Two chip ruling query

[tight4better]

Can see the argument, SENSIBLE ruling is call. I would see call 100% of time.

To COMPLETELY rule out angle shooting I guess a raise, but I guess most people who want to 2k it would probably announce as 98.41% of people would probably see a call in that spot.

[slowrolled]

depends on the action though. obv if you make it 1 thousand and i throw in a 5k and a 100 chip its a raise. taking away either chip is more than a call. but if you minraise someone to 1100 and i throw in a 1k and a 500 its two different value chips but still a call.

[outragous76]

depends on the action though. obv if you make it 1 thousand and i throw in a 5k and a 100 chip its a raise. taking away either chip is more than a call. but if you minraise someone to 1100 and i throw in a 1k and a 500 its two different value chips but still a call.

and this is why the rule is an absolute farce

[slowrolled]

i agree, i dont like the rule at all, although it doesnt leave much scope for angling. except possibly throwing in the call gauging the reaction of the player your in the hand with. although that would only work if you knew they didnt know it was a call, so not much chance of that. personally think it should be a raise but such is life

[pokerfan]

depends on the action though. obv if you make it 1 thousand and i throw in a 5k and a 100 chip its a raise. taking away either chip is more than a call. but if you minraise someone to 1100 and i throw in a 1k and a 500 its two different value chips but still a call.

Bad example, or lolraise ?

[slowrolled]

lol bad example maybe. personally i think if you put anything past the betting line and its more than 50% of the min raise it should be a raise. wether its 2 chips 5 chips or 20 rotten banana skins

[pokerfan]

Look at dealer, say raise or call, job done.

[Junior Senior]

This thread is pissing me off so i am done with it.

Its a mfkin raise ffs and rule is gay.

[doubleup]

depends on the action though. obv if you make it 1 thousand and i throw in a 5k and a 100 chip its a raise. taking away either chip is more than a call. but if you minraise someone to 1100 and i throw in a 1k and a 500 its two different value chips but still a call.

and this is why the rule is an absolute farce

lol The rule and ruling is about two chips of the same denomination, not a 5k chip and a 100 chip - this is like ppl making up EU regs and saying they prove the EU is crap.

[SuuPRlim]

Look at dealer, say raise or call, job done.

yh its just so retarded. I do it sometimes by mistake (just plain sloppy) and end up calling when I wanted to raise but w/e just dont do it.

[dik9]

Call, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez

[cambridgealex]

Call, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez

Finally some sense itt.

People getting tilted by what is obviously a good rule (see above) is tilting in itself!

[Doobs]

Call, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez

Finally some sense itt.

People getting tilted by what is obviously a good rule (see above) is tilting in itself!

Obviously a terrible use of the word obviously.  Got to say I find that a bit tilting.

Thought you went to a school where they learnt you good English, sir*.

* Sent the other half of the forum on tilt there.

[gatso]

Call, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez

Finally some sense itt.javascript:void(0);

People getting tilted by what is obviously a good rule (see above) is tilting in itself!

the above doesn't show that it's a good rule, just that it's a rule. if the rule was that it goes as a raise then dik9 would've posted

Raise, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a raise
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to call just say call........ simplez

would that make that version of it a good rule?

[cambridgealex]

Call, anywhere I've worked.


Bet is 1100 a player only has 10x1k chips puts 2 1k chips in its a call
Therefore if a player has a mixture of chips and puts in 2 1k chips without saying anything then the same rule has to apply. Cant have 1 rule for 1 and a different rule for the same action. If they want to raise just say raise ........ simplez

Finally some sense itt.

People getting tilted by what is obviously a good rule (see above) is tilting in itself!

Obviously a terrible use of the word obviously.  Got to say I find that a bit tilting.

Thought you went to a school where they learnt you good English, sir*.

* Sent the other half of the forum on tilt there.

Terrible grammatically or terrible in that you disagree?

Btw, if using the phrase "learnt you good English" was intentional irony, wp.