blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
October 29, 2020, 04:22:49 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2254979 Posts in 66557 Topics by 16625 Members
Latest Member: thrytiarod
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Live Tournament Updates
| | |-+  DTD Grand Prix 4: €250,000 GTD: FINAL DAY
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 [25] Go Down Print
Author Topic: DTD Grand Prix 4: €250,000 GTD: FINAL DAY  (Read 43515 times)
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #360 on: August 23, 2011, 09:44:10 PM »

There is not any need to continue after that.

I am not sure what you are asking sir lol
Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22121


30 million light-years away


View Profile
« Reply #361 on: August 23, 2011, 09:55:28 PM »

There is not any need to continue after that.

I am not sure what you are asking sir lol

In the old days the prize money was often 60%, 30%, 10%.

If the chip leader had a good lead and didn't want to deal 2nd and 3rd might agree to flatten the structure to 20% each and carry on playing, in effect a deal between themselves, a saver, and not really affecting the CL other than money pressure.

They might also agree to save 25% of whatever they win "in running", is that allowed these days?
Logged

If I'm not here I'm probably hacking it round the back nine
pottaker
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #362 on: August 23, 2011, 10:04:35 PM »

thanks debs was brill tourney still hard to take in , cant believe the deal .. mr 4 bigs now lol
Logged
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #363 on: August 23, 2011, 10:06:00 PM »

There is not any need to continue after that.

I am not sure what you are asking sir lol

In the old days the prize money was often 60%, 30%, 10%.

If the chip leader had a good lead and didn't want to deal 2nd and 3rd might agree to flatten the structure to 20% each and carry on playing, in effect a deal between themselves, a saver, and not really affecting the CL other than money pressure.

They might also agree to save 25% of whatever they win "in running", is that allowed these days?

Ah, understand now (I think). I never allowed that in the cardrooms I worked in.
If the Chip leader has locked it up, why would he consider playing on (unless friends with 2nd or 3rd if you get my drift). If it is not locked up then it effects everything if CL has a meltdown.
It may not be considered collusion but actually is for the 2nd and 3rd to have a 25% saver, because it may well lead to collusion indirectly so would not be allowed.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2011, 10:08:35 PM by dik9 » Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #364 on: August 23, 2011, 10:15:37 PM »

The whole question of "in running" or even pre tourney savers, also staking in a comp that the staker plays, although rife can be seen as collusion and can lead to many complications.

Just ask yourself if you would be happy 3 handed, if you "knew" CL has staked 2nd CL for a big %. Policing this is extremely hard and realistically cannot be done, but it does open a can of worms.
Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
George2Loose
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15213



View Profile
« Reply #365 on: August 24, 2011, 12:43:38 AM »

Any private deal between players whilst the tourney is running that doesn't include everyone is at best unethical and at worst down right dirty and cheating.
Logged

Ole Ole Ole Ole!
skolsuper
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1510



View Profile
« Reply #366 on: August 24, 2011, 01:29:07 AM »

Happened in Gala Nottingham at the £500 GCBPT last year (one player refusing a deal and then the other players making a deal between themselves). Pretty sure the TD knew all about it. I agree that everyone involved in the deal should be -ed.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 21 22 23 24 [25] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.119 seconds with 20 queries.