Hmmmmm very interesting spot here

[lolwutwasthat]

Maybe im just bad, you guys are welcome to play me anytime.

[Rexas]

Maybe im just bad, you guys are welcome to play me anytime.

I didn't say that either, just trying to offer my opinion.

[lolwutwasthat]

It'll be a very good proposition for you if my lines dont make sense, wanting to call Ahigh, not barreling with correct ranges. Printttt

[Rexas]

I'm not sure why you're getting so offended here, pretty sure I'm the one that's taken most of the stick in this thread :p

When you post a PHA, you should expect people to have different opinions. There are good, winning players on this forum that are happy to comment and explain their thought processes. I mean, what do you gain from posting if everyone just says you're right and leaves it there?

[Rexas]

DISCLAIMER - I am not saying I am a good winning player :p

[david3103]

I have no qualifications to comment here, play zero cash these days, although I used to, in this sort of game.
Without having sat with villain for a while it's hard to know quite what he thinks you have in your range. From your comments he's more interested in what he has and probably has the classic view of your hand. "I put you on Ace King mate"

Does he have a significant river bluffing range? Only you can know. We don't.
Should he have a significant bluffing range? Yes, especially since you have given him a cheap look at the river.
Seems doubtful that you are winning if you call, he has plenty of queens and jacks when he doesn't have the flush.
The remaining question is, will he fold to a jam? Again, we can't know that. Some players will, some definitely won't. As a former member here used to point out regularly, "you can't bluff idiots".

[titaniumbean]

Maybe im just bad, you guys are welcome to play me anytime.

but we don't play high enough   

[pleno1]

fwiw, op is very good reg. prob coming across bad here, river is somewhat interesting though. these things all about in game perceived ranges etc. like how close is he to finishing his session, how much is he up? how has his last 5 sessions gone etc etc, his frequencies will be based on  things we have no idea about.

thats why live poker hhs are 99% impossible to answer.


"it depends"

[PathFinder]

fwiw, op is very good reg. prob coming across bad here, river is somewhat interesting though. these things all about in game perceived ranges etc. like how close is he to finishing his session, how much is he up? how has his last 5 sessions gone etc etc, his frequencies will be based on  things we have no idea about.

thats why live poker hhs are 99% impossible to answer.


"it depends"

You could apply the same questions to an online hand, these things aren't live exclusive.

[diondustbin]

given you checked the turn you can't really jam repping the nut flush, you can really only have a7cc. i think check call flop is better but if you're going to bet the flop then bet the turn

[SuuPRlim]

in what world would he not raise a 9 high flush here  OTR? I think if you're against the right kinda opponent then its a cool river to raise for value with 89 too.

[MANTIS01]

Not sure if it's still relevant but I would deffo say Phil Laak is passive. I mean I know he bops up and down in his hoodie trying to act crazy but if you look at his actual play it's pretty nitty really.

[rfgqqabc]

First river bet seems really spewy to me, not sure what we are repping at all, especially for pot vs a nit. Kinda see why you want to call the river but I don't think its going to be +ev. Much more on board with the bet lots of turns and rivers plan. We block quite a lot of good hands, he will raise the stronger ones on the turn so we get a really profitable river bet imo.