MikkyT - We get the truth from the BBC

[Poppet7]

I don't think he meant it like that. Just wondering what the hell he could've done to get 6 years. I wouldn't know if that's a short or long sentence, but people seem to be shocked it's so long.

[thediceman]

And some of us are shocked it's not much longer. He could potentially be out in 3 years, hope he doesn't plan to come to bb15. 

[I KNOW IT]

I don't think he meant it like that. Just wondering what the hell he could've done to get 6 years. I wouldn't know if that's a short or long sentence, but people seem to be shocked it's so long.

I was agreeing with smithy, but you are way off if you think people are shocked at it being so long, they are shocked he only
got 6 yrs.The bastard should have got life.
Could it be for the sake of the 2 children in the effort for them to try and get over this horrendous ordeal that the exact details were ommited from the news,thankfully.

[dan]

WOW, its sick. its bad enough what he has done but to then ask for pictures of kids to be posted i think is getting everybody even more angry/pissed off because it means he has used blonde. Im not even sure if what im writing makes sense.

I honestly cant remember if i posted any of my kids, i hope not.

Suzanne, the guy pleaded GUILTY in court to sexual assaults/attacks or whatever it was what more do you need to know, I dont think 6 years is enough, the kids involved will probably be suffering longer that.


on a side issue why is sofa king leaving

[KingPoker]

WOW, its sick. its bad enough what he has done but to then ask for pictures of kids to be posted i think is getting everybody even more angry/pissed off because it means he has used blonde. Im not even sure if what im writing makes sense.

I honestly cant remember if i posted any of my kids, i hope not.

Suzanne, the guy pleaded GUILTY in court to sexual assaults/attacks or whatever it was what more do you need to know, I dont think 6 years is enough, the kids involved will probably be suffering longer that.


on a side issue why is sofa king leaving

He's not he thinks he is but noone is going to let him so its all in his head!! >:?

[Graham C]

If you have posted pics of your kids, they were posted for the right reasons and posted because you were proud of them   As The Camel said earlier, we stick them up because from time to time, they do things that are amazing and they should be shared.   For this to stop us sharing out proudest moments would be wrong.

Not sure about Sofa, but his latest artwork is the bet yet

[Sark79]

There was a guy on R5 recently, he was from one of the police units who work to track these kinds of people down.  Anyway, he said that it is possible to click on a link by accident, however if it happens more than a few times then it must be deliberate. He said, you have to be actively looking for these things.  Mikky MUST have been looking for this stuff, there can't have been any error if you read what the papers said .

[ariston]

Just read this whole thread with a tear in my eye. My son Jakob is 8 and is my entire reason for being and if anyone was to ever hurt him the only trial would be mine.

 Whatever Mikky has done he will not have a "soft" term and will not be up for parole after the 2-3 years as everyone expects, quite a high % of these scumbags don't ever make it out of jail after taking the easy option and doing themselves in (one can only pray he does to save any other children's lives from being ruined on his release). Whenever he gets near any of the general population he will be spat on, slapped,knifed (if they get chance) as nonces are the lowest denominator and a kind of unwritten rule between the other prisoners to make his life as miserable as possible whenever they get chance.

Poppet you have been daft in covering for a mate but I am 100% sure you didn't know about what he had been up to.

Suzanne - your comments disgust me and I like IFM always say it as I see it. My ex wife has had various "friends" since our divorce and if any of them "slapped" Jakob on his legs with wire, held his head under water or stood on his head then they would get exactly the same back from me and I'm the best part of 19 stone and 6ft 4 so you wouldn't want me standing on your head. I also would be likely to keep holding their head under the water. Playfull/ boisterous fighting? WTF? Are you really saying that that is acceptable? If you are I really hope you don't have or ever have kids yourself. 6 years IMO is about the tenth anyone harming/sexually abusing kids deserves- they should never see the light of day again and should never be allowed the chance to get near another child.

I am sorry for spoiling a "nice debate" Tikay but I am disgusted anybody could even think, "whats he got 6 years for". Remember people like Huntley and many others like him started with small inappropriate things that some would consider acceptable but most sane people would see as a warning. Those poor kids Mikyt has abused will never have a normal childhood and will live the rest of their lives with the mental scars, some of the kids abused by him may even turn into the abusers themselves in years to come as it has been proved a very high percentage of abusers were abused themselves as youngsters.

 The thread were Mikky asked for pictures of your kids should be kept and should referred to the child protection agencies as it may be used to increase his sentence if he was seen to be actively seeking children's images online (this was one of the offences Squiddy on the betfair forum was charged with).

[tikay]

WOW, its sick. its bad enough what he has done but to then ask for pictures of kids to be posted i think is getting everybody even more angry/pissed off because it means he has used blonde. Im not even sure if what im writing makes sense.

I honestly cant remember if i posted any of my kids, i hope not.

Suzanne, the guy pleaded GUILTY in court to sexual assaults/attacks or whatever it was what more do you need to know, I dont think 6 years is enough, the kids involved will probably be suffering longer that.


on a side issue why is sofa king leaving

 

http://blondepoker.com/forum/index.php?topic=21753.0

Note the first ever drawing of a Giraffe-hippo-zebra-kangaroo hybrid.

