blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 08:50:07 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  that old smoking thing again PLEASE VOTE. It's be nice to get Circa 500 votes
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: POKER ROOMS SHOULD BE NON SMOKING
AGREE
DISAGREE
INDIFFIERENT

Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 ... 11 Go Down Print
Author Topic: that old smoking thing again PLEASE VOTE. It's be nice to get Circa 500 votes  (Read 21514 times)
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #60 on: October 26, 2005, 06:27:35 PM »

it's actually very difficult to ignite petrol with a cigarette, ir even a live flame. If you did the who die hard, drop the match thing it'd just go out. even dropping a Zippo is likely to have no effect.
Logged
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #61 on: October 26, 2005, 06:30:01 PM »

it's actually very difficult to ignite petrol with a cigarette, ir even a live flame. If you did the who die hard, drop the match thing it'd just go out. even dropping a Zippo is likely to have no effect.

petrol fumes and vapour however are highly flamable
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #62 on: October 26, 2005, 06:31:39 PM »

quite true, but a dropped fag end wont be enough. jeez we're rubbish at staying on topic
Logged
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #63 on: October 26, 2005, 06:36:10 PM »

but a fag being smoked while pumping petrol could be enough to spark a fire IF vapour was in the air which knowing petrol is HIGHLY proberable but my understanding is that american GAS is less likely

these is due to slight differences in the 2 products
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22809


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #64 on: October 26, 2005, 06:42:05 PM »

This is like two dogs fighting over one bone 
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
M POWER
Guest
« Reply #65 on: October 26, 2005, 06:42:39 PM »

Adam

Douse yourself in Petrol and let Ironside throw matches at you.

We could bet on it too say £5 a match

Regards

M  
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #66 on: October 26, 2005, 06:47:35 PM »

that sounds like an inflamatory remark.

so, smoking incard rooms...
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #67 on: October 26, 2005, 06:53:03 PM »

Adam

Douse yourself in Petrol and let Ironside throw matches at you.

We could bet on it too say £5 a match

Regards

M  

LMAO!!!!
Logged
Harry Demetriou
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 140


View Profile
« Reply #68 on: October 26, 2005, 06:57:13 PM »

Harry, for someone who's posts are normally so insightful all of your posts so far seem to be missing the point. I happen to disagree that there's insufficient support for people who are trying to give up smoking. If you cannont afford the patches you can go and see your GP and he/she will happily write you a perscription. there's helplines and literature, websites and billboards. At the end of the day it's down to individual will power.

All of this has NO baring on whether or not smoking should be allowed in the card room. Sadly it looks like the new legislation will have the 'private members club' saver in place so there's no immediate legal support for those of us in favour of a ban. the reason I've put this poll up again is that I want to write a leeter to Notts Galas GM and I want to include the results.

I'm soory, Im a bit hazy on my amphetemine / barbituate / opiate catagorising. I still say it's an urban myth that pedigree pet food resort to drugging the food to make animals prefer it. maybe it's just better stuff  

I do not believe that the answer is a blanket ban and the amounts spent supporting those who want to give up is a pittance compared to what the governement is making from the sale of cigarettes. If they were to spend 10% of the duty received from fags it would be infintiely more than is currently spent on prevention and  support but like most things governments tend to squander our taxes on what they seem to deem appropriate but now I'm really off track.

Smokers need to be considered and have an outlet for being able to smoke as it is an involuntary act on their parts due to their addiction. Having enforced bans is not the answer as it denies the smoker any say and does not acknowledge his rights and makes it very difficult for them to cope.

I am not advocating that non smokers should be subjected to passive smoking (I have always personally hated smokey environments) but in the same way that a screaming baby or child cries for food you do not turn around and deny that child the food and say you'll have to wait an hour or so until dinner time before being fed.

I think that in this day and age smokers and non smokers can both be accomodated eg California card rooms where there are smoking rooms for smokers to walk into and smoke.

Personally nicotine patches and gum did not work for me and the answer is not to give people drug patches (imo) but to get them off the nicotine completely with 24 hour support if necessary.

Market forces should ultimately dictate whether smoking is or is not allowed in a place of leisure and if a card room somewhere became non smoking and had greater business than a smoking rival then thats the one that would survive.

Having said that there is probably a fair degree of correlation between gambling and smoking and probably drinking alcohol and coffee for that matter too as all involve some kind of addiction and often multiple dependancies and addictions are present in individuals.

I just find it suprising that both smokers and non smokers cannot be catered for in this day and age.

The Grosvenor Victoria has smoking and non smoking gaming tables but then is large enough to be able to do this. Which sections are busier I do not know but I do know that some will consider abusing the gaming rules and refuse to play a hand if drawn next to the bar section where smoking is allowed for some of their poker tournaments.

If it transpires that most casinos or card rooms make more money from smokers than non smokers then why should they be denied the opportunity to make money? Likewise if they make more from non smokers then why not let them make the place no smoking.

However if I were a card room or casino operator I would want to have as many customers as possible regardless of whether they smoked or not and as such have two seperate areas to accomodate all of them. Over the course of time I would then decide which group would get the greater space allocation and if one area were unprofitable or uneconomic then I would certainly drop that section and say tough luck to the unlucky group. This may sound cynical but then I would be in the business of making money and maximising profits and I certainly would not entertain any governemnt telling me what to do.

