Reverse Sheep Quiz 23 - The Google Monkey returns

[Colchester Kev]

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

[Shogun112]

For the top 10 Natural disasters, is it top 10 based on how many people got killed in say, all the "Disasters of that type" in the world, or just one specific "Disaster of that type", or... top 10 say..  there has been 75 trillion killed when someone dropped a brick on his foot, so that is the single most indvidual disater of its type..  Oh bollox..  what am I talking about..!!!  I would not know an answer either way, gonna have to be a pure guess...

[matt674]

Question 6: I am just looking for the type of natural disaster only - not a specific one or date.

Question 9: original UK monopoly board and it is irrelevant where you start your turn from - it can be anywhere on the board

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

You are just panicing because i introduced the following!!

Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she has the choice to either nominate a new QM (Colchester Kev) or do it themselves,  

[Shogun112]

I think...   If a previous QM wins...   If that person never actually won the RSQ and became a QM by nomination, then, they should be able to be QM again, because they won the chance, if that makes sense?  Not that it affects me like as I was QM because I won..!!  LOL

[kinboshi]

Question 6: I am just looking for the type of natural disaster only - not a specific one or date.

Question 9: original UK monopoly board and it is irrelevant where you start your turn from - it can be anywhere on the board

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

You are just panicing because i introduced the following!!

Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she has the choice to either nominate a new QM (Colchester Kev) or do it themselves, 

When you say 'natural disaster' do you mean a phenomenon that kills a lot of people at once, or can it include something that kills a lot of people over a period of time?

This question is going to cause arguments.  Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

[matt674]

Question 6: I am just looking for the type of natural disaster only - not a specific one or date.

Question 9: original UK monopoly board and it is irrelevant where you start your turn from - it can be anywhere on the board

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

You are just panicing because i introduced the following!!

Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she has the choice to either nominate a new QM (Colchester Kev) or do it themselves, 

When you say 'natural disaster' do you mean a phenomenon that kills a lot of people at once, or can it include something that kills a lot of people over a period of time?

This question is going to cause arguments.  Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

deadly (ded′lē)

adjective deadlier -·lier, deadliest -·li·est

meaning: causing death

[kinboshi]

Question 6: I am just looking for the type of natural disaster only - not a specific one or date.

Question 9: original UK monopoly board and it is irrelevant where you start your turn from - it can be anywhere on the board

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

You are just panicing because i introduced the following!!

Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she has the choice to either nominate a new QM (Colchester Kev) or do it themselves, 

When you say 'natural disaster' do you mean a phenomenon that kills a lot of people at once, or can it include something that kills a lot of people over a period of time?

This question is going to cause arguments.  Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

deadly (ded′lē)

adjective deadlier -·lier, deadliest -·li·est

meaning: causing death

Yes, I understand the dying part. 

It's the 'does it have to happen in one short period of time or can it be a series of related events that cause the dying over a long period of time?' bit that I need clarification on.

Ta.

[matt674]

there will be a specific natural disaster of each type that has killed the most number of people, for some natural disasters its all at once - for others it is over a period of time.

i'm not looking for the name of that specific event itself but just one of the top ten types of different deadliest natural disasters - it may well be that the type of most deadliest natural disaster of all time is also responsible for the 2nd and 3rd most deaths during a different natural disaster but these are irrelevant to the question

[Claw75]

Question 6: I am just looking for the type of natural disaster only - not a specific one or date.

Question 9: original UK monopoly board and it is irrelevant where you start your turn from - it can be anywhere on the board

LOL  ... I repeat

wank questions .... pass !

You are just panicing because i introduced the following!!

Should a previous QM be victorious, he/she has the choice to either nominate a new QM (Colchester Kev) or do it themselves,  

When you say 'natural disaster' do you mean a phenomenon that kills a lot of people at once, or can it include something that kills a lot of people over a period of time?

This question is going to cause arguments.  Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

deadly (ded′lē)

adjective deadlier -·lier, deadliest -·li·est

meaning: causing death

Yes, I understand the dying part.  

It's the 'does it have to happen in one short period of time or can it be a series of related events that cause the dying over a long period of time?' bit that I need clarification on.

Ta.

I've just been discussing this with Matt as I didn't understand his reply.

the simple answer to the second part of your question Kin is 'yes'

[matt674]

vagueness is the key to obtaining a high score on the FARCEOMETER

[gatso]

there will be a specific natural disaster of each type that has killed the most number of people, for some natural disasters its all at once - for others it is over a period of time.

i'm not looking for the name of that specific event itself but just one of the top ten types of different deadliest natural disasters - it may well be that the type of most deadliest natural disaster of all time is also responsible for the 2nd and 3rd most deaths during a different natural disaster but these are irrelevant to the question

that's cleared that up then

[matt674]

there will be a specific natural disaster of each type that has killed the most number of people, for some natural disasters its all at once - for others it is over a period of time.

i'm not looking for the name of that specific event itself but just one of the top ten types of different deadliest natural disasters - it may well be that the type of most deadliest natural disaster of all time is also responsible for the 2nd and 3rd most deaths during a different natural disaster but these are irrelevant to the question

that's cleared that up then

good, glad i could be of assistance

[Jon MW]

there will be a specific natural disaster of each type that has killed the most number of people, for some natural disasters its all at once - for others it is over a period of time.

i'm not looking for the name of that specific event itself but just one of the top ten types of different deadliest natural disasters - it may well be that the type of most deadliest natural disaster of all time is also responsible for the 2nd and 3rd most deaths during a different natural disaster but these are irrelevant to the question

that's cleared that up then

I don't think the definition of deadly/deadliest is the problem

It's the definition of disaster which contains the kernel of farce potential

[matt674]

yep, so i can either just give everyone my answer and have boring reveal or carry on being vague and have you take educated guesses leading to all out riots on the reveal

[bobAlike]

I feel with all the alleged Googling that seems to be getting unpunished of late we should start a Sheep Court (like a Kangaroo court but with bleating).

This should be a private board with a handful of respectable quizzers, say 3 or 4 not including the QM, where a consensus can be made in the handling of suspected Googlers.

The Sheep Courts decision should be final and would be able to hand out punishment without any involvement or agreement from the QM.

This Sheep Court could also be used as a court of farce appeal for objections to answers which the QM has denied.

A case can only be heard in the Sheep Court if all the Sheep judges agree.

I'm sure this could work.

This is only a basic thought with minor detail but if anyone has any ideas how this could benefit or not the RSQ's of our hearts then please chip in.