blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 26, 2024, 12:37:26 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272591 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  M, F or X?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Down Print
Author Topic: M, F or X?  (Read 10898 times)
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« on: October 11, 2017, 12:04:42 PM »


http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsbeat/article/41567449/why-i-want-gender-neutral-uk-passports



Is it reasonable to have "gender-neutral" passports?



 Click to see full-size image.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15493



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2017, 12:11:09 PM »

If you identify as either M or F this will not make a lick of difference to you.

Same as straight people moaning about gay marriage.
Logged
POWWWWWWWW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 857


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2017, 12:18:31 PM »

Quote
"When I changed my passport gender to female, I had to get a letter from my doctor that basically said 'OK Mia is trans. This transition is permanent. She is now considered female, please change it'. It wasn't enough for just my permission to do it.

Logged
ripple11
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6330



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2017, 01:03:31 PM »


 Unspecified sounds great....you can chose the shortest queue for the loos.
Logged
RickBFA
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2001


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2017, 03:12:50 PM »

The person in the article will be fuming with the BBC - in the article they described her as "she" - how dare they?

"she" should start a campaign for gender neutral descriptions in articles too.

Rather like the campaign to stop London Underground announcers saying "Good morning Ladies and Gentleman" and really offensive stuff like that.

There must be more important things to campaign about surely than this nonsense? 
Logged
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 11, 2017, 04:05:02 PM »

The person in the article will be fuming with the BBC - in the article they described her as "she" - how dare they?

"she" should start a campaign for gender neutral descriptions in articles too.

Rather like the campaign to stop London Underground announcers saying "Good morning Ladies and Gentleman" and really offensive stuff like that.

There must be more important things to campaign about surely than this nonsense? 

Unless you identify as gender neutral, I guess it might seem very important then.
Logged
Evilpengwinz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 302



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 11, 2017, 04:51:50 PM »

Think about reasons why this needs to be on a passport - Laws differ throughout the world, and some of those differ based on whether you are male or female. E.g. there are countries where men and women have a different age of consent. Indonesia's laws are not "According to your passport you're transgender, so you can pick and choose whether you're allowed to have underage sex based on whether you're feeling more masculine or feminine today". There are legitimate reasons why there are two options (Probably far better examples than the one I've given) and as I can't see places like Saudi Arabia rewriting their laws for equal treatment of men, women and everything in between any time soon, binary is necessary.

Quite frankly, you'd have to be an absolute moron to tick that box even if you were transgender and the option was provided, because of the rights you would be giving up in so many parts of the world. Pull your pants down and tick a box accordingly is the smart move - identifying as transgender on a passport will give you far more trouble than it's worth. You're literally volunteering to be discriminated against if you tick that box.

Commit a crime? Good luck when they chuck you in the men's part of a foreign prison if you're biologically female. Also, good luck being transgender and getting a fair trial in most parts of the world.
Getting through customs? Guess who is going to get held up for hours on end when they see you ticked the "X" box.
Visiting America? You'll probs get shot by a cop, just because.
Going to the World Cup in Russia next year? Not any more.

So no, we shouldn't allow an "X" option. It already says "Sex" which is biological, thus binary, as opposed to "Gender" which is psychological. It's fine the way it is right now.
« Last Edit: October 11, 2017, 05:09:45 PM by Evilpengwinz » Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: October 11, 2017, 05:11:12 PM »

The person in the article will be fuming with the BBC - in the article they described her as "she" - how dare they?

"she" should start a campaign for gender neutral descriptions in articles too.

Rather like the campaign to stop London Underground announcers saying "Good morning Ladies and Gentleman" and really offensive stuff like that.

There must be more important things to campaign about surely than this nonsense? 

Unless you identify as gender neutral, I guess it might seem very important then.

What does identifying oneself as gender neutral mean and what benefit accrues to the person if I suspend disbelief and say, yah, I see that you are indeed gender neutral, wp.

In the past you could just stick two spoons up your nose and achieve the same result.



Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: October 11, 2017, 06:16:46 PM »

The person in the article will be fuming with the BBC - in the article they described her as "she" - how dare they?

"she" should start a campaign for gender neutral descriptions in articles too.

Rather like the campaign to stop London Underground announcers saying "Good morning Ladies and Gentleman" and really offensive stuff like that.

There must be more important things to campaign about surely than this nonsense? 

Unless you identify as gender neutral, I guess it might seem very important then.

What does identifying oneself as gender neutral mean and what benefit accrues to the person if I suspend disbelief and say, yah, I see that you are indeed gender neutral, wp.

In the past you could just stick two spoons up your nose and achieve the same result.





I don't have enough knowledge of the subject for the first part of the question. It seems a statistically significant proportion of people do identify as gender neutral though and I guess the benefit that would accrue would be something like the same as when any person/group is shown respect.
Logged
ash_d
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 5


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2017, 06:26:20 PM »

worlds going bonkers imo
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2017, 06:50:02 PM »

The person in the article will be fuming with the BBC - in the article they described her as "she" - how dare they?

"she" should start a campaign for gender neutral descriptions in articles too.

Rather like the campaign to stop London Underground announcers saying "Good morning Ladies and Gentleman" and really offensive stuff like that.

There must be more important things to campaign about surely than this nonsense? 

Unless you identify as gender neutral, I guess it might seem very important then.

What does identifying oneself as gender neutral mean and what benefit accrues to the person if I suspend disbelief and say, yah, I see that you are indeed gender neutral, wp.

In the past you could just stick two spoons up your nose and achieve the same result.


I don't have enough knowledge of the subject for the first part of the question. It seems a statistically significant proportion of people do identify as gender neutral though and I guess the benefit that would accrue would be something like the same as when any person/group is shown respect.

I take your ticket on showing people respect. I would show any member of the LGBTQQIAAP community respect if I met them and they were alright with me.

This desire to be labelled quite specifically and on ones own terms, is very modern and ill conceived imo. My egalitarian spirit would tend to think less labelling, rather than more, is a better way forward.
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 46942



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2017, 07:43:09 PM »

Gender neutral my arse.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Marky147
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22797



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2017, 07:43:28 PM »

NSFW



Joey Diaz knows
Logged

Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15846



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: October 11, 2017, 09:02:40 PM »

No, it’s just more bullshit, we don’t just get to stamp our feet and get whatever we want in life, it doesn’t work like that although some like to try....
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: October 11, 2017, 11:06:45 PM »

NSFW



Joey Diaz knows

Oh man, literal lolling - he's funny ..about the coffee anyway
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.219 seconds with 20 queries.