Tips for Tikay

[kukushkin88]

+5? not really. might be if The rams were still running the ball well but Gurley has gone cold too

i intend to spend the next 36 hours putting myself off the Eagles +9 against to the Patriots, who are minus lewis, edelman and gronkowski. the Eagles though are minus a lot, every week

The Eagles are a bet. I'll be against the Pats for the rest of the season I think. Gronk and Edelman are not just great players, they're key to the heart/mentality of that group of people. TB is obviously incredible but if he's nobody to throw it to he's limited. Incredible really, how unfortunate they seem to be with injuries, only the Cowboys compare really for running bad on IR's.

[fatcatstu]

Is Scott Chandler worth a bet on over 45.5?

Replacing Gronk in a weakened attack, I can't see Brady going bonkers with deep passes, so checking down to the TE could be a big option?

[Tal]

Is Scott Chandler worth a bet on over 45.5?

Replacing Gronk in a weakened attack, I can't see Brady going bonkers with deep passes, so checking down to the TE could be a big option?

The Eagles are much better against tight ends (11th) than wide receivers (31st to WR1; 18th to WR2), allowing 45.7 yards per game. I think that's partly because the opposition have been happy throwing to their receivers and using the tight end to bolster the offensive line, which is probably reflected in them having an average number of passes to tight ends against them, when they have such a poor pass defense (i.e., the extra passes are going elsewhere)

There might be something in it because Chandler can get downfield well. Depends whether Brady is happy with LaFell again for the deep routes.

So, I sort of like it but for a different reason

[JohnCharver]

year too early from big adz, hope you had at least a saver bud. Got to front like said, different horse.

[BigAdz]

year to early from big adz, hope you had at least a saver bud. Got to front like said, different horse.

Not a penny bud. Painful!

[JohnCharver]

year to early from big adz, hope you had at least a saver bud. Got to front like said, different horse.

Not a penny bud. Painful!

Could be worse, could be telling everyone how much moores horses are flying then miss the fact hes got the rag who just hacked up at sandown.

[fatcatstu]

Is Scott Chandler worth a bet on over 45.5?

Replacing Gronk in a weakened attack, I can't see Brady going bonkers with deep passes, so checking down to the TE could be a big option?

The Eagles are much better against tight ends (11th) than wide receivers (31st to WR1; 18th to WR2), allowing 45.7 yards per game. I think that's partly because the opposition have been happy throwing to their receivers and using the tight end to bolster the offensive line, which is probably reflected in them having an average number of passes to tight ends against them, when they have such a poor pass defense (i.e., the extra passes are going elsewhere)

There might be something in it because Chandler can get downfield well. Depends whether Brady is happy with LaFell again for the deep routes.

So, I sort of like it but for a different reason

OK, I will go for it.

Recommend £30 bet on Scott Chandler OVER 45.5 yards  for New England v Philadelphia

[Ironside]

3 points for Aberdeen today and goal for Rooney Celtic and hearts games are postponed . next week Aberdeen v hearts could go along way to deciding who if anyone will give Celtic a push

[Peter-27]

3 points for Aberdeen today and goal for Rooney Celtic and hearts games are postponed . next week Aberdeen v hearts could go along way to deciding who if anyone will give Celtic a push

Before the 3PM kick-offs begin, I have decided to cash out £4 of my going for goals spread bet (for £100) .. mainly because I'm expecting a cricket score in the Newcastle/Liverpool game. Still got £1 in play which I can cash out for £25.

[DMorgan]

Not sure if this would be a palp but Hills at 11/8 Seahawks -1.5 @ Vikings

Generally available prices are between 5/6 and 19/20

Rec £200

Edit: OP says hills is fine for Tikay to get on, is this info currently accurate? It mentions that fred doesn't have 888 but this account was made recently if I remember correctly?

[arbboy]

http://www.bagsracing.com/east-midlands.html

Final heat of this group just started.  Towcester had max points in the first race with 1st and 2nd place.  Nottingham might be struggling to get a highest runner up position after that start.

Nottingham out as they only got 21 points tonight and haven't beaten Hall green's highest loser score.  Looks highly likely that 2 from the southern division will go through to the final and possibly 3.  This would really help Newcastle bet if Romford and crayford both made the final as their track is so much smaller than a standard 480m track.

Confirmed through to final

Towcester
Monmore
Newcastle

Current two highest scoring runner ups

Belle Vue (194 points)
Hall Green (183 points)

Final heat tomorrow night for South region

http://www.bagsracing.com/the-south.html

Looking like at least two out of Romford, Crayford and Sittingbourne will go through to the final.  Maybe all 3 depending on how badly Wimbledon perform who haven't taken the event seriously at all.  Wimbledon have two runners in every race as they are at home though.  The 3 tracks who can still qualify only have one so their max score is 60 (assuming they win all 6 races)

Somehow HG have held on to a highest scoring loser position.  Romford win the Southern group with none of the other South teams going through as highest scoring losers.

Finalists as follows

Newcastle
Towcester
Monmore
Hall Green
Belle Vue
Romford

BV 194 points
HG 183 points
Crayford 182 points
Sittingbourne 181 points for the highest scoring losers

http://www.oddschecker.com/greyhounds/ante-post/bags-track-championship/winner

[Tal]

Does this mean we're off eight dog racing at Perry Barr then?

[arbboy]

Nottingham could easily get the gig now as well as Perry barr.  Would say nottingham probably more likely than PB.

[Doobs]

Not sure if this would be a palp but Hills at 11/8 Seahawks -1.5 @ Vikings

Generally available prices are between 5/6 and 19/20

Rec £200

Edit: OP says hills is fine for Tikay to get on, is this info currently accurate? It mentions that fred doesn't have 888 but this account was made recently if I remember correctly?

They look like they have messed the lot up.  They make them odds on favourites but +1.5 is evens.

I think they wanted to start at -2, but put the sign in wrong, so every price is for a score that is 4 points away.  I'd be very wary of putting £200 on.

[sonour]

Not sure if this would be a palp but Hills at 11/8 Seahawks -1.5 @ Vikings

Generally available prices are between 5/6 and 19/20

Rec £200

Edit: OP says hills is fine for Tikay to get on, is this info currently accurate? It mentions that fred doesn't have 888 but this account was made recently if I remember correctly?

They look like they have messed the lot up.  They make them odds on favourites but +1.5 is evens.

I think they wanted to start at -2, but put the sign in wrong, so every price is for a score that is 4 points away.  I'd be very wary of putting £200 on.

Same odds I. The shops for anyone interested.