Title: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 12:25:55 PM I've never been able to win money on Stars.
Yesterday, I checked my account and was surprised to find that I had $160 in it. I was about to panic withdraw when curiosity got the better of me, were the games really softer sans Yanks? In a fit of degeneracy I opened two full ring $1/2 tables, (Would the kidz call them $100 NL tables?) and sat with $80 on each. I played 750 hands, and I now have $334.24 Was it luck, or does it qualify as crushing? Do you think it means the games are easier? I have a little time to spare today, so should I continue the experiment or snap withdraw? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 19, 2011, 12:26:37 PM SPIN FOR THE WINNNNNNNN
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 19, 2011, 12:31:32 PM $10 rush on demand tourneys on tilt imo, very very soft since friday Tom.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 19, 2011, 12:31:56 PM $10 rush on demand tourneys imo, very very soft since friday Tom. you cant play rush on pokerstars Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 19, 2011, 12:32:14 PM $10 rush on demand tourneys imo, very very soft since friday Tom. you cant play rush on pokerstars edited :D Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 12:41:29 PM I sort of fell out with Tilt a while back. Besides, I'm not really one of natures rushers, me brains don't work fast enough.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 19, 2011, 12:48:01 PM I sort of fell out with Tilt a while back. Besides, I'm not really one of natures rushers, me brains don't work fast enough. Prefer the trots to the runs? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 12:49:54 PM I sort of fell out with Tilt a while back. Besides, I'm not really one of natures rushers, me brains don't work fast enough. not hard to fall out with em. money management dictates you should put $160 into the pension play the rest and hope ability still prevails over varienceTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 12:54:55 PM I sort of fell out with Tilt a while back. Besides, I'm not really one of natures rushers, me brains don't work fast enough. not hard to fall out with em. money management dictates you should put $160 into the pension play the rest and hope ability still prevails over varienceCurrent Stars roll $400.99 I'm Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:04:11 PM I'll tell you what I've noticed. If I get disco'd from Stars, when I reconnect, I'm sat out and I don't have an "I'm back" button.
Anyone else noticed this? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 19, 2011, 01:04:22 PM I sort of fell out with Tilt a while back. Besides, I'm not really one of natures rushers, me brains don't work fast enough. not hard to fall out with em. money management dictates you should put $160 into the pension play the rest and hope ability still prevails over varienceCurrent Stars roll $400.99 I'm Epic Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 01:05:21 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:07:15 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: action man on April 19, 2011, 01:15:56 PM lovely soft 100 freezout at 2pm red
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 01:19:26 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:27:18 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? See now one time I would have pretended to know what vpip is Jase, but not any more ;carlocitrone; Enlighten me anyone? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 19, 2011, 01:27:44 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? What's vpip when it's at home? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celtic on April 19, 2011, 01:29:25 PM Is this your new diary?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on April 19, 2011, 01:37:52 PM I've never been able to win money on Stars. Yesterday, I checked my account and was surprised to find that I had $160 in it. I was about to panic withdraw when curiosity got the better of me, were the games really softer sans Yanks? In a fit of degeneracy I opened two full ring $1/2 tables, (Would the kidz call them $100 NL tables?) and sat with $80 on each. I played 750 hands, and I now have $334.24 Was it luck, or does it qualify as crushing? Do you think it means the games are easier? I have a little time to spare today, so should I continue the experiment or snap withdraw? I am afraid you aren't too cool for school. These tables would be NL200 tables, as the max buyin for them tradationally was $200. It comes from the golden days on party poker, when tables would actually be called NL25,NL50, NL100 etc instead of the size of the blinds. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on April 19, 2011, 01:45:12 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? See now one time I would have pretended to know what vpip is Jase, but not any more ;carlocitrone; Enlighten me anyone? VPIP= Voluntary put in pot %. It means how many times you put money in the pot preflop excluding checking your bb as that is not voluntary. This is expressed as a % and is tracked by software like poker tracker and holdem manager. Just tells how tight or loose a person is preflop. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:46:42 PM Is this your new diary? Haha! Not really Vin. I don't usually write about poker, mainly because when I do, it's not long before I say something daft and embarrass myself. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 19, 2011, 01:48:22 PM have you triple range merged at all yet? Tikay must have taught you that one..
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:50:06 PM I've never been able to win money on Stars. Yesterday, I checked my account and was surprised to find that I had $160 in it. I was about to panic withdraw when curiosity got the better of me, were the games really softer sans Yanks? In a fit of degeneracy I opened two full ring $1/2 tables, (Would the kidz call them $100 NL tables?) and sat with $80 on each. I played 750 hands, and I now have $334.24 Was it luck, or does it qualify as crushing? Do you think it means the games are easier? I have a little time to spare today, so should I continue the experiment or snap withdraw? I am afraid you aren't too cool for school. These tables would be NL200 tables, as the max buyin for them tradationally was $200. It comes from the golden days on party poker, when tables would actually be called NL25,NL50, NL100 etc instead of the size of the blinds. Er actually, I'm playing $.50/1 tables. I typed it wrong before... ;ashamed; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:51:51 PM have you triple range merged at all yet? Tikay must have taught you that one.. ARRGHH!!! I wanted to use that phrase in a joke but I couldn't remember it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:54:24 PM giq sir....before some kids come bum hunting lol Have you seen my Hendon Mob profile? See now one time I would have pretended to know what vpip is Jase, but not any more ;carlocitrone; Enlighten me anyone? VPIP= Voluntary put in pot %. It means how many times you put money in the pot preflop excluding checking your bb as that is not voluntary. This is expressed as a % and is tracked by software like poker tracker and holdem manager. Just tells how tight or loose a person is preflop. Does that basically mean I don't raise enough or see enough flops? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 01:59:38 PM This is from my current session
During current Hold'em session you were dealt 153 hands and saw flop: - 3 out of 19 times while in big blind (15%) - 6 out of 21 times while in small blind (28%) - 24 out of 113 times in other positions (21%) - a total of 33 out of 153 (21%) Don't know what that means though. (Although I am a bit in front) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 02:23:24 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one.
Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 19, 2011, 02:24:39 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... :D That's how the young dreamers get sucked in Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 19, 2011, 02:43:06 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 19, 2011, 02:45:28 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? (http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww249/mikill_thomas/unsure.gif) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 02:46:30 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 19, 2011, 02:55:26 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) I was only joking about Alex - but that seems to be the advice he's getting on his thread, so I thought I'd post the same here. You sure about playing frisbee with a horse? Have you thought this idea through? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 19, 2011, 03:00:41 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 03:03:55 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) I was only joking about Alex - but that seems to be the advice he's getting on his thread, so I thought I'd post the same here. You sure about playing frisbee with a horse? Have you thought this idea through? I'm gonna get those halo type frisbees and use bamboo canes for targets. Then I'll practice in secret and hustle the bejaysus out of my visitors. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 03:04:46 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Further than the horse. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 03:45:13 PM damm just spent 2 hours mowing the lawn doing old man stuff. missed out on the banter. had me going back to the vpip thing checking i had the letters in the right order. bloody dyslexia. what they dont know is we know what they know but just are not letting on we know what they know and when they know we know what they know we will all ready know that they know. lets keep one step ahead.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 03:53:24 PM This is from my current session ALTHOUGH I AM A BIT AHEAD is the easiest figure to understand imoDuring current Hold'em session you were dealt 153 hands and saw flop: - 3 out of 19 times while in big blind (15%) - 6 out of 21 times while in small blind (28%) - 24 out of 113 times in other positions (21%) - a total of 33 out of 153 (21%) Don't know what that means though. (Although I am a bit in front) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Wardonkey on April 19, 2011, 03:57:08 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Further than the horse. Clarification required: You can throw the frisbee further than the horse can throw it. Or You can't throw the horse as far as the frisbee. Ta Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 03:59:24 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Further than the horse. Clarification required: You can throw the frisbee further than the horse can throw it. Or You can't throw the horse as far as the frisbee. Ta I can throw the frisbee further than where the horse is. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 19, 2011, 04:04:31 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Further than the horse. Clarification required: You can throw the frisbee further than the horse can throw it. Or You can't throw the horse as far as the frisbee. Ta I can throw the frisbee further than where the horse is. But if you do that and shout at him/her to return it, you'll end up a little hoarse yourself. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 19, 2011, 04:07:37 PM Or a pony if you will
In which case playing frisbee with a horse is -ev Tom, as you will turn your 400 into 25! Not sure which stat on HEM will show this thou Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 04:09:25 PM Had a decent session last night and going all right in this one. Already I'm thinking, Wow.... maybe I could do this for a living.... Well, you're still young, have no family commitments, and $3K will be more than enough to give you a roll that can accommodate the downswings and variance. Do you play croquet? Harsh. BTW- I'm looking at making a Frisbee type golf course at my place. (That is if the horse doesn't mind) How far can you throw a frisbee? Further than the horse. Clarification required: You can throw the frisbee further than the horse can throw it. Or You can't throw the horse as far as the frisbee. Ta I can throw the frisbee further than where the horse is. But if you do that and shout at him/her to return it, you'll end up a little hoarse yourself. (http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/04/26/article-1268831-094D22E5000005DC-340_634x381.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 04:20:30 PM Or a pony if you will In which case playing frisbee with a horse is -ev Tom, as you will turn your 400 into 25! Not sure which stat on HEM will show this thou I fretted for ages about my MEMophobia but the truth is, the thought of trying to use it makes my blood run cold. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 04:25:07 PM So I've been playing two tables for 3.5 hours. It says I've played 450 hands. Does that sound right to you?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 19, 2011, 04:26:49 PM So I've been plating two tables for 3.5 hours. It says I've played 450 hands. Does that sound right to you? Yeh sounds about right. Roughly 60 hands per hour per table is what I'd expect Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 19, 2011, 04:43:28 PM One of my tables broke. (Everyone sat out at the same time, how does that happen?)
Decided to take a break. Current roll $441.19 See, can't cash out now, I'm hooked. Hope Stars doesn't grim me. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 19, 2011, 05:00:16 PM One of my tables broke. (Everyone sat out at the same time, how does that happen?) collusion imo tom....they all worked out you are not the fish your figures may have suggestedDecided to take a break. Current roll $441.19 See, can't cash out now, I'm hooked. Hope Stars doesn't grim me. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 08:28:15 AM Played another ~ 300 hands last night. Up almost two buy ins in the first orbit when I flopped top set against the raiser twice in consecutive hands, but then then I lost it again to the table big stack when I called his raise with 10 Js, flopped top 2 v his aces but the board to paired up on the end to give him a $385 pot.
I'm mostly playing tight passive because peeps keep betting into me all the way down the streets with nothing. (Air?) It's going scarily well atm. (Disaster report coming soon I'm sure). Current roll $654.19 Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on April 20, 2011, 08:50:38 AM Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? yep Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 08:51:58 AM Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? yep OK cool. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 08:54:23 AM I feel like Herbert O. Yardley.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 20, 2011, 09:09:29 AM Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? yep OK cool. With you getting the hang of all this lingo, you will be officially cool soon. Imagine the conversations you'll be able to have with Alex Martin and Titibean. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 09:17:20 AM Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? yep OK cool. With you getting the hang of all this lingo, you will be officially cool soon. Imagine the conversations you'll be able to have with Alex Martin and Titibean. Tit: $%&^£&^%$£^"^%$$&$%£^$%^$%W^$!!!! ;grr; Me: :dontask: Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 20, 2011, 09:18:23 AM Q: Is a "Wet" board what I might call a "Draw heavy" board? yep OK cool. With you getting the hang of all this lingo, you will be officially cool soon. Imagine the conversations you'll be able to have with Alex Martin and Titibean. Tit: $%&^£&^%$£^"^%$$&$%£^$%^$%W^$!!!! ;grr; Me: :dontask: rotflmfao (as titibean would say) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 20, 2011, 09:24:25 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k :'(
Bit annoyed with myself tbh........ Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 20, 2011, 09:38:20 AM Ffs woodsey, I didn't see you to get any.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 09:49:30 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k :'( Bit annoyed with myself tbh........ You got $200 up to 2.5k though. At the end of the day, that's pretty impressive. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 20, 2011, 09:52:39 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k :'( Bit annoyed with myself tbh........ You got $200 up to 2.5k though. At the end of the day, that's pretty impressive. Well if it was in my bank maybe, it's pretty meaniless otherwise. The moral of the story is if your prepared to play low enough there is some seriously easy money to be had. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 09:56:14 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k :'( Bit annoyed with myself tbh........ You got $200 up to 2.5k though. At the end of the day, that's pretty impressive. Well if it was in my bank maybe, it's pretty meaniless otherwise. The moral of the story is if your prepared to play low enough there is some seriously easy money to be had. Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 09:59:24 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k :'( Bit annoyed with myself tbh........ You got $200 up to 2.5k though. At the end of the day, that's pretty impressive. Well if it was in my bank maybe, it's pretty meaniless otherwise. The moral of the story is if your prepared to play low enough there is some seriously easy money to be had. Don't forget, your hard work did get you a shot at the higher levels. You don't rely on poker to support yourself, and you might have binked a big score. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 20, 2011, 10:02:26 AM I feel like Herbert O. Yardley. if you felt like Herbert K. Jason then you might wanna start panicing. enjoying this thread (mainly coz i can understand it and empathise [coz = because])Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 10:09:40 AM I feel like Herbert O. Yardley. if you felt like Herbert K. Jason then you might wanna start panicing. enjoying this thread (mainly coz i can understand it and empathise [coz = because])You're an idiot Jason. I'm laughing my tits off here. rotflmfao rotflmfao Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 20, 2011, 10:15:36 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 10:35:49 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Did you enjoy it - will you do it again? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 20, 2011, 10:44:53 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Nothing wrong with shot taking. You prob don't think twice if you run good and end up on $5k. As long as you didn't go broke and still have enough to grind back which you do, easily it's ok. Shot taking is good when you're running good. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 20, 2011, 11:02:51 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Nothing wrong with shot taking. You prob don't think twice if you run good and end up on $5k. As long as you didn't go broke and still have enough to grind back which you do, easily it's ok. Shot taking is good when you're running good. I would agree with that with this caveat: Shot-taking is okay with a certain %age of your roll as long as you have the ability/discipline to stop, as going busto taking shots at higher limits has been the ruin of many a poor boy who couldn't. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 11:16:05 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Nothing wrong with shot taking. You prob don't think twice if you run good and end up on $5k. As long as you didn't go broke and still have enough to grind back which you do, easily it's ok. Shot taking is good when you're running good. I would agree with that with this caveat: Shot-taking is okay with a certain %age of your roll as long as you have the ability/discipline to stop, as going busto taking shots at higher limits has been the ruin of many a poor boy who couldn't. Semi autobiographical - lessons learned and all that Ralph? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 20, 2011, 11:18:36 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Did you enjoy it - will you do it again? For sure, if I'm watching telly I've often got a game of some description running in the background anyway. The plan was to get to 3.5k and then withdraw 3k for my august holiday and then start again from $500. I fully expected it to take a couple of months more actually, but I obv ran good and binked a bit in the rush tourneys to help. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 20, 2011, 11:20:54 AM Massive sigh, I've patiently been building up a roll on tilt over the last month or so. Got $200 into about 2.5k by most following proper BR rules apart from in the early stages. Had a bottle of wine last night and jumped on 2/4 PLO, GG 1.5k Can I ask what stakes / games you were playing? Started off on .5/.10 Rush PLO, grinded the shit out of that for a few weeks and with rake back etc got it up to just over a grand. The last couple of weeks I've been playing .10/.25 Rush PLO and $10 Rush tourneys and had it to a peak of nearly 2.5 k. Nothing wrong with shot taking. You prob don't think twice if you run good and end up on $5k. As long as you didn't go broke and still have enough to grind back which you do, easily it's ok. Shot taking is good when you're running good. I would agree with that with this caveat: Shot-taking is okay with a certain %age of your roll as long as you have the ability/discipline to stop, as going busto taking shots at higher limits has been the ruin of many a poor boy who couldn't. This is the issue. If I'm playing after I've had a few there often isn't a stop button, I'd normally say $500 max or whatever for a shot and then stop, but after a bottle of wine I start chasing and gambling which is a recipe for disaster obv >:( Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 11:28:08 AM I have a little list of people that I have met through poker that I admire. (In a strictly hetro, punch each other on the shoulder sort of way of course).
Woodsey is one such. More on this later. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 20, 2011, 11:34:46 AM I've often been able to build a big bankroll fairly quickly. In fact it took me about 4-8 weeks to build up an almost $30k roll after I got back from Vegas last year, when I had about $2k to start with at most. This was mostly due to a bit of grinding and a lot of good shot taking. I'd shot take in decent bigger games, usually win and quit if I did one buy in, max two. The roll increased loads until I shot took when tilted and didn't stop til I went broke.
Basically shot taking is very +EV if done properly. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 20, 2011, 11:40:54 AM Basically shot taking is very +EV if done properly. I would also say that it is much better suited to the more technical game of PLO than HE. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 11:51:39 AM Basically shot taking is very +EV if done properly. I would also say that it is much better suited to the more technical game of PLO than HE. "The Science of Shot Taking". There's a good article there somewhere. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 20, 2011, 11:55:52 AM I have a little list of people that I have met through poker that I admire. (In a strictly hetro, punch each other on the shoulder sort of way of course). Woodsey is one such. More on this later. When are you gonna write the one about me? lol! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 12:00:47 PM I have a little list of people that I have met through poker that I admire. (In a strictly hetro, punch each other on the shoulder sort of way of course). Woodsey is one such. More on this later. When are you gonna write the one about me? lol! Wouldn't want to plagiarise.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 20, 2011, 12:23:12 PM Basically shot taking is very +EV if done properly. I would also say that it is much better suited to the more technical game of PLO than HE. "The Science of Shot Taking". There's a good article there somewhere. I think that to put it in a nutshell: Bankroll management > Triple range-merging Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 20, 2011, 01:21:34 PM Basically shot taking is very +EV if done properly. I would also say that it is much better suited to the more technical game of PLO than HE. "The Science of Shot Taking". There's a good article there somewhere. I think that to put it in a nutshell: Bankroll management > Triple range-merging Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 03:27:50 PM Horrible sesh. Played bad, ran bad.
So in keeping with my new cool image... Sick sick sick. DIAGF online pokerz. ;grr; Current roll $499.49 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 20, 2011, 03:29:22 PM Horrible sesh. Played bad, ran bad. varience imoSo in keeping with my new cool image... Sick sick sick. DIAGF online pokerz. ;grr; Current roll $499.49 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 20, 2011, 03:30:32 PM Horrible sesh. Played bad, ran bad. So in keeping with my new cool image... Sick sick sick. DIAGF online pokerz. ;grr; Current roll $499.49 mbn to only lose 1.5buyins in on of these.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 20, 2011, 03:34:15 PM Horrible sesh. Played bad, ran bad. So in keeping with my new cool image... Sick sick sick. DIAGF online pokerz. ;grr; Current roll $499.49 mbn to only lose 1.5buyins in on of these.... I think I just had a swong. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 12:46:42 AM Back up to $658.44
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on April 21, 2011, 01:02:23 AM Hilarious!! - Keep up the good work RED DOG! - Are you planning to play any comps at all? - If so, what ones, Imo, get to 1k and shot take the million, sunday warm up, etc etc, win them and be a european millionairee! weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
gl, dreenie Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 21, 2011, 01:06:32 AM Loving this thread. Please don't put up any hand histories. Would hate to here how you are doing it all wrong.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 08:21:35 AM Loving this thread. Please don't put up any hand histories. Would hate to here how you are doing it all wrong. I'm playing for half an hour this morning while I drink my tea and read the news. First hand I get Ac Ahrt in the cut off. Seat 5 makes it $3, I back raise to $8. (It's my thread so I can say back raise) He calls. Flop Jd 7h 7s He checks, I bet $12. He snap-calls. Already I'm thinking..... "Watch me get stacked here, surely he can't have Jacks.. Can he?" The turn is the Aspades and I'm thinking..... Have Jacks, Oh God please have Jacks.... He checks, I check behind. River Td He bets $22, I push, he calls. He shows Th Tc. Ouch! Poor bugger. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 21, 2011, 08:26:13 AM Boom. Good fred red.
Have u established ur goal yet? Pretty good time to begin the cash grinds with no americans about Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 21, 2011, 08:30:28 AM Boom. Good fred red. Have u established ur goal yet? Pretty good time to begin the cash grinds with no americans about Interesting, on my recent spin I set myself a financial target to hit every week. Nothing too difficult but it focused my mind to make sure I got there. At work I do this all the time, whilst I have a big overall goal I set myself little mini goals en-route to make the final end point not seem so far away. It makes everything seem a lot more achievable. I think this is a very good plan to have for poker and it holds back the temptation of going for the big shit or bust spin (unless I'm pissed >:() Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 08:47:45 AM Boom. Good fred red. Have u established ur goal yet? Pretty good time to begin the cash grinds with no americans about No Cos, I haven't got a goal as such. I suppose I would just like to be able to win at online cash. I keep reading about how "Soft" this or that site is, or how you can "crush" the small games. Well I've never been able to win consistently playing online cash at any level. So now, while I'm working and poker is just a hobby, I'm just enjoying trying to find a way to beat the game. I would be chuffed to bits if I could average a profit of $50 a day. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 21, 2011, 09:16:50 AM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games.
Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 09:30:03 AM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games. Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Lol, yes, always. (I like French Spanish & Russian). I also look to see how many tables they're playing Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 21, 2011, 09:33:41 AM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games. Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Lol, yes, always. (I like French Spanish & Russian). I also look to see how many tables they're playing The % of Russian player on full tilt is way, way higher now the ban has come in. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 09:39:42 AM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games. Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Lol, yes, always. (I like French Spanish & Russian). I also look to see how many tables they're playing The % of Russian player on full tilt is way, way higher now the ban has come in. Do you imagine them standing in the turret of a T34 waving a Kalashnikov, or is that just me? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 21, 2011, 09:44:08 AM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games. Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Lol, yes, always. (I like French Spanish & Russian). I also look to see how many tables they're playing The % of Russian player on full tilt is way, way higher now the ban has come in. Do you imagine them standing in the turret of a T34 waving a Kalashnikov, or is that just me? I have a stereotypical image of them being piss poor so I'm always wondering where they get the money from. This is obviously a very outdated view. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 05:04:18 PM Three times today someone has raised, I've re raised with kings and been re re raised.
Each time I've been certain that they have aces, and each time I've pushed and been proved right. (Not as bad as it sounds because I spiked a king on one of them) But, in these situations, can I ever seriously consider passing kings pre online? Current roll $572.59 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 21, 2011, 05:05:06 PM NO NEVER FOLD KINGS PLS PLS PLS !!!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on April 21, 2011, 05:15:37 PM Fair play red. I defo think you can playing the style you are at the moment. Perfect timing to embark on something like this too with all the septics not in the games. Obviously you can run bad enough that you'll go broke off the current stars bankroll, it doesn't for one minute mean you can't beat the game or aren't a winning player at that level. Do you ever look at the location of your opponents when playing? Lol, yes, always. (I like French Spanish & Russian). I also look to see how many tables they're playing The % of Russian player on full tilt is way, way higher now the ban has come in. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 21, 2011, 05:27:50 PM Three times today someone has raised, I've re raised with kings and been re re raised. just as a matter of interest how many times in the past few days have you been re re raised (4 bet i think) with any thing other than AA. andrew makes a point that you never fold kings. the past year i have seen people willing to get all their chips in with AK saying they never fold this either. not that i am saying andrew is wrong but i know 100% if you know live that villan has AA you will lay down some (if not all) of the time. you then dont shrugg your sholders blaming cooler, you are more likely to bite your bottom lip and think you played it bad coz you did not go with the read/imformation you had. I NEVER FOLD KINGS EITHER but for reasons of continuity and image obv say that of course i foldEach time I've been certain that they have aces, and each time I've pushed and been proved right. (Not as bad as it sounds because I spiked a king on one of them) But, in these situations, can I ever seriously consider passing kings pre online? Current roll $572.59 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 05:49:26 PM The truth is I never fold em online, but I think a case could be made.
I did fold em pre in the 300 @ DTD a while back. Same scenario, he rasises, I re raise, he re re's. I just couldn't see this bloke doing that with AK or QQ in the first level so I passed my kings. I lost 2k, but on the positive side, I was still in and I had 8 k left. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 21, 2011, 05:55:57 PM Three times today someone has raised, I've re raised with kings and been re re raised. Each time I've been certain that they have aces, and each time I've pushed and been proved right. (Not as bad as it sounds because I spiked a king on one of them) But, in these situations, can I ever seriously consider passing kings pre online? Current roll $572.59 I think you can in full ring vs an ep raise from a v tight/nitty plyr, but you have to have a good sample with in particular evidence that they have called a non-steal 3 bet with qq/ak. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 21, 2011, 05:58:12 PM The truth is I never fold em online, but I think a case could be made. yes similar styles/positions. been thinking has this guy got aces really. i dont think and hope not so lets go with the kings. they roll over AK so you are happy and have to take it on the chin when they hit an ace....taking it on the chin right up to the point were they look at their mate and say pretty standard cooler. we both cant fold their. then i might have a mini explosion and offer him a lift home in the boot of the carI did fold em pre in the 300 @ DTD a while back. Same scenario, he rasises, I re raise, he re re's. I just couldn't see this bloke doing that with AK or QQ in the first level so I passed my kings. I lost 2k, but on the positive side, I was still in and I had 8 k left. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 21, 2011, 06:02:42 PM The truth is I never fold em online, but I think a case could be made. yes similar styles/positions. been thinking has this guy got aces really. i dont think and hope not so lets go with the kings. they roll over AK so you are happy and have to take it on the chin when they hit an ace....taking it on the chin right up to the point were they look at their mate and say pretty standard cooler. we both cant fold their. then i might have a mini explosion and offer him a lift home in the boot of the carI did fold em pre in the 300 @ DTD a while back. Same scenario, he rasises, I re raise, he re re's. I just couldn't see this bloke doing that with AK or QQ in the first level so I passed my kings. I lost 2k, but on the positive side, I was still in and I had 8 k left. Not that it make any difference, but I said "OK I pass, now I'll show you my kings if you show me your aces" and he showed me. (I showed him my folded kings, but stole a few pots on the strength of it when the blinds were bigger) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 22, 2011, 09:30:29 AM I should have gone to bed because I'm working today, but I played a late sesh anyway, really volatile it was too. I couldn't get anyone to pass a flush draw, no matter how much I bet. Which is good when they miss, but a bugger when they hit. (Especially when I know they've hit, and still pay them off).
Tough gig. Very pleased to finish with $580.45 I'm playing 4 tables now btw, (Which impressed the crap out of my non poker playing friend). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 22, 2011, 11:14:59 AM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 22, 2011, 11:43:56 AM That's what they call a triple back raise Alex, keep up. GLGLGL Tom.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 22, 2011, 12:17:41 PM That's what they call a triple back raise Alex, keep up. GLGLGL Tom. Yeah Alex, do keep up. The correct term is triple back raise, or, if you're feeling flamboyant, you could use the the slightly more hip phrase, "Let rip whit' 'lastic siders" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 22, 2011, 01:53:37 PM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise? how bloody deep are you sitting. last count your poker/life roll was at £4k ;)Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 22, 2011, 03:44:29 PM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise? how bloody deep are you sitting. last count your poker/life roll was at £4k ;)thanks for the public announcement jase. GFY! last count your pissing your pants count was twice in 2days. Anything to add? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 22, 2011, 04:06:03 PM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise? how bloody deep are you sitting. last count your poker/life roll was at £4k ;)thanks for the public announcement jase. GFY! last count your pissing your pants count was twice in 2days. Anything to add? Alex 1 Jason 0 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 22, 2011, 04:15:56 PM need a smiley with a bottom lip out. sulking off to find an easier target. sorry about outing the roll but thought it was common knowledge but then realised it was only 4 of us commenting on your diary. rofl
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 22, 2011, 04:18:08 PM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise? how bloody deep are you sitting. last count your poker/life roll was at £4k ;)thanks for the public announcement jase. GFY! last count your pissing your pants count was twice in 2days. Anything to add? Alex 1 Jason 0 more like 46-45 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 22, 2011, 04:20:18 PM what about to a re-re-re-re-re-raise? how bloody deep are you sitting. last count your poker/life roll was at £4k ;)thanks for the public announcement jase. GFY! last count your pissing your pants count was twice in 2days. Anything to add? Alex 1 Jason 0 more like 46-45 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 22, 2011, 04:49:21 PM nah u read it wrong. i said his swearing didnt help his case and that maybe he didnt want to be, or care about being unbanned. still fighting his corner though!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 22, 2011, 06:48:25 PM sigh...put rofl and expected to see a smiley rolling n laughing
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 22, 2011, 07:28:03 PM Such Donks. Online poker is rigged!
Pull the lever someone ffs!!! Down I go. $470.39 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 22, 2011, 07:37:56 PM Such Donks. Online poker is rigged! Pull the lever someone ffs!!! Down I go. $470.39 Try 2/4! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 23, 2011, 12:26:12 AM If I was George2Loose, this would be a very long post.
$181.25 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 23, 2011, 12:30:06 AM If I was George2Loose, this would be a very long post. $181.25 std! its the stars roller coaster! ul Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 23, 2011, 12:54:00 AM Ul tom. Good post though, impressive that you don't feel the need to go into anymore detail.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 11:23:39 AM Last night while I was asleep I think Stars removed all of the players that are worse than me, and replaced them with players that are better than me.
Grinding like cheap brake pads on a Mk IV Cortina. Current SBR = $211.84 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 11:45:07 AM I hope Alex doesn't mind, but I've copied this to here from PHA so as not to spoil his thread.
