blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 31, 2025, 06:51:57 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262602 Posts in 66610 Topics by 16992 Members
Latest Member: Rmf22
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  The UK Politics and EU Referendum thread - merged
0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Poll
Question: How will you vote on December 12th 2019
Conservative - 19 (33.9%)
Labour - 12 (21.4%)
SNP - 2 (3.6%)
Lib Dem - 8 (14.3%)
Brexit - 1 (1.8%)
Green - 6 (10.7%)
Other - 2 (3.6%)
Spoil - 0 (0%)
Not voting - 6 (10.7%)
Total Voters: 55

Pages: 1 ... 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 ... 1533 Go Down Print
Author Topic: The UK Politics and EU Referendum thread - merged  (Read 2865297 times)
AlunB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1712


View Profile WWW
« Reply #585 on: October 28, 2015, 04:57:37 PM »

The other thing that struck me as positive for the tax take by using salary/dividend is the fact that the remaining funds after tax are in the hands of individuals who will spend a proportion of it generating other jobs, paying VAT etc.

The company paying corporation tax and leaving the funds undistributed in cash reserves generates nothing extra (other than the obvious point that every company needs working capital/financial stability).

What is Apple expecting to happen with its $205bn cash reserve?

Apple are hardly a typical example. They are a fairly unique. How many other businesses do you know with those reserves?

I presume they will eventually buy other business and also distribute funds to shareholders in some form or other.

Was a joke Smiley

As in are they expecting the downfall of Western civilisation or are they planning on buying Spain.
Logged
RickBFA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1932


View Profile
« Reply #586 on: October 28, 2015, 04:58:39 PM »

The other thing that struck me as positive for the tax take by using salary/dividend is the fact that the remaining funds after tax are in the hands of individuals who will spend a proportion of it generating other jobs, paying VAT etc.

The company paying corporation tax and leaving the funds undistributed in cash reserves generates nothing extra (other than the obvious point that every company needs working capital/financial stability).

Given this, assessing how ethical a business is by judging it on how much corporation tax it pays is pretty naive.

People aren't half making some leaps of logic with my questions and comments here.

Wasn't the article a few pages ago doing just that? I wasn't aiming my comment directly at you, just giving an opinion in general.
Logged
RickBFA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1932


View Profile
« Reply #587 on: October 28, 2015, 05:02:42 PM »

The other thing that struck me as positive for the tax take by using salary/dividend is the fact that the remaining funds after tax are in the hands of individuals who will spend a proportion of it generating other jobs, paying VAT etc.

The company paying corporation tax and leaving the funds undistributed in cash reserves generates nothing extra (other than the obvious point that every company needs working capital/financial stability).

What is Apple expecting to happen with its $205bn cash reserve?

Apple are hardly a typical example. They are a fairly unique. How many other businesses do you know with those reserves?

I presume they will eventually buy other business and also distribute funds to shareholders in some form or other.

Was a joke Smiley

As in are they expecting the downfall of Western civilisation or are they planning on buying Spain.

:-)
Logged
AlunB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1712


View Profile WWW
« Reply #588 on: October 28, 2015, 05:04:15 PM »

The other thing that struck me as positive for the tax take by using salary/dividend is the fact that the remaining funds after tax are in the hands of individuals who will spend a proportion of it generating other jobs, paying VAT etc.

The company paying corporation tax and leaving the funds undistributed in cash reserves generates nothing extra (other than the obvious point that every company needs working capital/financial stability).

Given this, assessing how ethical a business is by judging it on how much corporation tax it pays is pretty naive.

People aren't half making some leaps of logic with my questions and comments here.

Wasn't the article a few pages ago doing just that? I wasn't aiming my comment directly at you, just giving an opinion in general.

Oh. Sorry. Was getting a tad defensive.

Not paying any corporation tax at all over several years if the company is profitable is generally seen as not optimally ethical.

But that wasn't the case for Osborne and Little and the piece is clearly a wind-up of some sort and not meant to be taken literally.
Logged
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9165



View Profile WWW
« Reply #589 on: October 29, 2015, 09:27:34 AM »

Question of the day

What political issue causes the most conflict within you? What is the topic where you hold two very opposing ideas and you can't work out which side you lean towards.
Logged
AlunB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1712


View Profile WWW
« Reply #590 on: October 29, 2015, 11:01:05 AM »

V good question Bazza.

