blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 15, 2025, 05:09:17 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261631 Posts in 66596 Topics by 16983 Members
Latest Member: scotty2hatty2
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Apology to Tikay.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 ... 22 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Apology to Tikay.  (Read 49045 times)
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #150 on: August 11, 2010, 07:32:03 PM »

Have been given permission to post this from Kev...

 secondly
 Jane knew about the Laxie vid less than 1 minute after I saw it, She didnt actually watch the vid because I had no copy of it, but she knew exactly what it contained as I told her everything. Jane was disgusted at what I told her, but obviously not disgusted enough to tell Laxie until she had a major beef with me.



right there - thats all you need

Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Shogun112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713


View Profile
« Reply #151 on: August 11, 2010, 07:33:14 PM »

Think Claw nails it. People probably aren't just annoyed that their PM's were being read just the fact that somebody that is in a position of trust on blonde could have read private information that were made by different methods of communication. If she unveilled some incriminating evidence then well done for bringing it to somebody's attention but if she suspected it was there contac the police , if not than going through somebody's converstations, txts or emails isn't the behaviour i would expect of a mod.
I know nobdy involved but Claw mentioned earlier that she had heard back something from one of her converstations getting back to her. Whether it was a conversation on blonde or not doesn't really matter. It's not asking for a hanging or even a banning people just don't think that's what a mod should be doing.

"Probably" and "Could Have" - that is interesting...!!   

I have a car that is capable of doing 150mph...  People say, I "Could have" been speeding on the motorway.. Get the handcuffs out officer, guilty as accused..!!  The evidence is all there, my car is capable, so I MUST have done it..!!
Logged
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #152 on: August 11, 2010, 07:35:55 PM »

Think Claw nails it. People probably aren't just annoyed that their PM's were being read just the fact that somebody that is in a position of trust on blonde could have read private information that were made by different methods of communication. If she unveilled some incriminating evidence then well done for bringing it to somebody's attention but if she suspected it was there contac the police , if not than going through somebody's converstations, txts or emails isn't the behaviour i would expect of a mod.
I know nobdy involved but Claw mentioned earlier that she had heard back something from one of her converstations getting back to her. Whether it was a conversation on blonde or not doesn't really matter. It's not asking for a hanging or even a banning people just don't think that's what a mod should be doing.

"Probably" and "Could Have" - that is interesting...!!   

I have a car that is capable of doing 150mph...  People say, I "Could have" been speeding on the motorway.. Get the handcuffs out officer, guilty as accused..!!  The evidence is all there, my car is capable, so I MUST have done it..!!

Carl, we know for fact that Jane read Kev's msn conversations with other blonde members.  I don't think that's in dispute.
Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
Longines
Gamesmaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3795


View Profile
« Reply #153 on: August 11, 2010, 07:36:20 PM »

You imply she hacked into it, which is different to just accessing it.
Without authorisation for access, both are criminal offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 punishable by up to six months imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 5,000.
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #154 on: August 11, 2010, 07:36:33 PM »

That's it for tonight from me, I have to be elsewhere.

I will give long & hard consideration to the matter.

Within 48 hours I wll have come to a decision.

It will be.

1) Yes, remove Jane's modship.

2) No, I do not consider I should.

3) Given all the circumstances, suspend her Modship for the time being whilst I investigate all the rights & wrongs.

Whatever I decide - & I'll now seek the other Mods views, which I have not previously - I will have to convey my reasons to Jane.

Please debate it all you like, but if it gets out of hand, the thread will have to be closed. Nobody wants that.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7808



View Profile
« Reply #155 on: August 11, 2010, 07:37:36 PM »

There's some horrible underlying issues in this whole saga but tragedy throws out comedy:

Is a modship on Blonde so major that a mod will cling onto powers like Maggie going for a second ballot and that so much hand wringing needs to go on about removal of mod status. Also, "de-modding" as a new entry into the language - it's all pretty lol, ridic even.

Jane did a bad thing (like so many others in this sorry ass tale), but sincerely, I hope her life can move forward postively even if she loses mod status - gotta be a helluva body blow that - lol, handwringaments.
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
Claw75
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 28410



View Profile
« Reply #156 on: August 11, 2010, 07:39:01 PM »

You imply she hacked into it, which is different to just accessing it.
Without authorisation for access, both are criminal offences under the Computer Misuse Act 1990 punishable by up to six months imprisonment and/or a fine of up to 5,000.

I guess it comes down to what constitutes 'authorisation'.  If Jane had, for example, an administrator account on the computer which Kev knew about, that would probably be regarded as authorisation to access the information on it under the act. 

Logged

"Arguing with idiots is like playing chess with a pigeon....no matter how good you are the bird is going to shit on the board and strut around like it won anyway"
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7808



View Profile
« Reply #157 on: August 11, 2010, 07:39:18 PM »

I will give long & hard consideration to the matter.

Within 48 hours I wll have come to a decision.

Gets lollier
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
byronkincaid
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5024



View Profile
« Reply #158 on: August 11, 2010, 07:39:30 PM »

That's it for tonight from me, I have to be elsewhere.

I will give long & hard consideration to the matter.

Within 48 hours I wll have come to a decision.

It will be.

1) Yes, remove Jane's modship.

2) No, I do not consider I should.

