Michael Jackson dies of Heart Attack

[trafficjam]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

[pokerfan]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

He means the image not the grammar innit

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

[tikay]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

Yes, pokerfan has it right. Tighty (he of counter-fitted) was saying these those.

[trafficjam]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

Yes, pokerfan has it right. Tighty (he of counter-fitted) was saying these those.

I just get a bit wound up with spoken English at times, especially the use of 'them' in the wrong context!

[tikay]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

Yes, pokerfan has it right. Tighty (he of counter-fitted) was saying these those.

I just get a bit wound up with spoken English at times, especially the use of 'them' in the wrong context!

And so you should. Standards have dropped at an incredible rate in the last few years. It's the Internet, lack of decent education, & bad parenting.*

* Shareholders have an allowance of one troll per week.

[Newmanseye]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

Yes, pokerfan has it right. Tighty (he of counter-fitted) was saying these those.

I just get a bit wound up with spoken English at times, especially the use of 'them' in the wrong context!

And so you should. Standards have dropped at an incredible rate in the last few years. It's the Internet, lack of decent education, & bad parenting.*

* Shareholders have an allowance of one troll per week.

Ban PLS!

[AndrewT]

Wow, I remember those Duke Boxes.

these?

I don't wish to be pedantic and maybe I have it wrong but surely tiKay was correct by saying those - or am I missing something?

Yes, pokerfan has it right. Tighty (he of counter-fitted) was saying these those.

I just get a bit wound up with spoken English at times, especially the use of 'them' in the wrong context!

Tikay is street though, innit?

[G1BTW]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted is how expensive their lawyer was

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

[Rod Paradise]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted was how expensive their lawyer were

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

Apart from a serious overuse of ergo, I read nothing in that beyond "I disagree, my impression & conclusion is different from yours based on the same knowledge, but I'm going to try and make myself sound clever in a  bid to ridicule your interpretation of Michael Jackson's life."

[G1BTW]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted was how expensive their lawyer were

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

Apart from a serious overuse of ergo, I read nothing in that beyond "I disagree, my impression & conclusion is different from yours based on the same knowledge, but I'm going to try and make myself sound clever in a  bid to ridicule your interpretation of Michael Jackson's life."

negative, I demonstrate the errors in his logic. If it looks as if I'm trying to sound clever so be it, I do ridicule his interpretation of how logic can be applied to the life of MJ though.

[AndrewT]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted was how expensive their lawyer were

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

Apart from a serious overuse of ergo, I read nothing in that beyond "I disagree, my impression & conclusion is different from yours based on the same knowledge, but I'm going to try and make myself sound clever in a  bid to ridicule your interpretation of Michael Jackson's life."

I liked his attempt at nested checkboxes.

Even if he did mess them up.

[Rod Paradise]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted was how expensive their lawyer were

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

Apart from a serious overuse of ergo, I read nothing in that beyond "I disagree, my impression & conclusion is different from yours based on the same knowledge, but I'm going to try and make myself sound clever in a  bid to ridicule your interpretation of Michael Jackson's life."

negative, I demonstrate the errors in his logic. If it looks as if I'm trying to sound clever so be it, I do ridicule his interpretation of how logic can be applied to the life of MJ though.

No, you don't. You use your personal logic to reach conclusions that may or may not be right, but they are only that, your personal conclusions. You then badly attempt ridicule as if your interpretation is correct.

[gatso]

in fairness rod, the logic in billy's post is spectacularly bad

[G1BTW]

I've read through from beginning to end, Whilst Michael Jackson was a great music artist in the 70's and 80's his best days are long since past, the allegations of child abuse and the "pay off" pretty much killed off the potential as a recording artist in the future.

I have my views on the fella and I am in the " no smoke without fire" + " you don't pay people off if you are innocent"  + " he's so random and strange its seems all too probable" camp, I really did enjoy his music in my youth but with all the doubt and strange personal life antics and his NEED to be white and his deep emotional scars The guy was pretty much buggered from the get go.

in closing, I might just remind everyone of MikkyT, he was one of us, none of us suspected a thing, none of us thought he was a nonce but we were proven wrong there too, MikkyT as everyone knows was skint without a pot to piss in, no fancy lawyers for him, no eccentric behaviour and he is now serving time in the big house, mind you this was not a civil case but the fact remains, No money = Big house -- Plenty of money = Beverly hills

Either way, If my views are wrong and he is innocent he will reap the rewards in the after life, if he was Guilty as is my opinion, the i hope he gets a fresh pineapple shoved up his arse each day.

[ ] Weird, ergo paedophile

[ x ] Weird, ergo more likely to have kids stay over, do nothing to them sexually, but not really get why just having them over is not really ok

[ x ] Better, more expensive lawyers, give defendants a better chance of getting off when guilty

          [ ] A good measure of the guilt of those acquitted was how expensive their lawyer were

              [!?] Take a look at this poor guy I knew, he was guilty, and didn't have a rich lawyer who would probably have  
                    got him off the hook. See?

in closing none of us knew MikkyT was a paedo, but he was [ ] ergo there's a good chance MJ was a paedo too, even though there's not really direct evidence of this.

Apart from a serious overuse of ergo, I read nothing in that beyond "I disagree, my impression & conclusion is different from yours based on the same knowledge, but I'm going to try and make myself sound clever in a  bid to ridicule your interpretation of Michael Jackson's life."

negative, I demonstrate the errors in his logic. If it looks as if I'm trying to sound clever so be it, I do ridicule his interpretation of how logic can be applied to the life of MJ though.

No, you don't. You use your personal logic to reach conclusions that may or may not be right, but they are only that, your personal conclusions. You then badly attempt ridicule as if your interpretation is correct.

 [ ] [ x ] [ ] [ x ]  I have only my position to argue. Would you like me to apply someone else's position?

If you see something wrong in my logic, or something right in his, pray tell

 [ x ] (when you're sober)

[pokerfan]

Chamone!!!