Tips for Tikay

[exstream]

boro, worse team than watford were 20/1 to beat chelsea though, why would watford be 1.5x price of boro

[junior91]

exstream posted what is clearly a value bet, dont know why people like keith are being so hostile

[The Camel]

exstream posted what is clearly a value bet, dont know why people like keith are being so hostile

LOL, I'm not being hostile.

I'm just offering an opion that it was actually the correct price at the time.

Opinions are like arseholes, everyone has got one.

[JohnCharver]

Dont think camel is either wrong nor hostile above. Exstream is misrepresenting the price (not denying it was value but theres more too it.

It clearly wasnt 11/1 vs 19/1 its 11/1 times chelseas price vs wba to win. As the price decrease is totally reliant on that and anyone who thinks chelsea at home to a woeful watford team at the moment would be less than 19/1 is clutching at straws.

I dont agree with him being blanket ignored but its childish to aftertime prices that arent comparable.

[exstream]

I don't feel I ever misrepresented the price. I een said in my original post, if Chelsea don't win the title at West Brom, itll just be a bet at 19/1, which can't be that terrible in the premier league.
I also mentioned that surely Watford wouldn't get bigger as in the match day before that, Middlesbrough were 20/1 vs Chelsea.
I figured if Chelsea didn't win, watford would stay the same price, but if Chelsea at 2/5 did win, then watford would be a whole lot shorter
No afyertiming
Agree bout blanket ignore tho m8

[JohnCharver]

I don't feel I ever misrepresented the price. I een said in my original post, if Chelsea don't win the title at West Brom, itll just be a bet at 19/1, which can't be that terrible in the premier league.
I also mentioned that surely Watford wouldn't get bigger as in the match day before that, Middlesbrough were 20/1 vs Chelsea.
I figured if Chelsea didn't win, watford would stay the same price, but if Chelsea at 2/5 did win, then watford would be a whole lot shorter
No afyertiming
Agree bout blanket ignore tho m8

Middlesbroughs last game for survival vs a watford team who had showed nothing, with chelsea now needing a result. Agree with camel they would have been bigger but probably a bet on the two prices if correct.

You seem to have a bit to contribute particularly on darts, dont let it get lost in this nonsense imo. Who cares if tighty didnt get on because hes in a strop, would try to post tips for people who do give appreciate them.

Watford got beat so no value anyway lol.

[exstream]

a bit
ha
i know everything about everything
and yep lol gg watford

[rinswun]

Absolute skimmer for the bookies in the golf. For those placing, Oosthuizen would have been highest in the betting at 80ish/1.

Just a bit.

What price was the winner before it started?

Really hard to have envisaged that top three. Pleased for Poults though.

Most impressed by how cool and calm the winner was, he's only a kid, but he held himself together beautifully on a really nasty course all day. Well done him.

Top 5 were:

Kim - 400/1
Poulter - 250/1
Oosthuizen - 100/1
Cabrera Bello - 150/1
Stanley - 200/1

[TightEnd]

No idea who put it up, but Federer has pulled out of the French Open. 

Click to see full-size image.

so with Fed out, Djok struggling a bit, Murray coming back from injury and his worst surface where should we belooking?

Nadal? Wawrinka? a n other at a price?

https://www.oddschecker.com/tennis/french-open/mens/winner

[Doobs]

No idea who put it up, but Federer has pulled out of the French Open. 

Click to see full-size image.

so with Fed out, Djok struggling a bit, Murray coming back from injury and his worst surface where should we belooking?

Nadal? Wawrinka? a n other at a price?

https://www.oddschecker.com/tennis/french-open/mens/winner

I guess wait for the draw, back wheover has a chance each way in the side away from Nadal  (Djokovic and Murray are fairly close).

On Konta news.  She won on the clay in the 2nd round in Rome.  Despite her clay court season been fairly disastrous so far, she has climbed to 6 in the World.  This is because points are compared to the same tournaments in the l past, so her points aren't falling.  If she does put a run together somewhere, there is a good chance she moves up to 5 in the World, which is effectively top 4 in Serena's absence.   On the downside, though she isn't many points behind Chibulkova in 5, there are a handful of players who could knock her down a peg or two if they go on good runs too.

[tikay]

It's amazing how the Online Sports Betting industry - which never even existed 20 years ago - is evolving. Not always in ways many of us like, but that misses the point.

I was randomly sent news of this site a few days ago, "Kwiff". Their gimmick is that they randomly boost the odds, much the same as BetStars do.

Think I'll use these people as much as I use BetStars. 


http://kwiff.com/#/company

[bergeroo]

No idea who put it up, but Federer has pulled out of the French Open. 

Click to see full-size image.

so with Fed out, Djok struggling a bit, Murray coming back from injury and his worst surface where should we belooking?

Nadal? Wawrinka? a n other at a price?

https://www.oddschecker.com/tennis/french-open/mens/winner

I'd happily go each way Thiem if he is in the opposite side of the draw to Nadal. I haven't checked player schedules but I am assuming and hoping he takes next week off to rest and prepare... I couldn't really get involved with Murray with his stuttering form on clay. Likewise Djoko to an extent. Stan is 1-2 on clay this year so far. Let's see how he does in Rome.

[tikay]

Absolute skimmer for the bookies in the golf. For those placing, Oosthuizen would have been highest in the betting at 80ish/1.

Just a bit.

What price was the winner before it started?

Really hard to have envisaged that top three. Pleased for Poults though.

Most impressed by how cool and calm the winner was, he's only a kid, but he held himself together beautifully on a really nasty course all day. Well done him.

Top 5 were:

Kim - 400/1
Poulter - 250/1
Oosthuizen - 100/1
Cabrera Bello - 150/1
Stanley - 200/1

How does that even happen?

Amazing stuff. And those 5 all deserved to do well from what I saw, although Cabrero Bello did have, shall we say, the rub of the green towards the end.

On which note, did anyone see Sarah Stirk interview Cabrero after his albatross? Now an albatross is certainly worth a mention, but like a par 3 hole in one, it owes a great deal to luck, & in Cabrero's case that was most certainly true. And Miss Stirk was wetting herself with excitement at his "amazing" albatross. Well it was good, yeah, but if only the Media would treat us as fully grown adults.

[SuuPRlim]

Very interested to see how Wawrinka gets on in Rome, its really difficult not to wanna have a go at 10/1 in the current state of things, the man knows how to win.

[BigAdz]

Absolute skimmer for the bookies in the golf. For those placing, Oosthuizen would have been highest in the betting at 80ish/1.

Just a bit.

What price was the winner before it started?

Really hard to have envisaged that top three. Pleased for Poults though.

Most impressed by how cool and calm the winner was, he's only a kid, but he held himself together beautifully on a really nasty course all day. Well done him.

Top 5 were:

Kim - 400/1
Poulter - 250/1
Oosthuizen - 100/1
Cabrera Bello - 150/1
Stanley - 200/1

How does that even happen?

Amazing stuff. And those 5 all deserved to do well from what I saw, although Cabrero Bello did have, shall we say, the rub of the green towards the end.

On which note, did anyone see Sarah Stirk interview Cabrero after his albatross? Now an albatross is certainly worth a mention, but like a par 3 hole in one, it owes a great deal to luck, & in Cabrero's case that was most certainly true. And Miss Stirk was wetting herself with excitement at his "amazing" albatross. Well it was good, yeah, but if only the Media would treat us as fully grown adults.

I still would though.