The thing is, as far as I'm concerned, this post might just as well be in Swahili. Can someone please translate it for me line by line? (I've tried babel fish and drawn a blank) Once I understand the words, I might be able to start working on the concepts. Villain is a pretty spewy reg, generally confined to preflop superlight 5b jams. Call open is pretty high in the bb although doubtful KXs. River aggression factor 1.6/17% which i think is pretty important. wtsd 31%/won$sd 47. Views me as bluffy/spewy on occasion but mostly inline 100bb deep. I checkback turn for some peculiar reason (honestly looking now i hate my line so much it hurts). thoughts? Notes are below:- doesnt believe a flop cr, bet and bomb on wet board multiway for value avoid seat in blinds to his button/3bet his btn open a TONNe 5b jams small pps bvb 4b bluffs sb pre in blind wars float him a lot srp goes for cr on turn in 3b pots often 4b jams ATs mp v btn c/c tpgk, stationy the triple barrel is a hand, does barrel equity oop and giveup peels any pair to 10:1 direct implied 3b. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 24, 2011, 12:36:23 PM alex martin is the greatest but dont worry not many of us understand him :)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 12:41:09 PM alex martin is the greatest but dont worry not many of us understand him :) I knew it. I'm gonna do my own PHA post later. I'll include wind speed, medical references, Freemason chants and everything. Then Girgy will come on and say, "U played it like a donk" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 24, 2011, 12:47:07 PM please do a mockup alex martin one. has to include the phrases
backraise and/or re-re-raise I wanted to see where I was at i put him on AK he bet so I reraised fuck it Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 12:50:58 PM please do a mockup alex martin one. has to include the phrases backraise and/or re-re-raise I wanted to see where I was at i put him on AK he bet so I reraised fuck it LMAO!! Exactly what I had in mind. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Girgy85 on April 24, 2011, 12:51:55 PM alex martin is the greatest but dont worry not many of us understand him :) I knew it. I'm gonna do my own PHA post later. I'll include wind speed, medical references, Freemason chants and everything. Then Girgy will come on and say, "Fold Pre" FYP Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 12:53:36 PM Virtual trophy for the best Alex Martin mock up post. (Cambridge is winning atm)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Skippy on April 24, 2011, 01:09:39 PM Here's the bits I get:
Quote Villain is a pretty spewy reg, generally confined to preflop superlight 5b jams. Spewy is hard to define. Spews a lot? I guess a spew is when you bluff big when there is little chance it's going to work, or when you try and value bet too thin. A reg is someone who plays a lot at these stakes. Traditionally when playing pre flop, you 3-bet your monster hands (AA, KK, QQ, AK). The trouble with that is that if you 3-bet just these hands, anyone good knows what you've got and just folds. So people have started 3 betting some other hands too. In response to that, people have started 4 betting some junk as well as their premiums back. What this note says is that this guy's favourite way of blowing a lot of chips is to 5-bet light. Quote Call open is pretty high in the bb although doubtful KXs. Calls raises a lot in the big blind. Doesn't do it with King X suited much though. Quote River aggression factor 1.6/17% which i think is pretty important. Aggression factor is the ratio of bets or raises to calls. It's a favourite stat of Hold'em manager or PokerTracker. You can get it to split it up by street too- so this guy is betting on the river about 3 times for every 2 times he's calling. That's quite high (?). So you might infer that he's the sort to bluff missed hands on the river a lot, or the sort of player to try and check raise you off marginal hands. * NB this paragraph might be complete bollocks, since I don't really know much about aggression factor. Quote wtsd 31%/won$sd 47. 31% of the time they saw the flop with a hand they went to showdown with it. They won 47% of hands they showed down. Quote doesnt believe a flop cr If you check raise him on the flop, he thinks it's a bluff Quote , bet and bomb on wet board multiway for value You should play hands fast on wet boards against him (so reraise the flop, don't just call and hope he bets again). Quote avoid seat in blinds to his button/3bet his btn open a TONNe Try and avoid sitting one or two to his left. If you are sitting one or two to his left when he has the button, 3 bet him a lot. (I presume that Alex means this guy raises about 100% of hands on the button). Quote 5b jams small pps bvb as we said earlier, he likes to 5 bet light, with say small pocket pairs in blind vs blind confrontations. Quote 4b bluffs sb pre in blind wars And he 4 bets light too in blind vs blind confrontations (this is obvious implied by earlier notes). Quote float him a lot srp srp ???? Quote goes for cr on turn in 3b pots often Check raises the turn in a pot where there has been a 3 bet before the flop. Quote 4b jams ATs mp v btn More 4 betting light- he really doesn't believe 3 bets from the button. Quote c/c tpgk, stationy Will call down top pair, good kicker- so play your bigger hands fast, and don't try and bluff him off top pair so much. A calling station. Quote the triple barrel is a hand, does barrel equity oop and giveup Doesn't triple barrel bluff. Bluffs when has some equity out-of-position, but then gives up. Quote peels any pair to 10:1 direct implied 3b. If you 3 bet him pre flop, he will always call with any pocket pair if the implied odds are 10:1 of the bet. E.g. you're playing £0.50/£1, He has 2h 2c, he raises from middle position to £3, you three bet him to £9 from the button, he will always call and see the flop providing both your stack and his are £90 (10*9). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 24, 2011, 01:11:03 PM Wow Skippy. I'm impressed.
Need time to digest.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 24, 2011, 01:14:09 PM Wow Skippy. I'm impressed. well its your fault for asking. its just given me indegestion. was loving this thread and then you go get all new age on me... off to find a doms / 5's n 3's site.Need time to digest.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 24, 2011, 05:14:27 PM Alex once did a pha post where he described his image as scarlet pimpernel. Someone find that post?
Iirc I did a pretty good alex martin hand analysis about 2 years ago when I did a wsope report. Someone find it? P.s happy easter red. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: George2Loose on April 24, 2011, 05:15:24 PM Alex once did a pha post where he described his image as scarlet pimpernel. Someone find that post? Iirc I did a pretty good alex martin hand analysis about 2 years ago when I did a wsope report. Someone find it? P.s happy easter red. yeh thought about you wsope update when i read martin's post Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 09:23:18 AM (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQPn1JmelKq2XubF_2I3UmQ9cS6aPYGqlFGpesO6wSJAqCTWwsZ)
Tiger Blood Alert!!!! Luton £150 chopped five ways at 2:30pm when the blinds became bigger than the average stack. (£1240 each and £800 for the shortie). I had an accident in the first level and spent the next 10 hours on the respirator. If clinging to the wreckage was an Olympic event, I would be looking at at a podium finish in 2012. I was a great comp with a great atmo. (Especially my table cos I was on it). Special thanks are due to my Rail. Namely Lucky McBink and Phil 'Snattiramas' Cooklin for shouting "Queen Queen Queen" when I was all in AQ v AK. (They almost got duffed up when it came on the river). BTW- Lucky McBink shook my hand last night. We've shaken hands many times before, but until now, he's always been sitting down and me standing up. He looked confused doing it the other way around. Anyway, that's the WINNING report over for another year. Got to run around the field this morning to stave off the effects of fish & chips, lamb jalfrezi and half-price Easter eggs. Then its off to Barnsley to visit my old mam, and perhaps a few hours grinding Stars before going back to the Big W tomorrow. SBR = $224.14 PS- had 2 disputes with Kendall, won one outright, free-rollin' on the other. Toasty! (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6eTiTVomFghKqPFabbo5wK3hX-1V22Ht_UxcBUjiaWWzGPkGOjg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: ACE2M on April 25, 2011, 09:59:12 AM my new favourite thread.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 25, 2011, 10:09:07 AM my new favourite thread. Not far wrong. It's got more levels than a skyscraper, absolutely superb. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 10:17:25 AM BTW- Tone, I can't believe you said that about DingDell's hair.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 25, 2011, 10:29:17 AM BTW- Tone, I can't believe you said that about DingDell's hair. She sent me a stroppy text minutes after you said it, "so, what is wrong with my hair, eh?". The trouble with your levels is that everyone falls for them. You do more levels than Jason, and both of you seem to get them through. How that work? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dingdell on April 25, 2011, 10:57:07 AM BTW- Tone, I can't believe you said that about DingDell's hair. She sent me a stroppy text minutes after you said it, "so, what is wrong with my hair, eh?". The trouble with your levels is that everyone falls for them. You do more levels than Jason, and both of you seem to get them through. How that work? I think the fact that you didn't gush and say I love your hair was proof enough! Red is just good at making you fess up! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 12:54:28 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale.
The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: ACE2M on April 25, 2011, 01:21:24 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale. The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 young guns do not show pity, you've probably eaten his soul or sumfin. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 01:25:05 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale. The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 young guns do not show pity, you've probably eaten his soul or sumfin. Yeah! Feck him. I crushed him. Donk. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 25, 2011, 01:41:12 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale. The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 young guns do not show pity, you've probably eaten his soul or sumfin. Yeah! Feck him. I crushed him. Donk. Much better. You have to learn. All opponents are fish, tez, terrible, terra-bad, lol-bad, & utterly clueless, how else could we all crush the game? Never say "poor bugger, he got unlucky", either, that's so wrong. He deserved it. Do pay attention. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 01:43:39 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale. The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 young guns do not show pity, you've probably eaten his soul or sumfin. Yeah! Feck him. I crushed him. Donk. Much better. You have to learn. All opponents are fish, tez, terrible, terra-bad, lol-bad, & utterly clueless, how else could we all crush the game? Never say "poor bugger, he got unlucky", either, that's so wrong. He deserved it. Do pay attention. Yeah! Besides, the bastard just felted me. $188.42 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 25, 2011, 03:08:26 PM The bad news: Running late cos Mrs Red not back from car boot sale. The good news: having a little degen sesharooney on Stars. Flopped a set of sevens against the same blokes Jacks twice in consecutive hands. He's pulling his hair out now poor bugger. SBR = $306.14 young guns do not show pity, you've probably eaten his soul or sumfin. Yeah! Feck him. I crushed him. Donk. Much better. You have to learn. All opponents are fish, tez, terrible, terra-bad, lol-bad, & utterly clueless, how else could we all crush the game? Never say "poor bugger, he got unlucky", either, that's so wrong. He deserved it. Do pay attention. Yeah! Besides, the bastard just felted me. $188.42 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 03:22:06 PM No. They're all idiots.
$160.52 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 25, 2011, 03:30:03 PM ;).....me noij. me taeb tnac uoy fi Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 03:46:22 PM ;).....me noij. me taeb tnac uoy fi ?egap bom nodneH eht nO Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 25, 2011, 04:02:40 PM there is just no pulling the wool over some guys eyes.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 04:04:04 PM there is just no pulling the wool over some guys eyes. I triple-range merged you. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 04:05:55 PM I think we have a lot on common Jase. Both brilliant, both modest.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 04:07:46 PM And if I'm honest, you have even more to be modest about than I do.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 25, 2011, 04:15:28 PM not at all sir. you know how i feel about anyone been in the game for some time no matter if they play like a maniac or a rock they are still around. rather play bad poker and win than play winning poker and lose.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 25, 2011, 04:33:54 PM OK. I'm going to let you guys in on one of my on-line cash game winning strategies.
When you don't want your opponent to hit the card that will beat you, use the power of thought to influence the RNG. (This so often more effective if you vocalise your thoughts at the same time). Example: "No club no club no club". NB- For really big pots, its worth covering the middle of the screen with your hand and just waiting to see which way the chips go. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 25, 2011, 05:07:51 PM OK. I'm going to let you guys in on one of my on-line cash game winning strategies. When you don't want your opponent to hit the card that will beat you, use the power of thought to influence the RNG. (This so often more effective if you vocalise your thoughts at the same time). Example: "No club no club no club". NB- For really big pots, its worth covering the middle of the screen with your hand and just waiting to see which way the chips go. lol - that only works on fulltilt. I can't see how you think you can beat online pokers when you don't know the basics. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 25, 2011, 07:22:08 PM OK. I'm going to let you guys in on one of my on-line cash game winning strategies. When you don't want your opponent to hit the card that will beat you, use the power of thought to influence the RNG. (This so often more effective if you vocalise your thoughts at the same time). Example: "No club no club no club". NB- For really big pots, its worth covering the middle of the screen with your hand and just waiting to see which way the chips go. lol whenever I make a big bluff I snap hide the table and wait for it to pop back up Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: ACE2M on April 25, 2011, 07:42:01 PM OK. I'm going to let you guys in on one of my on-line cash game winning strategies. When you don't want your opponent to hit the card that will beat you, use the power of thought to influence the RNG. (This so often more effective if you vocalise your thoughts at the same time). Example: "No club no club no club". NB- For really big pots, its worth covering the middle of the screen with your hand and just waiting to see which way the chips go. lol, i do it because it stops me punching the screen. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Lucky on April 25, 2011, 08:52:14 PM (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQPn1JmelKq2XubF_2I3UmQ9cS6aPYGqlFGpesO6wSJAqCTWwsZ) Tiger Blood Alert!!!! Luton £150 chopped five ways at 2:30pm when the blinds became bigger than the average stack. (£1240 each and £800 for the shortie). I had an accident in the first level and spent the next 10 hours on the respirator. If clinging to the wreckage was an Olympic event, I would be looking at at a podium finish in 2012. I was a great comp with a great atmo. (Especially my table cos I was on it). Special thanks are due to my Rail. Namely Lucky McBink and Phil 'Snattiramas' Cooklin for shouting "Queen Queen Queen" when I was all in AQ v AK. (They almost got duffed up when it came on the river). BTW- Lucky McBink shook my hand last night. We've shaken hands many times before, but until now, he's always been sitting down and me standing up. He looked confused doing it the other way around. (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR6eTiTVomFghKqPFabbo5wK3hX-1V22Ht_UxcBUjiaWWzGPkGOjg) Good to see you Tom and well done. I was pleased to see that queen on the river, but probably shouldn't have made it so obvious! It wasn't just because your opponent in the hand had knocked me out earlier with a bad beat on the river >:( He'd also been somewhat arrogant about his ability and he'd been guilty of very poor etiquette when sucking out on the river in a massive pot 3 tables out, so it seemed to represent some sort of "justice" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 07:37:34 PM SBR down to $94.37
Cover me, I'm going in....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 26, 2011, 07:40:56 PM SBR down to $94.37 Cover me, I'm going in....... spin up one time? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 07:46:04 PM SBR down to $94.37 Cover me, I'm going in....... spin up one time? If I go below $50 I'm going to drop down a level. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 26, 2011, 07:52:56 PM I'd move up to where they respect your raises more!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 26, 2011, 07:55:21 PM SBR down to $94.37 Cover me, I'm going in....... spin up one time? If I go below $50 I'm going to drop down a level. Good man I love to see proper bankroll discipline implemented. Hope you don't need to obviously. GL Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 09:44:15 PM Brutal session.
$78.04 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 09:53:36 PM Q: Do I now sit at one table with $80 or at two tables with $40?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 09:55:12 PM I suppose two tables = less variance...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 26, 2011, 10:01:05 PM Q: Do I now sit at one table with $80 or at two tables with $40? assuming you are playing .5/1 - you could short stack 4 tables and go for a spin Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 26, 2011, 10:05:57 PM I suppose two tables = less variance... There's no such thing. Jason told me. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 10:07:47 PM Q: Do I now sit at one table with $80 or at two tables with $40? assuming you are playing .5/1 - you could short stack 4 tables and go for a spin 4 tables if I spin it up to $200 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 10:11:58 PM $63.79. Time to turn the risk dial all the way up to rumba.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 26, 2011, 10:12:39 PM $63.79. Time to turn the risk dial all the way up to rumba. am gonna rail - sn? GLGL! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 10:15:37 PM $63.79. Time to turn the risk dial all the way up to rumba. am gonna rail - sn? GLGL! I'm shy.... ;shame; Where's Lucky McBink when I need him? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 10:31:59 PM NOooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
Busto!!!!! Paid $5 to see a 3 way flop with Ad 8d Flopped a flush draw and everyone folds. Next hand I back I back-rase a late position laggy raiser with pocket two's and he peels or floats me or something. The flop comes 7 6 3 two spades. he bets 2/3 pot. I push he snaps with 33. $%&$£^*%^%$^*%$%&!! DIAGF Howard Lederer. The dream is over..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on April 26, 2011, 10:33:33 PM so sick
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 26, 2011, 10:37:27 PM What happened to patience, discipline, bankroll management and moving down the levels?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 10:44:45 PM What happened to patience, discipline, bankroll management and moving down the levels? I know Ralph. I'm so ashamed of myself. I just had a rush of blood. I ran it up to almost $800 at one stage and I wanted to get it back quickly. Damn!! I still can't make money on Stars, even without the Americans. Do you think it was variance, or am I just crap? I have to admit, I did start to play a bit lairy when my roll got big. Should I deposit another $200 and have another bash? I have to admit, I did enjoy the last week or so. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 26, 2011, 10:57:18 PM UL Tom, a load of blondes should all start with $200 br, maybe on Skypoker ;whistle; and see who can spin the most up in a week, side bets etc ftw.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: AndrewT on April 26, 2011, 11:04:30 PM Sigh - another one of the Blonde degens goes busto.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 26, 2011, 11:09:18 PM What happened to patience, discipline, bankroll management and moving down the levels? I know Ralph. I'm so ashamed of myself. I just had a rush of blood. I ran it up to almost $800 at one stage and I wanted to get it back quickly. Damn!! I still can't make money on Stars, even without the Americans. Do you think it was variance, or am I just crap? I have to admit, I did start to play a bit lairy when my roll got big. Should I deposit another $200 and have another bash? I have to admit, I did enjoy the last week or so. I'm not sure. I've never managed to win at cash NLH online on a regular basis so I've not tried for years now. You have been a winning NLH MTT player for as long as I've known you so why play anything else? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 11:14:34 PM What happened to patience, discipline, bankroll management and moving down the levels? I know Ralph. I'm so ashamed of myself. I just had a rush of blood. I ran it up to almost $800 at one stage and I wanted to get it back quickly. Damn!! I still can't make money on Stars, even without the Americans. Do you think it was variance, or am I just crap? I have to admit, I did start to play a bit lairy when my roll got big. Should I deposit another $200 and have another bash? I have to admit, I did enjoy the last week or so. I'm not sure. I've never managed to win at cash NLH online on a regular basis so I've not tried for years now. You have been a winning NLH MTT player for as long as I've known you so why play anything else? I haven't the time to play online tourneys on a regular basis at the moment Ralph, and I especially can't put in the volume to overcome MTT variance. Plus, I like the freedom of cash. An hour here, an hour there.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 26, 2011, 11:33:41 PM Volume schmolume, I play seven MTT's per week on average.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 26, 2011, 11:46:16 PM redeposit! I love this thread
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 26, 2011, 11:47:18 PM Volume schmolume, I play seven MTT's per week on average. It's difficult to argue in the face of such eloquence..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 26, 2011, 11:58:53 PM Volume schmolume, I play seven MTT's per week on average. It's difficult to argue in the face of such eloquence..... I don't mean to be trite but as a friend of mine said to me a few weeks ago about playing MTT's. He treats them rather like an Xmas club and he knows that he will get his payoff eventually. Personally if I increase my volume by multi-tabling (which many say is the accepted means of decreasing varience) it has a negative effect on my game so I tend to stick to my tortoise/snake in the grass modus operandi which seems to work for me although not on any grand scale. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 27, 2011, 12:01:56 AM Tom, if you're going to go back to MTTs I'd do so on Sky or one of the European networks rather than Stars or Tilt.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:03:34 AM Volume schmolume, I play seven MTT's per week on average. It's difficult to argue in the face of such eloquence..... I don't mean to be trite but as a friend of mine said to me a few weeks ago about playing MTT's. He treats them rather like an Xmas club and he knows that he will get his payoff eventually. Personally if I increase my volume by multi-tabling (which many say is the accepted means of decreasing varience) it has a negative effect on my game so I tend to stick to my tortoise/snake in the grass modus operandi which seems to work for me although not on any grand scale. I know that you don't mean to be trite Ralph, and what's more I agree with you. I just so so want to be able to crush, (or even lightly compress) online cash. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:06:24 AM Tom, if you're going to go back to MTTs I'd do so on Sky or one of the European networks rather than Stars or Tilt. I'm sure I will when I'm not quite so busy Cos. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 27, 2011, 12:24:03 AM Is there any european site in particular that you'd recommend, Cos?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 27, 2011, 12:39:31 AM Lol nah I wasn't subtly spamming at all alex.
I just think field sizes are more manageable and softer on euro networks. I also think their structures suit Tom's style better too. Tourneys on ipoker, microgaming, ongame and riveredbrentwoodlalalandpoker networks all good for tom. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celtic on April 27, 2011, 12:43:42 AM lol @ going busto on stars and posting DIAGF Lederer.
Your best post ever. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 27, 2011, 12:45:08 AM lol @ going busto on stars and posting DIAGF Lederer. Your best post ever. Haha, com. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:47:56 AM lol @ going busto on stars and posting DIAGF Lederer. Your best post ever. It's just as beneficial as posting it when you go bust on Tilt isn't it? :D Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celtic on April 27, 2011, 12:51:21 AM lol @ going busto on stars and posting DIAGF Lederer. Your best post ever. It's just as beneficial as posting it when you go bust on Tilt isn't it? :D Well, yes, but it's a bit harsh on Howard, I mean, he gets enough DIAGF's over a site he can control, without getting it for a site he can't control. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:52:25 AM lol @ going busto on stars and posting DIAGF Lederer. Your best post ever. It's just as beneficial as posting it when you go bust on Tilt isn't it? :D Well, yes, but it's a bit harsh on Howard, I mean, he gets enough DIAGF's over a site he can control, without getting it for a site he can't control. Well fuck him.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:53:03 AM And the horse he rode in on.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 12:58:34 AM I think I've decided to allow myself £300, deposited in £100 lumps, to see if I can crush online cash.
I'm far too spewy lately. Gonna play the first hunno tight as a gnat's chuff. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 27, 2011, 01:05:33 AM Nevermind this poker malarky, get back to our walk.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:07:11 AM Nevermind this poker malarky, get back to our walk. Mond, I'm seriously scared that you will collapse and you're a bit porky. I won't be able to carry you. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 27, 2011, 01:10:38 AM Nevermind this poker malarky, get back to our walk. Mond, I'm seriously scared that you will collapse and you're a bit porky. I won't be able to carry you. Your like 40 years older than me, it'll be me carrying you, I'm seriously up for doing it, going to start a thread about it now so you can't back out. You can pick your own charity as well, I'll let you :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:18:10 AM Nevermind this poker malarky, get back to our walk. Mond, I'm seriously scared that you will collapse and you're a bit porky. I won't be able to carry you. Your like 40 years older than me, it'll be me carrying you, I'm seriously up for doing it, going to start a thread about it now so you can't back out. You can pick your own charity as well, I'll let you :) I will do it, but don't want to get into a full blown sponsored charity thing Mond. Let's just lie in wait for old fish face and his mates and tag along behind them. That way we won't get lost and we can bung them a few quid to stop them getting shirty. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:22:40 AM Right. Deposited my first oncer.
SBR = $165.13 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 27, 2011, 01:29:54 AM Nevermind this poker malarky, get back to our walk. Mond, I'm seriously scared that you will collapse and you're a bit porky. I won't be able to carry you. Your like 40 years older than me, it'll be me carrying you, I'm seriously up for doing it, going to start a thread about it now so you can't back out. You can pick your own charity as well, I'll let you :) I will do it, but don't want to get into a full blown sponsored charity thing Mond. Let's just lie in wait for old fish face and his mates and tag along behind them. That way we won't get lost and we can bung them a few quid to stop them getting shirty. See pm, gl with the cash. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: AlexMartin on April 27, 2011, 01:30:13 AM rofl just seen this thread. glglglgl red!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:39:38 AM My first ever hh (Just for practice, pliss ignore)
PokerStars Game #61356827474: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/26 20:35:17 ET Table 'Klemola IV' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: RED D0G ($75.40 in chips) Seat 2: francopintu ($164.95 in chips) Seat 3: MattyM5 ($102.50 in chips) Seat 4: artem0801 ($43.55 in chips) Seat 5: AnhA6072 ($54 in chips) Seat 6: R1aki ($114.60 in chips) Seat 7: LickerGigolo ($60 in chips) Seat 8: TakeCareAA ($104.30 in chips) Seat 9: wladiw ($86.90 in chips) francopintu: posts small blind $0.50 MattyM5: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [8c 7s] artem0801: folds AnhA6072: folds R1aki: folds LickerGigolo: folds TakeCareAA: folds wladiw: folds RED D0G: calls $1 francopintu: folds MattyM5: checks *** FLOP *** [7h Js Ac] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: checks *** TURN *** [7h Js Ac] [2c] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: bets $2 MattyM5: folds Uncalled bet ($2) returned to RED D0G RED D0G collected $2.40 from pot RED D0G: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $2.50 | Rake $0.10 Board [7h Js Ac 2c] Seat 1: RED D0G (button) collected ($2.40) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 27, 2011, 01:42:33 AM My first ever hh (Just for practice, pliss ignore) PokerStars Game #61356827474: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/26 20:35:17 ET Table 'Klemola IV' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: RED D0G ($75.40 in chips) Seat 2: francopintu ($164.95 in chips) Seat 3: MattyM5 ($102.50 in chips) Seat 4: artem0801 ($43.55 in chips) Seat 5: AnhA6072 ($54 in chips) Seat 6: R1aki ($114.60 in chips) Seat 7: LickerGigolo ($60 in chips) Seat 8: TakeCareAA ($104.30 in chips) Seat 9: wladiw ($86.90 in chips) francopintu: posts small blind $0.50 MattyM5: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [8c 7s] artem0801: folds AnhA6072: folds R1aki: folds LickerGigolo: folds TakeCareAA: folds wladiw: folds RED D0G: calls $1 francopintu: folds MattyM5: checks *** FLOP *** [7h Js Ac] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: checks *** TURN *** [7h Js Ac] [2c] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: bets $2 MattyM5: folds Uncalled bet ($2) returned to RED D0G RED D0G collected $2.40 from pot RED D0G: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $2.50 | Rake $0.10 Board [7h Js Ac 2c] Seat 1: RED D0G (button) collected ($2.40) SO SICK Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:46:01 AM I crushed him...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:49:21 AM Tony will disown me btw...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celtic on April 27, 2011, 01:50:58 AM Owned his soul red dawwwwggggg.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 01:54:53 AM Owned his soul red dawwwwggggg. Think I'm ready to move up? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on April 27, 2011, 03:14:16 AM this thread is great tom, keep crushin them. Notice grandad has started updating his diary again now there's a new kid on the blog vying for first read every day
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:07:02 AM Cheers Jeff.
Tony only writes about trains, which is fine of course, but how can you get angry about trains? SexyTanya on the other hand...... Therese this one player, "SexyTanya" who seems to be at every table, 24/7. How can anyone play that much? She's totally doing my head in. We clash all the time. Every time I call her down, she has it. When I pass, she shows me air. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;technophobe; I'm bet She's not even a woman, and I bet if if she is, she's not even sexy. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:36:41 AM I know this question is in the Hoover, but how do you play AJ in early position?
Do I raise so that I can A: Take it down uncontested or c bet a missed flop for another bite of the cherry if he calls. B: Limp and think I'm behind to a raise from any player who's digestive system seems in good order? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: KarmaDope on April 27, 2011, 08:47:09 AM I know this question is in the Hoover, but how do you play AJ in early position? Do I raise so that I can A: Take it down uncontested or c bet a missed flop for another bite of the cherry if he calls. B: Limp and think I'm behind to a raise from any player who's digestive system seems in good order? Early position w/ AJos I'd probably fold. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 27, 2011, 08:52:13 AM I know this question is in the Hoover, but how do you play AJ in early position? you dont play AJo in FR utg or utg+1 (AJs prob ok) - there are some who think that Aqo should be mckd utg (if you used holdem manager, you would know who they are). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 10:00:21 AM My first ever hh (Just for practice, pliss ignore) yawn. and asking about AJ..... i feel like i've lost a close friend or even an armPokerStars Game #61356827474: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/26 20:35:17 ET Table 'Klemola IV' 9-max Seat #1 is the button Seat 1: RED D0G ($75.40 in chips) Seat 2: francopintu ($164.95 in chips) Seat 3: MattyM5 ($102.50 in chips) Seat 4: artem0801 ($43.55 in chips) Seat 5: AnhA6072 ($54 in chips) Seat 6: R1aki ($114.60 in chips) Seat 7: LickerGigolo ($60 in chips) Seat 8: TakeCareAA ($104.30 in chips) Seat 9: wladiw ($86.90 in chips) francopintu: posts small blind $0.50 MattyM5: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [8c 7s] artem0801: folds AnhA6072: folds R1aki: folds LickerGigolo: folds TakeCareAA: folds wladiw: folds RED D0G: calls $1 francopintu: folds MattyM5: checks *** FLOP *** [7h Js Ac] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: checks *** TURN *** [7h Js Ac] [2c] MattyM5: checks RED D0G: bets $2 MattyM5: folds Uncalled bet ($2) returned to RED D0G RED D0G collected $2.40 from pot RED D0G: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $2.50 | Rake $0.10 Board [7h Js Ac 2c] Seat 1: RED D0G (button) collected ($2.40) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 10:12:13 AM See. I knew I'd end up making a fool of myself.... ;marks;
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 10:15:40 AM i'm starting to think i'm fighting a losing battle when there is only me and tikay stood back to back swinging our swords lol
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 27, 2011, 10:58:11 AM i'm starting to think i'm fighting a losing battle when there is only me and tikay stood back to back swinging our swords lol An image I didn't want in my mind... ;surrender; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 11:01:58 AM i'm starting to think i'm fighting a losing battle when there is only me and tikay stood back to back swinging our swords lol An image I didn't want in my mind... ;surrender; Could be worse, they could be front to back...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:34:56 PM Analyse this....
perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 27, 2011, 07:37:51 PM Raise to $13.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: hector62 on April 27, 2011, 07:38:46 PM Raise to $20
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Nakor on April 27, 2011, 07:39:10 PM Analyse this.... perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Red and Blue are good colours for you Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 07:42:20 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:43:32 PM Red and Blue?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on April 27, 2011, 07:44:46 PM Red and Blue? .....will never do it's like red and green should never be seen Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:45:15 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:45:45 PM Red and Blue? .....will never do it's like red and green should never be seen Come on guys, no taking advantage.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:48:21 PM perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET
Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 Spagiari leaves the table FMorbiducci: folds BruceOxner: folds Miiiiga$: folds thor23111: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [4d Qc Qd] thor23111: checks RED D0G: .....? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:49:15 PM still lolling @ Jason.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 27, 2011, 07:52:23 PM Analyse this.... perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? only have a small sample on Miiiiga$ but he seems quite tight 10/7 ep raise ZERO, so i'd 3 bet on the larger side hopefully he will take offence to this and re-backraise. RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 - he deserves all he gets Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:56:26 PM Analyse this.... perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? only have a small sample on Miiiiga$ but he seems quite tight 10/7 ep raise ZERO, so i'd 3 bet on the larger side hopefully he will take offence to this and re-backraise. Don't really understand those figures Mr D, but I've moved the action on now. I guess I didn't bet enough? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 07:56:51 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 07:59:01 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Not if you're from California. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:00:17 PM RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 - he deserves all he gets Lol. Harsh, but fair.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 08:02:59 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Not if you're from California. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 27, 2011, 08:05:07 PM anyway either check and call one bet or c bet and give up.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:06:14 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Not if you're from California. No, but in California they call it "Math" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:08:40 PM perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 Spagiari leaves the table FMorbiducci: folds BruceOxner: folds Miiiiga$: folds thor23111: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [4d Qc Qd] thor23111: checks RED D0G: .....? RED D0G: checks *** TURN *** [4d Qc Qd] [5d] thor23111: bets $10.70 RED D0G: ....? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 08:17:20 PM perPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 Spagiari leaves the table FMorbiducci: folds BruceOxner: folds Miiiiga$: folds thor23111: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [4d Qc Qd] thor23111: checks RED D0G: .....? RED D0G: checks *** TURN *** [4d Qc Qd] [5d] thor23111: bets $10.70 RED D0G: ....? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:32:09 PM now the guy with Kd Qh needs to get the vaseline out .... net poker is like the chuckle brothers..to me to you to me to you But I have to call $10.70...... Right? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Lucky on April 27, 2011, 08:33:09 PM $63.79. Time to turn the risk dial all the way up to rumba. am gonna rail - sn? GLGL! I'm shy.... ;shame; Where's Lucky McBink when I need him? I guess I'm too late :( Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on April 27, 2011, 08:38:52 PM now the guy with Kd Qh needs to get the vaseline out .... net poker is like the chuckle brothers..to me to you to me to you But I have to call $10.70...... Right? why? if you raise then you change the rng, the river comes out different and you win the pot. simples Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 08:48:16 PM now the guy with Kd Qh needs to get the vaseline out .... net poker is like the chuckle brothers..to me to you to me to you But I have to call $10.70...... Right? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 08:49:55 PM Well anyway, I call the $10.70 and the river comes 8d.
thor23111: bets $41.80 Of course, fishy ole Red calls.. RED D0G: calls $41.80 *** SHOW DOWN *** thor23111: shows.... ? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 08:57:54 PM Why do you make it 9?!
puuuuump it pre pls, twice as much imo! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 09:02:14 PM Why do you make it 9?! explain why please andrew. not a level just want to understand why? are you trying to get everyone to fold? reds raise gets 1 caller perfect imo. if the guy is a calling station he calls 9 or 18 does he notpuuuuump it pre pls, twice as much imo! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 09:04:57 PM Why do you make it 9?! explain why please andrew. not a level just want to understand why? are you trying to get everyone to fold? reds raise gets 1 caller perfect imo. if the guy is a calling station he calls 9 or 18 does he notpuuuuump it pre pls, twice as much imo! I didn't want to scare everyone off, but Doubleup also said I should have bet more.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 09:07:14 PM we have the nut hand.
we cannot be losing preflop LETS WAGER MANEYS Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 09:11:54 PM we have the nut hand. we cannot be losing preflop LETS WAGER MANEYS Not saying that's wrong, but aces don't come along too often, is it wise to over bet them and induce a fold from most holdings? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 09:14:47 PM we have the nut hand. see i think this be the reason why some experience varience more than others andy. we have nut hand pre but the majority of the time we dont have nut hand on the flop. your thinking would also answer why so many guys are happy to get it all in pre with AK. is this your ethos as well? thanks for not laughing at me as understanding what my opponent is thinking is far more important than looking at my cards. despite giving the impression i only play premiums ;)we cannot be losing preflop LETS WAGER MANEYS Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 09:24:34 PM I hope this is all just a level.
