blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 04:21:50 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Independence Referendum
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: Do you agree that Scotland should be an independent country?
Yes - because it would be better for the Scots
Yes - because the rest of the UK would be better off without the Scots
Don't really know
Don't care
No, the Union is a good thing

Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 ... 114 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Independence Referendum  (Read 225843 times)
celtic
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19177



View Profile
« Reply #735 on: September 09, 2014, 04:59:23 PM »

The funny thing about all this is it's dividing Scotland and causing problems amongst friends. Seems ridiculous.
Logged

Keefy is back Smiley But for how long?
Eck
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3313


View Profile WWW
« Reply #736 on: September 09, 2014, 05:20:47 PM »

The funny thing about all this is it's dividing Scotland and causing problems amongst friends. Seems ridiculous.

yeah, I'm getting pissed you haven't organised this night out yet.
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #737 on: September 09, 2014, 05:32:29 PM »

The funny thing about all this is it's dividing Scotland and causing problems amongst friends. Seems ridiculous.

Just imagine when people decide independence has failed and the riots start 
Logged
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13270


View Profile
« Reply #738 on: September 09, 2014, 05:36:32 PM »

the serious stuff is done for the day!!!  The thread can relax and have a laugh now!
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #739 on: September 09, 2014, 05:39:22 PM »

Paul Waugh ‏@paulwaugh (Editor of PoliticsHome.com)

Quote of the Day. Salmond on issue of reneging on Scotland's debt: "What are they gonna to do? Invade?"


lol, what a weasel.
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Kmac84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


View Profile
« Reply #740 on: September 09, 2014, 06:06:34 PM »

But I don't see why using the £ is an asset really?  I think Scotland should get a share of the UK's reserves and keep the infrastructure it has built up.  In return it should take a share of debt and take on it's own pension liabilities going forward.  

I see the currency question as a seperate argument.

How so? Sterling is a tradeable currency therefore its an asset, no?
Logged
Kmac84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


View Profile
« Reply #741 on: September 09, 2014, 06:12:23 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16729


View Profile
« Reply #742 on: September 09, 2014, 06:14:30 PM »

But I don't see why using the £ is an asset really?  I think Scotland should get a share of the UK's reserves and keep the infrastructure it has built up.  In return it should take a share of debt and take on it's own pension liabilities going forward.  

I see the currency question as a seperate argument.

How so? Sterling is a tradeable currency therefore its an asset, no?

No
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16729


View Profile
« Reply #743 on: September 09, 2014, 06:16:30 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 

Before 1692?  You not think some improvements may have been made since then? 
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13270


View Profile
« Reply #744 on: September 09, 2014, 06:18:13 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 

Before 1692?  You not think some improvements may have been made since then? 

lolz!  Is that what you call owned Kmac or pawned!
Logged
Kmac84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


View Profile
« Reply #745 on: September 09, 2014, 06:25:16 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 

Before 1692?  You not think some improvements may have been made since then? 

Your not seriously suggesting this debt runs back to then.  FFS geez peace.
Logged
Kmac84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


View Profile
« Reply #746 on: September 09, 2014, 06:26:42 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 

Before 1692?  You not think some improvements may have been made since then? 

lolz!  Is that what you call owned Kmac or pawned!

I wouldn't say so. 
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #747 on: September 09, 2014, 06:28:26 PM »

To be fair - if the argument is that the debt was run up by the UK, not in Scotland's name therefore we won't pay, it does become a matter of honour.  You don't have to pay technically, but it's not very nice if you don't.

And I'm not sure where we are going with the asset argument - Scotland has plenty of infrastructure funded by UK debt?  The English aren't threatening to knock your hospitals down as far as I know.


I agree, but the threat not to take a share of the debt was in response to the claim that we can't use the £. 

I'm pretty sure we all agree that an independent Scotland will use the £ and in that case we will do what is  morally right and pay our fair share. 

Its the rUK who have been playing the scaremongering game from the day dot.

If rUK decide you can't use the pound why wouldn't you still pay off your debts when you leave?  After all, it's not the rUK who are asking you to leave.  You are leaving to become a stronger country so why wouldn't you settle all balances in full prior to you leaving whether you can use the pound or not?

You can't be serious. 

Why do you think we should take a share of debt we never borrowed f we don't get our fair share of assetts? 

You did reap the benefits of the borrowing as part of the UK.  You have hospitals, roads, schools.   You are keeping these assets.

We had hospitals, roads and schools well before this debt was taken on. 

Before 1692?  You not think some improvements may have been made since then? 

Your not seriously suggesting this debt runs back to then.  FFS geez peace.

i think the point is the assets don't pre-date the Union
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #748 on: September 09, 2014, 06:56:31 PM »

The funny thing about all this is it's dividing Scotland and causing problems amongst friends. Seems ridiculous.

friends have disowned me on facebook and removed me because I play devils advocate
I debate with both the yes and no camp and some people cant understand I am still undecided
and think I am firmly in the opposite camp to them

strength of feeling up here is swinging to YES with more people coming out as yes voters than no voters recently
how much of the fact the no campaigners are less vocals through not want to sound unpatriotic is unknown

earlier in the campaign my parents who are tories and very blue tories at that my mum a rare breed in Scotland as a thatcher fan
gave up there own time to put leaflets through the doors for the no campaign they refused to do it a 2nd time not because of
the fact they are swaying in there views if anything they are more entrenched in the NO camp but because of the reaction of "friends" and neighbours they have known for nearly 40 years
with an raf camp and an army base within a few miles of my home the village is split between nationalities but I haven't seen 1 no poster in a window
I honestly think the people are rightly or wrongly scared to put up a poster just incase.

I do know in the next village its a strong NO area many of the people are retired up here from England
 but still there are not many NO posters up

wounds have opened up amongst friends that are going to take years to heal I feel
I hope I am wrong
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
Kmac84
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2122


View Profile
« Reply #749 on: September 09, 2014, 07:16:58 PM »

I was in Labour heartslands of Coatbridge & Airdrie today and it was plastered in Yes posters.  Along Alexandra Parade through to Cumbernauld Rd, uptowards Stepps the Yes Posters outnumbered NO's 10:1

Alistair Darling although given a pretty easy time on Reporting Scotland struggled with some of Jackie Bird's questions.  If ponsonby gives him a hard time tonight like he did Salmond last night he might just pack it in. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 ... 114 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.254 seconds with 22 queries.