REVERSE SHEEP QUIZ 26 - THE ONE IN ALL CAPS AND WITH ROBERT'S RULES

[Cf]

Any objections to moving on?

[Cf]

SCORES AFTER QUESTION 3

Laxie: 3
Girgy85: 4
kinboshi: 4
The_duke: 4
Stokes: 5
xxMAIRxx: 6
Josedinho: 7
cdw1111: 9
TightEnd: 9
G1BTW: 10
RichEO: 13
Shogun112: 13

[Cf]

QUESTION 4 - I own a rather nice set of poker chips, with printed denominations. When playing a tournament the starting stack is 5,000. Name one of the denominations of chips in my set. If you're feeling confident I have a couple of denominations you might not expect for the sake of a complete set...

SHEEP - 100 - 6 points
Josedinho
Shogun112
kinboshi
Stokes
xxMAIRxx
G1BTW

ACE - 500 - 1 point
Girgy85

ACE - 10 - 1 point
cdw1111

ACE - 25 - 1 point
The_duke

FAIL - 5 - 9 points
RichEO
Laxie

PASS
TightEnd

For reference, the complete set is currently: 10, 25, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 25000

gg to cdw1111 for succesfully taking a punt on 10.

RichEO and Laxie have been sort of bad beated in that I currently have some .25, 1, and 5 chips on order for the same set. But as I don't currently have them...

[gatso]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

[trafficjam]

QUESTION 3 - Name a football team who has been relegated from the premier league, and since then also relegated from the championship (aka division one in the old days).

ACE - Sheffield Wednesday - 1 point
Josedinho

ACE - Bradford City - 1 point
Girgy85

ACE - Wimbledon - 1 point
kinboshi

ACE - Leeds - 1 point
cdw1111

ACE - QPR - 1 point
Stokes

ACE - TightEnd - 1 point
Leicester City

ACE - Swindon Town - 1 point
The_duke

FAIL - Newcastle United - 5 points
xxMAIRxx

PASS
RichEO
Shogun112
G1BTW
Laxie

I think there's about 12 teams or there abouts that fit this criteria. Got quite a few of them between you.

Doh would have got an Ace there - Leyton Orient

[TightEnd]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

[Shogun112]

QUESTION 4 - I own a rather nice set of poker chips, with printed denominations. When playing a tournament the starting stack is 5,000. Name one of the denominations of chips in my set. If you're feeling confident I have a couple of denominations you might not expect for the sake of a complete set...

SHEEP - 100 - 6 points
Josedinho
Shogun112
kinboshi
Stokes
xxMAIRxx
G1BTW

ACE - 500 - 1 point
Girgy85

ACE - 10 - 1 point
cdw1111

ACE - 25 - 1 point
The_duke

FAIL - 5 - 9 points
RichEO
Laxie

PASS
TightEnd

For reference, the complete set is currently: 10, 25, 100, 500, 1000, 5000, 25000

gg to cdw1111 for succesfully taking a punt on 10.

RichEO and Laxie have been sort of bad beated in that I currently have some .25, 1, and 5 chips on order for the same set. But as I don't currently have them...

Trick questions, another reason the quiz is ruined...

[G1BTW]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often bothsometimes both).

fyp

[TightEnd]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

[TightEnd]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

furthermore the rule is specifcally mentioned in other sets of rules I have checked in the 90 minutes since failure

[TightEnd]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

furthermore the rule is specifcally mentioned in other sets of rules I have checked in the 90 minutes since failure

furthermore, I continue to simmer, not so gently, with indignation

[TightEnd]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

furthermore the rule is specifcally mentioned in other sets of rules I have checked in the 90 minutes since failure

furthermore, I continue to simmer, not so gently, with indignation

I even consulted Simon Webbe from Blue, in Brussels. He concurred with me.

[trafficjam]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

furthermore the rule is specifcally mentioned in other sets of rules I have checked in the 90 minutes since failure

furthermore, I continue to simmer, not so gently, with indignation

I know the feeling

[Cf]

gah, don't reply! i wanted to see how long tighty would take to himself for

[trafficjam]

lol. don't give in to the haters cf

fyi most london cardrooms and several in europe do not declare a misdeal for a floored card, it is put faceup on the table and treated as an exposed card

 

gatso sticking up for a QM - the worlds gone mad!!

my attacks on QMs have always been justified as they have failed to understand the workings of the english language either in their questions or in their answers (or often both). in this instance however cf understands perfectly and it is the objectors who fail to grasp either their mother tongue or laughably the rules of poker

there is no one set of rules in poker. It was reasonable to assume that the answer given, which applies in every casino I have ever been to including London casinos the Vic, Sportsman and Palm Beach, would be covered under Robert's rules

furthermore it could be argued that the rule itself is covered in Robert's rules, but there we are into semantics, where you gatso should feel right at home, alongside myself on the sofa eating pringles and practicing arson techniques.

furthermore the rule is specifcally mentioned in other sets of rules I have checked in the 90 minutes since failure

furthermore, I continue to simmer, not so gently, with indignation

I even consulted Simon Webbe from Blue, in Brussels. He concurred with me.

Do they play  poker as well