Why would we want to price in tonnes of people with a hand we are then going to struggle to fold?# if a fish will call 30 bigs pre why not raise to 30? Why dont we just flat so no one can put us on aces? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celebspec on April 27, 2011, 09:28:19 PM I hope this is all just a level. Why would we want to price in tonnes of people with a hand we are then going to struggle to fold?# if a fish will call 30 bigs pre why not raise to 30? Why dont we just flat so no one can put us on aces? Lol. So much this. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 09:32:35 PM I hope this is all just a level. Why would we want to price in tonnes of people with a hand we are then going to struggle to fold?# if a fish will call 30 bigs pre why not raise to 30? Why dont we just flat so no one can put us on aces? No level, I'm here to learn Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 27, 2011, 09:34:24 PM Not saying that's wrong, but aces don't come along too often, is it wise to over bet them and induce a fold from most holdings? Sometimes there just isnt any money to be made with them. Giving opponents the max implied odds doesn't change that. A squeeze of a tight early position raise is just always going to look strong, so you might as well hope that one of these guys has got a hand good enough to call a strong raise. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on April 27, 2011, 09:38:02 PM 17 pages i have no idea who is levelling who or if the whole thread is a level?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 27, 2011, 09:38:13 PM Analyse this.... braces himself and bends over. you know its coming lolperPokerStars Game #61383637635: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/27 14:25:39 ET Table 'Baucis III' 9-max Seat #6 is the button Seat 1: Loo SweeTian ($105.35 in chips) Seat 2: Miiiiga$ ($100 in chips) Seat 3: yaokhmmmmm ($103.65 in chips) Seat 5: thor23111 ($94.80 in chips) Seat 6: RED D0G ($171.50 in chips) Seat 8: FMorbiducci ($106 in chips) Seat 9: BruceOxner ($104 in chips) boris063 will be allowed to play after the button FMorbiducci: posts small blind $0.50 BruceOxner: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [ Ahrt Ad] Loo SweeTian: folds Miiiiga$: raises $2 to $3 yaokhmmmmm: folds thor23111: calls $3 RED D0G:......? Lol. So true.... But where did I balls it up? Not if you're from California. nh sir (not the AA, ldo) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 09:42:51 PM I hope this is all just a level. 100% not a level andy....we have bet correct to get 1 caller here....bet more and we could have lost him. and your answer about struggling to fold confirms my thoughts. it may explain why tom and myself cashed so many dtd deeps and you stuggle to make day 2...its not coincidence or varience. you make an infinite more money on line than me tom and tikay added together. i learn so much from listening to you. please listen to me when i say to make finals in the deepstack you have to treat everyone like an idiot/amateur and play ABC poker. i will get flamed but dont give a toss. even the first couple of days at the wsop is about dodging the idiots. once again its not a level..(assuming leveling is taking the piss)Why would we want to price in tonnes of people with a hand we are then going to struggle to fold?# if a fish will call 30 bigs pre why not raise to 30? Why dont we just flat so no one can put us on aces? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on April 27, 2011, 09:46:35 PM Why oh why do you insist on posting the same stuff over and over again?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 27, 2011, 09:47:28 PM 17 pages i have no idea who is levelling who or if the whole thread is a level? 17 pages? I've waited 5 years for you to post on one of my threads. :hello: Dave. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 09:56:00 PM lol obvious troll is obvious
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 10:03:56 PM Why oh why do you insist on posting the same stuff over and over again? sorry dave. will get it out of the system eventuallyTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on April 27, 2011, 10:04:38 PM Many thanks. When u do il post constructive advise to hhs
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 10:13:06 PM Many thanks. When u do il post constructive advise to hhs look dave you have managed to move with the times and are still making a living from the on line game. where as i dont know my arse from my elbow having given the grind up some years ago i tend to cash a high %age of the time when i play live or to when trying to sat into stuff. cant speak for tom but 5 years maybe more like 10 but i remember him crushing (although we did not call it that back then) ladbrokes poker. once my kids start full time education in 18 months time i would like to think that with the spare time i might return to the grind. i have an education and have not done a days work for anyone but myself for getting on for 20 years. this is not a level. both tom and myself are just trying to learn. explain why andy (a very good on line player) has not made a deepstack day 2 in 18 attempts when complete idiots cash these comps for fun. and dont tell me its fucking varience coz i will ram that shit in your arseTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 10:15:07 PM It's variance.
If you think mincashing is a profitable strategy for tournies you have no idea just like most of the live world. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 10:35:21 PM It's variance. if i make the dough andy i must final table more than 50% of the time. you must have spent £6k on this competition which means you have to come 3rd buddy. i understand that all the money is in the top 3 but you must understand that you must be doing something wrong if you cant make day 2. i love you andrew and dont ever wanna upset you but they pay the top 10% of the field who in a results orientated world means that they are the top ten % who lasted longer in that competition. i know i only play low mid stake comps in general but the likes of eames romanello et al keep proving it at the highest level. i read a post maybe by maybe keys that john aint a net player but also read he has won 2 million on line so i dont know the truth but all i know from watching him is that he is a world class player and this is a guy killing it at the highest level were i would think varience is more prevellant because so many people are playing so well. when playing lesser players as we do varience should not be a problem because they our opponents are often clueless easy to read and over play their marginal hands.If you think mincashing is a profitable strategy for tournies you have no idea just like most of the live world. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 27, 2011, 10:58:43 PM BUT HOW MUCH DID YOU LOSE
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celebspec on April 27, 2011, 11:01:52 PM Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 27, 2011, 11:09:07 PM BUT HOW MUCH DID YOU LOSE andy i have never had to buy into any of the dtd comps as always qualified rf had a seat transfered. i only play twice a month now that i have 3 kids so can hardly be called professional but other than rent from a window cleaning business that i own its the primary income. just realized i actually bought into the last ukipt so that first bit was a slight exaggeration and last month spent more than the buy in for the monte carlo and never actually played it myself. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Boba Fett on April 28, 2011, 02:09:24 AM Red Dog, Can I ask what your motivations and goals for this bankroll are?
Is it to spin up a few hundred then cash out? Grind it up to a proper bankroll large enough to play the current stakes and then move up the stakes? As for the AA hand, why did you check behind on the flop? explain why andy (a very good on line player) has not made a deepstack day 2 in 18 attempts when complete idiots cash these comps for fun. and dont tell me its fucking varience coz i will ram that shit in your arse MBN to have never had an 18 tourney downswing.Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 08:12:14 AM It's variance. you would probably enjoy it andy. 100% meither tom or myself are piss takingIf you think mincashing is a profitable strategy for tournies you have no idea just like most of the live world. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 08:39:10 AM live twice i have had it and 13 is the most i ever had in all honesty and they were playing 5 nights a week in £20 re buy bingo where due to structures i would assume that the varience has to be higher due to the fact that you are pot committed to a raise at almost every point of the competition. cant honestly say about on line because its been that long since i played a 40 hour week. just experienced my worst month trying to win a seat to two events that i tried to sat into. would have almost been cheaper to buy in. i try to limit myself to playing 2/3 day comps twice a month due to having a young family and in my head i think i cash 50% of the time probably 33% in honesty and know of guys who seem to cash even more regually than me. looking at my hendonmob in last 19 months have had 18 result... 12 have been final tables of which 7 were top 3 where the majority of money is.....andy (sorry to use you mate) is 18 comps no day 2 and this is varience. what is the opposite of varience coz i am binning the hoodies and having it printed on a t shirt in big fuck off letters...i have a mate who like andy plays the odd live comps and has never cashed only ever making day 2 twice. we estimate that he has been in £181,000 (might be $) and the reason why he aint cashed is pure and simpley that he is shit (but getting better the more he listens). however this guy has a sunday milion final table and an ftops final but you look on the opr (think this was the one but aint sure) he was down $250k. go figure. i hate to be the anti christ but i am trying to understand all of this but it just makes my shit itch with frustration.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:19:07 AM Red Dog, Can I ask what your motivations and goals for this bankroll are? Is it to spin up a few hundred then cash out? Grind it up to a proper bankroll large enough to play the current stakes and then move up the stakes? As for the AA hand, why did you check behind on the flop? My goal? Good question. Fun. I want to play poker, I want to have fun doing it, I want to make sustainable profit at this level. I haven't considered moving up levels yet. I can't win at online cash at any level so I guess I'm just trying to solve that puzzle. If I can't make a profit, I want my losses to be as small as possible while I'm having fun. Scratch that. The real reason is, I want to CRUUUUSH!!!!!!! The AA hand? Checking behind was a mistake eh? He had 6d 7d BTW Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Girgy85 on April 28, 2011, 09:20:27 AM Dude please use paragraphs!! I really like reading ur posts but can never be arsed as it just looks like too much hard work!!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 28, 2011, 09:26:09 AM Dude please use paragraphs!! I really like reading ur posts but can never be arsed as it just looks like too much hard work!! +1 it's almost as bad as girgy's !!s :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 28, 2011, 09:26:42 AM Dude please use paragraphs!! I really like reading ur posts but can never be arsed as it just looks like too much hard work!! If we are dissing writing styles, please stop using exclamation marks after every sentence, which is, arguably, far worse. Dude. You must, thank goodness, be the only person to ever write "RIP!!" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 09:37:42 AM Disappear for a week-end to Newcastle. Come back to discover gatso is terrorising geese. Cos has gone all quiet. Chuckles isn't complaining about bad beats. Tom and Tony have been abducted by aliens. And their alien replacements talk hood speak. WTF is going on 'round here?!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 09:38:30 AM He had 6d 7d BTW yeah FR in a nutshell, cider in your ear Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:56:35 AM Do I have to call the river with the nut flush?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 10:01:32 AM Do I have to call the river with the nut flush? Fist pump jam while doing a pelvic thrust is apparently the way to go...maybe throw a "BOOOOOOOOM" into the mix as yer at it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 10:04:07 AM Or ya could snap fold just for shits and giggles. Forgot about that one.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:08:00 AM Do I have to call the river with the nut flush? Fist pump jam while doing a pelvic thrust is apparently the way to go...maybe throw a "BOOOOOOOOM" into the mix as yer at it. NURSE! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:12:51 AM Current SBR = $105.62 (Not going well is it?)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 10:16:29 AM Do I have to call the river with the nut flush? I honestly dont know.. I think that as a general rule in FRNL, if you know your opponent is competent and your range is very strong (as it is here), but your opponent doesn't seem to care, you should make some very big laydowns. If you want to avoid that you should move to 6max, then everyones range is much much wider. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:24:29 AM Do I have to call the river with the nut flush? I honestly dont know.. I think that as a general rule in FRNL, if you know your opponent is competent and your range is very strong (as it is here), but your opponent doesn't seem to care, you should make some very big laydowns. If you want to avoid that you should move to 6max, then everyones range is much much wider. More on this concept, and six max general strategies and principles please, if you have the time and the inclination. Their range has to be wider, but doesn't my range have to be wider too? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 28, 2011, 10:24:53 AM Even at FR it's at very least a call.
I mean come on. What beats us here? 67s, QQ, or Qfull. He hasn't got queens full surely so that leaves quads or the straight flush. Both are unlikely. He's more likely to have AQ/KQ/JQ or maybe the Kd. He could also be bluffing. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:26:41 AM Lol. I don't know what FR is ;ashamed;
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 28, 2011, 10:28:11 AM Oh my bad. He could obv have all the pocket pairs too. Makes it a bit closer.
Full Ring. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 10:53:44 AM Their range has to be wider, but doesn't my range have to be wider too? yes and that = fun - also ppl bluff more, bet with mediocre holdings. I mostly play full ring when trying to clear a bonus/get to a vip level because I can play loads of tables (I cant do that with 6 max due to senility). I think that finding weak players is the key anyway nowadays and if you are only playing a couple of tables of 6max it should be quite easy to work out if there is any value, if not move on to another table. and btw if you are not going to use a hud at least spend ten minutes running thru the lobby and marking the multitable players red or blue or something and assume they are reasonably competent. Avoid tables entirely composed of multitablers. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:59:11 AM Their range has to be wider, but doesn't my range have to be wider too? yes and that = fun - also ppl bluff more, bet with mediocre holdings. I mostly play full ring when trying to clear a bonus/get to a vip level because I can play loads of tables (I cant do that with 6 max due to senility). I think that finding weak players is the key anyway nowadays and if you are only playing a couple of tables of 6max it should be quite easy to work out if there is any value, if not move on to another table. I enjoy FR but it might be exciting to try 6 max. If I go busto again, I might take a shot at it with my next c note. SBR = $187.07 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 11:02:20 AM So bearing the lessons of the AA hand in mind...
Mid position (fairly solid) makes it $3. Next man (Station) calls the $3, I'm in the cut off with QQ. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 28, 2011, 11:45:40 AM $13.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 11:50:12 AM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 11:53:13 AM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 11:56:11 AM $13. I made it $12. Both of them call. Flop 9s Js 5d Both check Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Cf on April 28, 2011, 12:00:29 PM $13. I made it $12. Both of them call. Flop 9s Js 5d Both check $25 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 28, 2011, 12:01:48 PM Tom, don't get hung up on what hand you have.
How does it look if you re-raise? What does your hand look like? How will your opponents view you if you squeeze and what hands will they continue with and how? Once we have thought about this we can then work out what hands we want to place in which ranges. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dingdell on April 28, 2011, 12:07:37 PM Tom, don't get hung up on what hand you have. How does it look if you re-raise? What does your hand look like? How will your opponents view you if you squeeze and what hands will they continue with and how? Once we have thought about this we can then work out what hands we want to place in which ranges. Loving this thread btw. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 12:08:02 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: hector62 on April 28, 2011, 12:25:06 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Have I missed the post where after the hand has finished you typed in the chat box " Heads up for rolls you donk?" Because that's my favourite bit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 12:43:39 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Have I missed the post where after the hand has finished you typed in the chat box " Heads up for rolls you donk?" Because that's my favourite bit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 12:48:47 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Have I missed the post where after the hand has finished you typed in the chat box " Heads up for rolls you donk?" Because that's my favourite bit. Nah, he's proper hip - has a lappy and all. But don't ask what happened to the poor cat. It's still recovering and has since formed a union with the moles. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 12:52:44 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Have I missed the post where after the hand has finished you typed in the chat box " Heads up for rolls you donk?" Because that's my favourite bit. Nah, he's proper hip - has a lappy and all. But don't ask what happened to the poor cat. It's still recovering and has since formed a union with the moles. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 12:56:29 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Have I missed the post where after the hand has finished you typed in the chat box " Heads up for rolls you donk?" Because that's my favourite bit. Nah, he's proper hip - has a lappy and all. But don't ask what happened to the poor cat. It's still recovering and has since formed a union with the moles. Not at all. Tom's too shrewd for that. Gonna wait til he cruuuuuuushes to buy the balla one obv. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: AlexMartin on April 28, 2011, 12:58:41 PM warning Tom, fullring is basically an abc reg top-set-mining contest. Id definitely swerve it if i were you, its not poker. You cant outplay someone who never calls with worse but wont fold better.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 01:06:25 PM $13. I made it $12. Both of them call. Flop 9s Js 5d Both check $25 I'd bet a bit smaller, I normally cbet less in 3 bet pots tho normally heads up. $20 for me prob folding to a raise from mp but happy to get it in with the loose player. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 28, 2011, 01:16:40 PM warning Tom, fullring is basically an abc reg top-set-mining contest. Id definitely swerve it if i were you, its not poker. You cant outplay someone who never calls with worse but wont fold better. QFT Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 28, 2011, 01:19:16 PM by Alex's definition you can beat this game by micro grinding and winning every flop (in position)
but i agree its tough grind Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 01:33:06 PM i like what alex says dont understand what cos says but not sure if its a level. this is exactley how you make money playing ABC to beat idiots live. so am sort of agreeing with guy. none of you guys are 15 or under and have multiple hendonmob entries i take it.... ;)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 02:57:25 PM have i missed the river tom? by time it takes me to write out my post the thread has moved on 3 pages. The river was to the AA hand was 6d 7d Yes. He rivered the straight flush. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:29:53 PM $13. I made it $12. Both of them call. Flop 9s Js 5d Both check $25 Anyway, back to this hand. I make it $22. Original raiser pushes for $58, Station folds. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 28, 2011, 03:33:47 PM And now we call.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:35:27 PM I'm interested in the FR v 6 Max thang.
Good input from Alex, Jason, Guy and Dave. (I don't understand Cos either) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 03:37:42 PM even i aint folding for that amount into that pot. looks like you are ahead to draw / top pair type hands... i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. so agrred with andy but possibly for different reasoning
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:43:30 PM Also interested in peeps thoughts on short-stacking FR. Even good players seem to make really bad plays against me when I sit with a short stack. It seems to tilt the crap out of them for some reason.
Do you think short-stacking FR is a viable strategy? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: GreekStein on April 28, 2011, 03:43:59 PM what have i said that's confusing?
I simply agreed with what Alex said about online fullring. It's not poker. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:46:30 PM what have i said that's confusing? I simply agreed with what Alex said about online fullring. It's not poker. ;laxie; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 28, 2011, 03:47:15 PM I'm interested in the FR v 6 Max thang. Good input from Alex, Jason, Guy and Dave. (I don't understand Cos either) 9 handed - 6 max - HU = reduced average hand strengths the lower the average hand strength the more place there is in the game for thin value bets and bluffing. the more decisions you have to make (there are more in 6max and even more in HU ldo) the greater your chance to create an edge and have your opponents make mistakes. full ring is just people playing tonnes of tables being super nitty with one pair being a struggle. 6max is much more fun. shortstacking FR would be super boring, quite high variance and be purely maths based so you wouldn't be playing much of a game. no fun imo. 6max ftw. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:48:58 PM I'm interested in the FR v 6 Max thang. Good input from Alex, Jason, Guy and Dave. (I don't understand Cos either) 9 handed - 6 max - HU = reduced average hand strengths the lower the average hand strength the more place there is in the game for thin value bets and bluffing. the more decisions you have to make (there are more in 6max and even more in HU ldo) the greater your chance to create an edge and have your opponents make mistakes. full ring is just people playing tonnes of tables being super nitty with one pair being a struggle. 6max is much more fun. shortstacking FR would be super boring, quite high variance and be purely maths based so you wouldn't be playing much of a game. no fun imo. 6max ftw. Ole tit head can present a compelling case when he wants to... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 03:50:44 PM it was the qyt thing Cos. full ring obv suits the guys like me who are happy to have a narrower range as the nature of the beast means you have to open up in 6 max. my sample size of 6 max is only 4 games and cashed in 3. i found that people over played their hands on the flop and actually heard two guys say how the hell can he be ahead everytime. only small sample but poker is poker. adapt and overcome each given situation
not sure if this is the same as andrew says but 6 max aint as fun imo. seem to move tables a lot just as your arse gets comfy in one seat Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 03:52:02 PM . i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. no way - the flop is too drawy to slow play Tom - is it 58 for you to call or 38? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 03:53:52 PM . i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. no way - the flop is too drawy to slow play Tom - is it 58 for you to call or 38? 38 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 28, 2011, 03:57:21 PM Also interested in peeps thoughts on short-stacking FR. Even good players seem to make really bad plays against me when I sit with a short stack. It seems to tilt the crap out of them for some reason. Do you think short-stacking FR is a viable strategy? Tom I refer you to my post of the other day Shortstacking has been referred to as 1. cheating 2. unbeatable poker 3. moral-less 4. why would you do anything else 5. annoying 6. .................i could go on If done with immaculate application short stacking is unbeatable. I guess the issue is most people dont do it well - those that do have made a lot of money. Someone on here will link you to a good 2+2 thread - im not very good with 2+2 so it would take me 4 days to find it As an example - if you sit with 20bbs and everyone else has 100 - in a 6 max c/o opens his opening range, button calls his 100bb calling range and you jam 20bbs! You are gonna make a lot of money of you play a specific range of holdings (helps to run good too) stars have now changed their tables to combat this, tilt havent as far as i know Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 03:58:26 PM . i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. no way - the flop is too drawy to slow play Tom - is it 58 for you to call or 38? 38 hmmm dont like it but have to call - he is value betting I think and I dont think he has AJ, so that leaves set and combi draws, so we arent making much money here. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 28, 2011, 03:59:26 PM lol at calling shortstacking cheating.
it's just like playing a tournament stack, just push fold ranges and opponents opening/calling ranges. it's just a maths puzzle. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 04:04:09 PM . i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. no way - the flop is too drawy to slow play Tom - is it 58 for you to call or 38? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 04:08:41 PM . i think hands beating you flat n get it in on the next street. no way - the flop is too drawy to slow play Tom - is it 58 for you to call or 38? 38 hmmm dont like it but have to call - he is value betting I think and I dont think he has AJ, so that leaves set and combi draws, so we arent making much money here. Spot on Mr D. We call, he had pocket jacks. I don't think we can play it differently. can we? Btw- we river a queen ;karabiner; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 04:11:37 PM what does ido mean as well tom?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 28, 2011, 04:12:48 PM what does ido mean as well tom? its ldo - and its "like der, obv" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 04:14:45 PM what does ido mean as well tom? its ldo - and its "like der, obv" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 04:25:00 PM so AA KK and sets shove... seems alien to me but take your word. are there many drawing hands that call toms raise pre. He doesn't play AA KK this way pre, but if he did he would most def push here. The loose player quite likely has a drawing hand and in fact (to illustrate the nittiness of FR) the original raiser turned his jj into a drawing hand. Tom is just about pot commited so there is no reason to slow play anyway and additionally the concern would be that a scare card could hit the turn and frighten off Tom. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 04:34:50 PM so AA KK and sets shove... seems alien to me but take your word. are there many drawing hands that call toms raise pre. He doesn't play AA KK this way pre, but if he did he would most def push here. The loose player quite likely has a drawing hand and in fact (to illustrate the nittiness of FR) the original raiser turned his jj into a drawing hand. Tom is just about pot commited so there is no reason to slow play anyway and additionally the concern would be that a scare card could hit the turn and frighten off Tom. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 04:36:15 PM Lol. I don't know about nitty. Some of these players are looser than a brown ale and curry bowel movement.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 05:49:48 PM SBR = $200.56
(http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSo11fI1QoFIgzkxnUUuL5cPcr-oEm9QRErmxlGkyC47huegBdr) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 07:33:42 PM Finished the sesh on $230.97.
Might Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 07:41:17 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 07:43:44 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 07:45:29 PM Why do some of the 6 Max tables have that PokerStars red ace of spades symbol in front of the table name?
Some of the players have this too. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 28, 2011, 07:47:29 PM Why do some of the 6 Max tables have that PokerStars red ace of spades symbol in front of the table name? Some of the players have this too. online pro sat at table Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 07:49:58 PM Why do some of the 6 Max tables have that PokerStars red ace of spades symbol in front of the table name? Some of the players have this too. online pro sat at table What does "Pro" mean on this case Guy? Sponsored by Stars or self styleed? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 28, 2011, 07:52:39 PM Why do some of the 6 Max tables have that PokerStars red ace of spades symbol in front of the table name? Some of the players have this too. online pro sat at table What does "Pro" mean on this case Guy? Sponsored by Stars or self styleed? yeah sponsored by stars - but "online pro" is like 2nd tier - in the sense of not necessarily big poker names - but that said they have usually made their names on line so not to be taken lightly at all Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on April 28, 2011, 07:53:01 PM Sponsored by stars.
Dale who posts on here is one. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 07:54:53 PM Any idea what a Stars online sponsorship consists of?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 08:01:41 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 08:07:30 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 28, 2011, 08:20:03 PM Any idea what a Stars online sponsorship consists of? It's a secret. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:24:20 PM Playing 6 Max (1 table)
Head spinning...... Heart racing....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:31:14 PM Blimey. I've only been playing 10 minutes and I've been in more hands than Britney Spears's tits.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 28, 2011, 09:33:05 PM Blimey. I've only been playing 10 minutes and I've been in more hands than Britney Spears's tits. Blue, Bearded or Great? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:41:25 PM Blimey. I've only been playing 10 minutes and I've been in more hands than Britney Spears's tits. Blue, Bearded or Great? What, Britney Spears's tits? Great. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:43:14 PM Oops....
Table 'Berenike V' 6-max Seat #4 is the button Seat 3: Ialogen ($100 in chips) Seat 4: RED D0G ($77 in chips) Seat 6: rivgold ($56.60 in chips) theboy7 will be allowed to play after the button rivgold: posts small blind $0.50 brudman: is sitting out Ialogen: posts big blind $1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [Qc Qs] H-Good-Joke joins the table at seat #1 RED D0G: raises $2 to $3 rivgold: calls $2.50 Ialogen: folds *** FLOP *** [3c 8c 7c] rivgold: bets $6 RED D0G: raises $12 to $18 rivgold: raises $35.60 to $53.60 and is all-in RED D0G: calls $35.60 *** TURN *** [3c 8c 7c] [Qh] *** RIVER *** [3c 8c 7c Qh] [Qd] *** SHOW DOWN *** rivgold: shows [7h 8d] (two pair, Queens and Eights) RED D0G: shows [Qc Qs] (four of a kind, Queens) RED D0G collected $113.20 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $114.20 | Rake $1 Board [3c 8c 7c Qh Qd] Seat 3: Ialogen (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 4: RED D0G (button) showed [Qc Qs] and won ($113.20) with four of a kind, Queens Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 28, 2011, 09:45:32 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 09:48:06 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:48:35 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 28, 2011, 09:52:59 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. skilll game........................... :D Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 09:55:08 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Was he Jase? Farriers worked their bollocks off back then. They earn good money nowadays. (Not that I begrudge them) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 09:56:57 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. You haz greeeeeeeeeeeen. was always coming home to ya. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:03:57 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. You haz greeeeeeeeeeeen. was always coming home to ya. That's broccoli right? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on April 28, 2011, 10:04:01 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. You haz parsley. was always coming home to ya. So behind the times. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 28, 2011, 10:05:30 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. You haz parsley. was always coming home to ya. So behind the times. FML - I tried. Sigh. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 28, 2011, 10:07:33 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Was he Jase? Farriers worked their bollocks off back then. They earn good money nowadays. (Not that I begrudge them) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:10:00 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Was he Jase? Farriers worked their bollocks off back then. They earn good money nowadays. (Not that I begrudge them) There are some great stories out there. Everyone has them. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: sovietsong on April 28, 2011, 10:11:03 PM great thread. but then again the one about keeping chickens was one of my favs Me too. Have you ever kept chickens Jacearoony? I would have liked your Grandad. Was he Jase? Farriers worked their bollocks off back then. They earn good money nowadays. (Not that I begrudge them) There are some great stories out there. Everyone has them. My dad had a computer shop. Went out of business. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on April 28, 2011, 10:11:12 PM Now you're learning!! Get it in behind, and hit runner runner quads! Mitch will be so proud. I crushed that fecker. You haz parsley. was always coming home to ya. So behind the times. FML - I tried. Sigh. To be fair, where you live you're normally a good 20 years behind - so not a bad effort. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 10:18:13 PM This 6 Max is bad for me nerves. Playing two tables now. Shattered 8 teeth already.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 28, 2011, 10:30:22 PM This 6 Max is bad for me nerves. Playing two tables now. Shattered 8 teeth already. I think you should move on to heads-up now before you get bored. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 28, 2011, 11:13:59 PM Back on FR. 6 Max too scary.
