for Cod



no, it aint a typo Smiley
Logged

Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done

http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/


kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: December 21, 2006, 09:47:55 PM »

firstly, calm down and play nice.

you can't blame labour for privatisation, that's a tory legacy

when I left school Thatcher was still in charge and there was 10 million unemployed. the health service was in ruins and the grammer schools were leaps and bounds ahead of the under funded state schools.

health service 'cut backs' may appear to be going on but there's huge wastage in the NHS and that's the focus. The current administration spends Billions more than the tories did.

University. 20 years ago far less working class kids went to uni. I don't know the figures but I wouldn't be suprised if more than double the 18 year olds went to uni compared to 20 years ago. that needs paying for and to ask graduates to contribute from their higher expected earnings isn't distasteful to everyone.

"Margeret Thatcher solved a lot of the UKs economic problems" I would say caused rather than solved. The best thing to come out of thatcherism is new labour. you're dead right about the militant unions and their grip over old labour. that needed changing.

try not to get too heated about this here though. blondites are a very mixed political bag. best not to get on our soap boxes too much
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 21, 2006, 09:49:38 PM »



Where do you think most car users are?

the middle of the ladder.

two car families, school runs to walking distance schools. shopping trips in the big saloons or 4x4s.
Logged
M3boy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5785



View Profile WWW
« Reply #27 on: December 21, 2006, 09:49:58 PM »

The "proposed" scheme just wouldnt work - pure and simple.

Why? Simple economics.

Increase in delivery/transport costs will only drive up the price of goods/services - which inturn will increase the demand for higher wages and also increase borrowings. Just look at the hike in fuel prices over the last 10 years or so, alot higher than inflation - has this reduced the amount of traffic? Of course not.

Net effect? SAME amount of traffic.

Also a point on Global warming, there are many arguments (both scientific and other) as to why the "Global Warming" theory is flawed.

Tracking devices CAN be fitted to your car now AT YOUR OWN CHOICE. Which imo is how it should be.

Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 21, 2006, 09:54:22 PM »


Also a point on Global warming, there are many arguments (both scientific and other) as to why the "Global Warming" theory is flawed.




you're right but that's a tricky argument to win. good luck
Logged
M3boy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5785



View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: December 21, 2006, 10:01:00 PM »

As tricky an argument to win as your "Big Saloons, 4x4 users should pay more" - WHY?!?

If person A earns 5x more than person B , why should person A pay MORE for something than person B - would you expect person A to pay more for a pint of Lager in a pub than person B? Of course not, so why would you in this?
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 20 queries.