Ladjokes

Royal Flush

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 22972

Booooccccceeeeeee

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2007, 12:00:39 PM »

Maybe you are just not a very good player?


	Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!

MrsBar

Probation

Offline

Posts: 8

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #31 on: February 19, 2007, 12:01:22 PM »

Quote from: barhell on February 19, 2007, 11:40:31 AM

Quote from: SupaMonkey on February 19, 2007, 11:38:25 AM

Can some1 make a chauvinistic joke to justify the title of the thread

Why do women get married in white?
No prizes for first correct answer.
Judges decision is final.
No correspondence will be entered into.

Would it be something to do with kitchen appliances


	Logged

barhell

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1418

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #32 on: February 19, 2007, 12:52:17 PM »

Quote from: MrsBar on February 19, 2007, 12:01:22 PM

Quote from: barhell on February 19, 2007, 11:40:31 AM

Quote from: SupaMonkey on February 19, 2007, 11:38:25 AM

Can some1 make a chauvinistic joke to justify the title of the thread

Why do women get married in white?
No prizes for first correct answer.
Judges decision is final.
No correspondence will be entered into.

Would it be something to do with kitchen appliances

I missed a rule family members are not eligible for entry.


	Logged

I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
Douglas Adams

SupaMonkey

Sr. Member

Offline

Posts: 985

Allin!

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #33 on: February 19, 2007, 02:21:41 PM »

Quote from: Royal Flush on February 19, 2007, 12:00:39 PM

Maybe you are just not a very good player?

In a good mood today?


	Logged

Royal Flush

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 22972

Booooccccceeeeeee

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #34 on: February 19, 2007, 02:41:06 PM »

Quote from: SupaMonkey on February 19, 2007, 02:21:41 PM

Quote from: Royal Flush on February 19, 2007, 12:00:39 PM

Maybe you are just not a very good player?

In a good mood today?

No it's just my standard response to players who think online poker is bent. Usually because they are capable of beating the local £10 rebuy they think they are good, when infact online they are playing better players.


	Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!

SupaMonkey

Sr. Member

Offline

Posts: 985

Allin!

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #35 on: February 19, 2007, 02:51:53 PM »

Yer reckon? Have you ever played against Kev in a blonde tourney when he's got the lever.


	Logged

kinboshi

ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 44302

We go again.

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #36 on: February 19, 2007, 03:02:07 PM »

Playing in a tourney last night on PokerStars (1,000+ runners), and with about 110 left I get crippled down to about 2,000 chips which is 2xBB. Oh yes, I'm in the BB next hand. Hoping for a monster, instead I get 48o. Nice.

I push all-in, and get 4 callers! So I'm out of my virtual chair. Flop comes 4K3 - so I reckon I'm dead. One of the players raises, gets one caller, and they check to the river. They both show AQ and I quintuple up (is that a word?). So I'm still short-stacked but back from the dead. Then I get the best run of cards I've ever seen, I outdraw when I'm behind, hold when I'm ahead, and somehow manage to get to the final table.

Due to the structure, even when I manage to get the chip lead, I'm still short-stacked and so it's going to come down to a lot of luck. My QQ came up against KK, and then I lost a few close ones to go out in 6th. My Dad was watching and said 'unlucky' via MSN. I replied that I'd had more luck going my way in that tourney than I've ever had before. But it's the QQ v KK that stood out as being 'unfortunate'. If I'd had the kings, or a different hand, who knows - maybe I'd have won it?

I'm not going to linger on that at all. I had no right to still be in the tournament at that stage, I know that I was the lucky one. I'm going to make sure I remember this one the next time I'm bemoaning the cards I'm dealt and my next bad beat.


	Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'

Nem

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 9500

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #37 on: February 19, 2007, 03:25:38 PM »

Online poker is rigged thread # 1,923,412 - LOL

BigTomotoes, did you see the 9/11 conspiracies program on BBC2 last night?


	Logged

Eck

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 3304

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #38 on: February 19, 2007, 03:27:35 PM »

Quote from: Nemesis on February 19, 2007, 03:25:38 PM

Online poker is rigged thread # 1,923,412 - LOL

BigTomotoes, did you see the 9/11 conspiracies program on BBC2 last night?

Don't tell me! it was the same guys who built the laddies rng


	Logged

kinboshi

ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 44302

We go again.

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #39 on: February 19, 2007, 03:28:13 PM »

Quote from: Eck on February 19, 2007, 03:27:35 PM

Quote from: Nemesis on February 19, 2007, 03:25:38 PM

Online poker is rigged thread # 1,923,412 - LOL

BigTomotoes, did you see the 9/11 conspiracies program on BBC2 last night?

Don't tell me! it was the same guys who built the laddies rng

Yes, on the grassy knoll.


	Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'

thetank

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 19284

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #40 on: February 19, 2007, 03:30:50 PM »

No-one is 100% sure that Colchester Kev isn't a girl.


	Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.

kinboshi

ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 44302

We go again.

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2007, 03:32:08 PM »

Quote from: thetank on February 19, 2007, 03:30:50 PM

No-one is 100% sure that Colchester Kev isn't a girl.

~~He's a bloody ugly one if he is.~~

She's a bloody ugly one if she is.


	Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'

barhell

Hero Member

Offline

Posts: 1418

Re: Ladjokes

« Reply #42 on: February 19, 2007, 03:33:12 PM »

I saw a conspiracies programme yesterday that stated the titanic never sunk it was in fact the olympic which sunk(never heard of this one before but i'm convinced it was the aliens that did it now)