SBR $245.57 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: AlexMartin on April 29, 2011, 01:16:30 AM Also interested in peeps thoughts on short-stacking FR. Even good players seem to make really bad plays against me when I sit with a short stack. It seems to tilt the crap out of them for some reason. Do you think short-stacking FR is a viable strategy? Tom I refer you to my post of the other day Shortstacking has been referred to as 1. cheating 2. unbeatable poker 3. moral-less 4. why would you do anything else 5. annoying 6. .................i could go on If done with immaculate application short stacking is unbeatable. I guess the issue is most people dont do it well - those that do have made a lot of money. Someone on here will link you to a good 2+2 thread - im not very good with 2+2 so it would take me 4 days to find it As an example - if you sit with 20bbs and everyone else has 100 - in a 6 max c/o opens his opening range, button calls his 100bb calling range and you jam 20bbs! You are gonna make a lot of money of you play a specific range of holdings (helps to run good too) stars have now changed their tables to combat this, tilt havent as far as i know iv played with a lot of shortstacker pro's over a number of years and hundreds of k's of hands. none of them have a positive bb/100, the best simply lose at a lower rate and the rake they generate plus ridic promotions gets them paid. They are usually (albeit tiny), value in the game because they have ridiculously exploitable tendencies. Many of the shorties on euro networks belonged to a spanish staking company (we referred to them as the spanish armada) who had to play by a set standard, iirc badbeats serbian shortstacker outfit was also forced to play to a set standard. They basically try to open in excess of 80% of buttons and sb's, but they dont adjust and cbet 90%+ almost regardless of board texture. They are simply parasites of the game because fish hate them, they reduce the preflop fun of poker and they take money out the game in rb. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on April 29, 2011, 03:26:08 AM ^^^ lol at a pro referring to others as parasites of the game :D
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: jakally on April 29, 2011, 03:49:37 AM Blimey. I've only been playing 10 minutes and I've been in more hands than Britney Spears's tits. Blue, Bearded or Great? What, Britney Spears's tits? Great. Enjoying this thread.... especially this little exchange. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on April 29, 2011, 07:31:08 AM Absoloutly love this thread!
So honest and funny, please keep this going, and glglglgl in your cash shenanigans... p.s - Jason, keep on smoking them crack pipes!! lolololol pp.s Men in white coats are coming - weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 29, 2011, 07:50:03 AM Absoloutly love this thread! you should of heard me back in the day when drugs were drugs. you could half an E with your mate and both be buzzing all night (instead of having to neck 15 like folks do today), your coke actually had coke in it (and not baby laxative or creatine) and your crack was washed up with amnonia and more pure (instead of magic which dont burn off all the crap). not had the experience of brown but understand the cutting agent of choice is rat poison. So honest and funny, please keep this going, and glglglgl in your cash shenanigans... p.s - Jason, keep on smoking them crack pipes!! lolololol pp.s Men in white coats are coming - weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on April 29, 2011, 07:52:58 AM Absoloutly love this thread! you should of heard me back in the day when drugs were drugs. you could half an E with your mate and both be buzzing all night (instead of having to neck 15 like folks do today), your coke actually had coke in it (and not baby laxative or creatine) and your crack was washed up with amnonia and more pure (instead of magic which dont burn off all the crap). not had the experience of brown but understand the cutting agent of choice is rat poison. So honest and funny, please keep this going, and glglglgl in your cash shenanigans... p.s - Jason, keep on smoking them crack pipes!! lolololol pp.s Men in white coats are coming - weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Never tried @coke@ and never will - only ever smoked that wacky backy stuff, and that's no good when I'm trying to earn some bread by playing till 4am for 50$ :-( - What's it like? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:54:56 AM Had a real blast with the pokerings y-day. Got ridic coolered in a few big pots, but by the same token I sucked out more times than a chav with a petrol can and a syphoning pipe.
I had a ponder about it overnight, and I think that 6 Max is probs the way to go. I'm just not ready for it yet. My brains don't work fast enough. I played two tables for about an hour, and by the end I was so confused I didn't know if I was in York or Cork. Gonna be grinding like a gigalo with a 3 rock crack habit. SBR = $169.73 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:21:44 AM Also interested in peeps thoughts on short-stacking FR. Even good players seem to make really bad plays against me when I sit with a short stack. It seems to tilt the crap out of them for some reason. Do you think short-stacking FR is a viable strategy? Tom I refer you to my post of the other day Shortstacking has been referred to as 1. cheating 2. unbeatable poker 3. moral-less 4. why would you do anything else 5. annoying 6. .................i could go on If done with immaculate application short stacking is unbeatable. I guess the issue is most people dont do it well - those that do have made a lot of money. Someone on here will link you to a good 2+2 thread - im not very good with 2+2 so it would take me 4 days to find it As an example - if you sit with 20bbs and everyone else has 100 - in a 6 max c/o opens his opening range, button calls his 100bb calling range and you jam 20bbs! You are gonna make a lot of money of you play a specific range of holdings (helps to run good too) stars have now changed their tables to combat this, tilt havent as far as i know iv played with a lot of shortstacker pro's over a number of years and hundreds of k's of hands. none of them have a positive bb/100, the best simply lose at a lower rate and the rake they generate plus ridic promotions gets them paid. They are usually (albeit tiny), value in the game because they have ridiculously exploitable tendencies. Many of the shorties on euro networks belonged to a spanish staking company (we referred to them as the spanish armada) who had to play by a set standard, iirc badbeats serbian shortstacker outfit was also forced to play to a set standard. They basically try to open in excess of 80% of buttons and sb's, but they dont adjust and cbet 90%+ almost regardless of board texture. They are simply parasites of the game because fish hate them, they reduce the preflop fun of poker and they take money out the game in rb. Thanks for taking the time to post this Alex, and for dumbing it down enough for me to understand it. :P Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:36:25 AM Nice to see Dreenie in here. She scares the living crap out of me when we share a table. (But don't tell her that obv).
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 29, 2011, 09:37:47 AM Alex
Like I said, it needs to be done right, which is playing inexploitably! What you described clearly isn't. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on April 29, 2011, 09:40:02 AM Had a real blast with the pokerings y-day. Got ridic coolered in a few big pots, but by the same token I sucked out more times than a chav with a petrol can and a syphoning pipe. I had a ponder about it overnight, and I think that 6 Max is probs the way to go. I'm just not ready for it yet. My brains don't work fast enough. I played two tables for about an hour, and by the end I was so confused I didn't know if I was in York or Cork. Gonna be grinding like a gigalo with a 3 rock crack habit. SBR = $169.73 !!! Coffee all over monitor now rotflmfao Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:59:57 AM Alex Like I said, it needs to be done right, which is playing inexploitably! What you described clearly isn't. I would be crap on a jury. Someone puts their case forward and I'm absolutely convinced that they are right, then someone else puts forward a counter argument and I change my mind straight away. I remember watching the OJ Simpson trial thinking, Guilty...... innocent...... guilty .......innocent..... NB: I finally decided on Guilty. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 29, 2011, 10:47:38 AM Absoloutly love this thread! you should of heard me back in the day when drugs were drugs. you could half an E with your mate and both be buzzing all night (instead of having to neck 15 like folks do today), your coke actually had coke in it (and not baby laxative or creatine) and your crack was washed up with amnonia and more pure (instead of magic which dont burn off all the crap). not had the experience of brown but understand the cutting agent of choice is rat poison. So honest and funny, please keep this going, and glglglgl in your cash shenanigans... p.s - Jason, keep on smoking them crack pipes!! lolololol pp.s Men in white coats are coming - weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Never tried @coke@ and never will - only ever smoked that wacky backy stuff, and that's no good when I'm trying to earn some bread by playing till 4am for 50$ :-( - What's it like? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 29, 2011, 11:05:00 AM Alex Like I said, it needs to be done right, which is playing inexploitably! What you described clearly isn't. I would be crap on a jury. Someone puts their case forward and I'm absolutely convinced that they are right, then someone else puts forward a counter argument and I change my mind straight away. I remember watching the OJ Simpson trial thinking, Guilty...... innocent...... guilty .......innocent..... NB: I finally decided on Guilty. I can't believe that you seriously considered that OJ might have been innocent for one second. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 11:16:23 AM Alex Like I said, it needs to be done right, which is playing inexploitably! What you described clearly isn't. I would be crap on a jury. Someone puts their case forward and I'm absolutely convinced that they are right, then someone else puts forward a counter argument and I change my mind straight away. I remember watching the OJ Simpson trial thinking, Guilty...... innocent...... guilty .......innocent..... NB: I finally decided on Guilty. I can't believe that you seriously considered that OJ might have been innocent for one second. Oh come on man, he hired the Dream Team ffs, and the glove didn't fit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 29, 2011, 11:29:21 AM Alex Like I said, it needs to be done right, which is playing inexploitably! What you described clearly isn't. Not sure if there is an inexploitable strategy with 20bbs (except maybe sb vs bb). An open pushing strategy would be too tight, so they have to raise normally and after that it is entirely opponent/flop dependent. There are some 3 bet situations that would probably guarantee profit, but most of that would be taken in rake. Almost all the botlikehuge volume short stackers lose a small amount at the tables - maybe something like 1bb/100 but they make 1.5+bb/100 from rakeback etc. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 29, 2011, 01:37:59 PM calling for a ban on this thread for anyone who has any knowledge and is in anyway competent.you are ruining it for those of us whose favourite board game is HAVENTGOTACLUEDO
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 29, 2011, 06:14:11 PM calling for a ban on this thread for anyone who has any knowledge and is in anyway competent.you are ruining it for those of us whose favourite board game is HAVENTGOTACLUEDO this. it was a fun thread before all that fancy pants talk. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 06:42:19 PM Like, no need to be a drag man, just because you don't know where it's at.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 29, 2011, 06:49:12 PM is this what they mean by "range merging"?
(http://i371.photobucket.com/albums/oo151/outragous76/rangemerging.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 06:56:17 PM Lol @ Guy.
Triple reins merging. (http://www.myhorse.com/MyHorse/upload/0/33/3354/asset_upload_file219_3354.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 07:21:25 PM Just sitting down for a sesh now. SBR = $220.27.
With any luck, all the regs will have been watching the wedding and drinking all day. One good push should see me hit the $300 mark. (Famous last words) Cover me, I'm going in..... (http://mp3muffin.com/train/pics/john.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: sovietsong on April 29, 2011, 07:57:42 PM gl gl excellent thread.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 07:58:53 PM I raise the button with 10 10, sb re-raises, bb shoves, I fold.
next hand I raise in the cut off with JJ, button re-raises. big blind shoves, I fold. Do me a favour, just sniff your monitor and tell me if I smell fishy. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on April 29, 2011, 08:05:26 PM I raise the button with 10 10, sb re-raises, bb shoves, I fold. next hand I raise in the cut off with JJ, button re-raises. big blind shoves, I fold. Do me a favour, just sniff your monitor and tell me if I smell fishy. Is this in 6 max? what were the stack sizes? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:05:47 PM AARRRGGHH!!!!
This table is so soft, it bends when I rest my elbows on it. Why can't I win? Confidence fading.... fading.... fading... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:13:18 PM I raise the button with 10 10, sb re-raises, bb shoves, I fold. next hand I raise in the cut off with JJ, button re-raises. big blind shoves, I fold. Do me a favour, just sniff your monitor and tell me if I smell fishy. Is this in 6 max? what were the stack sizes? Full ring Dreenie. (Bank roll / Cajones too small for 6 Max) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 29, 2011, 08:15:07 PM Have you got yourself hidden for Stars search Tom ?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:16:22 PM Have you got yourself hidden for Stars search Tom ? Yes. Too many jealous husbands around. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 29, 2011, 08:17:06 PM play 6 max 9 is horrible. it will hold you back from improving imo.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on April 29, 2011, 08:17:41 PM I raise the button with 10 10, sb re-raises, bb shoves, I fold. next hand I raise in the cut off with JJ, button re-raises. big blind shoves, I fold. Do me a favour, just sniff your monitor and tell me if I smell fishy. Is this in 6 max? what were the stack sizes? Full ring Dreenie. (Bank roll / Cajones too small for 6 Max) Me being me, I'm prob not folding the JJ there, imo if you wanna exeperience the highs aswell as the lows, think u need to get it in more, to get more highs out of it. The postions you are all sat in, prob makes my decision towards the call button - imo, get it in and hope for the best, it's the way forward imo - gl :-) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:24:45 PM Strapping a pair on as we speak...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:35:14 PM Haemorrhaging money calling raises with small pairs trying to catch a set.
Better to rr late position with small pairs? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on April 29, 2011, 08:44:37 PM Haemorrhaging money calling raises with small pairs trying to catch a set. Better to rr late position with small pairs? No Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 08:47:03 PM Haemorrhaging money calling raises with small pairs trying to catch a set. Better to rr late position with small pairs? No That's what I thought 8) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 29, 2011, 08:54:27 PM Haemorrhaging money calling raises with small pairs trying to catch a set. Better to rr late position with small pairs? No This is poker, surely the answer is depends ....... On alot of things! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 29, 2011, 09:14:47 PM Tom, post hh's. Remove your hole cards. Give reads on your opponents, how many tables are they playing? did they sit full? are they awful etc.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:28:12 PM PokerStars Game #61472043641: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/04/29 16:22:29 ET
Table 'Benetnasch VII' 9-max Seat #5 is the button Seat 1: aq10 ($44 in chips) Seat 2: MrChiffo ($41 in chips) Seat 3: tanyaa1956 ($100 in chips) Seat 5: Jompatan ($106.65 in chips) Seat 6: Vattanen_AA ($47.50 in chips) Seat 7: RED D0G ($91.30 in chips) Seat 9: generalpoker ($104.50 in chips) Vattanen_AA: posts small blind $0.50 RED D0G: posts big blind $1 bekay87: sits out *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G generalpoker: folds aq10: folds MrChiffo: folds tanyaa1956: folds Jompatan: folds Vattanen_AA: raises $2 to $3 RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 Vattanen_AA: raises $11 to $20 RED D0G: folds Uncalled bet ($11) returned to Vattanen_AA Vattanen_AA collected $18 from pot Vattanen_AA: doesn't show hand *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $18 | Rake $0 Seat 1: aq10 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: MrChiffo folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: tanyaa1956 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: Jompatan (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: Vattanen_AA (small blind) collected ($18) Seat 7: RED D0G (big blind) folded before Flop Seat 9: generalpoker folded before Flop (didn't bet) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Tractor on April 29, 2011, 09:37:08 PM play 6 max/
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 29, 2011, 09:41:06 PM ok...
edit fwiw I didn't see that our opponent only had 50bbs, check stack sizes always ldo. assume 100bb discussion not 50. 1) try to have 100bbs if poss 2) What is your opponent type in the hand? tight/loose? aggressive/passive? To be taking the line of 3 bet folding bvb , we want to be thinking that our villain is opening to steal with a wide range, that our villain perceives us as not being out of line/vloose, we want to either have what we consider against this player type to be a strong value hand or a hand that we don't mind dumping when we get 4 bet (preferably either with blocker value to his nut range or with a hand that plays relatively well when called ie 67s>A2o if we see a flop). Another good read on our opponent would be that they are wide active pre but then call too many 3 bets oop and we can gain money by 3bet/cbetting with a high frequency and exploit their wide oop calling range. BvB people really can go mental. Another way of playing back to exploit a wide sb steal range is to just call your opponent and play the pot inposition with the idea to raise and call lots of different flop textures. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:46:17 PM tyty
absorbing...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on April 29, 2011, 09:46:26 PM Tom have a peek at this and try some low stakes 6 max, maybe even make a video with you discusing your play. That is by far the best way to learn!
http://www.gamblingsystem.biz/books/2p2NL6max.pdf Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 29, 2011, 09:49:49 PM Tom have a peek at this and try some low stakes 6 max, maybe even make a video with you discusing your play. That is by far the best way to learn! http://www.gamblingsystem.biz/books/2p2NL6max.pdf Will do. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: sovietsong on April 30, 2011, 02:00:17 AM Ball till you fall
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 09:27:42 AM Played FR for a couple of hours but didn't make any real progress as such, so I moved to 6 Max and got totally owned.
Those guys just wiped the floor with me. The only reason I'm not busto is because I got it in bad a couple of times ans sucked out. BTW- Every one of theose 6 Max guys was playing about a mirrion tables. I'm definitely doing something wrong when it comes to online cash. I think it's A psychological thing. I'm treating it like it's a bogey man or something... WOOOOOOO! Online cash is gonna get you........ Well I'm going to play my next session the same way as I would a live cash game. i.e. I'm going to rock up, talk a lot, drink a lot of tea, and keep sending someone to the kitchen to bring me a sandwich. BTW- When I said WOOOOOOO! earlier, I think it would have had more impact if I'd used more than one exclamation mark, but Tony gets all uppity about that sort of thing and I decided it wasn't worth the hassle. SBR = $164.72 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Girgy85 on April 30, 2011, 10:05:04 AM Fk him use as many as u feel necessary!!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 30, 2011, 12:34:55 PM Played FR for a couple of hours but didn't make any real progress as such, so I moved to 6 Max and got totally owned. Those guys just wiped the floor with me. The only reason I'm not busto is because I got it in bad a couple of times ans sucked out. BTW- Every one of theose 6 Max guys was playing about a mirrion tables. I'm definitely doing something wrong when it comes to online cash. I think it's A psychological thing. I'm treating it like it's a bogey man or something... WOOOOOOO! Online cash is gonna get you........ Well I'm going to play my next session the same way as I would a live cash game. i.e. I'm going to rock up, talk a lot, drink a lot of tea, and keep sending someone to the kitchen to bring me a sandwich. BTW- When I said WOOOOOOO! earlier, I think it would have had more impact if I'd used more than one exclamation mark, but Tony gets all uppity about that sort of thing and I decided it wasn't worth the hassle. SBR = $164.72 I do get uppity when I see ANY exclamation marks, never mind TWO, behind "RIP", it's so incredibly disrespectful to the deceased. "......Overly frequent use of the exclamation mark is generally considered poor writing, for it distracts the reader and reduces the mark's meaning. Cut out all those exclamation points. An exclamation point is like laughing at your own jokes. —F. Scott Fitzgerald....." I awoke today in fine heart & mood, & Tom's rattled my cage already. I may just have to spend a few hours on my Diary now, to calm myself down. Dear. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 01:29:01 PM See?
I only use the one exclamation mark, just to keep the peace like, and he still gets uppity. Did it ever occur to you that the use of two exclamation marks might be at the same time disrespectful in the one exdample, and erudite in the other? "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function". F. Scott Fitzgerald Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 30, 2011, 01:36:15 PM This is good banter. More grammar related discussion ITT please.
I like the sound of this Fitzgerald chap. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 30, 2011, 01:37:17 PM See? I only use the one exclamation mark, just to keep the peace like, and he still gets uppity. Did it ever occur to you that the use of two exclamation marks might be at the same time disrespectful in the one exdample, and erudite in the other? "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in mind at the same time and still retain the ability to function". F. Scott Fitzgerald Double exclamation marks are fine, & quite correct when properly used, nothing wrong with that. Behind "RIP" ANY exclamation mark offends. Time & place, & all that. Why don't traditional keyboards include an interrobang? I must say, I rather like the idea of these, but have never seen one used. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interrobang Now, stop winding me up. PS - I believe the "bang" in "interrobang" arises from the slang for an exclamation mark, which is a "bang". Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 01:47:01 PM This is good banter. More grammar related discussion ITT please. I like the sound of this Fitzgerald chap. Oh it goes much deeper than banter Alex. It's an age thing. Kids like us indulging in grammatical rule bending cause people of his advancing years to feel insecure. "At eighteen our convictions are hills from which we look; at eighty-five they are caves in which we hide". F. Scott Fitzgerald Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 02:20:22 PM Had a bit of an accident.
(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2009/03/36700,xcitefun-1053659946-c7fa4bae6d.jpg) SBR = $ 81.87 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 30, 2011, 02:20:56 PM My new signature is in honour of you fine gentlemen.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 02:44:58 PM Had a bit of an accident. but least the wheels aint come off completly(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2009/03/36700,xcitefun-1053659946-c7fa4bae6d.jpg) SBR = $ 81.87 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 02:50:14 PM Had a bit of an accident. but least the wheels aint come off completly(http://img.xcitefun.net/users/2009/03/36700,xcitefun-1053659946-c7fa4bae6d.jpg) SBR = $ 81.87 Too good ;tightend; ;tightend; ;tightend; ;tightend; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on April 30, 2011, 02:51:55 PM I don't play cash - i'm rubbish at it. when stars did that promo thing a year or two where they were giving away loads of FPPs to UK players I kinda got caught up in the 'got to have it' mentality (even though I didn't). I'd built a nice (for me) four figure bankroll playing low stakes MTTs, and did the lot on cash chasing these points. I swear the players on there could all see my hole cards.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 02:53:20 PM Yeah, but you're a girl...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 02:55:28 PM And judging by my performance, I think I'm a girl too.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 02:57:54 PM At lest that means we can go to the loo together.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on April 30, 2011, 03:02:50 PM At lest that means we can go to the loo together. the pubs with these cubicles are the best for that (http://www.prusikloop.org/mrwatson/images/double_toilet_anand.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 03:04:12 PM At lest that means we can go to the loo together. the pubs with these cubicles are the best for that (http://www.prusikloop.org/mrwatson/images/double_toilet_anand.jpg) LAMAOOOOO!!!! Where are they, and who wants a prop bet to share one with Girgy? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 03:05:10 PM lol. nice pic. cant deny i much prefer to sit down to wee.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on April 30, 2011, 03:05:49 PM At lest that means we can go to the loo together. the pubs with these cubicles are the best for that (http://www.prusikloop.org/mrwatson/images/double_toilet_anand.jpg) LAMAOOOOO!!!! Where are they, and who wants a prop bet to share one with Girgy? haha - not sure where that particular one is, just googled it. i've seen them in a few places though. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 03:07:16 PM lol. nice pic. cant deny i much prefer to sit down to wee. Really? I should do that instead of waving it around in the dark, waiting for the sound of water hitting water. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 03:12:30 PM lol. nice pic. cant deny i much prefer to sit down to wee. Really? I should do that instead of waving it around in the dark, waiting for the sound of water hitting water. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 30, 2011, 03:19:24 PM lol. nice pic. cant deny i much prefer to sit down to wee. Really? I should do that instead of waving it around in the dark, waiting for the sound of water hitting water. lol, that's what real mean do. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 03:23:11 PM Anyway, this is supposed to be a serious poker thread, not somewhere for me an Claw to have a girly chat.
Dragged myself back up to $160.74 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 03:32:50 PM Anyway, this is supposed to be a serious poker thread, not somewhere for me an Claw to have a girly chat. so at breakfast you were on $161. lunch $81. tea time $160. can i enquire "are you playing the tight style you mentioned"Dragged myself back up to $160.74 flushy made a comment about being tight on line means you are gonna lose slowly. its a good point Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 03:45:44 PM Anyway, this is supposed to be a serious poker thread, not somewhere for me an Claw to have a girly chat. so at breakfast you were on $161. lunch $81. tea time $160. can i enquire "are you playing the tight style you mentioned"Dragged myself back up to $160.74 flushy made a comment about being tight on line means you are gonna lose slowly. its a good point So far, I have two choices 1: Lose slowly. 2: Lose quickly. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on April 30, 2011, 04:37:30 PM Anyway, this is supposed to be a serious poker thread, not somewhere for me an Claw to have a girly chat. so at breakfast you were on $161. lunch $81. tea time $160. can i enquire "are you playing the tight style you mentioned"Dragged myself back up to $160.74 flushy made a comment about being tight on line means you are gonna lose slowly. its a good point So far, I have two choices 1: Lose slowly. 2: Lose quickly. http://tinyviolins.com/ know im not one to talk, mind. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 30, 2011, 04:40:32 PM Tbf to Tom, sounded more like a statement than a whinge!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 04:41:44 PM Lol. I'm not whinging, I'm just making fun of my own ineptitude.
Mind you, it's not fair, all the other cash game players can beat 50/1..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on April 30, 2011, 04:43:56 PM Lol. I'm not whinging, I'm just making fun of my own ineptitude. Mind you, it's not fair, all the other cash game players can beat 50/1..... Do pay attention, Tom, crush, not beat. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 04:45:14 PM Lol. I'm not whinging, I'm just making fun of my own ineptitude. Mind you, it's not fair, all the other cash game players can beat 50/1..... Do pay attention, Tom, crush, not beat. I'll settle for compressing it lightly atm. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 04:53:56 PM Lol. I'm not whinging, I'm just making fun of my own ineptitude. [X] tom is honest about resultsMind you, it's not fair, all the other cash game players can beat 50/1..... [X] 95% of cash game players maybe telling porkies [X] life is not fair Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 04:57:41 PM Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 05:00:27 PM yes life is good. does 50/1 suit your natural game and is it worth both the time effort and stress.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 05:10:04 PM yes life is good. does 50/1 suit your natural game and is it worth both the time effort and stress. No. It doesn't. Well structured tournaments suit my natural game. Is it worth the time effort and stress? No, not money-wise I have to admit, but yes fun wise. It's like trying to solve a puzzle. PS- I try to save emotions like stress for important stuff. Now feck off. Yer gettin on me tits. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 05:58:49 PM Pmsl.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on April 30, 2011, 06:14:14 PM Have you tried wearing a baseball cap skewed sideways whilst playing?
It aeems to work for a lot of the kidz. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on April 30, 2011, 06:15:14 PM Have you tried wearing a baseball cap skewed sideways whilst playing? It aeems to work for a lot of the kidz. playing in your underwear is also key! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on April 30, 2011, 06:17:33 PM Such a noob Guy, tracky bottoms, commando, obv.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on April 30, 2011, 06:26:48 PM when red dog used to be the big dog back in the day.... how good were these times. i only ever saw you mtting and you was the muts nuts quite often
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on April 30, 2011, 06:38:58 PM Anyone playing the deepie @ Luton tomorrow?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 08:17:15 AM I'm excited....
(http://www.gifs.net/Animation11/Hobbies_and_Entertainment/Excitement/Excited_man_2.gif) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 08:38:24 AM Somebody wake up and ask me why I'm excited....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on May 01, 2011, 09:01:19 AM Knew there was a reason I woke up early,why you excited ?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 09:17:25 AM Cos I'm going to Luton to play the deepstack!!!!! (I love the live pokerz)
Also excited cos I got my Stars Bankroll up to $300, but you wern't up early enough for that. Current SBR = $286.92 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 09:28:33 AM Is it just me, or do all poker players go from thinking "I'm crap" to "I'm brilliant" and back again several times a week?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 09:52:37 AM This question doesn't apply to Jason Herbert obv...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 01, 2011, 10:17:22 AM What is this Luton deepstack Tom?
How many runners do they get, how much is entry and what time does it start/finish? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celtic on May 01, 2011, 10:23:18 AM 4pm start Ralph, at the G. 21500 chips, 150+15. 8k gtd with 45 runners. Regs seem quite excited by it, so should be a decent field.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 10:27:09 AM What is this Luton deepstack Tom? How many runners do they get, how much is entry and what time does it start/finish? From memory Ralph. £150 + £15 20k 2 / 45 min then 30 min 25 / 50 + all the proper levels. (anties @ 200 /400) 4:pm start. £8k Gtd My guess, ~ 70 runners. (More if they find out I'm playing) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 01, 2011, 10:37:57 AM 4pm start Ralph, at the G. 21500 chips, 150+15. 8k gtd with 45 runners. Regs seem quite excited by it, so should be a decent field. What is this Luton deepstack Tom? How many runners do they get, how much is entry and what time does it start/finish? From memory Ralph. £150 + £15 20k 2 / 45 min then 30 min 25 / 50 + all the proper levels. (anties @ 200 /400) 4:pm start. £8k Gtd My guess, ~ 70 runners. (More if they find out I'm playing) Cheers guys, off for a bit of a dither now ;carlocitrone; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on May 01, 2011, 10:38:32 AM Is it just me, or do all poker players go from thinking "I'm crap" to "I'm brilliant" and back again several times a week? several times a day I'd say Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 10:41:04 AM 4pm start Ralph, at the G. 21500 chips, 150+15. 8k gtd with 45 runners. Regs seem quite excited by it, so should be a decent field. What is this Luton deepstack Tom? How many runners do they get, how much is entry and what time does it start/finish? From memory Ralph. £150 + £15 20k 2 / 45 min then 30 min 25 / 50 + all the proper levels. (anties @ 200 /400) 4:pm start. £8k Gtd My guess, ~ 70 runners. (More if they find out I'm playing) Cheers guys, off for a bit of a dither now ;carlocitrone; Your welcome to leave your car at mine and ride down with me if you like Ralph. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 01, 2011, 10:47:08 AM good luck tom!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 10:47:53 AM Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 01, 2011, 10:58:27 AM 4pm start Ralph, at the G. 21500 chips, 150+15. 8k gtd with 45 runners. Regs seem quite excited by it, so should be a decent field. What is this Luton deepstack Tom? How many runners do they get, how much is entry and what time does it start/finish? From memory Ralph. £150 + £15 20k 2 / 45 min then 30 min 25 / 50 + all the proper levels. (anties @ 200 /400) 4:pm start. £8k Gtd My guess, ~ 70 runners. (More if they find out I'm playing) Cheers guys, off for a bit of a dither now ;carlocitrone; Your welcome to leave your car at mine and ride down with me if you like Ralph. I'm going to go and whack a few golf balls about this lunchtime and will decide then, but if I do come I'll just drive straight to the G otherwise I'll end up waiting around till silly o'clock while you win it. I'm very tempted as I've always enjoyed a nice Sunday tourney and not seen the Luton posse for yonks. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 11:04:16 AM OK Ralph. Hope to see you there.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on May 01, 2011, 11:37:01 AM Is it just me, or do all poker players go from thinking "I'm crap" to "I'm brilliant" and back again several times a week? All the time, it is very hard to not be results orientated. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 01, 2011, 12:59:12 PM Good luck Tom, looking forward to a comedy TR when you return!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 01:07:44 PM Good luck Tom, looking forward to a comedy TR when you return! I try not to do comedy, but it's Luton ffs! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Laxie on May 01, 2011, 01:09:19 PM Win the lot and the tourney too!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 01, 2011, 03:27:42 PM M1 closed both directions @ J 15.