[kinboshi]

There was a guy on R5 recently, he was from one of the police units who work to track these kinds of people down.  Anyway, he said that it is possible to click on a link by accident, however if it happens more than a few times then it must be deliberate. He said, you have to be actively looking for these things.  Mikky MUST have been looking for this stuff, there can't have been any error if you read what the papers said .

I spend at least 12 hours a day on the Internet, have done for over 7 years now, and have never clicked or seen a link that links to images of children like that.

Once, I received a spam email that suggested that there was a site containing pictures of children.  I reported it to the police, forwarded it on to the officer involved and then deleted the email.

It is possible that someone was on a porn site, and was duped into clicking a link that took them to a site showing indecent images of children.  But someone who was duped would delete those images instantly and make sure it never happened again. 

On another note, Poppet - I believe what you've said - and I don't think for one second that you'd even consider shielding a child molester.  He conned you like he conned others, don't beat yourself up about it.  The piece of crap is locked up, and will hopefully get what he deserves.
 

[KingPoker]

To add on to what Kinboshi said, it IS possible for somehow to be redirected to a site offering these images but it is just about 99% impossible nowadays with AV and spamware programs for these to automatically download these images. It involves input from the administraor to do such things so if hey say they found 13 images on his computer that means he has downloaded them and stored them. End Of!!!!!

[AndrewT]

All i can say from a poker players view which means life revolves around money is donate donate donate! There are plenty of charities we could all donate too! Maybe NSPCC?? im sure it would be possible to pool money together on here somehow!

Lets not forget this kid was brave enough to come forward but 1000's of kids cant coz of the horrible abuse, we can play our part in stopping it aswell!

Yes mate that might be an idea. I applaud the work the NSPCC or the SSPCC do but I always find it difficult to justify giving to these types of charities when the running and administration costs take  90%+ of the money donated, I will give it some thought though.

I have a friend who works for NCH, which is a children's charity which is actually as big as the NSPCC. I bet very few of you will have heard of it. This is because they have always strived to spend as much of the money they raise as possible in the homes and projects that they run. There is quite a bit of resentment against the NSPCC, who spend a huge amount of money every year on emotional blackmail TV adverts and advertising campaigns in order to raise their profile, and yet manage to actually get less money to children who need it.

I don't think the admin costs are near 90%, but I'm always wary of charities which run TV campaigns (animal charities are hugely guilty of this, and they have more money than they know what to do with).

[smithy69]

Ariston I think you and me would get on very well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your post is everything I agree with

[Sark79]

There was a guy on R5 recently, he was from one of the police units who work to track these kinds of people down.  Anyway, he said that it is possible to click on a link by accident, however if it happens more than a few times then it must be deliberate. He said, you have to be actively looking for these things.  Mikky MUST have been looking for this stuff, there can't have been any error if you read what the papers said .

I spend at least 12 hours a day on the Internet, have done for over 7 years now, and have never clicked or seen a link that links to images of children like that.

Once, I received a spam email that suggested that there was a site containing pictures of children.  I reported it to the police, forwarded it on to the officer involved and then deleted the email.

It is possible that someone was on a porn site, and was duped into clicking a link that took them to a site showing indecent images of children.  But someone who was duped would delete those images instantly and make sure it never happened again. 

On another note, Poppet - I believe what you've said - and I don't think for one second that you'd even consider shielding a child molester.  He conned you like he conned others, don't beat yourself up about it.  The piece of crap is locked up, and will hopefully get what he deserves.
 

I agree, I have never clicked something by accident either.  I guess it depends what you type into your google.  I type in Poker, wikipedia, VideoJug,  youtube, touring cars, NASCAR, motorsports, BBC Sport, Hotmail, BBC news, Euronews, IMDB, Boxing, Tennis, DTM, Radical Sports Cars, Gus Hansen earnings, Jean Alesi 1997 career stats, Photoreading, Political History, Austrailian V8 SuperCars, BlondePoker STT techniques ( was trying to track down Wardonkeys 3 part guide, lol. ). A peak into my viewing habits over the last 24 hrs    My sites would not run the risk of finding any dodgy material.  Anyway, thats what the guy on the radio said.  I can't really see how it would be possible to stumble upon this stuff by accident. It must be deliberate in my opinion.

[KingPoker]

All i can say from a poker players view which means life revolves around money is donate donate donate! There are plenty of charities we could all donate too! Maybe NSPCC?? im sure it would be possible to pool money together on here somehow!

Lets not forget this kid was brave enough to come forward but 1000's of kids cant coz of the horrible abuse, we can play our part in stopping it aswell!

Yes mate that might be an idea. I applaud the work the NSPCC or the SSPCC do but I always find it difficult to justify giving to these types of charities when the running and administration costs take  90%+ of the money donated, I will give it some thought though.

I have a friend who works for NCH, which is a children's charity which is actually as big as the NSPCC. I bet very few of you will have heard of it. This is because they have always strived to spend as much of the money they raise as possible in the homes and projects that they run. There is quite a bit of resentment against the NSPCC, who spend a huge amount of money every year on emotional blackmail TV adverts and advertising campaigns in order to raise their profile, and yet manage to actually get less money to children who need it.

I don't think the admin costs are near 90%, but I'm always wary of charities which run TV campaigns (animal charities are hugely guilty of this, and they have more money than they know what to do with).

Yeh jonMW said that the actual admin cost is 58% for the NSPCC and around only 20% gets to those who need it!!! Absoultely ridiculous isnt it!