|
Leatherman
|
 |
« Reply #1290 on: September 07, 2013, 09:06:32 PM » |
|
See this Sky Sports undercard, is Calum Smith even in the same weight division as his opponent?
Super Middle |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Satellite King
|
|
|
|
McGlashan
|
|
« Reply #1291 on: September 07, 2013, 09:11:29 PM » |
|
See this Sky Sports undercard, is Calum Smith even in the same weight division as his opponent?
Super Middle Aye where does the weight go tho. That's no the first time on Sky he's looked enormous compared to his opponent! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Leatherman
|
|
« Reply #1292 on: September 07, 2013, 09:14:07 PM » |
|
See this Sky Sports undercard, is Calum Smith even in the same weight division as his opponent?
Super Middle Aye where does the weight go tho. That's no the first time on Sky he's looked enormous compared to his opponent! Yeh looked good again tho, dem Smith Brothers are a force. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Satellite King
|
|
|
|
Karabiner
|
|
« Reply #1293 on: September 07, 2013, 11:27:30 PM » |
|
Back to back "strange" outcomes for Burns no way did he ever deserve a draw tonight on my scorecard, heaven knows how one judge had him a 115-112 winner.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
|
|
|
|
Waz1892
|
|
« Reply #1294 on: September 07, 2013, 11:29:26 PM » |
|
If the Burns fight was in Mexico tonight and the judges produced those figures to get that result the reaction would have done 100 times worse!
Scandalous judging.
How can you put Burns 3 points up!???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Carpe Diem
|
|
|
|
OverTheBorder
|
|
« Reply #1295 on: September 07, 2013, 11:36:46 PM » |
|
Seen it coming but what a farce! I had Beltram a few rounds up! My mate said 5 rounds out that the draw was a good bet at 22/1
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #1296 on: September 07, 2013, 11:44:39 PM » |
|
Seen it coming but what a farce! I had Beltram a few rounds up! My mate said 5 rounds out that the draw was a good bet at 22/1
Said the same to my mate when the ref let Burns get away with rolling around the ring hanging off Beltran for half the fight. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Leatherman
|
|
« Reply #1297 on: September 07, 2013, 11:51:16 PM » |
|
Shocking.. Give the guy the rematch that he deserves
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Satellite King
|
|
|
|
malt vinegar
|
|
« Reply #1298 on: September 08, 2013, 12:00:04 AM » |
|
shouldnt be surprised by scoring anymore but i fall for it everytime - i gave burns 4 rounds
last two fights hes been out of his depth think everybody got a bit carried away with the way he took apart mitchell
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #1299 on: September 08, 2013, 07:11:10 AM » |
|
Vile decision. I had it 117-110 to Beltran.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Teacake
|
|
« Reply #1300 on: September 08, 2013, 09:01:01 AM » |
|
Result aside that was unbelievable courage from Burns to finish that fight with a broken jaw.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
|
« Reply #1301 on: September 08, 2013, 10:11:34 AM » |
|
Result aside that was unbelievable courage from Burns to finish that fight with a broken jaw.
Agreed, and excuses the performance to some extent. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Marky147
|
|
« Reply #1302 on: September 08, 2013, 01:52:17 PM » |
|
Interview after the fight with Beltran, who comes across as a very classy guy. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
malt vinegar
|
|
« Reply #1303 on: September 08, 2013, 03:12:44 PM » |
|
the judges never seem to be held accountable for the scoring or have to explain themselves. when they release the scorecards you wonder what the hell they have been watching. the same old names are always cropping time and time again
no wonder most people thinks it bent
close fights you cant complain about because it so open to interpretation but sometimes they are just way out
the whole scoring system should be changed or at least simplified from what it is now
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #1304 on: September 08, 2013, 03:17:25 PM » |
|
the judges never seem to be held accountable for the scoring or have to explain themselves. when they release the scorecards you wonder what the hell they have been watching. the same old names are always cropping time and time again
no wonder most people thinks it bent
close fights you cant complain about because it so open to interpretation but sometimes they are just way out
the whole scoring system should be changed or at least simplified from what it is now
There is, of course, an easy to understand system with the amateurs, but the sport will always be mired by accusations of dodgy decisions. I'd say there's a fair chance it's better now than it used to be. I like your idea of visible accountability, tho. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
|
Author