|
G1BTW
|
 |
« Reply #165 on: June 22, 2009, 08:42:14 PM » |
|
re video - Tracey Ullman possibly?
No sorry, not Nenah cherry either. She's resident in England I think but looks middle eastern. Sade? Looks quite like her, not Sade tho |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #166 on: June 22, 2009, 08:43:21 PM » |
|
safe to post scores?
Spacefrog 11
Claw75 13
Pawprint 14
The Duke 15
Acidmouse 15
Sharplea 16
Wardonkey 16
Gatso 17
TrafficJam 17
xxMairxx 17
Amcgrath1uk 18
Newportlad 19
Josedinho 19
Joobie538 21
Shogun112 21
hector62 22
Bobalike 23
Tightend 23
G1BTW 23
Suited Jock 24
Kinboshi 26
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #167 on: June 22, 2009, 08:44:26 PM » |
|
safe to post scores?
probs. we can't object as we don't know what we're objecting to |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #168 on: June 22, 2009, 08:44:28 PM » |
|
safe to post scores?
Spacefrog 11
Claw75 13
Pawprint 14
The Duke 15
Acidmouse 15
Sharplea 16
Wardonkey 16
Gatso 17
TrafficJam 17
xxMairxx 17
Amcgrath1uk 18
Newportlad 19
Josedinho 19
Joobie538 21
Shogun112 21
hector62 22
Bobalike 23
Tightend 23
G1BTW 23
Suited Jock 24
Kinboshi 26
OBJECTION I move the motion that the whole of the last question is disregarded as the question itself was framed in such as way as the answers are unmarkable All those that agree, say "Chimpanzee" |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
matt674
|
|
« Reply #169 on: June 22, 2009, 08:45:27 PM » |
|
OBJECTION
why is avalanche a fail?
How can you prove that the sum total of death's by avalanches does not put it in the top ten?
there is no way of measuring the total number of death's for every specific natural disaster - so for the top 10 deadliest each catagory is assigned the one disaster that caused the most deaths. so in fact, the question as framed is completely useless, and impossible to prove an answer is right or wrong ergo: I suggest The number of people who trip over, resulting in a trip to casualty, is greater than the number of people who die from Floods. Prove me wrong I understand that loads of people have died as a result of spontaneous combustion... Gotta be more than 96 lol show me a case where more than 96 people tripped and killed themselves in one specific natural disaster or spontaneosly combusted (as far as i am aware 3 is the record for this) and i'll gladly enter it into the top 15........... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #170 on: June 22, 2009, 08:45:54 PM » |
|
obv not the answer but thinking about 80s music led to me playing belinda carlisle dead loud. lovin' it
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
matt674
|
|
« Reply #171 on: June 22, 2009, 08:46:45 PM » |
|
7. Name a province of CanadaSheep Answer: 5 Points - ManitobaHector62 Tightend Kinboshi The Duke Sharplea Sheep Answer: 5 Points - AlbertaAcidmouse Suited Jock Spacefrog Newportlad Wardonkey Other Answers: 4 Points - Nova ScotiaPawprint Trafficjam Shogun112 Amcgrath1UK 2 Points - QuebecxxMAIRxx Joobie538 2 Points - British ColumbiaG1BTW Gatso  - OntarioBobalike Pass: 0 PointsJosedinho Fail : 8 PointsClaw75 (Newfoundland) - name changed from Newfoundland to Newfoundland & Labrador Dec 2001 Noteable missing answers:New Brunswick Prince Edward Island Saskatchewan Newfoundland & Labrador
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #172 on: June 22, 2009, 08:47:14 PM » |
|
OBJECTION
why is avalanche a fail?
How can you prove that the sum total of death's by avalanches does not put it in the top ten?
there is no way of measuring the total number of death's for every specific natural disaster - so for the top 10 deadliest each catagory is assigned the one disaster that caused the most deaths. so in fact, the question as framed is completely useless, and impossible to prove an answer is right or wrong ergo: I suggest The number of people who trip over, resulting in a trip to casualty, is greater than the number of people who die from Floods. Prove me wrong I understand that loads of people have died as a result of spontaneous combustion... Gotta be more than 96 lol show me a case where more than 96 people tripped and killed themselves in one specific natural disaster or spontaneosly combusted (as far as i am aware 3 is the record for this) and i'll gladly enter it into the top 15........... show me a natural disaster where they didn't? I suggest in the powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 that hit Japan's north-east coast in 2005 at commuter rush hour would have seen more than 96 people trip over and die |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
matt674
|
|
« Reply #173 on: June 22, 2009, 08:47:59 PM » |
|
strange how lots of complaints about how question 6 was constructed and yet all but one of those who answered were correct.........  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
|
Jon MW
|
|
« Reply #174 on: June 22, 2009, 08:48:25 PM » |
|
...
