blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 16, 2025, 08:41:28 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262924 Posts in 66616 Topics by 16993 Members
Latest Member: jobinkhosla
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Another set of Jacks river decision
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Another set of Jacks river decision  (Read 3894 times)
Highstack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 515



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2007, 12:44:07 PM »

I totally agree WC (although I'm not a cash player), but I prefer my reraises to be when I am in position. Here he is acting first post flop and if he doesn't set, then 50% of the time, the flop will at the very least bring a scare card.
Logged

Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2007, 12:45:49 PM »

I think the idea is to take it down pre flop.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Highstack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 515



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2007, 12:54:31 PM »

Horses for courses then I guess. I don't reraise OoP with JJ in cash ... but like I say, cash isn't really my thing. When I do venture into the cash games, I prefer to play very mechanically (As I play low levels and they are not even watching that I might have passed almost every hand). This means that I like to flop sets and get stacked from opponents who can't lay down overpairs. Its dull, but its profitible ... then again I find cash dull regardless ... which is why I tend to leave it for those that can play it properly Smiley
Logged

WellChief
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 571



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 05, 2007, 12:56:26 PM »

Yeh that's what I meant when I said I'd be reraising large.  I would probably reraise to between $60 and $70 here (basically reraising pot), which should either take it down or at least get it heads up.  Playing them as small pairs for set value isn't terrible from the blinds, the hand is disguised, but you must play the streets well.  If the flop comes 2 2 3 and you bet out and get raised you're in a tough spot.
Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: January 05, 2007, 12:57:03 PM »

likewise stack, but i think its bad not to re-raise these spots.
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: January 05, 2007, 12:57:39 PM »

Got to bet out on the flop
Logged
WellChief
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 571



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: January 05, 2007, 12:58:29 PM »

Horses for courses then I guess. I don't reraise OoP with JJ in cash ... but like I say, cash isn't really my thing. When I do venture into the cash games, I prefer to play very mechanically (As I play low levels and they are not even watching that I might have passed almost every hand). This means that I like to flop sets and get stacked from opponents who can't lay down overpairs. Its dull, but its profitible ... then again I find cash dull regardless ... which is why I tend to leave it for those that can play it properly Smiley

Stack have you tried playing the 6-max tables?  Short-handed cash isn't dull, certainly not as dull as STT's! 
Logged
Highstack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 515



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: January 05, 2007, 01:03:13 PM »

Horses for courses then I guess. I don't reraise OoP with JJ in cash ... but like I say, cash isn't really my thing. When I do venture into the cash games, I prefer to play very mechanically (As I play low levels and they are not even watching that I might have passed almost every hand). This means that I like to flop sets and get stacked from opponents who can't lay down overpairs. Its dull, but its profitible ... then again I find cash dull regardless ... which is why I tend to leave it for those that can play it properly Smiley

Stack have you tried playing the 6-max tables?  Short-handed cash isn't dull, certainly not as dull as STT's! 

Yes mate - usually when I come in drunk at the weekends and I play like a complete lunatic. This is why I try to avoid them. Cheesy
Logged

Smart Money
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: January 05, 2007, 04:28:38 PM »

Nothing wrong with betting or checking the flop. How you play it will often be decided by your take on your opponent(s.)

With no other info on your opponent, it's quite an easy call on the river. His most likely holding is AQ. If you're beat, you're beat.
Logged

Smart Money
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



View Profile WWW
« Reply #24 on: January 05, 2007, 04:32:57 PM »

Re-rasing pre-flop (even with position) with Jacks on a full-handed cash table is generally a big mistake.
Logged

doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7141


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: January 05, 2007, 05:31:59 PM »

I called because I thought 2pr or even AK from an overplayer were very possible.  He had KsTs.  The small stack had AQ - if only he'd reraised my pissy turn bet.....
Logged
Smart Money
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: January 05, 2007, 07:13:30 PM »

Unlucky there doubleup. Sad
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.143 seconds with 19 queries.