I would say pretty much anything where theory comes into conflict with Nimbyism. Immigration would be a big one for most people in that sense. I'm not sure what it is for me. Possibly education. I think there is real evidence that selective education (grammar schools and such) provide more social mobility but they are also inherently unfair.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #591 on: October 29, 2015, 11:56:30 AM »

the chilcot report is now due out in jul 16

it is 2 million words long, and each word needs to be security checked

If printed in double-spaced 12pt Times New Roman on 250 gsm paper, the Chilcot report would stack 1.9 metres (6'3") high

it would take the average person 120 hours to read

executive summary might be key.
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
DaveShoelace
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9165



View Profile WWW
« Reply #592 on: October 29, 2015, 11:58:23 AM »

the chilcot report is now due out in jul 16

it is 2 million words long, and each word needs to be security checked

If printed in double-spaced 12pt Times New Roman on 250 gsm paper, the Chilcot report would stack 1.9 metres (6'3") high

it would take the average person 120 hours to read

executive summary might be key.

What a fantastic way to stall, I bet there are not contractions in that bad boy. It is will beat it's all the way.
Logged
AlunB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1712


View Profile WWW
« Reply #593 on: October 29, 2015, 12:01:15 PM »

Loved this

https://twitter.com/hrtbps/status/557659918510325763
Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #594 on: October 29, 2015, 01:26:33 PM »

I'd hate to be the person in the office who needs to print out a boarding pass on the day they're printing that out.
Logged
Marky147
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22638



View Profile
« Reply #595 on: October 29, 2015, 03:10:29 PM »

I'd hate to be the person in the office who needs to print out a boarding pass on the day they're printing that out.

Cheesy


What do people think about John McDonnell?

As I've said, until these threads were started on here, I've never followed politics at all.

In turn, I don't know any politicians beyond the ones who get all the headlines.

Saw him on QT last month, and thought he came across very well, and seems to be a lot more likeable than Osborne, who I believe is his opposite number.

Logged

The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17076


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #596 on: October 29, 2015, 04:22:23 PM »


Do you know who the person is who makes the tweets for this account?

Seems to get retweeted onto my timeline alot and seems very sharp and funny.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
AlunB
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1712


View Profile WWW
« Reply #597 on: October 29, 2015, 04:29:47 PM »

He's just a normal guy from Leeds as far as I know.
Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #598 on: October 29, 2015, 06:49:32 PM »

Question of the day

What political issue causes the most conflict within you? What is the topic where you hold two very opposing ideas and you can't work out which side you lean towards.

For me it's the Brexit question.

On the one hand the EU is a horribly bureaucratic behemoth, operated purely to advance the cause of capitalism, culminating in the TTIP nonsense (a trade treaty they want to implement, which is so bad that the details of it are secret).

On the other, outside of the EU, Britain is just a small island stuck out in the North Sea, liable to be kicked around by USA/China/Russia.
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3883



View Profile
« Reply #599 on: October 29, 2015, 11:39:44 PM »

I'd hate to be the person in the office who needs to print out a boarding pass on the day they're printing that out.

Cheesy


What do people think about John McDonnell?

As I've said, until these threads were started on here, I've never followed politics at all.

In turn, I don't know any politicians beyond the ones who get all the headlines.

Saw him on QT last month, and thought he came across very well, and seems to be a lot more likeable than Osborne, who I believe is his opposite number.



If everybody formed their view based on directly watching and listening to politicians rather than allowing the press and other people to tell them what to think, British politics would be very, very different. Milliband, Corbyn and McDonnell being outstanding recent examples. When Dacre and Murdoch die it will be a wonderful day for democracy and no I haven't been drinking :-)
« Last Edit: October 29, 2015, 11:45:34 PM by kukushkin88 » Logged
Pages: 1 ... 36 37 38 39 [40] 41 42 43 44 ... 1533 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.097 seconds with 21 queries.