poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 27, 2025, 08:49:41 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262525
Posts in
66609
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Poker articale in the Economist
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: Poker articale in the Economist (Read 2403 times)
weirwizard
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 38
Poker articale in the Economist
«
on:
December 28, 2007, 06:19:22 PM »
Poker is getting younger, cleverer, duller and much, much richer
http://www.economist.com/displaystory.cfm?story_id=10281315
Quote
Today poker is the third most watched sport on cable television in the United States, after car racing and American football, trumping even NBA basketball.
And apparently they have on the radio now as well!
Logged
Delboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2484
If you never let me go, I will never let you down.
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #1 on:
December 28, 2007, 06:52:55 PM »
Good article!
What is Morton's Theorem
Logged
'Still we sing with our heroes thirty three rounds a minute'
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Online
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #2 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:02:13 PM »
Quote from: Delboy on December 28, 2007, 06:52:55 PM
Good article!
What is Morton's Theorem
It's here. Read, then take a headache tablet. Then two more headache tablets. It could be good, it could be utter tosh, it's hard to follow to be honest.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton's_theorem
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #3 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:03:54 PM »
it's basically to do with implicit collusion that nearly always occurs in loose FLHE games, basically you sometimes want your opponent to make a correct fold.
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #4 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:25:37 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on December 28, 2007, 07:03:54 PM
it's basically to do with implicit collusion that nearly always occurs in loose FLHE games, basically you sometimes want your opponent to make a correct fold.
doesn't only apply to FLHE.
sklansky explains it well in theory of poker. basically whereas HU you always want your opponents to make an incorrect move, sometimes in a multiway pot you want 1 opponent to make a correct fold to increase your equity in the pot
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #5 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:44:47 PM »
Quote from: gatso on December 28, 2007, 07:25:37 PM
Quote from: Royal Flush on December 28, 2007, 07:03:54 PM
it's basically to do with implicit collusion that nearly always occurs in loose FLHE games, basically you sometimes want your opponent to make a correct fold.
doesn't only apply to FLHE.
sklansky explains it well in theory of poker. basically whereas HU you always want your opponents to make an incorrect move, sometimes in a multiway pot you want 1 opponent to make a correct fold to increase your equity in the pot
Sorry yes its strictly to do with multiway pots, however the most common occurrence of its discussion is FLHE. At least that's where i always saw it applied.
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
AlrightJack
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2962
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #6 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:46:51 PM »
Another shocking example of your dress sense in that Economist article Flushy
Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #7 on:
December 28, 2007, 07:51:43 PM »
Quote from: AlrightJack on December 28, 2007, 07:46:51 PM
Another shocking example of your dress sense in that Economist article Flushy
lol shut it Raab
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #8 on:
December 28, 2007, 08:08:39 PM »
ok, so IIRC this example should explain the theorem.
3 handed tikay's hand has a 55% chance of winning, my hand has a 30% chance and flushy's 15%.
now tikay makes a small bet. if the correct play from flushy (if he could see everyone's cards) was to pass then I would normally want him to call here.
however in some cases I actually want him to make the correct play and pass.
for this to be true I must hase the correct pot odds to make the call AND my equity in the pot must increase.
so if I have the odds to call and after the call my chance of scooping the pot is now 40% to tikays 60% I want flushy to play correctly.
I think this is the reason you normally see it in FL rather then PL and NL; the smaller bets in realation to the pot size are more likely to give the correct pot odds.
also there's no reason to apply this only to HE, it works equally in all games.
the theorem NEVER applies in heads up pots where you never want an opponent to make a correct play
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Delboy
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2484
If you never let me go, I will never let you down.
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #9 on:
December 28, 2007, 08:19:59 PM »
Thanks for your responses.
Don't often see it mentioned on the PHA boards
Logged
'Still we sing with our heroes thirty three rounds a minute'
weirwizard
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 38
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #10 on:
December 28, 2007, 08:56:13 PM »
Quote
One recent discussion had more than 1,600 participants. No wonder it is often said that poker has done more than anything apart from pornography to develop the web.
so what web site do think they are talking about there then? unless they are reading robs diary
I think there is a big error in this, yes Annie Duke has won a few million but when compared to the men I doubt she is anywhere near the same league.
Also clearly a gap in the market for DTD to start to running some poker classes...
Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #11 on:
December 28, 2007, 10:22:11 PM »
Quote from: weirwizard on December 28, 2007, 08:56:13 PM
Quote
One recent discussion had more than 1,600 participants. No wonder it is often said that poker has done more than anything apart from pornography to develop the web.
so what web site do think they are talking about there then? unless they are reading robs diary
I think there is a big error in this, yes
Annie
Duke
has won a few million but when compared to the men I doubt she is anywhere near the same league.
Also clearly a gap in the market for
dt
d
to start to running some poker classes...
My guess would be it adds up to 4
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Online
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #12 on:
December 29, 2007, 03:21:35 PM »
Quote from: Royal Flush on December 28, 2007, 10:22:11 PM
Quote from: weirwizard on December 28, 2007, 08:56:13 PM
Quote
One recent discussion had more than 1,600 participants. No wonder it is often said that poker has done more than anything apart from pornography to develop the web.
so what web site do think they are talking about there then? unless they are reading robs diary
I think there is a big error in this, yes
Annie
Duke
has won a few million but when compared to the men I doubt she is anywhere near the same league.
Also clearly a gap in the market for
dt
d
to start to running some poker classes...
My guess would be it adds up to 4
Ahh, the old 3 + 3.
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Tragic
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 625
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #13 on:
December 29, 2007, 04:51:04 PM »
Link not working for anyone else?
Logged
Heike
Probation
Offline
Posts: 6
Re: Poker articale in the Economist
«
Reply #14 on:
December 29, 2007, 05:38:28 PM »
Quote from: Tragic on December 29, 2007, 04:51:04 PM
Link not working for anyone else?
Seems fine for me. Good article.
Thanks for explaining the theory guys. Still took a couple of reads for me to sort of get my head around it!
Logged
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...