I think I'm gonna be late..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 02, 2011, 09:13:46 AM This question doesn't apply to Jason Herbert obv... hey play poker twice a month so to get a bit annoyed if i dont get a flag on my hendonmob every month. failed april. sighTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 10:20:20 AM So here are the best bits from Luton. (Bear with me, I’m struggling).
When I arrived I shook hand with Vinny and was pleased to note that he has a proper handshake. None of that ‘rubber glove full of snot’ feel with Vin. It’s like giving your hand to a rottweiler, you don’t get it back until he’s finished with it. For some strange reason, I was hungry so I had the meat-feast pizza. Actually this turned out to be a mistake. I was going to have the steak pie with mash but was unable to resist the subliminal mental image conjured up by the words “Meat” and “Feast”. In reality, it looked and tasted like a rag that had been used to rub down a pig with scabies. The poker was unremarkable. Players were limp calling raises of anything between 700 / 1500 and building 10k pots almost every hand right from the get go. A typical example would be something like this. Blinds 25 / 50. Limp – limp – limp – limp – limp – limp – limp - Raise to 900. Call – call – call – call – call – call –call. Flop. Check – check – check – check – check – check – check. Turn. Bet 3000 – fold – fold – fold – fold – fold – dwell……. call. River. Bet 3000 – dwell…….. call. Pair of fives beats ace high. I say that’s unremarkable because it is. That’s how players play deep-stack tournaments these days. I’m too scared to get involved. Like a solder who has found safety at the bottom of a shell hole during the battle of the Somme, I just sit there, gasping and wincing while the battle rages around me. I did play one hand well, but it was an accident. Blinds are 200 / 400. Everyone limps around to me in the sb. I have J8 of clubs and decide that I will make up the blind and hope to see my first flop. The trouble was, I inadvertently include a 1000 chip, and instead of calling, I make it 1200 to go. The table is stunned into silence. It’s like we were in a Sky plus movie and someone had pressed the pause button. Then there is a flurry of cards going into the muck so fast that it sounds like a flock of pigeons taking off. That was the high point of my game. It was all down hill from that point. I left around 10:pm without troubling the scorers. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 10:45:32 AM I didn't know it was a bank holiday again today ffs!!
Is there anything good on anywhere? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 10:48:46 AM Just before I went to Luton yesterday, I had a little fling on Stars.
[ ] It went well. SBR = $135.47 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 11:02:31 AM Disaster:
Tilt re shove my AK into serial raise lag's KK.... SBR = $57.63 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dewi_cool on May 02, 2011, 11:28:36 AM Disaster: Tilt re shove my AK into serial raise lag's KK.... SBR = $57.63 Reshoving with A high tut tut, you wait till Jason sees this. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 11:31:34 AM Disaster: Tilt re shove my AK into serial raise lag's KK.... SBR = $57.63 Reshoving with A high tut tut, you wait till Jason sees this. It's OK. He isn't in the clique. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: marcro on May 02, 2011, 01:08:26 PM To overcome the variance associated with this game you will need to put in significant volume, say >1,500 hands/day.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 02, 2011, 02:03:46 PM pmsl. love this thread but am stuck for words. guess i think your bet sizing may have been wrong with the squeeze in the sb... and them sort of moves making out you had put the extra chips to raise by accident whislt sitting with a premium hand just get lol'd at these days.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 02:25:02 PM To overcome the variance associated with this game you will need to put in significant volume, say >1,500 hands/day. Sigh.... Now he tells me. ::) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 02, 2011, 02:28:09 PM To overcome the variance associated with this game you will need to put in significant volume, say >1,500 hands/day. Sigh.... Now he tells me. ::) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 03:25:04 PM This game is full of fish.
*** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to RED D0G [8c As] elvichente: folds picantisimo: folds Kloonike: folds Perec87: folds FMorbiducci: folds BooyaKash: folds wullst: raises $2 to $3 TakeCareAA: folds RED D0G: raises $6 to $9 wullst: calls $6 *** FLOP *** [8h 6d 6h] RED D0G: bets $49.30 and is all-in wullst: calls $49.30 *** TURN *** [8h 6d 6h] [8s] *** RIVER *** [8h 6d 6h 8s] [Js] *** SHOW DOWN *** RED D0G: shows [8c As] (a full house, Eights full of Sixes) wullst: shows [8d Ad] (a full house, Eights full of Sixes) RED D0G collected $57.05 from pot wullst collected $57.05 from pot *** SUMMARY *** Total pot $117.10 | Rake $3 Board [8h 6d 6h 8s Js] Seat 1: Perec87 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: FMorbiducci folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: BooyaKash folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: wullst (button) showed [8d Ad] and won ($57.05) with a full house, Eights full of Sixes Seat 5: TakeCareAA (small blind) folded before Flop Seat 6: RED D0G (big blind) showed [8c As] and won ($57.05) with a full house, Eights full of Sixes Seat 7: elvichente folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: picantisimo folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 9: Kloonike folded before Flop (didn't bet) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 02, 2011, 03:37:39 PM eh?!!!!!!!!!! what's happening?!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 03:45:24 PM eh?!!!!!!!!!! what's happening?! This is my meta game. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 05:01:37 PM Busto on Stars, again.
How long did that £100 last? I now have 3 options. 1: Deposit another £100 on Stars. 2: Deposit £100 on SKY. 3: Take up heading the shot. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: celebspec on May 02, 2011, 05:25:11 PM Busto on Stars, again. How long did that £100 last? I now have 3 options. 1: Deposit another £100 on Stars. 2: Deposit £100 on SKY. 3: Take up heading the shot. Go to microgaming imo the standard is so much worse. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Tonji on May 02, 2011, 09:41:04 PM What about the mixed games? HORSE, 8 Game etc. More fun imo, at least if I'm running bad I lose slowly.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 02, 2011, 10:15:03 PM What about the mixed games? HORSE, 8 Game etc. More fun imo, at least if I'm running bad I lose slowly. LOL He won't even try Omaha despite my urgings. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on May 02, 2011, 10:15:11 PM What about the mixed games? HORSE, 8 Game etc. More fun imo, at least if I'm running bad I lose slowly. When I do that I feel like I've moved into poker's equivalent of an old folks home ;) Where I prob belong tbh Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Tonji on May 02, 2011, 10:36:02 PM What about the mixed games? HORSE, 8 Game etc. More fun imo, at least if I'm running bad I lose slowly. When I do that I feel like I've moved into poker's equivalent of an old folks home ;) Where I prob belong tbh oh my, I consider myself midlle aged, although I do now own slippers :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 02, 2011, 11:15:44 PM Back to what I know....
(http://i52.tinypic.com/34p1100.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 03, 2011, 12:47:41 AM Tbh, I would just stick to what you know,if you make a decent amount playing mtt's why try something else, unless u r just having a spin up, I wouldn't worry about not getting the hang on cash, I would much prefer to play cash live than online as I feel too many deep pockets online.
Imo it's much more enjoyable beating hundreds of runners every other week and becoming the winner... Get a win from a mtt and then leave 500 $ on there and play 5/10 and have a real spin up, where u could potentially win a nice holiday or a plasma t.v imo - I owuld much rather risk the money playing a game I was not very good at , and getting a big reward then just bleeding away money, and making myself feel worse. Obv the choice is yours, but gl to you and whatever you do, wp in the tourney :-) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 03, 2011, 12:59:01 AM I'm just having fun with the online cash Dreenie. I've never been able to beat it.
I'm not sure it's down to people having deep pockets though, I think it may be something to do with all the tracking software combined with me being crap BTW- I made 30 Euros in the tourney, so I won't be retiring any time soon. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 03, 2011, 05:04:45 AM Do all the same players from 5-10 years ago still play on ladbrokes tom? Around the time actionjack left Decision was the boss I think
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 03, 2011, 06:04:23 AM dreeniee82 plays on there, that's all you need to do, she loves it too, just need to add some higher gtd tourneys, then it wil be perfect wiiiiiiiii
Btw Jason, wtf r u still doing up at 5:am?, have you been getting the lot all night>>??? oi oi oioooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 03, 2011, 07:47:25 AM Do all the same players from 5-10 years ago still play on ladbrokes tom? Around the time actionjack left Decision was the boss I think No. a lot of them have gone now Jason as Dreenie says. She's right about the tournies too. Remember the afternoon $8k, the nightly $30k, the Sunday Lunch, the "Who's The Daddy?" Small fields too, ~ 250 runners. Remember Strummer, Taximan, Salmonoyster, Jafffacake? (I wonder what ever happened to him?) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 03, 2011, 10:32:59 AM Do all the same players from 5-10 years ago still play on ladbrokes tom? Around the time actionjack left Decision was the boss I think No. a lot of them have gone now Jason as Dreenie says. She's right about the tournies too. Remember the afternoon $8k, the nightly $30k, the Sunday Lunch, the "Who's The Daddy?" Small fields too, ~ 250 runners. Remember Strummer, Taximan, Salmonoyster, Jafffacake? (I wonder what ever happened to him?) And dreenie woke up on the sofa at 4 am after 3 crona extra ( I never drink ). Just been through here and sadbook to see who I upset. Surprised to see I'm actually less of an arsehole drunk than sober. Spotted your advice to alex about stating calm and rising above.... Must have you confused with the girl on Facebook who wins the world every other day and on alternate days she wants to rip the head off an andrex puppie ;) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Lucky on May 03, 2011, 02:02:27 PM Back to what I know.... (http://i52.tinypic.com/34p1100.jpg) Well done & one place ahead of Vinni by looks of it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 07, 2011, 12:42:56 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them)
I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 07, 2011, 12:46:43 AM deepstack ldo
do what u know and come 2nd to me! im obv gonna win 'cause Sunny said so Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 07, 2011, 12:46:52 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Always next month and the month after, grind up a roll online imo. Always too tempting to go for the big win, that's when you start doing your bollocks. :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: George2Loose on May 07, 2011, 12:49:20 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Always next month and the month after, grind up a roll online imo. Always too tempting to go for the big win, that's when you start doing your bollocks. :) Sell some %s? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 07, 2011, 09:56:38 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Always next month and the month after, grind up a roll online imo. Always too tempting to go for the big win, that's when you start doing your bollocks. :) Sell some %s? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 07, 2011, 10:13:20 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) cant even think that you are wrestling with this. get down to dtd. its like printing money and more fun.I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 07, 2011, 10:23:36 AM deepstack ldo love you line at the bottom. seems to be a theme developing with people nicking my linesdo what u know and come 2nd to me! im obv gonna win 'cause Sunny said so http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=134376 i have never actually used my one time ever. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 07, 2011, 10:28:00 AM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Always next month and the month after, grind up a roll online imo. Always too tempting to go for the big win, that's when you start doing your bollocks. :) Sell some %s? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 07, 2011, 12:44:21 PM Played half a dozen or so online tourneys over the last couple of nights. Buy ins ~ £50. Managed 3 small cashes. (Lost a monster pot for big chip lead set over set with 18 left in one of them) I've been enjoying it, and I've turned a small profit, but now I have a quandry. Do I play the deepstack @ DTD tomorrow, or save the money and play another 6 or 7 onliners? Always next month and the month after, grind up a roll online imo. Always too tempting to go for the big win, that's when you start doing your bollocks. :) Sell some %s? I think I'm going to give it a miss, but thanks a lot all the same. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 07, 2011, 01:37:32 PM ^ O.K, gl online.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 07, 2011, 01:42:27 PM no red-dog or george2loose. gonna have to change it too 93% of the players at dtd..... for someone who believes in karma i'm leaving myself open to one all mighty kick in the nutz. thank god for ability tho ;)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 07, 2011, 01:52:31 PM no red-dog or george2loose. gonna have to change it too 93% of the players at dtd..... for someone who believes in karma i'm leaving myself open to one all mighty kick in the nutz. thank god for ability tho ;) Lol. What do me and George have to do with karma? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 07, 2011, 01:59:30 PM you and george are obv not in my usual 90% so when not in attendance that %age increases. thewy is being the corporate whore and up in leeds with tikay. karma dictates i should not be tapping the tank and would expect to see at least 95% of the field laughing when i bust out first level. hey tom if you are not there i have also told ironside i will donate another £50 more to the fund. no tikay or tighty so is it ok just to give it to sharplea, i dont think that its a big secret but i think he is more lea than sharp ;)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 07, 2011, 02:05:55 PM you and george are obv not in my usual 90% so when not in attendance that %age increases. thewy is being the corporate whore and up in leeds with tikay. karma dictates i should not be tapping the tank and would expect to see at least 95% of the field laughing when i bust out first level. hey tom if you are not there i have also told ironside i will donate another £50 more to the fund. no tikay or tighty so is it ok just to give it to sharplea, i dont think that its a big secret but i think he is more lea than sharp ;) Jason, you're either mental or brilliant, possibly both. Sharplea should be OK with the nifty, but don't blame me if he degens it away on the roulette. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 07, 2011, 02:18:41 PM all three Tom. ok will give it to his bird if she is there then coz she is alright. still no idea what to do with the nifty tho ;whistle;
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 07, 2011, 03:01:06 PM AARRRGGHHHH!!!!!!
I'm dithering......... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: jakally on May 07, 2011, 03:05:46 PM AARRRGGHHHH!!!!!! I'm dithering......... See you in a couple of hours then.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: KarmaDope on May 08, 2011, 12:00:43 AM all three Tom. ok will give it to his bird if she is there then coz she is alright. still no idea what to do with the nifty tho ;whistle; I've just seen this, you cheeky fecker lolololol What's gotta happen for Joobs to get £50 out of you then? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 08, 2011, 12:06:54 AM all three Tom. ok will give it to his bird if she is there then coz she is alright. still no idea what to do with the nifty tho ;whistle; I've just seen this, you cheeky fecker lolololol What's gotta happen for Joobs to get £50 out of you then? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 08, 2011, 05:37:53 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours.
I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 08, 2011, 09:32:52 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 08, 2011, 09:57:39 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 08, 2011, 09:58:27 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 08, 2011, 10:03:27 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 08, 2011, 10:04:19 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl meh - tom dishes 'em out like they're smarties - just go for it next time Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 08, 2011, 10:13:57 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl meh - tom dishes 'em out like they're smarties - just go for it next time I don't give em to just anyone. I thought we were having an affair. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 08, 2011, 10:23:18 AM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl meh - tom dishes 'em out like they're smarties - just go for it next time I don't give em to just anyone. I thought we were having an affair. oh are we? In that case I have to say I'm feeling a little short changed with a cuddle every 6 months! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 08, 2011, 01:43:20 PM Playing €10 6 man super turbo STT's.
I know I know... but that's the kind of Devil-may-care thrill seeking degen I am. 6MSTSTT's played = 5 (http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSgpomy2varTn4D-vtClswy_RcBC4TD23sWjMtvOS098iL8UNidIQ) € 38 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 08, 2011, 01:59:44 PM I was totally card dead and passed every hand for 6 hours. I decide to push my 11bb without looking. (I do look though, and find 72os) A bloke who has watched me fold every hand for 6 hours snaps with A4os. DIAGF Howard Lederer. ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; ;grr; so rigged! was lovely to see you for a quick cuddle :) nope - sadly my presence is not required today because i don't make final tables for fun :) glgl meh - tom dishes 'em out like they're smarties - just go for it next time I don't give em to just anyone. I thought we were having an affair. oh are we? In that case I have to say I'm feeling a little short changed with a cuddle every 6 months! I thought girls like taking things slowly? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 09:35:47 AM I'm playing 6 man STT's.
There is one particular reg who is always sitting waiting for tables to fill, therefore I have a choice of where to sit in relation to him. where should I sit, and why? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: hector62 on May 12, 2011, 09:47:59 AM The seat nearest to the buffet.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 10:05:33 AM The seat nearest to the buffet. I do the jokes on this thread, thank you. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 12:24:24 PM I'm playing 6 man STT's. There is one particular reg who is always sitting waiting for tables to fill, therefore I have a choice of where to sit in relation to him. where should I sit, and why? This guy is the best of the regs imo, so the best seat choices seem to be on his immediate right or directly opposite. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on May 12, 2011, 01:31:03 PM I'm playing 6 man STT's. There is one particular reg who is always sitting waiting for tables to fill, therefore I have a choice of where to sit in relation to him. where should I sit, and why? This guy is the best of the regs imo, so the best seat choices seem to be on his immediate right or directly opposite. Directly opposite in sngs imo. You just don't want him near you nearing bubble situations. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: TightEnd on May 12, 2011, 01:33:11 PM Don't want to be on his immediate right Tom, surely?
So much of it is shoving ranges and calling ranges late on and if he's good he'll be calling right more often than not when you shove first If you can't be opposite be on the left, I think Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 01:45:11 PM Don't want to be on his immediate right Tom, surely? So much of it is shoving ranges and calling ranges late on and if he's good he'll be calling right more often than not when you shove first If you can't be opposite be on the left, I think My bad Rich, I meant left. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 04:39:19 PM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms.
When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 04:41:38 PM BTW- Feel free to add your own truisms.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 12, 2011, 04:45:07 PM D: Always be willing/looking to improve/adapt, basically don't rest on your laurels as people will undoubtedly improve and eventually surpass you.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 05:00:15 PM So if we meet this criteria, we will be able to play poker, have fun, and theoretically make a small profit.
That's fine for recreational poker, and lets face it, if we're talking recreational poker, it doesn't really matter if we make a small profit or a small loss. But what if we were to talk professional poker, i.e. playing for a living? What are the Professional poker truisms? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 12, 2011, 05:15:34 PM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 05:20:57 PM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 12, 2011, 05:22:43 PM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Are you playing to make money or fart around with silly principles? :kiss: Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 12, 2011, 05:25:35 PM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Are you playing to make money or fart around with silly principles? :kiss: To answer that one, we would have to agree that principles are silly, which I refuse to do, on principle. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 12:40:58 AM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. what did you fall out with tilt for. they fell out with me so have had that decision taken away...as for cutting off your nose i am down at the vic for a black belt seminar saturday and forgot that this is a grosvenor casino. hope i can get in lol Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 13, 2011, 12:48:00 AM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Lol. This is not about me, it's just what I believe to be fact. Everyone's poker game, even yours, is high variance. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 13, 2011, 07:27:26 AM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Lol. This is not about me, it's just what I believe to be fact. Everyone's poker game, even yours, is high variance. Anyway..... If you're playing for a living, in addition to A B C D & E, you must also be able to F: Have a separate life roll. G: Be capable of winning enough to maintain both your pokerz roll & your life roll. (Big ask) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 08:22:39 AM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 13, 2011, 08:26:36 AM Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Lucky on May 13, 2011, 08:31:29 AM So I'm going to start writing down what I see as poker truisms. When we get to the point were you disagree, shout. To make money from playing poker, you have to A: Find a game that you have an edge in. B: Have a bankroll that allows you to play that game for long enough to overcome the variance. C: Have the mental fortitude to maintain your edge while said variance is having it's wicked way with you. This is the last time I will mention the $11 rush on demand tournies on full tilt, I won't mention them again. Haha. Thanks Andrew, but I fell out with Tilt so I won't play there. I suppose we could add that to the criteria. E: Must not cut nose off to spite face. Are you playing to make money or fart around with silly principles? :kiss: To answer that one, we would have to agree that principles are silly, which I refuse to do, on principle. Thats just silly. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: nirvana on May 13, 2011, 08:32:29 AM I wouldn't know an exact number but to make a reasonable living out of playing poker you probably need to be in the top 5 % of players (perhaps ??) because if you're not how many games can you find that you have a true edge in
Based on a thought like this it takes me approx 3 seconds to figure out I'm better off with a job and then see if I can earn some pocket money from poker now and then. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 08:36:31 AM Aren't you a little short for a stormtrooper? I am average height for a yoda and as hairy as a wooki. Thinking about it I'm probably an ewok. Fml5% winners has always been the recognised figure in live play. Only line it's 99% are winners because other than alex Tom and myself everyone is crushing it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 13, 2011, 08:39:40 AM I wouldn't know an exact number but to make a reasonable living out of playing poker you probably need to be in the top 5 % of players (perhaps ??) because if you're not how many games can you find that you have a true edge in Based on a thought like this it takes me approx 3 seconds to figure out I'm better off with a job and then see if I can earn some pocket money from poker now and then. Difficult to argue with that Glen. (Won't stop Jason though) How are you BTW? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 08:47:56 AM Is it wrong to be proud to be a losing on line player and recognise the fact so stick to what I am good at. Game selection is key and that means almost any form of live poker and satellites with multiple seats were I don't need to finish top three as the prize for in the money with one chip is the same for in the Money with a world of chips
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 13, 2011, 08:51:30 AM Is it wrong to be proud to be a losing on line player and recognise the fact so stick to what I am good at. Game selection is key and that means almost any form of live poker and satellites with multiple seats were I don't need to finish top three as the prize for in the money with one chip is the same for in the Money with a world of chips Can't argue with that either. People talk such sense in the early morning. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on May 13, 2011, 09:23:19 AM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope tikay wankinobi (who I portrayed on TV once, full costume, the lot, "my servant, you shall be") is too tired to keep flogging that horse, Jase, he's not Canute. But he still resolutely believes it was always so, & will always be so. I admire your ability & courage to not only stand up to all the tide of hype, though, but to keep fighting back, you da man. You have to admire the Cody's, Toby's, Tricky Sams, Keys, & Ruperts of the gung-ho brigade, though, too, they seem to get the job done plenty enough, & I respect them immensely, too. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 09:38:50 AM 100% agree Tony and these guys are proving it time and time again. But these guys adapt their games and react to each senario. I still believe poker is results orientated. My fight is usually with the guy who always gets a final table stack after 3 levels never makes day 2 then tells his mate he played with me on day 1 and I am tez. This is always as I walking away from the cash desk counting my money. My answer to him is always " please don't stop coming"
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 13, 2011, 10:55:17 AM I still believe poker is results orientated. Can't believe you wrote this. It makes me happy. Actually it depends what you mean. Do you mean that people's view of who's good and who's not is wildy distorted by results? Because this couldn't be more true. E.g. Jason runs supergood and therefore cashes a lot. [ ] means you're good/winning player NB: the above is just an example, definitely not my belief. Or do you mean that results mean everything, "the proof is in the pudding" type line? In which case, sigh, gg. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 03:39:00 PM I still believe poker is results orientated. Can't believe you wrote this. It makes me happy. Actually it depends what you mean. Do you mean that people's view of who's good and who's not is wildy distorted by results? Because this couldn't be more true. E.g. Jason runs supergood and therefore cashes a lot. [ ] means you're good/winning player NB: the above is just an example, definitely not my belief. Or do you mean that results mean everything, "the proof is in the pudding" type line? In which case, sigh, gg. just to make a point about the on line game. when tom and i were winning players on line and doing 40 hour weeks + times were so much easier.... just read ruperts tank thread and has it me thinking wtf we are never gonna catch up and become winning players on line again. i have a degree and post 91 just blew my mind. so for now my game selection means win cheap seats on line and take advantage of the live idiots. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 13, 2011, 03:52:53 PM If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. That just means he's on the positive side. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 03:58:11 PM If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. That just means he's on the positive side. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 13, 2011, 04:13:08 PM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope tikay wankinobi (who I portrayed on TV once, full costume, the lot, "my servant, you shall be") is too tired to keep flogging that horse, Jase, he's not Canute. But he still resolutely believes it was always so, & will always be so. I admire your ability & courage to not only stand up to all the tide of hype, though, but to keep fighting back, you da man. Poker isn't a results business at all. Dempsey, Kelly, Banzi banished from the coveted list for Keys and Rupert- will they be back in if they win again? You have to admire the Cody's, Toby's, Tricky Sams, Keys, & Ruperts of the gung-ho brigade, though, too, they seem to get the job done plenty enough, & I respect them immensely, too. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on May 13, 2011, 04:18:08 PM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope tikay wankinobi (who I portrayed on TV once, full costume, the lot, "my servant, you shall be") is too tired to keep flogging that horse, Jase, he's not Canute. But he still resolutely believes it was always so, & will always be so. I admire your ability & courage to not only stand up to all the tide of hype, though, but to keep fighting back, you da man. Poker isn't a results business at all. Dempsey, Kelly, Banzi banished from the coveted list for Keys and Rupert- will they be back in if they win again? You have to admire the Cody's, Toby's, Tricky Sams, Keys, & Ruperts of the gung-ho brigade, though, too, they seem to get the job done plenty enough, & I respect them immensely, too. Lol, knew I should not have named examples! No no no, JP, Banzi, & plenty more all get just as much respect from me. And as to Dr Demps, his "serious" poker head is a thing of wonder, & he certainly gets the respect biscuit for that, without a shadow of doubt. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 13, 2011, 04:21:21 PM It's just a funny old game. Where people seem to be flavour of the month and then forgotten. At least Andy Warhol was correct :)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 13, 2011, 04:52:37 PM It's just a funny old game. Where people seem to be flavour of the month and then forgotten. At least Andy Warhol was correct :) Flushy and Toby are feeling it too. http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=53274.msg1368173#msg1368173 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: redarmi on May 13, 2011, 04:54:32 PM Talking of which does DPommo (formerly in Britains most eligible batchlor list iirc!!!) still play Dubai???
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Boba Fett on May 13, 2011, 05:11:58 PM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope lol Im never sure if you're joking or not. Variance is mathematical fact. Just because you play a low variance style it doesnt mean variance doesnt exist, it just means you spend less time on either side of it. So in terms of B & C on the list, it is affected by style but never completely eliminated Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 13, 2011, 05:56:54 PM Talking of which does DPommo (formerly in Britains most eligible batchlor list iirc!!!) still play Dubai??? Yeah he does, he had moved to Sweden with a bird but he messaged me to say he is back last week Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Jon MW on May 13, 2011, 06:16:11 PM If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. That just means he's on the positive side. I thought about posting similar but the way I wrote it took a few paragraphs. Like BobaFett said variance isn't just slang for luck, it's a mathematical term. People obviously do use it incorrectly but by and large the regular usage of it in poker is about right. If you take the average or expected value of a hypothetical event Then you graph the actual results of the event The variance is a measure of how far away (on average) your actual results are from they hypothetical expected/average result Above or below / positive or negative / good luck or bad luck isn't really relevant - it's just people tend to notice more when they're on the below average side of variance (and pretend to themselvesthat they are when they've just been playing bad) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 13, 2011, 06:37:17 PM Will accept my game is high variance coz you say it is but is it has to be less high variance than the guy getting it in bad all the time. If a guy is playing well running well and cashing a lot is he experiencing the opposite of variance. And what is the opposite of variance. I still maintain variance is a good excuse for poor results. ;starwars; use the force Tom. Don't let the dark side take you. Once you cross over there will just be two of us............ Help me tikay wan. kinobi your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi. Your my only hope...... Help me tikay wan kinobi your my only hope lol Im never sure if you're joking or not. Variance is mathematical fact. Just because you play a low variance style it doesnt mean variance doesnt exist, it just means you spend less time on either side of it. So in terms of B & C on the list, it is affected by style but never completely eliminated yep i'm up to speed with varience now and understand. it was just that it is being used by losers so i did not grasp it fully. i prefer losers to say i'm between rolls at the moment as i understand what they mean. however i am gonna now tell people i am experiencing varience which is not a lie but may help to stop em nipping me everytime i get a draw.... and dave you are not yesterdays news but for the purposes of tonys point we needed to emphasise those players the opposite side to puberty than you. dave shallow for wsop braclet or scoop. ;) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 12:21:07 AM Sigh.
Put so many big hands down tonight, should have put this one down too.... I raise AK of broccoli and get two callers. Flop comes AQ, two tomato's. I make it 2500, Mr Tilty McTilt pushes for 5k more. Does he have AQ, or a salad draw.... I tell him he has AQ, then I call... He shows AQ. ;marks; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 14, 2011, 12:37:23 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli.
I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 12:45:46 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli. I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Well earlier today he was standing next to me regarding my tomatoes. True story. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 14, 2011, 12:51:53 AM :hello: :kiss:
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on May 14, 2011, 12:59:25 AM 50p pls.
could get used to veg based suit references though! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:00:08 AM :hello: :kiss: What happened to you, and did I smell of garlic? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:00:45 AM 50p pls. could get used to veg based suit references though! It's the way forward. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 14, 2011, 05:26:40 AM Tom it's all good as long as you get your five a day.
Broccoli, tomatoes.. what are the other two? I'm going to use these from now on and get this meme into general usage amongst those I play poker with. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 14, 2011, 07:10:24 AM Morning. Been up since 5am. No jogging yet tho.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 08:19:15 AM Tom it's all good as long as you get your five a day. Broccoli, tomatoes.. what are the other two? I'm going to use these from now on and get this meme into general usage amongst those I play poker with. Figs & Olives obv ::) (http://fineartamerica.com/images-medium/ripe-figs-jim-delillo.jpg) (http://www.keepingupwithmom.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/black-olives.JPG) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 08:43:37 AM Morning. Been up since 5am. No jogging yet tho. Lol. That post was at ten past seven. If you had been up at five you would have posted on here to prove it. I bet you got up for a slash, posted on here and then went back to bed. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: ForthThistle on May 14, 2011, 08:46:47 AM Morning. Been up since 5am. No jogging yet tho. Lol. That post was at ten past seven. If you had been up at five you would have posted on here to prove it. I bet you got up for a slash, posted on here and then went back to bed. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 08:48:46 AM Morning. Been up since 5am. No jogging yet tho. Lol. That post was at ten past seven. If you had been up at five you would have posted on here to prove it. I bet you got up for a slash, posted on here and then went back to bed. They have to be up early to catch us out eh Dave? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:02:26 AM Blimey! I've been looking at my online br wrong.
