Renee Xsie

[DropTheHammer]

The chat messages are quite amusing, "Can't believe she was trying to sell action to people.for this hope she goes broke pure scum and filth what she did"

The Tower has gone very quiet.

[Doobs]

The chat messages are quite amusing, "Can't believe she was trying to sell action to people.for this hope she goes broke pure scum and filth what she did"

The Tower has gone very quiet.

The chat messages are a bit too much.  Sure pull her up for stealing money, but some in the chat box are not making me feel any better about them.

Edit.  Didn't realise she is wearing a t-shirt with "bad" on the front.  That takes some chutzpah.

[Ironside]

Guess who's on the feature table...

mike jones?

how many guesses do i get?

[DropTheHammer]

Edit.  Didn't realise she is wearing a t-shirt with "bad" on the front.  That takes some chutzpah.

Well, you could call it that...

[DaveShoelace]

Has Alex walked onto the stream yet and pointed at her shouting 'grimmer' yet?

[DropTheHammer]

I played with seat 2 'Nik' a couple of years ago and he was very good then...

[DropTheHammer]

And seat 3 too. He was conservative and very quiet at the table.

[Woodsey]

Has Alex walked onto the stream yet and pointed at her shouting 'grimmer' yet?

Should def get a t-shirt with that on and float by the table a few times 

[DropTheHammer]

"They have mispelt Anonymous."   

[sonour]

The gist of the PM is I don't like witch hunts and mob rule.

That seems like fair comment, but why did you have to say it via PM when you made your original observations in public?

Surely the way forward would have been to PM Alex in the first place.

I probably shouldn't have made the comments about Alex in the first place.

I was pretty angry when I saw him bragging about "outing" her like he was some sort of hero. But I should have counted to ten and not posted.

Makes no difference what I think, and I just get into pointless arguments with people whose opinions are not going to change.

So I decided not to post on the subject again. But then Dan made a perfectly civil post which I thought was worthy of a reply, so I PMed him.

See that's the thing Keith. Most people don't think he was bragging about outing her like he was some sort of hero.

If you make controversial comments people will disagree and ask you to defend them, that's how debate works.

Is your opinion likely to change BTW?

Impossible my opinion changes.

He has fallen to the lowest common denominator and resorted to oafish behaviour. On a subject that is none of his business. She didn't steal from him.

Achieved nothing.

I couldn't disagree with this more.

[Karabiner]

The gist of the PM is I don't like witch hunts and mob rule.

That seems like fair comment, but why did you have to say it via PM when you made your original observations in public?

Surely the way forward would have been to PM Alex in the first place.

I probably shouldn't have made the comments about Alex in the first place.

I was pretty angry when I saw him bragging about "outing" her like he was some sort of hero. But I should have counted to ten and not posted.

Makes no difference what I think, and I just get into pointless arguments with people whose opinions are not going to change.

So I decided not to post on the subject again. But then Dan made a perfectly civil post which I thought was worthy of a reply, so I PMed him.

See that's the thing Keith. Most people don't think he was bragging about outing her like he was some sort of hero.

If you make controversial comments people will disagree and ask you to defend them, that's how debate works.

Is your opinion likely to change BTW?

Impossible my opinion changes.

He has fallen to the lowest common denominator and resorted to oafish behaviour. On a subject that is none of his business. She didn't steal from him.

Achieved nothing.

And your calling Alex out was none of those things?

He bragged about it on internet poker forum that I visit.

Wasn't she  gambling with stolen money in a casino that he visits?

Roughly how much of the money that is in play in tourneys and cash games is either "stolen" or "dirty" would you say Tom?

20%, 30%, or possibly more imo but that doesn't stop anyone playing on moral grounds that I know of.

[RED-DOG]

The gist of the PM is I don't like witch hunts and mob rule.

That seems like fair comment, but why did you have to say it via PM when you made your original observations in public?

Surely the way forward would have been to PM Alex in the first place.

I probably shouldn't have made the comments about Alex in the first place.

I was pretty angry when I saw him bragging about "outing" her like he was some sort of hero. But I should have counted to ten and not posted.

Makes no difference what I think, and I just get into pointless arguments with people whose opinions are not going to change.

So I decided not to post on the subject again. But then Dan made a perfectly civil post which I thought was worthy of a reply, so I PMed him.

See that's the thing Keith. Most people don't think he was bragging about outing her like he was some sort of hero.

If you make controversial comments people will disagree and ask you to defend them, that's how debate works.

Is your opinion likely to change BTW?

Impossible my opinion changes.

He has fallen to the lowest common denominator and resorted to oafish behaviour. On a subject that is none of his business. She didn't steal from him.

Achieved nothing.

And your calling Alex out was none of those things?

He bragged about it on internet poker forum that I visit.

Wasn't she  gambling with stolen money in a casino that he visits?

Roughly how much of the money that is in play in tourneys and cash games is either "stolen" or "dirty" would you say Tom?

20%, 30%, or possibly more imo but that doesn't stop anyone playing on moral grounds that I know of.

Oh I don't know Ralph. IMO it doesn't matter if it's 10% or 100%, the moral argument is still the same. That wasn't really the point I was trying to make though.

Keith's argument was that he called Alex out because he did something that Keith disagrees with in a place that he visits, so I countered with the fact that Alex called Renne out because she did something that he disagrees with in a place that he visits.



My own opinion on the matter is, although what she has done is deplorable, it isn't that shocking. Gamblers are poor choices when it comes to choosing who to trust with your money.

When it comes to lending money I use this criteria.

1- I trust them completely.

2-  They give me some collateral.

3- I trust them a bit and it's an amount I won't lose sleep over.

[RED-DOG]

I've just looked at your question again Ralph. I didn't quite understand it the first time but now I do.

I think 20-30% is a conservative estimate.

[DaveShoelace]

Genuinely with all due respect Keith, I'm not sure how you can call what Alex did 'oafish' when you are currently using this image as your Blonde avatar like a badge of honour:



I don't have any objection to either this or what Alex did, just saying it seems a bit disingenuous that you can reprimand somebody for calling out a grimmer when it is arguably in the poker communities interest, yet proudly show off an instance where you made an unprovoked attack on somebody else.

(how do I make the image smaller?)

[cambridgealex]

Genuinely with all due respect Keith, I'm not sure how you can call what Alex did 'oafish' when you are currently using this image as your Blonde avatar like a badge of honour:



I don't have any objection to either this or what Alex did, just saying it seems a bit disingenuous that you can reprimand somebody for calling out a grimmer when it is arguably in the poker communities interest, yet proudly show off an instance where you made an unprovoked attack on somebody else.

(how do I make the image smaller?)

QFT