I sympathise with those of you who go to The Gala? Nottingham Casino but like most things if they do not accomodate your needs then you should vote with your feet. If enough of you do so (and raisng a petition is a good way of getting attention) then they will have to listen as it will hurt them in their pockets.
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #69 on: October 26, 2005, 07:09:51 PM »

to say that smoking is involutary is going too far and, the more I come to think of it, the more I object to money being spent supporting smokers giving up at all. The withdrawal effects from stopping smoking cause nothing more than a temporary longing. It's not the same as recovering from Heroin/cocaine/alcohol. Society is gradually coming round to the concept that smokers have no rights other that that of being able to smoke in their own home.

I would vote with my feet if there were anywhere near enough to considewr an alternative and, given that he's indicated playing areas are likely to be smoke free, when Rob Yongs place eventually gets off the ground I will certainly be doing just that.
Logged
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #70 on: October 26, 2005, 07:13:06 PM »

to say that smoking is involutary is going too far and, the more I come to think of it, the more I object to money being spent supporting smokers giving up at all. The withdrawal effects from stopping smoking cause nothing more than a temporary longing. It's not the same as recovering from Heroin/cocaine/alcohol. Society is gradually coming round to the concept that smokers have no rights other that that of being able to smoke in their own home.


being an ex acholic and an ex smoker i can say that it was much easier to come of the demon drink,
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #71 on: October 26, 2005, 07:19:19 PM »

my point about the physiolocical effects stands.
Logged
jammer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 485



View Profile
« Reply #72 on: October 26, 2005, 07:29:24 PM »

The thing is with poker rooms is that in a town, one casino will tend to have a monopoly (there is market failure), which mean the players in its locality have no choice if they want to play live. Hence making them non-smoking if that is the majority opinion makes absolute sense (while still providing facilities for smoking customers).

Now I think this is completely different to pubs. I have just heard a woman ranting on the radio about smoking in public places such as pubs. These obsessive activists do my nut. The thing is in each town there are hundreds of pubs all competing, and as such there is room for market forces to compete between non-smoking pubs, full-smoking pubs, and those with only designated areas and let the invisible hand make the choice. If people are concerned enough, smoking pubs will die out (no pun intended) due to lack of trade. I never go to weatherspoons because they have no background music, but some people love that, and that's great. Choice!

But for pete's sake, let PEOPLE decide.  Enforcing non-smoking in all pubs, in a highly competetive market with low barriers to entry, is lunacy (and probably a violation of civil liberties). grrrr. Angry

An angry ex-smoker, Jammer
Logged
Harry Demetriou
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 140


View Profile
« Reply #73 on: October 26, 2005, 08:30:31 PM »

to say that smoking is involutary is going too far and, the more I come to think of it, the more I object to money being spent supporting smokers giving up at all. The withdrawal effects from stopping smoking cause nothing more than a temporary longing. It's not the same as recovering from Heroin/cocaine/alcohol. Society is gradually coming round to the concept that smokers have no rights other that that of being able to smoke in their own home.

I would vote with my feet if there were anywhere near enough to considewr an alternative and, given that he's indicated playing areas are likely to be smoke free, when Rob Yongs place eventually gets off the ground I will certainly be doing just that.

It is very sad imho to read these thoughts.

The reason smoking is so addictive and difficult to give up (if memory serves me correctly) is due to the nicotine staying in the blood system for 28 days. Heroin metabolises quickly in less than 48 hrs so is in fact easier to give up. It is very much an involuntary act for an addict and it is very much NOT a "Temporary longing" which makes a smoking addiction very different to heroin, cocaine and alcohol.

As for objecting to money being spent on reforming smokers and helping them give up I would assert that the NHS would cease to function completely without the contribution made by tax on cigarettes and society as a whole would benefit in more ways than just financially from a massive investment in helping people give up.

Smokers are people and as such have rights or at least an entitlement to have their views heard. Admittedly you could argue contibutory negligence but to abandon them completely in the way you suggest is ludicrous and does not represent a way forward whilst forcing views and laws on people is more akin to a dictatorship and fascism.

I'm not sure what the stats are for smokers and non smokers but doubt very much that the split is outside the 60/40 range and as such neither group can be termed an insignificant minority. In any event, however, I thought that democracy was all about freedom of speech and preserving and protecting the rights of minorities from the majority and as such would never wish to deny any group an opportunity to argue their case..
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #74 on: October 26, 2005, 08:39:02 PM »

I struggled for years to give up smoking and I realise how difficult it is. I've also had close friends who've battled with Class A drugaddiction(and in most cases sadly lost) the two just don't compare.
you don't need medical assistance, or hypnotherapy, or helplines to give up smoking. you just need a determination not to put another one in your mouth. if you want it enough, you'll crack it. the same cannot be said about a drug like Heroin.

please Harry, lets not fall out about this. I have no wish to sadden you . I'm trying (and failing) to keep this thread on topic.

poker rooms, smoking
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 ... 11 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.228 seconds with 22 queries.