Although I play in €, when I view my roll, it's in £. I'm crushing this game too, so now I have a whopping £236.62 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:12:25 AM Anyone know any good restaurants in the Hinckley area?
What about Harvester? I've heard their Plantation Platter is pretty good. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:18:20 AM (http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcR_gAMkHhTkr_c15zJ03-KN-yFOhSfwZ3CdwXaOqpuRWMUCgILW)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 14, 2011, 09:19:11 AM Anyone know any good restaurants in the Hinckley area? What about Harvester? I've heard their Plantation Platter is pretty good. Harversters are't that great from my experience, just depends what your expectations are I guess. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:22:40 AM Anyone know any good restaurants in the Hinckley area? What about Harvester? I've heard their Plantation Platter is pretty good. Harversters are't that great from my experience, just depends what your expectations are I guess. Well I do have quite sophisticated tastes..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:24:52 AM Trouble is, I have a Pâté de foie gras pallete, and a bacon butty bankroll.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:29:29 AM Come to think about it, I'll stick with my bacon butty.
(http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcReA9bwaIlUo_NruVMmMTC3MMKO7CdaZZI_fEjW9UZgSkbGwFwH&t=1) (http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcSBJl9NLpG_1i6cE9Tv3Jf0KRgTW7fMSL88T_Ery1BYD0BN-uVS) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 14, 2011, 09:29:52 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli. I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Well earlier today he was standing next to me regarding my tomatoes. True story. Coincidentally, Felicity and I are currently growing some tomatoes in her greenhouse in a joint-venture. Spooky. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:31:50 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli. I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Well earlier today he was standing next to me regarding my tomatoes. True story. Coincidentally, Felicity and I are currently growing some tomatoes in her greenhouse in a joint-venture. Spooky. Home grown, fresh picked marters are the nuts Ralph. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 09:40:52 AM On a heater!!!!
Online br = £300.20 Currently thinking Toby Carvery (http://www.tobycarvery.co.uk/scaleimage.php?img=images/news/news-roastlamb.jpg&w=280) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 14, 2011, 10:07:46 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli. I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Well earlier today he was standing next to me regarding my tomatoes. True story. Coincidentally, Felicity and I are currently growing some tomatoes in her greenhouse in a joint-venture. Spooky. Home grown, fresh picked marters are the nuts Ralph. How big are your plants currently Tom? Ours are already around three feet high and flowering. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 10:10:48 AM Don't expect any sympathy from tikay when it comes to brocolli. I'm not exactly sure where he stands regarding tomatoes. Well earlier today he was standing next to me regarding my tomatoes. True story. Coincidentally, Felicity and I are currently growing some tomatoes in her greenhouse in a joint-venture. Spooky. Home grown, fresh picked marters are the nuts Ralph. How big are your plants currently Tom? Ours are already around three feet high and flowering. Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 14, 2011, 10:16:23 AM On a heater!!!! Online br = £300.20 Currently thinking Toby Carvery (http://www.tobycarvery.co.uk/scaleimage.php?img=images/news/news-roastlamb.jpg&w=280) Better than harvester for sure, and I think it's an all you eat carvery so go for a run first....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 14, 2011, 10:29:24 AM harvesters are fine if you just want pub grub type stuff - although i think the quality varies from place to place.
carvery ftmfw tho - pile it up! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: rex008 on May 14, 2011, 12:50:48 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 12:53:21 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 14, 2011, 12:57:15 PM a tomato derail - but i wondered after your fascination with the triple range merge if you had seen this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSkbVrZK7ZM&feature=player_embedded Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:03:53 PM a tomato derail - but i wondered after your fascination with the triple range merge if you had seen this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSkbVrZK7ZM&feature=player_embedded Yes, I've seen it. I thought it was brilliant. BTW- I had to explain the tripple range merge to Claw, Holdy-Handy and tikay yesterday. I mean fair enough, though, they are girls after all, but what's tikay's excuse? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 14, 2011, 01:04:59 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 14, 2011, 01:11:00 PM a tomato derail - but i wondered after your fascination with the triple range merge if you had seen this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSkbVrZK7ZM&feature=player_embedded Yes, I've seen it. I thought it was brilliant. BTW- I had to explain the tripple range merge to Claw, Holdy-Handy and tikay yesterday. I mean fair enough, though, they are girls after all, but what's tikay's excuse? I don't remember that Tom. I must have been lost in your eyes. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:11:48 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Not even close. Come on, the clues are there.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:14:10 PM a tomato derail - but i wondered after your fascination with the triple range merge if you had seen this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSkbVrZK7ZM&feature=player_embedded Yes, I've seen it. I thought it was brilliant. BTW- I had to explain the tripple range merge to Claw, Holdy-Handy and tikay yesterday. I mean fair enough, though, they are girls after all, but what's tikay's excuse? I don't remember that Tom. Yes you do. We were standing by the coffee machine. Holdy was whittering about pizza. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Girgy85 on May 14, 2011, 01:32:52 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Not even close. Come on, the clues are there.... Buttercup? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 01:34:05 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Not even close. Come on, the clues are there.... Buttercup? Nope.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on May 14, 2011, 02:34:20 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Not even close. Come on, the clues are there.... Marge...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 02:35:37 PM Oh I don't grow em myself Ralph. There's a lady in the village who does though. I just butter her up occasionally. Oh dear. Insta-thought of Last Tango In Paris, then insta-wished I hadn't. Bet you can't guess her name. doris? sue? betty? lolita? Not even close. Come on, the clues are there.... Marge...... YES!!!! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on May 14, 2011, 02:37:07 PM a tomato derail - but i wondered after your fascination with the triple range merge if you had seen this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSkbVrZK7ZM&feature=player_embedded Yes, I've seen it. I thought it was brilliant. BTW- I had to explain the tripple range merge to Claw, Holdy-Handy and tikay yesterday. I mean fair enough, though, they are girls after all, but what's tikay's excuse? I tried, just for mischief purposes, asking Neil Channing about TRM recently, on the UK Cash Game, he just shot back, "you'll be alright".... (That's just for HoldyFoldy). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 05:11:00 PM On a heater!!!! Online br = £300.20 Anyone got a shilling for the meter? Me heater's gorn out. Online br = £192.09 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 07:15:46 PM So what are the odds that any three from five cards will be of the same suit?
Also, what are the odds that they will be of a of a specific suit? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on May 14, 2011, 07:25:51 PM Also, what are the odds that they will be of a of a specific suit? which one? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 07:27:48 PM Also, what are the odds that they will be of a of a specific suit? which one? Broccoli. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 07:29:08 PM Odds 3 times greater for specific suit?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 07:37:32 PM 6 Max STT. 4 players left. blinds 100 /200. Button bets 600 from 1800. I have 2100 and pocket nines in the sb.
No brainer push? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 14, 2011, 08:01:01 PM 6 Max STT. 4 players left. blinds 100 /200. Button bets 600 from 1800. I have 2100 and pocket nines in the sb. No brainer push? Seems to me that I will rarely be v a smaller pair, otherwise he would have pushed. So that means I'm mostly behind behind or racing. Better to fold here and get it in first with a weaker hand if necessary. That way he folds or perhaps calls with overs and I'm not a huge dog. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: redarmi on May 14, 2011, 11:28:49 PM Other two players stacks are quite important here Tom. I probably fold but it is close.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: redarmi on May 14, 2011, 11:33:44 PM Just ran this through SNGWiz and assuming the other two stacks are roughly equal and the raiser and BB are average players in terms of their range then it is an ICM shove and it isn't that close really.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 15, 2011, 12:31:18 AM shove ainec was my reaction too. obv stack sizes important tho
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 08:32:37 AM Thanks Guys.
When you play turbo STTS you really get to see variance in action. So many showdowns where your best hand loses, or your worst hand wins, often in the most outrageous fashion. If you didn't know better, it would cause you to say that online poker is rigged. I especially like that pause while it works out what the miracle card is just before it deals the river. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 10:41:02 AM Thanks Guys. i went to a black belt seminar yesterday. one of the guys said he dont play on line anymore and when he had AK two seats away always beat him but it was not just him his mate had a million hands to prove it. i was so embarressed that i could not stop myself pissing myself out loud. i then had to bite my finger when another guy come out with some more bollocks, and this was the guy giving the seminar tears were streaming down my eyesWhen you play turbo STTS you really get to see variance in action. So many showdowns where your best hand loses, or your worst hand wins, often in the most outrageous fashion. If you didn't know better, it would cause you to say that online poker is rigged. I especially like that pause while it works out what the miracle card is just before it deals the river. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 10:46:46 AM Thanks Guys. i went to a black belt seminar yesterday. one of the guys said he dont play on line anymore and when he had AK two seats away always beat him but it was not just him his mate had a million hands to prove it. i was so embarressed that i could not stop myself pissing myself out loud. i then had to bite my finger when another guy come out with some more bollocks, and this was the guy giving the seminar tears were streaming down my eyesWhen you play turbo STTS you really get to see variance in action. So many showdowns where your best hand loses, or your worst hand wins, often in the most outrageous fashion. If you didn't know better, it would cause you to say that online poker is rigged. I especially like that pause while it works out what the miracle card is just before it deals the river. The thing is, if you could see the same number of showdowns playing live poker, you would think that was rigged too. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 15, 2011, 10:48:10 AM Thanks Guys. i went to a black belt seminar yesterday. one of the guys said he dont play on line anymore and when he had AK two seats away always beat him but it was not just him his mate had a million hands to prove it. i was so embarressed that i could not stop myself pissing myself out loud. i then had to bite my finger when another guy come out with some more bollocks, and this was the guy giving the seminar tears were streaming down my eyesWhen you play turbo STTS you really get to see variance in action. So many showdowns where your best hand loses, or your worst hand wins, often in the most outrageous fashion. If you didn't know better, it would cause you to say that online poker is rigged. I especially like that pause while it works out what the miracle card is just before it deals the river. The thing is, if you could see the same number of showdowns playing live poker, you would think that was rigged too. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on May 15, 2011, 11:10:12 AM So what are the odds that any three from five cards will be of the same suit? Also, what are the odds that they will be of a of a specific suit? 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit 741 combinations of 2 others from the 39 not of that suit 2598960 combinations of 5 cards from 52 so (286x741)/2598960 = .081543 So 8% for brocolli and 32% for any colour. which is lower than I would have thought.. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 11:16:48 AM So what are the odds that any three from five cards will be of the same suit? Also, what are the odds that they will be of a of a specific suit? 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit 741 combinations of 2 others from the 39 not of that suit 2598960 combinations of 5 cards from 52 so (286x741)/2598960 = .081543 So 8% for brocolli and 32% for any colour. which is lower than I would have thought.. Wow, me too. The numbers make my head hurt. Can you explain them to me as if you are explaining to a 5 year old? How do you know that there are 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit for instance? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on May 15, 2011, 11:34:32 AM How do you know that there are 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit for instance? I've forgotten the general formula (written as a rule) for combinations but the way it works is for combos of 2 its 10x9 divided by 2x1 for combos of 3 its 10x9x8 divided by 3x2x1 for combos of 4 its 10x9x8x7 divided by 4x3x2x1 The multiplication bit is matching the things together eg 2h 3h 4h and the division is removing the duplicates eg 4h 3h 2h. The difference between a combination and a permutation is the order doesnt matter in a combo, but it does in a perm. So you wouldn't do the division bit to work out permutations. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 11:40:21 AM How do you know that there are 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit for instance? I've forgotten the general formula (written as a rule) for combinations but the way it works is for combos of 2 its 10x9 divided by 2x1 for combos of 3 its 10x9x8 divided by 3x2x1 for combos of 4 its 10x9x8x7 divided by 4x3x2x1 The multiplication bit is matching the things together eg 2h 3h 4h and the division is removing the duplicates eg 4h 3h 2h. The difference between a combination and a permutation is the order doesnt matter in a combo, but it does in a perm. So you wouldn't do the division bit to work out permutations. For me, this is like watching an artist paint, or a ballerina dance. I can't do it, but I can stand back and appreciate it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on May 15, 2011, 11:52:17 AM How do you know that there are 286 combinations of 3 cards from 13 of a suit for instance? I've forgotten the general formula (written as a rule) for combinations but the way it works is for combos of 2 its 10x9 divided by 2x1 for combos of 3 its 10x9x8 divided by 3x2x1 for combos of 4 its 10x9x8x7 divided by 4x3x2x1 The multiplication bit is matching the things together eg 2h 3h 4h and the division is removing the duplicates eg 4h 3h 2h. The difference between a combination and a permutation is the order doesnt matter in a combo, but it does in a perm. So you wouldn't do the division bit to work out permutations. For me, this is like watching an artist paint, or a ballerina dance. I can't do it, but I can stand back and appreciate it. hmmmmmm don't think so - I deliberately used 10 in my example so that you could have a go at working out the combinations of 3 from 13 using my example as a guide.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 11:58:58 AM It's like I'm running across an ice field and I come upon a wide crevasse. I want to take the leap, but I'm just too scared.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 12:09:44 PM Thanks Guys. i went to a black belt seminar yesterday. one of the guys said he dont play on line anymore and when he had AK two seats away always beat him but it was not just him his mate had a million hands to prove it. i was so embarressed that i could not stop myself pissing myself out loud. i then had to bite my finger when another guy come out with some more bollocks, and this was the guy giving the seminar tears were streaming down my eyesWhen you play turbo STTS you really get to see variance in action. So many showdowns where your best hand loses, or your worst hand wins, often in the most outrageous fashion. If you didn't know better, it would cause you to say that online poker is rigged. I especially like that pause while it works out what the miracle card is just before it deals the river. The thing is, if you could see the same number of showdowns playing live poker, you would think that was rigged too. just opened bluff magazine and seen one of the presenters says in his article that he got another flag for his hendonmob at blackbelt live. justed pmsl again when i checked it out. as winning satelittes is the only thing i am good at on line and is what i teach novices to be successful at i thought i would go down there and pick up some more stuff that i can incorporate in to my game. the whole 7 hours was about winning sats live and online and with a view to winning a seat to the wsop. one of the things that most intrested me was the programme sit n go wizard. have asked jamie burland to send me the hand details but with about 16 left 6 seats available about 360k chips in play (so obv 60k will be av stack when the seat bubble bursts) blinds 800/1600 ante? you are sat with AA on a stack of 41k in cut off??. guy before you shoves his 30k and you had to fold. tried telling me that sng wiz would say fold so as they had it on their lap top when i asked em to show me there was some sort of technical error. 100% get that you can fold aces on the bubble sitting pretty in chips and this was actually done. but they then loled at shorty shoving 7k with KQ...k9 calls k2 calls 49 calls A6 folds?? which is the winning hand and actually 49 hits a 4 to make the only pair. shorty wins otherwise and i said that everyone calling shorty and checking down is pretty standard 7 nights a week. Just off the top of my head i have won in the last 18 months 1 x wsop package on stars , 1 irish open package on paddy power , 1 irish open seat at dtd, 1 irish open seat in the super in the burlington, 2 irish winter festival packages on paddy power, 2 irish winter festival seats in super , 4 ukipt packages and 3 seat only on stars, 1 chilli open package to marrakesh, i chilli open package to costa brava, 4 gukpt seats in live sats, 1 monte carlo seat and dozens of dtd deepstack seats. i felt a bit cheated out of 15 hours of my precious time yesterday and have drafted an email to tell neil so.....have not found the bottle to push send tho ;) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 12:14:01 PM That's an interesting piece Jason. Would you mind if I break it down into paragraphs to make it a little more readable?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 12:20:39 PM shit thought i had. hitting return aint good enough. you have to do it twice i take it...nice choppers btw
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 12:36:23 PM shit thought i had. hitting return aint good enough. you have to do it twice i take it... Never mind Jase. You're a prophet. Following you shouldn't be too easy. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 12:41:47 PM blind leading the blind tom. tikay is the lord jesus christ. i am but a mere disciple.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 01:25:57 PM Toying with the idea of playing the €30k gtd on Laddies this arvo.
€190 buy in is a bit steep, but the structure really suits me and I feel a bink coming on. Decisions decisions....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 01:35:38 PM Toying with the idea of playing the €30k gtd on Laddies this arvo. €190 buy in is a bit steep, but the structure really suits me and I feel a bink coming on. Decisions decisions....... what time does this start tom? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 01:36:33 PM Toying with the idea of playing the €30k gtd on Laddies this arvo. €190 buy in is a bit steep, but the structure really suits me and I feel a bink coming on. Decisions decisions....... what time does this start tom? 15:00 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 15, 2011, 01:38:32 PM Toying with the idea of playing the €30k gtd on Laddies this arvo. €190 buy in is a bit steep, but the structure really suits me and I feel a bink coming on. Decisions decisions....... what time does this start tom? 15:00 cash spin up for the buy in yo Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 01:40:48 PM Toying with the idea of playing the €30k gtd on Laddies this arvo. €190 buy in is a bit steep, but the structure really suits me and I feel a bink coming on. Decisions decisions....... what time does this start tom? 15:00 cash spin up for the buy in yo I could use my "One time"...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 01:41:34 PM Nah. I'm saving that for when the grim reaper calls.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: strak33 on May 15, 2011, 02:09:14 PM Just play it , do it i have a good feeling.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:18:55 PM Spooky!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: sovietsong on May 15, 2011, 02:22:10 PM I think you should play it Red-Dog.
I'm 70% sure you will win it. Can I buy 1% pls. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:26:14 PM I think you should play it Red-Dog. I'm 70% sure you will win it. Can I buy 1% pls. No, but you can buy 50% for €190. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:28:13 PM Forgot the €10 juice but I'll stand on.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:34:41 PM Tossing a coin.
Heads I play..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 02:39:50 PM Tossing a coin. Heads I play..... never waste a flip like that! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 15, 2011, 02:44:27 PM tossing a coin is always a great way to make a decision. not necessarily sticking by the outcome, but if you're disappointed with how it falls you realise you actually did have a preference.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:46:34 PM tossing a coin is always a great way to make a decision. not necessarily sticking by the outcome, but if you're disappointed with how it falls you realise you actually did have a preference. Oh I deffo had a preference... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 15, 2011, 02:47:16 PM tossing a coin is always a great way to make a decision. not necessarily sticking by the outcome, but if you're disappointed with how it falls you realise you actually did have a preference. Oh I deffo had a preference... then jfdi Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 02:49:52 PM tossing a coin is always a great way to make a decision. not necessarily sticking by the outcome, but if you're disappointed with how it falls you realise you actually did have a preference. Oh I deffo had a preference... norrrrrrrrrrrr Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:50:44 PM tossing a coin is always a great way to make a decision. not necessarily sticking by the outcome, but if you're disappointed with how it falls you realise you actually did have a preference. Oh I deffo had a preference... norrrrrrrrrrrr Lol Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 02:53:54 PM I have reg'd it -stars is killing me atm!
Field doesnt look too soft thou Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 02:57:16 PM I have reg'd it -stars is killing me atm! Field doesnt look too soft thou To be honest it's a tough field, but Laddies run loads of "All in or fold" one chip satellites to this, so there are lots of soft spots. gl gl Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:02:51 PM Got KunkuWap two to my left. He's a Laddies legend and a real handful.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 03:04:11 PM I have reg'd it -stars is killing me atm! Field doesnt look too soft thou To be honest it's a tough field, but Laddies run loads of "All in or fold" one chip satellites to this, so there are lots of soft spots. gl gl tyty - no 4 colour deck option could prove fun - hope I dont make a auto pilot mistake with a [ ] flush (as I type someone just 10xd pre - could have a good table) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:06:32 PM There is a four colour option Guy. Menu + options + tickbox 2/3 down the page.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 03:23:03 PM There is a four colour option Guy. Menu + options + tickbox 2/3 down the page. tyty not sure I like the "deck style" but saves smaking a boo boo! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:35:16 PM KunkuWap plays big pot, (Not against me) Matey checks river, Kunku smells weakness and moves in.....
Matey folds. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:37:15 PM Missed 800 worth of flops.
103/133 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 03:44:04 PM I think you should play it Red-Dog. I'm 70% sure you will win it. Can I buy 1% pls. No, but you can buy 50% for €190. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 03:48:10 PM wow kunkuwap. has he moved with the times then tom?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:51:01 PM I think you should play it Red-Dog. I'm 70% sure you will win it. Can I buy 1% pls. No, but you can buy 50% for €190. Haha. There is no "Rest" Jase, I haven't sold any. You can have 50% for €190 though. (Rates for live tourneys can be negotiated) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 03:52:11 PM wow kunkuwap. has he moved with the times then tom? He still crushes on Laddies. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 03:56:47 PM lol. i do lots of staking for good karma requests. are you using a hud .. saw 103/133 and wondered if it related to kunkuwap or is this your stats
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 03:57:04 PM bleurgh - ran JJ into shorties QQ - down to 30 bbs - was motoring nicely too
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:02:57 PM lol. i do lots of staking for good karma requests. are you using a hud .. saw 103/133 and wondered if it related to kunkuwap or is this your stats No hud. They're my stats. (Haven't won a hand yet) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:10:28 PM bleurgh - ran JJ into shorties QQ - down to 30 bbs - was motoring nicely too What's your alias Guy? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:17:14 PM bleurgh - ran JJ into shorties QQ - down to 30 bbs - was motoring nicely too What's your alias Guy? pm'd Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:23:17 PM It's not going well. 99/116
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:24:44 PM raise, 3 bet and Im sat with KK - toasty life!
All in, fold, call, he flips AQ Window A, (meh) A K (Obv) x x 8k ish (39/116) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:25:25 PM It's not going well. 99/116 15bbs - at least there are no tough decisions! get thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 04:26:17 PM bleurgh - ran JJ into shorties QQ - down to 30 bbs - was motoring nicely too What's your alias Guy? pm'd Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 04:28:36 PM It's not going well. 99/116 15bbs - at least there are no tough decisions! get thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! believe the prophet Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:29:24 PM It's not going well. 99/116 15bbs - at least there are no tough decisions! get thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! 15 bigs. My comfort zone. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:31:48 PM oioi!
easy game! (no jacks no jacks no jacks no jacks ) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:34:10 PM Got my double up. KK v 10 10
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:36:01 PM a nice 10 minutes sir!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:36:26 PM Up tp 16k. AK v 10 Q on K J flop.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:36:54 PM mad lolz! sick table move!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:40:16 PM mad lolz! sick table move! Got away from a bad position on Kunku though..... He's on 10k now btw... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:41:01 PM mad lolz! sick table move! Got away from a bad position on Kunku though..... He's on 10k now btw... i feel my table spot just got a little worse! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:42:23 PM mad lolz! sick table move! Got away from a bad position on Kunku though..... He's on 10k now btw... i feel my table spot just got a little worse! Not really. You know my game.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 04:47:20 PM ;applause;
It's not going well. 99/116 15bbs - at least there are no tough decisions! get thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! believe the prophet Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 04:55:38 PM sigh
more abs redic nonsense! gl tom - get it won Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 04:56:39 PM sigh more abs redic nonsense! gl tom - get it won UL Guy. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 05:15:22 PM Dangerous phase of the tourney now, lots of shorter stacks splashing around, lots of 3/4 way pots...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 05:24:52 PM See what I mean......
(http://i52.tinypic.com/md35dt.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 06:10:25 PM gooooo. ??/116 with ?? being current position. getting it now. gonna have a trip to G sheff for the £50 rebuy gtd £8k but never makes it coz they banned barry neville , daz row , minty and a whole load of others who nver have a chance any way. will rail on here till about half 7. gl
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 06:11:50 PM 4/34
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 06:14:06 PM Under pressure all the time from chip leader though.
Have to take a stand soon.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 06:25:58 PM 8/28.
Card dead. Languishing in the doldrums. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: EvilPie on May 15, 2011, 06:33:30 PM 8/28. Card dead. Languishing in the doldrums. 8/28 is not languishing!! Stay composed please. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 06:34:18 PM ;pokergods;
8/28. ;pokergods; ;hattip; ;goodluck; ;shitfanhit;Card dead. Languishing in the doldrums. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: h on May 15, 2011, 06:46:56 PM 8/28. Card dead. Languishing in the doldrums. This is an internet forum plenty of wind about gl Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:02:36 PM Bubble time, my usual exit spot.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:04:55 PM 16/21
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on May 15, 2011, 07:07:23 PM Good luck sir. stay strong!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 15, 2011, 07:08:07 PM gl again. you never lose it. right off to take on some live idiots in a £50 re buy.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 07:09:06 PM nicely played !
now gogogogogoggogoogogoo Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:11:00 PM 10 min break on the bubble....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 15, 2011, 07:12:58 PM keep it up Tom. was just gonna ask how many paid and you answered my question. we are sooooooo on the same wavelength xx :)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:20:42 PM keep it up Tom. was just gonna ask how many paid and you answered my question. we are sooooooo on the same wavelength xx :) Soulmates n all that,,,, Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:26:06 PM Bubble has busted!!!!!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 15, 2011, 07:28:12 PM Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:30:29 PM Still in. Just took a a hit racing AQ v 99
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on May 15, 2011, 07:32:42 PM goood ruck
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:33:39 PM 15/15
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: titaniumbean on May 15, 2011, 07:35:12 PM on going position doesn't matter. just your stack size.
gogogogo gambooool well Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Marky147 on May 15, 2011, 07:43:06 PM WIN WIN WIN!!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:44:32 PM Need a double up.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 07:46:56 PM FT Bubble.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: sovietsong on May 15, 2011, 07:47:22 PM I was a little shocked to see the chippy raise to 5k and then fold to your 22k shove.
Did he have a soul read ? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 07:49:00 PM glgl Tom
I love these spots, and in order to keep the PMA up, as I too am a "position sufferer", I like to say , "well a double through takes me to 6th" (or whatever) so come on get that double through then crush souls!!!!! gogogogoogooooogoogogo Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 15, 2011, 07:50:50 PM now
luuddddeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: strak33 on May 15, 2011, 07:51:03 PM Just play it , do it i have a good feeling. Just saying. Gl red Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 15, 2011, 08:03:10 PM Grinding tune (hope it's not too late)
YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50azTZcQqdI Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 15, 2011, 08:06:04 PM Out in 10th.
Thanks for the rail guys. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 15, 2011, 08:21:52 PM Grinding tune (hope it's not too late) YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50azTZcQqdI +1, I have been grinding to this recently. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 04:52:31 AM 4:50am and that Jason is still not up.
What a lightweight. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 16, 2011, 05:01:59 AM 4:50am and that Jason is still not up. What a lightweight. LOLOLOLOL And wed on Laddies! I added u as a buddy, but u didn't accept it :-( Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 05:07:24 AM 4:50am and that Jason is still not up. What a lightweight. LOLOLOLOL And wed on Laddies! I added u as a buddy, but u didn't accept it :-( Sorry darling, I didn't see it. Laddies. Yes. I really fancied that one. Shame I couldn't have just made a few more places, it would have made a big difference. What are you doing up at this time anyway? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 16, 2011, 05:26:33 AM 4:50am and that Jason is still not up. What a lightweight. LOLOLOLOL And wed on Laddies! I added u as a buddy, but u didn't accept it :-( Sorry darling, I didn't see it. Laddies. Yes. I really fancied that one. Shame I couldn't have just made a few more places, it would have made a big difference. What are you doing up at this time anyway? Yh I dbled early, then ran AK into AA, then sat forever and passed passsed passed, finally I raise and the guy shoves, I call with AQ and he has 77 lolol can't win that flip - love that comp tho, such a slow structure, and really never any need to rush ...... As for the being up late, I had pretty much a horrific sunday, so just couldn't sleep, reliving all the mistakes I made - BIG SIGH! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 05:30:14 AM 4:50am and that Jason is still not up. What a lightweight. LOLOLOLOL And wed on Laddies! I added u as a buddy, but u didn't accept it :-( Sorry darling, I didn't see it. Laddies. Yes. I really fancied that one. Shame I couldn't have just made a few more places, it would have made a big difference. What are you doing up at this time anyway? Yh I dbled early, then ran AK into AA, then sat forever and passed passsed passed, finally I raise and the guy shoves, I call with AQ and he has 77 lolol can't win that flip - love that comp tho, such a slow structure, and really never any need to rush ...... As for the being up late, I had pretty much a horrific sunday, so just couldn't sleep, reliving all the mistakes I made - BIG SIGH! "reliving all the mistakes I made" Haha. I thought it was just me who does that. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 16, 2011, 05:49:01 AM I am now
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 05:50:31 AM I am now Lol. Well done Jason. Any good last night? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 16, 2011, 06:24:50 AM I am now LOL - were u playing the million on stars last night JAse? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 06:28:45 AM Meh! He's back in bed again. props just got up for a you-know-what.
Meanwhile, some of us are alone in the dark, grinding our whatsits off. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 16, 2011, 06:46:47 AM Meh! He's back in bed again. props just got up for a you-know-what. Meanwhile, some of us are alone in the dark, grinding our whatsits off. looooooooooool - U playing now?, have u been up all night?, if not how comes u can wake up so early??? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 07:14:23 AM Meh! He's back in bed again. props just got up for a you-know-what. Meanwhile, some of us are alone in the dark, grinding our whatsits off. looooooooooool - U playing now?, have u been up all night?, if not how comes u can wake up so early??? The older I get, the less sleep I seem to need. I fell asleep at about 11pm last night while watching Morgan Freeman telling us about life on other planets in "Through the Wormhole" Then I must have gone to bed without waking up (I do that regularly) and slept until 4am, when I woke up as bright as a button. I love having the early mornings to myself. Watching the world come alive. Looking out of the window at the mackerel sky. Slipping my Walther PPK into my chamois leather shoulder holster.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 16, 2011, 08:56:51 AM Yes one of the kids woke me up jumped in my bed so I got out and in bed. No good in Sheff. 800/1600. Serial raiser raises high jack I shove 15 bigs with AQ. Small blind re shoves 50 bb with 10 10 and KK in bb covers. Would be upset but the young lad with 10 10 looked like he was about to cry so I did not feel too bad
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 06:36:13 PM Plan K. (Yes, I know it looks like plank)
I seem to be managing to win a small amount playing turbo stt's. So I'm going to re-invest that as buy-ins for mtt's. Tonight I will mostly be playing a €6k gtd €5 rebuy, and a €25k gtd €20 rebuy. I could be headed for the big time. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 16, 2011, 08:00:55 PM My resolve is starting to lessen regarding not playing the grand prix at DTD.