3) Given all the circumstances, suspend her Modship for the time being whilst I investigate all the rights & wrongs.

Whatever I decide - & I'll now seek the other Mods views, which I have not previously - I will have to convey my reasons to Jane.

Please debate it all you like, but if it gets out of hand, the thread will have to be closed. Nobody wants that.

£5 on number 3 please
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17072


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #159 on: August 11, 2010, 07:41:05 PM »

Have been given permission to post this from Kev...

 secondly
 Jane knew about the Laxie vid less than 1 minute after I saw it, She didnt actually watch the vid because I had no copy of it, but she knew exactly what it contained as I told her everything. Jane was disgusted at what I told her, but obviously not disgusted enough to tell Laxie until she had a major beef with me.



right there - thats all you need



This is incredibly disappointing.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7808



View Profile
« Reply #160 on: August 11, 2010, 07:44:03 PM »

That's it for tonight from me, I have to be elsewhere.

I will give long & hard consideration to the matter.

Within 48 hours I wll have come to a decision.

It will be.

1) Yes, remove Jane's modship.

2) No, I do not consider I should.

3) Given all the circumstances, suspend her Modship for the time being whilst I investigate all the rights & wrongs.

Whatever I decide - & I'll now seek the other Mods views, which I have not previously - I will have to convey my reasons to Jane.

Please debate it all you like, but if it gets out of hand, the thread will have to be closed. Nobody wants that.

£5 on number 3 please

wp sir
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
Shogun112
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1713


View Profile
« Reply #161 on: August 11, 2010, 07:51:59 PM »

I am seriously still sat here wondering why a number of people are still attacking the whistleblower and supporting the people who comitted the crime.  I guess the friendship is just too strong.  Its not enough to be caught for what they did, but, try lay the blame or reason onto someone else.  Never their own fault.  Whatever happend to having to take responsibility to your own actions.
Logged
Josedinho
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4515



View Profile
« Reply #162 on: August 11, 2010, 08:00:07 PM »

Think Claw nails it. People probably aren't just annoyed that their PM's were being read just the fact that somebody that is in a position of trust on blonde could have read private information that were made by different methods of communication. If she unveilled some incriminating evidence then well done for bringing it to somebody's attention but if she suspected it was there contac the police , if not than going through somebody's converstations, txts or emails isn't the behaviour i would expect of a mod.
I know nobdy involved but Claw mentioned earlier that she had heard back something from one of her converstations getting back to her. Whether it was a conversation on blonde or not doesn't really matter. It's not asking for a hanging or even a banning people just don't think that's what a mod should be doing.

"Probably" and "Could Have" - that is interesting...!!   

I have a car that is capable of doing 150mph...  People say, I "Could have" been speeding on the motorway.. Get the handcuffs out officer, guilty as accused..!!  The evidence is all there, my car is capable, so I MUST have done it..!!

Carl, we know for fact that Jane read Kev's msn conversations with other blonde members.  I don't think that's in dispute.
Yeh used "probably" as i don't speak for everyone and "could have" as i don't have proof. Sounds like others do.
Logged
mouth
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4010



View Profile
« Reply #163 on: August 11, 2010, 08:23:51 PM »

I am seriously still sat here wondering why a number of people are still attacking the whistleblower and supporting the people who comitted the crime.  I guess the friendship is just too strong.  Its not enough to be caught for what they did, but, try lay the blame or reason onto someone else.  Never their own fault.  Whatever happend to having to take responsibility to your own actions.

This is exactly what I cannot relate to. Laxie was sexually abused and people are worried that someone may have read their PMs?

It's not alleged - the guy admitted to it. (He was drunk.. the worse my exs did when drunk was piss the bed and I'd sure rather wake up in a puddle than with some fat twat filming me for all to see)

Certain people are going on about how it came to light and missing the main issues - something disgraceful happened here and PLENTY of Blonde members knew all about it and never said a word to the woman it happened to. Eventually someone had the decency to let her know and once she did find out, all the people who thought it was hysterical are suddenly all very busy shouting at Jane, Tikay, whoever, to avoid facing up to the fact they knew about a sexual assault and did nothing.

Turny for one seems to be really showing his true colours, calling Jane a bitch on here - sure would like you following me up a dark alley .

Every one of you who viewed that video should be ashamed of yourselves. People who were slightly more involved shouldn't even be here.

It's a police investigation now and unfortunately many sexual offences often don't get to court. If this should happen, you would all do well to remember the guy admitted to what he did, and admitted Laxie wasn't concious. If it doesn't get to court because of red tape, remember this. There's no alleged to it.

Pick your friends wisely and carefully. You've all been fooled once by Blatch, what makes you think this can't  happening again?
Logged

Don't tell her to turn down, put on your shades if you can't see
Don't tell her to turn down, turn up the flame.

http://gobshiteonlegs.blogspot.com/
outragous76
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13315


Yeah Bitch! ......... MAGNETS! owwwh!


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: August 11, 2010, 08:29:02 PM »

just incase there is any ambiguity

I have never seen this tape

i did not know it had happened

etc etc

i can fully understan why people defend Kev - because the way people are going on you would think he did it - and he has no ability to defend himself on here
Logged

".....and then I spent 2 hours talking with Stu which blew my mind.........."
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 ... 22 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.122 seconds with 20 queries.