|
rinswun
|
 |
« Reply #870 on: August 29, 2016, 02:08:26 PM » |
|
Oh yeh, it wasn't the elbow that connected but his fist caught him flush on the side of his jaw/neck.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Archer
|
|
« Reply #871 on: August 29, 2016, 03:36:55 PM » |
|
https://twitter.com/cheadleblue16/status/769948558694965248Aguero definitely naughty there but looking at that link clearly the contact was the neck and below. It is so rare that Aguero snaps like that it makes you wonder what other unseen dark arts Reid got up to during the game. I like the way he goes down holding his face but then when going off the pitch he is holding his neck. Make your mind up Winston. It will be interesting to see how it pans out with Marriner's report but fearing the 3 match ban. All this detracts from the game. Some of the stuff was excellent yesterday and totally loved it. Think this Guardiola fella is going to be good..... Sterling awarded MOTM yet again and that's now 2 penalties won, 3 assists and 2 goals in his 4 games. Silva was the star man for me tho and at his silky best running the show.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
exstream
|
|
« Reply #872 on: August 30, 2016, 01:39:50 AM » |
|
Nobody wants Joe Hart, going to Torino lol
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
hhyftrftdr
|
|
« Reply #873 on: August 30, 2016, 01:49:11 AM » |
|
Nobody wants Joe Hart, going to Torino lol
Wonder if there is more to this than meets the eye.....a certain Torino right back called Peres that we tried and failed to buy this summer.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best Bitter.
|
|
|
|
Archer
|
|
« Reply #874 on: August 30, 2016, 07:19:38 PM » |
|
From the FA site: Sergio Aguero has been charged for an alleged act of violent conduct which was not seen by the match officials but caught on video.
The Manchester City forward was involved in an incident with West Ham United’s Winston Reid in the 76th minute of the game on Sunday [28 August 2016].
He has until 6pm on Wednesday 31 August to reply.
Off the ball incidents which are not seen at the time by the match officials are referred to a panel of three former elite match officials.
Each panel member will review the video footage independently of one another to determine whether they consider it a sending-off offence.
For retrospective action to be taken, and an FA charge to follow, the decision of the panel must be unanimous.
So, Marriner didn't see it and the FA consider it to be an "off the ball" incident. Looking at the image below that all adds up   |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Karabiner
|
|
« Reply #875 on: August 30, 2016, 07:40:59 PM » |
|
Do you think there might be a "campaign"?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
|
|
|
|
Cf
|
|
« Reply #876 on: August 30, 2016, 09:00:07 PM » |
|
They need to do away with this "if the official saw it we can't do anything about it" for violent conduct. Just make all violent conduct retroactable (new word there).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Blue text
|
|
|
|
hhyftrftdr
|
|
« Reply #877 on: August 30, 2016, 09:42:41 PM » |
|
We've had trial by television before at City, Balotelli vs Spurs (?) a few years despite Webb seeing it at the time.
100% he'll be found guilty, sadly. No chance the FA don't take this opportunity to ban our star striker.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best Bitter.
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
|
« Reply #878 on: August 30, 2016, 09:45:47 PM » |
|
Because it is an open and shut case. Just like huth and vardy last year. No need for flimsy conspiracy theories please!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #879 on: August 30, 2016, 10:13:10 PM » |
|
Because it is an open and shut case. Just like huth and vardy last year. No need for flimsy conspiracy theories please!
This. Utter tosh that your team is somehow the victim. Bottom gravy of the highest order. What annoys me about the rule is a player only gets a three game ban, when, had they been caught by the officials at the time, they would have been sent off AND given a three game ban. Should really be getting a fourth game for a retrospective one. I'll say the same for spurs players FWIW. Can't go round walloping people. Don't start me on Balotelli v Spurs... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
|
hhyftrftdr
|
|
« Reply #880 on: August 30, 2016, 10:21:49 PM » |
|
Where's the conspiracy theory? We're not talking about UEFA's heated balls  It's clearly not off the ball, and the ref has clearly seen it. If the FA want to bend the rules occasionally then so be it. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best Bitter.
|
|
|
|
hhyftrftdr
|
|
« Reply #881 on: August 30, 2016, 11:16:02 PM » |
|
If Aguero gets banned then he only has himself to blame; he's swung an elbow in the direction of the defender so despite missing him there is intent there. Warrant a 3 match ban? I'm not sure but I don't doubt the independent 3 man panel will decide the right course of action.
However, its consistency we all want to see. There are players in the PL who do this stuff week in week out and get away with it. Costa nearly snaps Adrian's leg in half in the opening game and nothing. The FA are also making a mockery of the situation by saying it was off the ball and missed by the official. It was clearly neither and Marriner has bottled it.
Ref knows that if he said 'Actually I saw it, and didn't think much of it hence not blowing up', he'll be in charge of a Burton vs Leeds match next week.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best Bitter.
|
|
|
|
Archer
|
|
« Reply #882 on: August 31, 2016, 01:15:31 AM » |
|
Because it is an open and shut case. Just like huth and vardy last year. No need for flimsy conspiracy theories please!
This. Utter tosh that your team is somehow the victim. Bottom gravy of the highest order. What annoys me about the rule is a player only gets a three game ban, when, had they been caught by the officials at the time, they would have been sent off AND given a three game ban. Should really be getting a fourth game for a retrospective one.
I'll say the same for spurs players FWIW. Can't go round walloping people. Don't start me on Balotelli v Spurs... No problem for me if Marriner had sent him off. Utter tosh IMO to suggest an extra game for a retrospective ban. You are talking in generic terms but looking at the specifics of this incident why on earth should Aguero get an extra game (assuming he gets suspended) for Marriners incompetence in not spotting it when positioned with the best view on the pitch? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Archer
|
|
« Reply #883 on: August 31, 2016, 01:43:18 AM » |
|
If Aguero gets banned then he only has himself to blame; he's swung an elbow in the direction of the defender so despite missing him there is intent there. Warrant a 3 match ban? I'm not sure but I don't doubt the independent 3 man panel will decide the right course of action.
However, its consistency we all want to see. There are players in the PL who do this stuff week in week out and get away with it. Costa nearly snaps Adrian's leg in half in the opening game and nothing. The FA are also making a mockery of the situation by saying it was off the ball and missed by the official. It was clearly neither and Marriner has bottled it.
Ref knows that if he said 'Actually I saw it, and didn't think much of it hence not blowing up', he'll be in charge of a Burton vs Leeds match next week.
I wouldn't have had a problem if Aguero had been sent off because it certainly looks bad albeit it wasn't full on assault. I'd speculate that if Aguero really wanted to do Reid he would know exactly where his face was. My problem is with the process and it just seems implausible that Marriner didn't see it. In some respects it is a shame Marriner didn't see it - he probably would have given a yellow card. Certainly he was reluctant to send Massuaku off who was spoken to no fewer than 3 times after his original booking. How he stayed on the pitch was a total mystery. IIRC Aguero has only completely lost it once and that was against David Luiz (the master wind-up merchant) in the cup semi-final 3 years ago when he chased him and lunged into him with both feet. 100% red card IMO. The referee awarded a free kick and subsequently based on the rules at the time there could be no retrospective action against Aguero because the ref saw the incident and had acted on it by awarding a free kick. Clattenburg will get the Derby and the fun will continue.... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
hhyftrftdr
|
|
« Reply #884 on: September 01, 2016, 12:33:57 AM » |
|
We got any players left?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Best Bitter.
|
|
|
|
Author