It seems churlish not to take part at all when it's literally just down the road from my gaff. I'm thinking Thursday as there are a couple of decent PLO tourneys online tomorrow and Wednesday. You coming? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 08:09:51 PM My resolve is starting to lessen regarding not playing the grand prix at DTD. It seems churlish not to take part at all when it's literally just down the road from my gaff. I'm thinking Thursday as there are a couple of decent PLO tourneys online tomorrow and Wednesday. You coming? I'm sitting up on Wednesday for a funeral on Thursday Ralph so it's not looking good. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 08:38:38 PM Got Dreenie on my right. Crushing.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 16, 2011, 10:48:28 PM Out of the 25k, Dreenie out too.
Made the small cash in the 6k, need to find a hand or a spot now.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 16, 2011, 10:59:05 PM My resolve is starting to lessen regarding not playing the grand prix at DTD. It seems churlish not to take part at all when it's literally just down the road from my gaff. I'm thinking Thursday as there are a couple of decent PLO tourneys online tomorrow and Wednesday. You coming? I'm sitting up on Wednesday for a funeral on Thursday Ralph so it's not looking good. I wish you and all of your family a long life. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: dreenie on May 17, 2011, 01:05:14 AM Out of the 25k, Dreenie out too. Made the small cash in the 6k, need to find a hand or a spot now.... Yeah, I think I noticed you, but was playing other tables so couldn't say hi, I got pretty tilted throughout that comp, had the 77 vs 33 - the 33 flop lolol - then folded 2 pair when the 4 card straight came on the river, then just tilted out with a King and a Queen - sooooooooooooooooo soft aswell that comp - ah well better luck tomorrow -- how did u end up in the 6k gtd? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 17, 2011, 07:03:38 AM Got into the money, but only the shallow end. Went out in 22nd when I lost a race.
Was happy with my game though. Part of the "F" on my fold button has worn away so I must be playing with my usual flair. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 17, 2011, 10:12:54 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 17, 2011, 10:15:47 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. You'll have do do me a satellite master class Jase. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 17, 2011, 10:17:38 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. You'll have do do me a satellite master class Jase. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 17, 2011, 10:23:32 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. You'll have do do me a satellite master class Jase. (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eN_kMgHlktU/TahBiJ4PssI/AAAAAAAACmc/vq9vzjLxde0/s1600/Poster.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 17, 2011, 10:25:25 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. You'll have do do me a satellite master class Jase. (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-eN_kMgHlktU/TahBiJ4PssI/AAAAAAAACmc/vq9vzjLxde0/s1600/Poster.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 17, 2011, 10:28:43 AM I can't even crush micro stakes cash.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 17, 2011, 10:41:26 AM I can't even crush micro stakes cash. i aint written off the on line game just yet. i've just gone on a sabbatical until the kids are at school. seems to me all the value is in sats anyway. i know people killing it by winning multiple seats and packages on line. they dont cash that often in live events but are playing poker at some beautiful places all over the world....cebu was another place i had never heard of the other day. nice life for single guysTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 18, 2011, 07:23:08 AM I've been musing, so here are a couple of questions.
Do you think we, (Most of us) play poker because we have a thrill-seeker mentality, or because we have a gamblers mentality? If you would no longer play poker or gamble, what would you replace it with? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: tikay on May 18, 2011, 07:49:42 AM I've been musing, so here are a couple of questions. Do you think we, (Most of us) play poker because we have a thrill-seeker mentality, or because we have a gamblers mentality? If you would no longer play poker or gamble, what would you replace it with? I think it's the latter (or is in my case). What would I replace it with? Like any other addiction, once weaned off it, it would not need replacing. In my case, I'm hoping the novelty will wear off & I'll grow out of it, it's only been 49 years now. I shudder to think how much I've gambled in my life, but I've enjoyed it immensely. An oddity is that even now, & it's only May, 2011 has been my best ever year in gambling, & I won't be giving it back. Well, not all of it...... (In before Jase, as he's still tucked up in bed, the slacker). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 18, 2011, 10:02:52 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. Significant sample size? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 18, 2011, 11:28:09 AM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. Significant sample size? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 02:58:51 PM I can't even crush micro stakes cash. i aint written off the on line game just yet. i've just gone on a sabbatical until the kids are at school. seems to me all the value is in sats anyway. i know people killing it by winning multiple seats and packages on line. they dont cash that often in live events but are playing poker at some beautiful places all over the world....cebu was another place i had never heard of the other day. nice life for single guysMoving rapidly up my list of places to go, reckon I will be there within 12 months. Would have been already but flight prices were stupid for my travel dates....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 18, 2011, 03:25:17 PM I can't even crush micro stakes cash. i aint written off the on line game just yet. i've just gone on a sabbatical until the kids are at school. seems to me all the value is in sats anyway. i know people killing it by winning multiple seats and packages on line. they dont cash that often in live events but are playing poker at some beautiful places all over the world....cebu was another place i had never heard of the other day. nice life for single guysMoving rapidly up my list of places to go, reckon I will be there within 12 months. Would have been already but flight prices were stupid for my travel dates....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 03:42:43 PM I can't even crush micro stakes cash. i aint written off the on line game just yet. i've just gone on a sabbatical until the kids are at school. seems to me all the value is in sats anyway. i know people killing it by winning multiple seats and packages on line. they dont cash that often in live events but are playing poker at some beautiful places all over the world....cebu was another place i had never heard of the other day. nice life for single guysMoving rapidly up my list of places to go, reckon I will be there within 12 months. Would have been already but flight prices were stupid for my travel dates....... Yeah a fair of my friends have been. The Philippines has got enough good places to fill about 3 or 4 holidays, it will move up the list of holiday hotspots massively in the next 20 or 30 years, especially once their infrastructure improves. The chicks are incred too (http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww249/mikill_thomas/unsure.gif) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 18, 2011, 03:47:36 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 18, 2011, 03:50:21 PM I can't even crush micro stakes cash. i aint written off the on line game just yet. i've just gone on a sabbatical until the kids are at school. seems to me all the value is in sats anyway. i know people killing it by winning multiple seats and packages on line. they dont cash that often in live events but are playing poker at some beautiful places all over the world....cebu was another place i had never heard of the other day. nice life for single guysMoving rapidly up my list of places to go, reckon I will be there within 12 months. Would have been already but flight prices were stupid for my travel dates....... Yeah a fair of my friends have been. The Philippines has got enough good places to fill about 3 or 4 holidays, it will move up the list of holiday hotspots massively in the next 20 or 30 years, especially once their infrastructure improves. The chicks are incred too (http://i724.photobucket.com/albums/ww249/mikill_thomas/unsure.gif) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 18, 2011, 03:56:49 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Mauritius is incred. went on family holiday when i was about 14 and was defo best holiday of my life. absolute paradise. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 04:00:56 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Yeah but all those places are expensive, the Phils offers all the stuff you get in those places for a fraction of the price. You probably need to be the adventurous type though as no package holidays go there and most things are rough around the edges as with much of SEA. I think some places in the Phils would be pretty awesome for a poker/lads holiday actually, but few would think of going there. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 18, 2011, 04:13:09 PM what poker is there there woodsey? poker/lads holidays are the best imo
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 18, 2011, 04:20:35 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Mauritius is incred. went on family holiday when i was about 14 and was defo best holiday of my life. absolute paradise. Got married there. Used to slag off beach/paradise type hols in favour for New York city type hols. How wrong was I?? Abso amazing! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 18, 2011, 04:27:37 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Yeah but all those places are expensive, the Phils offers all the stuff you get in those places for a fraction of the price. You probably need to be the adventurous type though as no package holidays go there and most things are rough around the edges as with much of SEA. I think some places in the Phils would be pretty awesome for a poker/lads holiday actually, but few would think of going there. When i go on hols i don't want rough around the edges. I want complete luxury, everything booked in advance and taken care for. On the plane, in the car to the hotel, excursions provided etc etc. I think it was you who commented on a previous post of mine when i said i got mugged in Jamaica, that was staying in a 5 star gaff and just going for a walk outside. So yea, rough around the edges isn't really my thing. Phills probs has some nice places, but i have seen a lot of bad press from over there. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 18, 2011, 04:32:50 PM Yeah +1 to Mauritius went in October after winning the Wcoop so lived it up a bit but was amazing, fully recommend- even went horse racing when there and had 4k at 4-6 on a horse called Disa Leader that won! Good memories
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 04:39:24 PM After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Yeah but all those places are expensive, the Phils offers all the stuff you get in those places for a fraction of the price. You probably need to be the adventurous type though as no package holidays go there and most things are rough around the edges as with much of SEA. I think some places in the Phils would be pretty awesome for a poker/lads holiday actually, but few would think of going there. When i go on hols i don't want rough around the edges. I want complete luxury, everything booked in advance and taken care for. On the plane, in the car to the hotel, excursions provided etc etc. I think it was you who commented on a previous post of mine when i said i got mugged in Jamaica, that was staying in a 5 star gaff and just going for a walk outside. So yea, rough around the edges isn't really my thing. Phills probs has some nice places, but i have seen a lot of bad press from over there. Fair enough, I guess we look for the opposites in holidays, I would be bored shitless in Mauritius and I hate staying in places where they lick your arse 24/7. I get that with work trips all the time and can't be arsed with it. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: bobAlike on May 18, 2011, 04:40:22 PM Honeymooned in Mauritius almost 20years ago, 3 weeks of paradise. Planning to go back for silver anniversay. Hotel double booked us so free upgrade to what was one of the better hotels on the island called the Pullman. I'm not even sure if it still exists.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 18, 2011, 04:41:38 PM I thought there was a fair bit to do in Mauritius which is why we went there instead of Maldives- we swam with wild dolphins, went Marlin fishing, walked Lions etc- i got short attention span and wasnt bored
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 04:45:12 PM I thought there was a fair bit to do in Mauritius which is why we went there instead of Maldives- we swam with wild dolphins, went Marlin fishing, walked Lions etc- i got short attention span and wasnt bored Fair enough mate, just not my thing tbh, I just orientate more to adventurey type holidays. I would never go on a package holiday to a beach resort ever, however grand. Been there done that....... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Dubai on May 18, 2011, 04:47:03 PM Nah thats fine totally understand- the word package is used very lightly anyway these days, u book everything seperate and choose what u want anyway
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 18, 2011, 04:55:42 PM sticking to what you know and are good at is key. i thought that it would be tougher to win a deepstack seat now that there are 2 gtd instead of 5 gtd. have to admit i was wrong as i won a seat quite easily last night. was gonna play for another to have a re entry bullet but friday the 3rd is alisters 4th birthday so very much think i wont be playing the friday and will play the saturday now instead. Significant sample size? That's the thing though - 5th is nowhere when there are only 2 seats, that's why the 5 seats gtd would be much better for the likes of you and I. With 2 seats, the effect from variance will be much more apparent. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 18, 2011, 05:02:30 PM I thought there was a fair bit to do in Mauritius which is why we went there instead of Maldives- we swam with wild dolphins, went Marlin fishing, walked Lions etc- i got short attention span and wasnt bored Same + Scuba diving, bubble walking, Cattareman Sailing (*sp),Mauritius is one of only 2 places you can walk with Lions or so the rep told me. Plus amazing food, drink, entertainment etc. I might try and get a job for the Mauritius tourism board. Maldives was our second choice as well. I thought there was a fair bit to do in Mauritius which is why we went there instead of Maldives- we swam with wild dolphins, went Marlin fishing, walked Lions etc- i got short attention span and wasnt bored Fair enough mate, just not my thing tbh, I just orientate more to adventurey type holidays. I would never go on a package holiday to a beach resort ever, however grand. Been there done that....... Yea 'package' holidays in my eyes, is when you get those families taking all the rascals to Gran Canaria or Tenerife and generally giving the UK a bad name. I would never go to Spain or anything like that again, might as well just go to Blackpool or Skegness imo! Mauritius, Maldives and all that is a bit different. Met ppl from Dubai, Germany, Auz, hardly any Brits in sight which is a good thing. Don't get me started on Cruises!! Abso love em. Like 10 holidays in 1 imo. After Mauritius last year i have got a taste for the tropical sort of holiday. French Polynnesia and The Cook islands are high up my list. Get em googled Yeah but all those places are expensive, the Phils offers all the stuff you get in those places for a fraction of the price. You probably need to be the adventurous type though as no package holidays go there and most things are rough around the edges as with much of SEA. I think some places in the Phils would be pretty awesome for a poker/lads holiday actually, but few would think of going there. When i go on hols i don't want rough around the edges. I want complete luxury, everything booked in advance and taken care for. On the plane, in the car to the hotel, excursions provided etc etc. I think it was you who commented on a previous post of mine when i said i got mugged in Jamaica, that was staying in a 5 star gaff and just going for a walk outside. So yea, rough around the edges isn't really my thing. Phills probs has some nice places, but i have seen a lot of bad press from over there. Fair enough, I guess we look for the opposites in holidays, I would be bored shitless in Mauritius and I hate staying in places where they lick your arse 24/7. I get that with work trips all the time and can't be arsed with it. Obv a I have a sweet ass job brag Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 18, 2011, 05:02:48 PM what poker is there there woodsey? poker/lads holidays are the best imo Manila, Cebu and Angeles City are the best for poker I understand, the latter being not a very desirable destination. Not big games at all maybe 1/2 max so I understand and lots of smaller games, there are some threads on 2+2 about the poker in those places. Other that that good beaches, good nightlife, and as a young western guy, you will be able to cherry pick the absolute cream of the women out there. All very cheap too.......... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 18, 2011, 08:49:06 PM You are right kiboshi. I had to prove to my stable that there is still value in these. However most of em will only play the 10 seats gtd in the last week both on line mon tues and live wed thurs friday
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 06:58:59 PM Gonna play the €25k gtd I think...
On the - side, I'm a bit tired. On the + side, I feel a bink coming on. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 07:11:44 PM Not off to a good start.
First hand, UTG limps for 20, I snap-push for 5000 with KK. he calls with AQ, (Surprising how often you can induce a call like this in the first level) he flops an ace. Still feeling binky.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 19, 2011, 07:13:47 PM you pushed for 250bbs over one limper and got called by worse?! ;hattip;
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 07:18:25 PM you pushed for 250bbs over one limper and got called by worse?! ;hattip; It works so often in the first level of rebuy comps. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 07:21:05 PM Especially when they have hands like JJ or QQ.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 19, 2011, 07:23:29 PM you pushed for 250bbs over one limper and got called by worse?! ;hattip; It works so often in the first level of rebuy comps. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 07:32:50 PM Actually, I reported it slightly wrong.
holtekila posted the small blind - 10.00 fizoka posted the big blind - 20.00 ** Dealing cards to RED-DOG: Kc, Ks ekziter folded Fish_19 folded Nokautas_LT folded wba68 folded christ666 raised to 50.00 RED-DOG went all-in - 5000.00 ileach71 folded holtekila folded fizoka folded christ666 called - 5000.00 christ666 shows: As, Qh RED-DOG shows: Kc, Ks ** Dealing the flop: Jc, 9c, Ac ** Dealing the turn: Qd ** Dealing the river: 5s RED-DOG shows: Kc, Ks christ666 wins 10030.00 from the main pot Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 09:33:40 PM You'll all be doing it tomorrow.
The massive over bet all in with a monster hand will become known as "Going Dogging" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 19, 2011, 09:38:10 PM You'll all be doing it tomorrow. The massive over bet all in with a monster hand will become known as "Going Dogging" Its standard play in the small rebuys I play....... :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 09:47:02 PM Come on Andrew, let me have something. I can't very well use the limp-fold as my signature move now can I?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 19, 2011, 09:58:15 PM Come on Andrew, let me have something. I can't very well use the limp-fold as my signature move now can I? Alright, alright.......(http://i266.photobucket.com/albums/ii269/theogrit/1sm067roll.gif) :P Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 19, 2011, 10:13:29 PM I go dogging all the time
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 10:17:37 PM I go dogging all the time You know it makes sense. A word of warning though, watch out for a bloke with XL trolleys and a kid with a croquet mallet. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 11:43:55 PM Bubble.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 19, 2011, 11:57:16 PM Burst. made the dosh anyroad.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 20, 2011, 12:07:26 AM Burst. made the dosh anyroad. Have you got your eyes wedged open with matchsticks? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 12:12:29 AM Sort of got to that "Gone past it" stage.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 12:13:05 AM Out for minor cash again. I'm going to bag this puppy soon.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 20, 2011, 12:18:41 AM Out for minor cash again. I'm going to bag this puppy soon. Is it the old $20R in a different guise? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 07:56:03 AM Out for minor cash again. I'm going to bag this puppy soon. Is it the old $20R in a different guise? It's a really unusual comp cost-wise Ralph. Buy in is €16.50 + €1.50 for 2500 points. Re-buys cost €16.50. 2500 points for the first re-buy, 2000 points for subsequent re-buys. The add-on costs €30 and buys 5000 chips. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: blonde17 on May 20, 2011, 11:15:44 AM Come on Andrew, let me have something. I can't very well use the limp-fold as my signature move now can I? You have for sooo Looong WHY CHANGE IT NOW?LoL. Just a thought Tom change the title to alone in the PARK ....as there never seems a time when you are actualy alone in this thread. GL anyways and see ya soon at a live event. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 11:50:11 AM Come on Andrew, let me have something. I can't very well use the limp-fold as my signature move now can I? You have for sooo Looong WHY CHANGE IT NOW?LoL. Just a thought Tom change the title to alone in the PARK ....as there never seems a time when you are actualy alone in this thread. GL anyways and see ya soon at a live event. Pete! Nice of you to pop in. How the devil are you? Pete & I go back a ways. He's old school. Get him on your table and you'll know about it. He's tougher than a 5 bob beef-steak and harder to shake than a 10lb maraca. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 20, 2011, 11:58:52 AM Out for minor cash again. I'm going to bag this puppy soon. Is it the old $20R in a different guise? It's a really unusual comp cost-wise Ralph. Buy in is €16.50 + €1.50 for 2500 points. Re-buys cost €16.50. 2500 points for the first re-buy, 2000 points for subsequent re-buys. The add-on costs €30 and buys 5000 chips. I'll have to come and have a little look as I've not been on Laddies for ages now, is it a 7pm start? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 12:00:35 PM Yes Ralph. Late reg for an hour.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: blonde17 on May 20, 2011, 12:28:19 PM [/quote] Pete! Nice of you to pop in. How the devil are you? Pete & I go back a ways. He's old school. Get him on your table and you'll know about it. He's tougher than a 5 bob beef-steak and harder to shake than a 10lb maraca. [/quote] Surviving...well slightly better than surviving, grinding a lowly livin here and there ...same old really! I see you are practicing a few new tricks...keep it up, and who knows one of us may crack (Bink) a big un yet! With Ralph here too it`s like a derby and joan poker thread...LoL Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 20, 2011, 12:46:40 PM You are right kiboshi. I had to prove to my stable that there is still value in these. However most of em will only play the 10 seats gtd in the last week both on line mon tues and live wed thurs friday That's all I'll be playing (the online ones). Haven't bothered with the 2-seat GTD sats. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 20, 2011, 12:52:52 PM You are right kiboshi. I had to prove to my stable that there is still value in these. However most of em will only play the 10 seats gtd in the last week both on line mon tues and live wed thurs friday That's all I'll be playing (the online ones). Haven't bothered with the 2-seat GTD sats. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 01:23:37 PM Haha. Just Dogged another one...
Real Money Raymi92 sitting in seat 1 with 1500.00 rommo47 sitting in seat 2 with 1310.00[Dealer] Noman sitting in seat 3 with 1440.00 RED-DOG sitting in seat 4 with 1500.00 djnck sitting in seat 5 with 1750.00 lopatostrelec sitting in seat 6 with 1500.00 Noman posted the small blind - 10.00 RED-DOG posted the big blind - 20.00 ** Dealing cards to RED-DOG: Kd, Kc djnck called - 20.00 lopatostrelec folded Raymi92 called - 20.00 rommo47 folded Noman called - 20.00 RED-DOG went all-in - 1480.00 djnck called - 1500.00 Raymi92 folded Noman folded RED-DOG shows: Kd, Kc djnck shows: 6s, 6h ** Dealing the flop: 10h, 7s, Qd ** Dealing the turn: 5s ** Dealing the river: 2h RED-DOG shows: Kd, Kc RED-DOG wins 3040.00 from the main pot Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 20, 2011, 01:25:59 PM these are genius shoves tom. how do you get called each time!?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 01:33:26 PM these are genius shoves tom. how do you get called each time!? It just looks like such a bad play. They can't believe I would do that with a monster, I mean, why? (They often type "Why?" into the chat box) I think they want to teach me a lesson. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 20, 2011, 01:42:54 PM these are genius shoves tom. how do you get called each time!? It just looks like such a bad play. They can't believe I would do that with a monster, I mean, why? (They often type "Why?" into the chat box) I think they want to teach me a lesson. I hope they get irony. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 01:47:10 PM I don't know about that. When they spike their set they type "lol muppet" or something similar.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: kinboshi on May 20, 2011, 02:14:34 PM I don't know about that. When they spike their set they type "lol muppet" or something similar. Aha, the old lesson-teaching/being pwnd/hitting the 2-outer merging trick. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 20, 2011, 02:41:02 PM Still, I get my are smacked with monotonous regularity, so mustn't get too full of myself. ;smackedbottom;
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 20, 2011, 06:27:48 PM >:(
Full Tilt Poker Game #30604916624: $23,000 Rush Guar (Rebuy) (237517072), Table 86 - 60/120 - No Limit Hold'em - 13:24:16 ET - 2011/05/20 Seat 1: kakiyo (5,310) Seat 2: Susannie (15,840) Seat 3: VDMHDC (3,000) Seat 4: Tommyknocker10 (11,566) Seat 5: MZama1990 (4,465) Seat 6: manoy1414 (10,027) Seat 7: Zaph-Beeblebrox (3,260) Seat 8: TaPPaJaAQ (4,854) Seat 9: IneedMoney1986 (20,857) Susannie posts the small blind of 60 VDMHDC posts the big blind of 120 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Susannie [As Kd] Tommyknocker10 has 8 seconds left to act Tommyknocker10 folds MZama1990 folds manoy1414 folds Zaph-Beeblebrox folds TaPPaJaAQ calls 120 IneedMoney1986 calls 120 kakiyo folds Susannie calls 60 VDMHDC raises to 3,000, and is all in TaPPaJaAQ folds IneedMoney1986 folds Susannie calls 2,880 VDMHDC shows [Kh Kc] Susannie shows [As Kd] *** FLOP *** [7s 4d 3h] *** TURN *** [7s 4d 3h] [5h] *** RIVER *** [7s 4d 3h 5h] [9h] VDMHDC shows a pair of Kings Susannie shows Ace King high VDMHDC wins the pot (6,240) with a pair of Kings Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 20, 2011, 06:32:53 PM Shoving with monsters is a pretty STD play in the tourneys I play. Rule number 1 in the ABC poker guide is idiots can't fold. And even more so in s rebuy comp because they have the excuse "it's a rebuy innit".
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 20, 2011, 06:33:40 PM Shoving with monsters is a pretty STD play in the tourneys I play. Rule number 1 in the ABC poker guide is idiots can't fold. And even more so in s rebuy comp because they have the excuse "it's a rebuy innit". U calling me an idiot? :o Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on May 20, 2011, 08:53:26 PM >:( Full Tilt Poker Game #30604916624: $23,000 Rush Guar (Rebuy) (237517072), Table 86 - 60/120 - No Limit Hold'em - 13:24:16 ET - 2011/05/20 Seat 1: kakiyo (5,310) Seat 2: Susannie (15,840) Seat 3: VDMHDC (3,000) Seat 4: Tommyknocker10 (11,566) Seat 5: MZama1990 (4,465) Seat 6: manoy1414 (10,027) Seat 7: Zaph-Beeblebrox (3,260) Seat 8: TaPPaJaAQ (4,854) Seat 9: IneedMoney1986 (20,857) Susannie posts the small blind of 60 VDMHDC posts the big blind of 120 The button is in seat #1 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Susannie [As Kd] Tommyknocker10 has 8 seconds left to act Tommyknocker10 folds MZama1990 folds manoy1414 folds Zaph-Beeblebrox folds TaPPaJaAQ calls 120 IneedMoney1986 calls 120 kakiyo folds Susannie calls 60 VDMHDC raises to 3,000, and is all in TaPPaJaAQ folds IneedMoney1986 folds Susannie calls 2,880 VDMHDC shows [Kh Kc] Susannie shows [As Kd] *** FLOP *** [7s 4d 3h] *** TURN *** [7s 4d 3h] [5h] *** RIVER *** [7s 4d 3h 5h] [9h] VDMHDC shows a pair of Kings Susannie shows Ace King high VDMHDC wins the pot (6,240) with a pair of Kings Since when is Ace high a monster? Your dogging technique needs work. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 20, 2011, 09:04:18 PM I think I might just have had enough chips to take a shot :kiss: Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Nakor on May 20, 2011, 10:59:44 PM I think I might just have had enough chips to take a shot :kiss: 25BB? that old bloke on the tele box on the channel up near babestation reckons you don't have to start shoving till 4bb, and he's on the tele so it must be true, do you need to read it in the daily mail before you stop this foolishness? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 12:08:29 AM I was reading this thread about to post how nice it is to hear from pete and get him to tell u the story of the triads (I think) that followed him to the car park in the Commerce in LA after he'd bad beat one of them (must have spiked a king?) when someone knocked on the door to say all the power was going off as they needed to fix something in an emergency.
So instead of reading my second favourite Blonde thread Alone in the Dark....I've been sat alone in the dark waiting for power. The power of negative thinking? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 12:18:08 AM I was reading this thread about to post how nice it is to hear from pete and get him to tell u the story of the triads (I think) that followed him to the car park in the Commerce in LA after he'd bad beat one of them (must have spiked a king?) when someone knocked on the door to say all the power was going off as they needed to fix something in an emergency. So instead of reading my second favourite Blonde thread Alone in the Dark....I've been sat alone in the dark waiting for power. The power of negative thinking? Hey Jeff. Speaking of tales, I was telling someone about the time we were on a GUKPT final table and you set that kid all in. He dwelled forever before finally pushing his chips forward, then you flipped over the nuts and he snatched his chips back. Remember that? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 12:24:04 AM lol no, can't remember the last time we played together tbh. That kinda thing happened but not at a final in blackpool once, I was sat beside Mickey who was eating pie n mash and was getting so into telling the floor what they should be doing he had peas and steak flying in his beard. Was that the one?
I'm a bit eager never to slowroll someone but I'm still not sure what the right thing was, in the end they got him to admit he was calling til he saw my hand, was like a good cop bad cop interrogation and he cracked and gave me his stack Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 12:29:09 AM lol no, can't remember the last time we played together tbh. That kinda thing happened but not at a final in blackpool once, I was sat beside Mickey who was eating pie n mash and was getting so into telling the floor what they should be doing he had peas and steak flying in his beard. Was that the one? I'm a bit eager never to slowroll someone but I'm still not sure what the right thing was, in the end they got him to admit he was calling til he saw my hand, was like a good cop bad cop interrogation and he cracked and gave me his stack That was the one. I'm sure it was at a GUKPT. I think it was the £300, not the ME. If not, what/where was it? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 12:44:00 AM yeh that was a side event in GUKPT but defo not a final, don't think I made the final, and I can picture which table it was in blackpool, defo not where they have final tables. Didn't realise u were there, that must be coming up for three years ago. Can't think of the lad's name, nice kid, decent player....and too honest under cross examination
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 12:51:49 AM yeh that was a side event in GUKPT but defo not a final, don't think I made the final, and I can picture which table it was in blackpool, defo not where they have final tables. Didn't realise u were there, that must be coming up for three years ago. Can't think of the lad's name, nice kid, decent player....and too honest under cross examination I think your wrong and it was a final, but perhaps not...... I remember Sam Tricket knocked me out somewhere around 7th. (I could be confusing two different comps here come to think of it). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 12:59:20 AM pretty sure you're confusing, or that maybe this happened earlier in the comp. I can remember getting up after it happened to tell a mate on another table. This is the comp you're on about, I'm obv down the pleasure beach while u boys are carving up the final :( http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/event.php?a=r&n=30770
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:04:28 AM pretty sure you're confusing, or that maybe this happened earlier in the comp. I can remember getting up after it happened to tell a mate on another table. This is the comp you're on about, I'm obv down the pleasure beach while u boys are carving up the final :( http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/event.php?a=r&n=30770 That's the one. Sam mutherfkin Tricket sucked out to bust me.... again!!!! :D Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:04:59 AM Last time we played together was a £300 or a £500 in Walsall.
Bill Shervington bluffed off a mountain of chips to you with no hand no draw..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 01:11:44 AM Yeh that Trickett will never get anywhere tho, u mark my words. It was? I haven't even been to Walsall in at least two years, dno who this Bill charachter is but I like the sound of him. He doesn't sound like an internet wizard but he has to know I always have it, us old guys always do
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:12:51 AM Reminder for Pete - Tell us about the Triads in the car park.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 21, 2011, 01:19:29 AM Reminder for Pete - Tell us about the Triads in the car park. Tells a great story does Pete, think it's all the time he has while passing in cash games. He's a black belt in something or other, and I don't mean the paying Channing's mortgage type, the proper mess with me and I'll kick your ass....but not if they're tooled up like a triad in a car parkTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:22:15 AM Yeh that Trickett will never get anywhere tho, u mark my words. It was? I haven't even been to Walsall in at least two years, dno who this Bill charachter is but I like the sound of him. He doesn't sound like an internet wizard but he has to know I always have it, us old guys always do Bill is an old guy. One of the oldest in fact. He's a great player, won all sorts. You would know him if you saw him. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:30:20 AM This is him
http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/player.php?a=r&n=1234 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:36:12 AM He made a great call to knock me out of this in 7th. He went on to finish second to Paul Maxwell.