Fail : 8 Points
Claw75 (Newfoundland) - name changed from Newfoundland to Newfoundland & Labrador Dec 2001
...
Did you ask for the full name? because this looks like a pass to me |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Jon "the British cowboy" Woodfield
2011 blonde MTT League August Champion
2011 UK Team Championships: Black Belt Poker Team Captain - - runners up - -
5 Star HORSE Classic - 2007 Razz Champion
2007 WSOP Razz - 13/341
|
|
|
|
matt674
|
|
« Reply #175 on: June 22, 2009, 08:49:13 PM » |
|
OBJECTION
why is avalanche a fail?
How can you prove that the sum total of death's by avalanches does not put it in the top ten?
there is no way of measuring the total number of death's for every specific natural disaster - so for the top 10 deadliest each catagory is assigned the one disaster that caused the most deaths. so in fact, the question as framed is completely useless, and impossible to prove an answer is right or wrong ergo: I suggest The number of people who trip over, resulting in a trip to casualty, is greater than the number of people who die from Floods. Prove me wrong I understand that loads of people have died as a result of spontaneous combustion... Gotta be more than 96 lol show me a case where more than 96 people tripped and killed themselves in one specific natural disaster or spontaneosly combusted (as far as i am aware 3 is the record for this) and i'll gladly enter it into the top 15........... show me a natural disaster where they didn't? I suggest in the powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 that hit Japan's north-east coast in 2005 at commuter rush hour would have seen more than 96 people trip over and die and so those said 96+ people were included in the death toll of the 2005 Japanese earthquake............. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
|
gatso
|
|
« Reply #176 on: June 22, 2009, 08:50:09 PM » |
|
I suggest in the powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 that hit Japan's north-east coast in 2005 at commuter rush hour would have seen more than 96 people trip over and die
do you reckon? I think it'll be close as you have to distinguish between tripping and falling. if however you whale trips and falls then it's def over 96 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
|
|
|
|
Shogun112
|
|
« Reply #177 on: June 22, 2009, 08:50:28 PM » |
|
OBJECTION
why is avalanche a fail?
How can you prove that the sum total of death's by avalanches does not put it in the top ten?
there is no way of measuring the total number of death's for every specific natural disaster - so for the top 10 deadliest each catagory is assigned the one disaster that caused the most deaths. so in fact, the question as framed is completely useless, and impossible to prove an answer is right or wrong ergo: I suggest The number of people who trip over, resulting in a trip to casualty, is greater than the number of people who die from Floods. Prove me wrong I understand that loads of people have died as a result of spontaneous combustion... Gotta be more than 96 lol show me a case where more than 96 people tripped and killed themselves in one specific natural disaster or spontaneosly combusted (as far as i am aware 3 is the record for this) and i'll gladly enter it into the top 15........... show me a natural disaster where they didn't? I suggest in the powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 that hit Japan's north-east coast in 2005 at commuter rush hour would have seen more than 96 people trip over and die LOL |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #178 on: June 22, 2009, 08:52:08 PM » |
|
I suggest in the powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.2 that hit Japan's north-east coast in 2005 at commuter rush hour would have seen more than 96 people trip over and die
do you reckon? I think it'll be close as you have to distinguish between tripping and falling. if however you whale trips and falls then it's def over 96 With modern paving technology, the ratio of trips to falls is much reduced. Nevertheless I still think its an issue that shoulkd not be ignored and that renders Q6 totally redundant |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Claw75
|
|
« Reply #179 on: June 22, 2009, 08:52:23 PM » |
|
...
Fail : 8 Points
Claw75 (Newfoundland) - name changed from Newfoundland to Newfoundland & Labrador Dec 2001
...
Did you ask for the full name? because this looks like a pass to me thank you Jon - bloody farce place changing it's name after I've left school  I too would like to object to this overly-harsh failure of my answer. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
|
|
|
|
Poll
Author