Devilfish who was chippy for most of the final, finished 3rd. http://pokerdb.thehendonmob.com/event.php?a=r&n=1794 Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 01:38:27 AM Reminder for Pete - Tell us about the Triads in the car park. Tells a great story does Pete, think it's all the time he has while passing in cash games. He's a black belt in something or other, and I don't mean the paying Channing's mortgage type, the proper mess with me and I'll kick your ass....but not if they're tooled up like a triad in a car parkI was at a table in Sheffield (I think) with Pete when he almost got it on with a bloke called Gangster Dave. That would have been an interesting encounter. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: blonde17 on May 21, 2011, 03:17:10 AM You boys are sick!!
Black belt in what ? Oregami ?...Used to be reasonable at Taekwondo...but now I`m old, so give it a rest! Jeff, it was the Bike in LA, late 80s, and the rascals were Vietnamese pickpockets , went outside to retrieve around $100 met the rest of em who had fckn shooters, gave it up as a bad job.... not worth getting dead for $100! And Tom my run in was at Blackpool with a guy who is sadly no longer with us, and again.. when I found out who he was... not worth dying for. We ended up as mates after the incident, kind of mutual respect thing. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: I KNOW IT on May 21, 2011, 06:59:38 AM Yeh that Trickett will never get anywhere tho, u mark my words. It was? I haven't even been to Walsall in at least two years, dno who this Bill charachter is but I like the sound of him. He doesn't sound like an internet wizard but he has to know I always have it, us old guys always do Bill is an old guy. One of the oldest in fact. He's a great player, won all sorts. You would know him if you saw him. Unfortunately, Bill passed away last year Tom. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 08:21:29 AM You boys are sick!! Black belt in what ? Oregami ?...Used to be reasonable at Taekwondo...but now I`m old, so give it a rest! Jeff, it was the Bike in LA, late 80s, and the rascals were Vietnamese pickpockets , went outside to retrieve around $100 met the rest of em who had fckn shooters, gave it up as a bad job.... not worth getting dead for $100! And Tom my run in was at Blackpool with a guy who is sadly no longer with us, and again.. when I found out who he was... not worth dying for. We ended up as mates after the incident, kind of mutual respect thing. I knew who he was at the time. That's why I was making those faces at you. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 08:25:26 AM Yeh that Trickett will never get anywhere tho, u mark my words. It was? I haven't even been to Walsall in at least two years, dno who this Bill charachter is but I like the sound of him. He doesn't sound like an internet wizard but he has to know I always have it, us old guys always do Bill is an old guy. One of the oldest in fact. He's a great player, won all sorts. You would know him if you saw him. Unfortunately, Bill passed away last year Tom. Oh, I didn't know. That's one less true gentlemen in the game. You will be missed Bill. RIP Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 09:43:31 AM Been thinking about Jason's rantings re on-line satellites.
For smallish buy in events, say up to £300, (Live or on line) are they good value time investment wise? What I mean is, would I be better playing a $20 re-buy sat into a $200 event, or would I be be better off just playing a $20 re buy comp proper? If I play the comp and finish in the minor places, I will probably win enough for the entry fee. If I finish top 3, I will win a lot more.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: millidonk on May 21, 2011, 09:55:04 AM Been thinking about Jason's rantings re on-line satellites. For smallish buy in events, say up to £300, (Live or on line) are they good value time investment wise? What I mean is, would I be better playing a $20 re-buy sat into a $200 event, or would I be be better off just playing a $20 re buy comp proper? If I play the comp and finish in the minor places, I will probably win enough for the entry fee. If I finish top 3, I will win a lot more.... I see what you doing here, it sounds nice, but when you actually try it out, i think the MTTs would have a lot more and probs a lot more capable players making it X amount harder to get into the top 3s, obv the Sats would have smaller and what is perceived as generally more weaker fields. Maybe some Maths bod can do the workings out of the %more you would win in top 3 of the MTTs, by the % of times you would cash in them vs the % of Seats won or something. Variance in the MTTs would probs be too swingy imo. Would probs rather play 3 $10 MTTs or 4 $5. I don't know, its early, I could just be talking pish. That make any sense at all? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 10:05:04 AM Been thinking about Jason's rantings re on-line satellites. For smallish buy in events, say up to £300, (Live or on line) are they good value time investment wise? What I mean is, would I be better playing a $20 re-buy sat into a $200 event, or would I be be better off just playing a $20 re buy comp proper? If I play the comp and finish in the minor places, I will probably win enough for the entry fee. If I finish top 3, I will win a lot more.... I see what you doing here, it sounds nice, but when you actually try it out, i think the MTTs would have a lot more and probs a lot more capable players making it X amount harder to get into the top 3s, obv the Sats would have smaller and what is perceived as generally more weaker fields. Maybe some Maths bod can do the workings out of the %more you would win in top 3 of the MTTs, by the % of times you would cash in them vs the % of Seats won or something. Variance in the MTTs would probs be too swingy imo. Would probs rather play 3 $10 MTTs or 4 $5. I don't know, its early, I could just be talking pish. That make any sense at all? Yes it does. That's the other side of the quandary. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 10:11:13 AM Mickey who was eating pie n mash and was getting so into telling the floor what they should be doing he had peas and steak flying in his beard. Thought about this line while I was in bed last night and couldn't stop laughing. Good job I was alone, I must have sounded like a mental case. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 21, 2011, 10:38:43 AM Shoving with monsters is a pretty STD play in the tourneys I play. Rule number 1 in the ABC poker guide is idiots can't fold. And even more so in s rebuy comp because they have the excuse "it's a rebuy innit". U calling me an idiot? :o Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 21, 2011, 11:04:16 AM Been thinking about Jason's rantings re on-line satellites. For smallish buy in events, say up to £300, (Live or on line) are they good value time investment wise? What I mean is, would I be better playing a $20 re-buy sat into a $200 event, or would I be be better off just playing a $20 re buy comp proper? If I play the comp and finish in the minor places, I will probably win enough for the entry fee. If I finish top 3, I will win a lot more.... I see what you doing here, it sounds nice, but when you actually try it out, i think the MTTs would have a lot more and probs a lot more capable players making it X amount harder to get into the top 3s, obv the Sats would have smaller and what is perceived as generally more weaker fields. Maybe some Maths bod can do the workings out of the %more you would win in top 3 of the MTTs, by the % of times you would cash in them vs the % of Seats won or something. Variance in the MTTs would probs be too swingy imo. Would probs rather play 3 $10 MTTs or 4 $5. I don't know, its early, I could just be talking pish. That make any sense at all? most ot the tournies i play live i have won a seat to but as i have probably said before (sorry for being repetative jeff) i judge my success on the results of my pupils. i can take a kid who cant even spell poker and after a few lessons can play ABC and that holds him in good stead from home/pub games through casino small re buys and upto and including DTD deepstacks and ukipts. i think i may have to put my money were my mouth is and look at playing dtd sats 10 seats gtd on line on the monday/tues and live wed/thurs. cant make friday coz its alisters birthday but will return saturday for the deepstack. george geary taught me that the most important thing in poker is winning. make sure you prove that you are a winner by getting paid. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 11:09:54 AM Do you think this applies to online sats in general or just DTD sats?
Do you play other satellites, like the WSOP or EPT ones on Stars for instance? Do you play sats into online comps? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 21, 2011, 11:16:40 AM Do you think this applies to online sats in general or just DTD sats? lol trying to get off this gotta go to scarborough.... not ept the std is too good with all these young guns trying to get there on the cheap. wsop/irish open defo soft and the live sats for these are ridic soft imo...ukipts are easy on stars as you are up against poor p[layers as the superstars are just buying in direct to this....not played online tournies for years but may occasionally play an odd sunday million and will sat into it without too much trouble. when i was playing full time on line i would just buy in to all the torunies i played.Do you play other satellites, like the WSOP or EPT ones on Stars for instance? Do you play sats into online comps? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 11:18:41 AM Right oh.
You can go now. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: blonde17 on May 21, 2011, 11:43:47 AM Do you think this applies to online sats in general or just DTD sat lol trying to get off this gotta go to scarborough.... not ept the std is too good with all these young guns trying to get there on the cheap. wsop/irish open defo soft and the live sats for these are ridic soft imo...ukipts are easy on stars as you are up against poor p[layers as the superstars are just buying in direct to this....not played online tournies for years but may occasionally play an odd sunday million and will sat into it without too much trouble. when i was playing full time on line i would just buy in to all the torunies i played.Errr TOM, is this guy THE GOD OF POKER? Or is it the guy I sat next to at DTD 300 last month , nice enough and well meaning... but never shuts up! He sure makes this poker lark sound pretty dam easy....I must be missing something. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 11:45:15 AM I'm experimenting with 6 man stts speeds today.
Normal - blinds increase every 10 hands. Super turbo - Every 5 hands. Extreme - Every 2 hands. Technique obv varies depending which I play, but I have a feeling that the Extreme is more beatable. Players seem to make such horrible mistakes. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 21, 2011, 11:48:40 AM I'm experimenting with 6 man stts speeds today. Normal - blinds increase every 10 hands. Super turbo - Every 5 hands. Extreme - Every 2 hands. Technique obv varies depending which I play, but I have a feeling that the Extreme is more beatable. Players seem to make such horrible mistakes. Do the extremes have a 150/300 level? ;D Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 11:48:51 AM Errr TOM, is this guy THE GOD OF POKER? Or is it the guy I sat next to at DTD 300 last month , nice enough and well meaning... but never shuts up! He sure makes this poker lark sound pretty dam easy....I must be missing something. Actually, he is the God of poker Pete, he told me so himself. ;) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 11:49:36 AM I'm experimenting with 6 man stts speeds today. Normal - blinds increase every 10 hands. Super turbo - Every 5 hands. Extreme - Every 2 hands. Technique obv varies depending which I play, but I have a feeling that the Extreme is more beatable. Players seem to make such horrible mistakes. Do the extremes have a 150/300 level? ;D Lol. Behave yourself. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 21, 2011, 12:06:23 PM Errr TOM, is this guy THE GOD OF POKER? Or is it the guy I sat next to at DTD 300 last month , nice enough and well meaning... but never shuts up! He sure makes this poker lark sound pretty dam easy....I must be missing something. Actually, he is the God of poker Pete, he told me so himself. ;) No I never lol. On the road now. Was I sat next to blonde Tom? Certain not at the start coz it was cam law n a young gun. Possibly late day 1 or day 2..... Did have a pleasant old boy with a sahara chip next to me at some point. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: blonde17 on May 21, 2011, 12:36:32 PM Errr TOM, is this guy THE GOD OF POKER? Or is it the guy I sat next to at DTD 300 last month , nice enough and well meaning... but never shuts up! He sure makes this poker lark sound pretty dam easy....I must be missing something. Actually, he is the God of poker Pete, he told me so himself. ;) No I never lol. On the road now. Was I sat next to blonde Tom? Certain not at the start coz it was cam law n a young gun. Possibly late day 1 or day 2..... Did have a pleasant old boy with a sahara chip next to me at some point. If so we did sit next to each other late on day 1. If not apologies as we didn`t Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 12:41:08 PM Errr TOM, is this guy THE GOD OF POKER? Or is it the guy I sat next to at DTD 300 last month , nice enough and well meaning... but never shuts up! He sure makes this poker lark sound pretty dam easy....I must be missing something. Actually, he is the God of poker Pete, he told me so himself. ;) No I never lol. On the road now. Was I sat next to blonde Tom? Certain not at the start coz it was cam law n a young gun. Possibly late day 1 or day 2..... Did have a pleasant old boy with a sahara chip next to me at some point. If so we did sit next to each other late on day 1. If not apologies as we didn`t ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ (http://hadrian6in6.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/smashie-and-nicey1.jpg) (You have to be of a certain age to make sense of this reference) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on May 21, 2011, 02:39:15 PM Extremes are going to have lower obtainable rois just due to the nature of the beast. The games are so quick that any natural edge you have, just won't have enough time to be used to its full power. It is bit like the way the earth is shaped, it needs pressure and time for the water to cut through the rock.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 02:45:32 PM Extremes are going to have lower obtainable rois just due to the nature of the beast. The games are so quick that any natural edge you have, just won't have enough time to be used to its full power. It is bit like the way the earth is shaped, it needs pressure and time for the water to cut through the rock. I understand perfectly and by and large I agree. But the really dreadful plays made by the Extreme players do compensate to some extent. I'm not sure it's exploitable, but it's worth exploring. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 03:23:28 PM Satellite campaign of to a decent start. €190 + €10 seat. wiiiiiiii
(http://i56.tinypic.com/sqp3k8.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: pokerfan on May 21, 2011, 03:30:30 PM Satellite campaign of to a decent start. €190 + €10 seat. wiiiiiiii ;applause; Can you take cash or t money on there ? (http://i56.tinypic.com/sqp3k8.jpg) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 03:32:27 PM Don't think so.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on May 21, 2011, 03:33:12 PM Satellite campaign of to a decent start. €190 + €10 seat. wiiiiiiii (http://i56.tinypic.com/sqp3k8.jpg) Meh, you came 2nd, try harder. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 09:10:57 PM Blimey.
I think I just made balls up. Satellite. I had 17000 chips, blinds 125/250 10 players left, 5 seats. ave stack 13000 ish I ran KK into AA twice is consecutive hands, all in pre. Lost 7.5k on the first one. Both times I am re- raise and push all in. Mistake? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 21, 2011, 09:13:55 PM Blimey. I think I just made balls up. Satellite. I had 17000 chips, blinds 125/250 10 players left, 5 seats. ave stack 13000 ish I ran KK into AA twice is consecutive hands, all in pre. Lost 7.5k on the first one. Both times I am re- raise and push all in. Mistake? no - 26 k for a seat so you are a long way short and 5 from the money - played it fine Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: gatso on May 21, 2011, 09:43:22 PM not even close to shutting up shop time, get it in with yer KK everytime there
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 21, 2011, 09:48:10 PM Cheers guys.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 08:54:05 AM Today I will be mostly mixing poker with my chores. So basically it will be do a job, play a stt, do a job, play a... well you get the idea.
Then, at 3pm. I'm gonna down tools altogether and play the biggie that I satted into yesterday. Wiiiiiiii. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 05:33:22 PM Today I will be mostly mixing poker with my chores. So basically it will be do a job, play a stt, do a job, play a... well you get the idea. Then, at 3pm. I'm gonna down tools altogether and play the biggie that I satted into yesterday. Wiiiiiiii. Got absolutely mullered in the €30k. All in with the best hand 3 times...... Ho hum ;marks; Contemplating playing the €100k gtd €100 + 10 rebuy. (rebuys cost €55) This comp has been introduced recently so it's new to me, but the structure is great. Thinking of risking €275 max spend ;carlocitrone; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Karabiner on May 22, 2011, 05:37:23 PM Today I will be mostly mixing poker with my chores. So basically it will be do a job, play a stt, do a job, play a... well you get the idea. Then, at 3pm. I'm gonna down tools altogether and play the biggie that I satted into yesterday. Wiiiiiiii. Got absolutely mullered in the €30k. All in with the best hand 3 times...... Ho hum ;marks; Contemplating playing the €100k gtd €100 + 10 rebuy. (rebuys cost €55) This comp has been introduced recently so it's new to me, but the structure is great. Thinking of risking €275 max spend ;carlocitrone; I'll put a few extra spuds on if you want to bring your lappy round here for a bit of roast beef. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 05:40:35 PM Today I will be mostly mixing poker with my chores. So basically it will be do a job, play a stt, do a job, play a... well you get the idea. Then, at 3pm. I'm gonna down tools altogether and play the biggie that I satted into yesterday. Wiiiiiiii. Got absolutely mullered in the €30k. All in with the best hand 3 times...... Ho hum ;marks; Contemplating playing the €100k gtd €100 + 10 rebuy. (rebuys cost €55) This comp has been introduced recently so it's new to me, but the structure is great. Thinking of risking €275 max spend ;carlocitrone; I'll put a few extra spuds on if you want to bring your lappy round here for a bit of roast beef. Bloody Hell Ralph, that's a great offer. Unfortunately, I have to stay in tonight, I'm holding a key that someone is coming to collect. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 07:26:09 PM Today I will be mostly mixing poker with my chores. So basically it will be do a job, play a stt, do a job, play a... well you get the idea. Then, at 3pm. I'm gonna down tools altogether and play the biggie that I satted into yesterday. Wiiiiiiii. Got absolutely mullered in the €30k. All in with the best hand 3 times...... Ho hum ;marks; Contemplating playing the €100k gtd €100 + 10 rebuy. (rebuys cost €55) This comp has been introduced recently so it's new to me, but the structure is great. Thinking of risking €275 max spend ;carlocitrone; I'm wondering if it's better to wait until the end of the registration period (I hour) before buying in. You see you first €100 +10 buys 3000 points, subsequent €55 re buys are 2000 points, but the €55 add on is 5000 points. It would be a shame to bust before the add on. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 08:03:54 PM Decided to enter before the break in the end. Took the re-buy straight away and then made it to the add on without indecent.
In for €220 total. gl me. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Claw75 on May 22, 2011, 08:10:09 PM gl you!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 08:33:44 PM Lost a 14k pot.
Down to 3.2k and grinding like a set of ill fitting dentures. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 08:41:28 PM 2k.....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 22, 2011, 09:16:25 PM Out. Bugger!
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 24, 2011, 06:35:04 PM So no real binkage over the weekend, but on the plus side I did manage to fund my buy-ins (Just about) with my 6 man STT winnings.
I had a dream last night that I bought a new lap top poker, and when I used it for the first time I noticed a button in the middle of the keyboard with "T entry" on it in red letters. When I pressed it, it entered me into tournaments, even on sites where I wasn't registered or had no funds. Every so often, a pop-up would say "Warning! Button Expires in 24 Hours...." "Warning! Button Expires in 23 Hours...." and so on. I was playing everything I could find, but I couldn't make the money in anything. I was playing terribly and I couldn't concentrate because I had too many tables open. To make matters worse, I was having a debate on here about the ethics of it all.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 24, 2011, 06:49:21 PM lol
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on May 24, 2011, 06:53:29 PM To make matters worse, I was having a debate on here about the ethics of it all.... wow u don't remember? This all really happened - Ironside deleted it all tho as he also had a "red button laptop" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 25, 2011, 07:41:35 AM I'm developing a theory, it goes like this...
The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longines on May 25, 2011, 07:59:24 AM I think you're right to a degree but it's a bell curve. The question is which stakes are at the top of the curve?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on May 25, 2011, 11:50:04 AM The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. Moving up so they respect my backraises Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 25, 2011, 11:55:18 AM I'm developing a theory, it goes like this... The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. its a good theory - you just gotta hold...................... everytime! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 25, 2011, 12:17:17 PM I'm developing a theory, it goes like this... its always been the same sir. totally agree with this but the best players adapt. if you sit at a table of like minded rocks then you open up your own game to take advavtage of your table. conversely if you are sat at a table of players firing off like a gatling gun we sit and wait to let our cannon off and blow em away. each player is unique and each hand different. if we pidgeon hole too much then our game becomes weak and exploitable. ha ha says me who treats everyone like an idiot until proved otherwise :)The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 26, 2011, 09:07:01 AM Over the last 20 hours playing two tables 6 man stt's I'm €200 up.
That's €10 Ph. (About €5ph more than I'm qualified to earn). Can I sustain this level of success? In other words, can I crush the game at this level? How big a sample size do I need? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Longy on May 26, 2011, 11:26:19 AM Over the last 20 hours playing two tables 6 man stt's I'm €200 up. That's €10 Ph. (About €5ph more than I'm qualified to earn). Can I sustain this level of success? In other words, can I crush the game at this level? How big a sample size do I need? So you have played about 50? Multiply that by 40 and you have a decent(ish) sample. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 27, 2011, 02:51:52 PM How I laughed.....
** Hand # 3927339838 starting - 2011-05-27 14:49:00 ** [Sit & Go Hold'em] (10|20 NL - STT) Real Money MG70 sitting in seat 1 with 1500.00 Yipeekayay sitting in seat 2 with 1500.00 heino7 sitting in seat 3 with 1500.00 Bindinindi sitting in seat 4 with 1500.00 Fethiyespor sitting in seat 5 with 1500.00 RED-DOG sitting in seat 6 with 1500.00[Dealer] MG70 posted the small blind - 10.00 Yipeekayay posted the big blind - 20.00 ** Dealing cards to RED-DOG: Kc, Ac heino7 folded Bindinindi folded Fethiyespor raised to 60.00 RED-DOG raised to 180.00 MG70 folded Yipeekayay folded Fethiyespor called - 180.00 ** Dealing the flop: 6s, 8c, 6c Fethiyespor checked RED-DOG went all-in - 1320.00 Fethiyespor went all-in - 1320.00 Fethiyespor shows: 9c, 7c RED-DOG shows: Kc, Ac ** Dealing the turn: Qs ** Dealing the river: 5c Fethiyespor wins 3030.00 from the main pot Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 27, 2011, 02:55:03 PM Ooooooh!
Just ran that through my ready reckoner. It was much closer than I thought. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 27, 2011, 02:56:02 PM norrrrrrrrr you beat me to it
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt 990 games 0.005 secs 198,000 games/sec Board: 8c 6c 6s Dead: equity win tie pots won pots tied Hand 0: 56.212% 55.76% 00.45% 552 4.50 { AcKc } Hand 1: 43.788% 43.33% 00.45% 429 4.50 { 9c7c } --- Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 27, 2011, 03:01:15 PM Mind you, they're all idiots on here....
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: Woodsey on May 27, 2011, 03:03:05 PM Mind you, they're all idiots on here.... Give up your job and play for a living imo, a couple of hundred quid a day should be easy..... ;whistle; Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 27, 2011, 04:03:38 PM Mind you, they're all idiots on here.... Give up your job and play for a living imo, a couple of hundred quid a day should be easy..... ;whistle; Just reached my target of 20 buy ins. (Which allows me to move up a level). Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: JaffaCake on May 27, 2011, 04:12:15 PM I'm developing a theory, it goes like this... There's a 600-1200 game running at the Aria apparently, staking thread ftw?The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 27, 2011, 04:14:30 PM I'm developing a theory, it goes like this... There's a 600-1200 game running at the Aria apparently, staking thread ftw?The higher the stakes, the more likely the players will be loose / aggressive / lairy / creative, call it what you will... The more likely it is that plodding donkey, old bloke stylee poker will make a profit. Just let me rev up my pacemaker & find my bicycle clips.... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 28, 2011, 12:13:42 PM Taking shots.......
I've been playing €10 STT's, but I accidentally reg'd for a €100 one. Didn't realise until after it started. ;oopsy; Came 2nd. Phew! ::) Made my heart beat faster though..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: mondatoo on May 28, 2011, 12:19:39 PM Taking shots....... I've been playing €10 STT's, but I accidentally reg'd for a €100 one. Didn't realise until after it started. ;oopsy; Came 2nd. Phew! ::) Made my heart beat faster though..... Run better :) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 28, 2011, 12:40:47 PM Taking shots....... been telling alex a similar thing to this. all these superstars playing at the top level have it easy. get em back down to playing at our level and the idiots we have to deal with, then see how their results are. :)I've been playing €10 STT's, but I accidentally reg'd for a €100 one. Didn't realise until after it started. ;oopsy; Came 2nd. Phew! ::) Made my heart beat faster though..... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 29, 2011, 12:51:30 PM Huge downswong..... Can't win a hand...... Dropped back down a level...... Gone below 10 buy-ins......... Surely going busto now......
(http://asalmasperdidas.files.wordpress.com/2007/07/help-me.jpg?w=450) Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 29, 2011, 08:25:21 PM Dogging.
** Hand # 3930625054 starting - 2011-05-29 20:21:59 ** [Sit & Go Hold'em] (10|20 NL - STT) Real Money Rockis sitting in seat 1 with 1510.00 jobbe_6 sitting in seat 2 with 1530.00 Mustalaine sitting in seat 3 with 1530.00 RED-DOG sitting in seat 4 with 1490.00 cantona2243 sitting in seat 5 with 1470.00 Russian73 sitting in seat 6 with 1470.00[Dealer] Rockis posted the small blind - 10.00 jobbe_6 posted the big blind - 20.00 ** Dealing cards to RED-DOG: Kh, Kd Mustalaine called - 20.00 RED-DOG went all-in - 1490.00 cantona2243 folded Russian73 folded Rockis folded jobbe_6 called - 1490.00 Mustalaine folded jobbe_6 shows: As, Ks RED-DOG shows: Kh, Kd ** Dealing the flop: 3h, Jd, 2h ** Dealing the turn: Ah ** Dealing the river: 6s RED-DOG shows: Kh, Kd jobbe_6 wins 3010.00 from the main pot Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 29, 2011, 08:35:03 PM 50p
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 29, 2011, 08:36:57 PM Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 29, 2011, 08:50:44 PM (http://www.ukhairdressers.com/carol/skint.jpg)
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 30, 2011, 09:11:47 PM Had a good day online (By my standards) so having a pop at the DTD sat...
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on May 30, 2011, 09:17:04 PM Had a good day online (By my standards) so having a pop at the DTD sat... get thereeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 30, 2011, 09:19:46 PM Been stacked already, but feel optimistic.... ish
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 30, 2011, 10:25:55 PM None event really. Didn't find a playable hand, shipped 7 bigs, missed.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on May 31, 2011, 12:21:05 AM What's a none event please, Tom?
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 31, 2011, 12:30:02 AM What's a none event please, Tom? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonevent Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 10:50:21 AM What's a none event please, Tom? http://www.thefreedictionary.com/nonevent Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on May 31, 2011, 11:11:12 AM scunthorpe mum finds out how to turn her yellow teeth white for less than £2... Is that per tooth? If so, I know a few sunny Scunny mums who could get all their teeth done for less than a fiver. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on May 31, 2011, 11:13:59 AM scunthorpe mum finds out how to turn her yellow teeth white for less than £2... Is that per tooth? If so, I know a few sunny Scunny mums who could get all their teeth done for less than a fiver. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on June 02, 2011, 05:09:25 PM (http://www.ukhairdressers.com/carol/skint.jpg) Managed to get my metaphorical arse out of the ditch before I went completely bustarama. At £405.40 my online br is now off the respirator. Wheezing, but breathing unassisted. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: doubleup on June 03, 2011, 11:36:34 PM what the hell site is this....just gone on it.....scunthorpe mum finds out how to turn her yellow teeth white for less than £2...and best of all unemployed scunthorpe mum makes £57 an hour working from home. i bet she bloody does but this requires two punters and she is on quick turn around The internet thinks you are a Scunthorpe mum and is telling you what it thinks a Scunthorpe mum wants to hear. For some reason it thinks I'm a Tadcaster woman. Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on June 03, 2011, 11:38:22 PM what the hell site is this....just gone on it.....scunthorpe mum finds out how to turn her yellow teeth white for less than £2...and best of all unemployed scunthorpe mum makes £57 an hour working from home. i bet she bloody does but this requires two punters and she is on quick turn around The internet thinks you are a Scunthorpe mum and is telling you what it thinks a Scunthorpe mum wants to hear. For some reason it thinks I'm a Tadcaster woman. I know. It's crazy. That link was to a dictionary page giving the definition of "None event" Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 03, 2011, 11:42:10 PM My laptop is running a lot slower as well. It ain't an Internet virus is it coz I much prefer to catch live viruses
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on June 03, 2011, 11:44:17 PM Live viruses are idiots.
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on June 04, 2011, 05:35:27 PM Online br up to a staggering £731.25.
(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zb4bMDH-iJo/Sw60cUGFTkI/AAAAAAAAACY/CIqWiO9aJoQ/s320/fatWomanSittingOnMan.png) Crushing!!! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 04, 2011, 07:49:48 PM Online br up to a staggering £731.25. Lol. Whatever floats you boat. Afaik she lives in scunthorpe(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zb4bMDH-iJo/Sw60cUGFTkI/AAAAAAAAACY/CIqWiO9aJoQ/s320/fatWomanSittingOnMan.png) Crushing!!! Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: cambridgealex on June 05, 2011, 01:44:08 AM Online br up to a staggering £731.25. Lol. Whatever floats you boat. Afaik she lives in scunthorpe(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zb4bMDH-iJo/Sw60cUGFTkI/AAAAAAAAACY/CIqWiO9aJoQ/s320/fatWomanSittingOnMan.png) Crushing!!! who's that poor chap your wife is sitting on Jason? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 05, 2011, 03:03:04 AM Online br up to a staggering £731.25. Lol. Whatever floats you boat. Afaik she lives in scunthorpe(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zb4bMDH-iJo/Sw60cUGFTkI/AAAAAAAAACY/CIqWiO9aJoQ/s320/fatWomanSittingOnMan.png) Crushing!!! who's that poor chap your wife is sitting on Jason? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 05, 2011, 07:22:22 AM Online br up to a staggering £731.25. Lol. Whatever floats you boat. Afaik she lives in scunthorpe(http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_zb4bMDH-iJo/Sw60cUGFTkI/AAAAAAAAACY/CIqWiO9aJoQ/s320/fatWomanSittingOnMan.png) Mrs h here. Sorry but that's just incredibly rude and hurtful. Insult mr Bertie all u want he's on here dishin it everyday he's fair game. But me? You av no idea who I am n I hope I never get t meet u either. It's not funny at all Crushing!!! who's that poor chap your wife is sitting on Jason? Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 05, 2011, 08:23:21 AM hey babe just seen this. you sound like a plastic gangster with your "you av no idea who i am line". i will bring you to dtd one time and you can sit in the £1/£2 game with alex then you can show him crushing. bed at 4 am woke up fully alert at 6.30 am. just as if the boys were jumping on me lol
Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: smashedagain on June 05, 2011, 09:21:37 AM hey babe just seen this. you sound like a plastic gangster with your "you av no idea who i am line". i will bring you to dtd one time and you can sit in the £1/£2 game with alex then you can show him crushing. bed at 4 am woke up fully alert at 6.30 am. just as if the boys were jumping on me lol Meant it in a u don't know me or anything about me way not gangster!!! Lol!!! Kids were up at 6.30 lol at work now so chat later xxTitle: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: RED-DOG on June 05, 2011, 10:46:48 AM Just been watching Harrison Ford in "Firewall"
Script writers take note. NEVER call one of your main characters Cox. It spoils all the dialogue. Have you seen Cox? Do you know where to find Cox? Did Cox hurt you? I want you to hold on to Cox...... Title: Re: Alone in the Dark - The poker musings of an also ran Post by: outragous76 on June 05, 2011, 03:27:54 PM I learnt the hard way to not insult someones wife, even if it was a joke!
Just simply dont know who it'll be taken! |